Civil and Political Liberties and FDI: An Evaluation of Emerging and Develo** Economies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Growth Frontiers in International Business

Abstract

This chapter argues that foreign direct investment (FDI) has been embraced as a key driver of economic development and growth in host economies. Amongst the literature focusing on the determinants of FDI, a number of studies have considered the influence of the level of democracy in host countries on inward FDI and have reported contrasting results. To explain these inconsistencies, a recent strand of literature has focused on the disaggregated measures that constitute democracy of the host countries, mainly civil liberties and political rights. We argue that the effect of civil liberties and political rights will depend on the motivations of MNEs investing and will have a strong impact on the jobs created. We also argue that there is a positive moderating effect from the existence of human capital (semi and highly skilled) on the effect of political rights and civil liberties on the jobs created. We empirically test our hypotheses on a large sample of approximately 35,000 investment projects in 110 develo** and emerging economies over the period 2003–2013. Our findings suggest that there is a non-linear relationship between civil liberties and FDI, and the existence of human capital does moderate the relationship in a positive way.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The list of recipient countries can be found in Appendix 1.

  2. 2.

    The correlation matrix for our dependent and independent variables can be found in Appendix 2.

  3. 3.

    To choose among various breakpoints in our sample, we also employed the Supremum F test, which involves estimating all Chow F-statistics for each potential breakpoint in the sample and choosing the one where the F-statistic was higher. When this test was implemented, the breakpoint was determined at CL = 4. The differences of the estimated coefficients among the two models (CL ≤ 4 and CL < 4) were not as statistically significant as the ones presented here. Further both R-squares were much lower than when the breakpoint was at CIVILREP = 3.

References

  • Adam, A., & Filippaios, F. (2007). Foreign direct investment and civil liberties: A new perspective. European Journal of Political Economy, 23(4), 1038–1052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Addison, T., & Heshmati, A. (2003). The new global determinants of FDI flows to develo** countries: The importance of ICT and democratization (World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU WIDER) Discussion Paper 2003/45). UNU WIDER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asiedu, E., & Lien, D. (2011). Democracy, foreign direct investment and natural resources. Journal of International Economics, 84(1), 99–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baek, K., & Qian, X. (2011). An analysis on political risks and the flow of foreign direct investment in develo** and industrialized economies. Economics, Management and Financial Markets, 6(4), 60–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandelj, N. (2002). Embedded economies: Social relations as determinants of foreign direct investment in Central and Eastern Europe. Social Forces, 81(2), 411–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanton, S. L., & Blanton, R. (2007, February). What attracts foreign investors? An examination of human rights and foreign direct investment. Journal of Politics, 69(1), 143–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borensztein, E. J., De Gregorio, J., & Lee, J.-W. (1998). How does foreign direct investment affect economic growth? Journal of International Economics, 45(1), 115–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busse, M. (2004). Transnational corporations and repression of political rights and civil liberties: An empirical analysis. Kyklos, 57(1), 45–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busse, M., & Hefeker, C. (2007). Political risk, institutions and foreign direct investment. European Journal of Political Economy, 23(2), 397–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coates, D., Willson, B., & Heckelman, J. (2010). The political economy of investment: Sclerotic effects from interest groups. European Journal of Political Economy, 26(2), 208–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coughlin, C., Terza, J., & Vanchira, A. (1991). State characteristics and the location of foreign direct investment within the United States. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 73(4), 675–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drazen, A. (2000). Political economy in macroeconomics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. (1988). The eclectic paradigm of international production: A restatement and some possible extensions. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(1), 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Wassal, K. (2012). Foreign direct investment and economic growth in Arab countries (1970–2008): An inquiry into determinants of growth benefits. Journal of Economic Development, 37(4), 79–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferejohn, J. (1986). Incumbent performance and electoral control. Public Choice, 50(1), 5–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greider, W. (1998). One world, ready or not: The manic logic of global capitalism. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harms, P., & Ursprung, H. (2002). Do civil and political repression really boost foreign direct investments? Economic Inquiry, 40(4), 651–663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S. P., & Dominguez, J. I. (1975). Political development. In F. I. Greenstein & N. W. Polsby (Eds.), Handbook of political science (Vol. 3, pp. 1–114). Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, N. (2003). Democratic governance and multinational corporations: Political regimes and inflows of foreign direct investment. International Organization, 57(3), 587–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, M. N. (2004). Assessing the political stability of Oman. Middle East Review of International Affairs, 8(3), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Q., & Resnick, A. (2003). Reversal of fortunes: Democratic institutions and foreign direct investment inflows to develo** countries. International Organization, 57(1), 175–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, M. C., & Olson Jr., M. (1996). The economics of autocracy and majority rule: The invisible hand and the use of force. Journal of Economic Literature, 34(1), 72–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noorbakhsh, F., Alberto, P., & Ali, Y. (2001). Human capital and FDI inflows to develo** countries: New empirical analysis. World Development, 29(9), 1593–1610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1993). Dictatorship, democracy, and development. American Political Science Review, 87(3), 567–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pournarakis, M., & Varsakelis, N. (2004). Institutions, internationalization and FDI: The case of economies in transition. Transnational Corporations, 13(2), 77–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D. (1996). Labour standards in international trade: Do they matter and what do we do about them? In R. Lawrence, D. Rodrik, & J. Whalley (Eds.), Emerging agenda for global trade: High stakes for develo** countries (pp. 35–79). Washington, DC: Overseas Development Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, B., & Ruiz, I. (2012). Political risk, macroeconomic uncertainty and the patterns of foreign direct investment. The International Trade Journal, 26(1), 181–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ursprung, H., & Harms, P. (2001). Do civil and political repression really boost foreign direct investments? (CESifo Working Paper Series No. 421). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=265418

    Google Scholar 

  • Wintrobe, R. (1998). The political economy of dictatorship. Cambridge: Cambridge Books.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendix 1: List of recipient countries

Albania; Algeria; Angola; Argentina; Armenia; Azerbaijan; Bahamas; Bahrain; Bangladesh; Belarus; Bolivia; Botswana; Brazil; Bulgaria; Burkina Faso; Cameroon; Chile; China; Colombia; Congo (DRC); Costa Rica; Cote d’Ivoire (Ivory Coast); Croatia; Cuba; Czech Republic; Dominican Republic; Ecuador; Egypt; El Salvador; Estonia; Ethiopia; Gabon; Gambia; Ghana; Guatemala; Guinea; Guinea-Bissau; Guyana; Haiti; Honduras; Hungary; India; Indonesia; Iran; Iraq; Jamaica; Jordan; Kazakhstan; Kenya; Kuwait; Latvia; Lebanon; Liberia; Libya; Lithuania; Madagascar; Malawi; Malaysia; Mali; Malta; Mexico; Moldova; Mongolia; Morocco; Mozambique; Myanmar (Burma); Namibia; Nicaragua; Niger; Nigeria; North Korea; Oman; Pakistan; Panama; Papua; New Guinea; Paraguay; Peru; Philippines; Poland; Qatar; Republic of the Congo; Romania;

Russia; Saudi Arabia; Senegal; Serbia; Sierra Leone; Slovakia; Slovenia; Somalia; South Africa; South Korea; Sri Lanka; Sudan; Suriname; Tanzania; Thailand; Togo; Trinidad & Tobago; Tunisia; Turkey; UAE; Uganda; Ukraine; Uruguay; Venezuela; Vietnam; Yemen; Zambia; Zimbabwe.

Appendix 2: Correlation matrix

 

Jobs created

GDP

GDP per person employed

FDI Inflows

Trade

Ores and metals exports

Fuel exports

Gross enrol-ment ratio, secondary

Gross enrol-ment ratio, tertiary

Institu-tional quality

Political rights

Civil liberties

Jobs created

1.0000

           

GDP

0.0645

1.0000

          

GDP per person employed

−0.0751

−0.4267

1.0000

         

FDI Inflows

−0.0208

−0.2743

0.0871

1.0000

        

Trade

−0.0549

−0.6103

0.4642

0.2823

1.0000

       

Ores and metals exports

−0.0218

−0.2395

0.1045

0.1301

−0.0654

1.0000

      

Fuel exports

−0.0615

−0.1133

0.0384

−0.0206

−0.0976

−0.0116

1.0000

     

Gross enrolment ratio, secondary

−0.0816

−0.3679

0.6926

0.1440

0.3365

−0.0005

0.1174

1.0000

    

Gross enrolment ratio, tertiary

−0.0633

−0.4155

0.6986

0.1163

0.3810

0.0922

0.1323

0.7241

1.0000

   

Institutional quality

−0.0027

−0.3881

0.5671

0.2235

0.4788

0.0751

−0.1733

0.4696

0.4159

1.0000

  

Political rights suppression

−0.0327

0.5437

−0.3172

−0.0854

−0.2607

−0.2415

0.1634

−0.1726

−0.3070

−0.3398

1.0000

 

Civil liberties suppression

−0.0185

0.6402

−0.4124

−0.1438

−0.3736

−0.2548

0.1975

−0.2967

−0.4360

−0.4483

0.9573

1.0000

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Filippaios, F., Annan-Diab, F., Hermidas, A. (2017). Civil and Political Liberties and FDI: An Evaluation of Emerging and Develo** Economies. In: Ibeh, K., Tolentino, P., Janne, O., Liu, X. (eds) Growth Frontiers in International Business. The Academy of International Business. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48851-6_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation