CSR as an Adaptive Selling Tool: a Novel Framework and a Robust Analysis Proposal

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Celebrating America’s Pastimes: Baseball, Hot Dogs, Apple Pie and Marketing?

Abstract

In this working chapter the authors document an additional way that CSR can be used by employees to improve customer relationships. That is, employees can use CSR as an adaptive selling tool. Employees use CSR as an adaptive selling tool to the extent that CSR fits with what their understanding of the company identity is, and to the degree that customers support the CSR program.

This study proposes and tests empirically a novel framework that is linked to former research through the use of two control variables already existing in the literature. Additionally and based in their findings, the authors propose an empirical model intended to predict the extent to what employees would make use of CSR as an adaptive selling tool, in order to help assessing if a specific CSR initiative is worth to be developed within a company.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arredondo-Trapero, F. G., Maldonado De Lozada, V. C., & De la Garza-García, J. (2011). El Consumidor ante la Responsabilidad Social Corporativa. Actitudes segun Edad y Genero. Consumer attitudes in the face a lack of csr in business. The role of age and gender (English). Cuadernos de Administracion, 24(43), 285–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazinska, R., Jaworski, M., & Wojciszke, B. (1998). On the dominance of moral categories in impression formation. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(12), 1251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker-Olsen, K. L., Cudmore, B. A., & Hill, R. P. (2006). The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior. Journal of Business Research, 59(1), 46–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, C., Korschun, D., & Sen, S. (2009). Strengthening stakeholder—Company relationships through mutually beneficial corporate social responsibility initiatives. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 257–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bianco, A. M., & Martínez, E. (2009). Robust testing in the logistic regression model. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 53(12), 4095–4105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boorom, M. L., Goolsby, J. R., & Ramsey, R. P. (1998). Relational communication traits and their effect on adaptiveness and sales performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 26(1), 16–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, R. J., & Pederson, S. (1993). On robustness in the logistic regression model. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B: Methodological, 55(3), 693–706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chong, M. (2009). Employee participation in CSR and corporate identity: Insights from a disaster-response program in the Asia-Pacific. Corporate Reputation Review, 12(2), 106–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, C., Heath, F., & Thompson, R. L. (2000). A meta-analysis of response rates in web-or internet-based surveys. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60(6), 821–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croux, C., & Haesbroeck, G. (2003). Implementing the Bianco and Yohai estimator for logistic regression. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 44(1), 273–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Aveni, R. A., Canger, J. M., & Doyle, J. J. (1995). Co** with hypercompetition: Utilizing the new 7S’s framework [and executive commentary]. The Academy of Management Executive (1993–2005), 9(3), 45–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M., & Harquail, C. V. (1994). Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(2), 239–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franke, G. R., & Park, J. E. (2006). Salesperson adaptive selling behavior and customer orientation: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(4), 693–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gengler, C. E., Howard, D. J., & Zolner, K. (1995). A personal construct analysis of adaptive selling and sales experience. Psychology & Marketing, 12(4), 287–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, R., & Booth, D. (2011). Predicting bankruptcy with robust logistic regression. Journal of Data Science, 9, 565–584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hohnen, P. (2007). Corporate social responsibility. An implementation guide for business. In J. Potts (ed.). Winnipeg: IISD—International Institute for Sustainable Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homburg, C., Stierl, M., & Bornemann, T. (2013). Corporate social responsibility in business-to-business markets: How organizational customers account for supplier corporate social responsibility engagement. Journal of Marketing, 77(6), 54–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korschun, D., Bhattacharya, C., & Swain, S. D. (2014). Corporate social responsibility, customer orientation, and the job performance of frontline employees. Journal of Marketing, 78(3), 20–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P., & Lee, N. (2005). Corporate social responsibility: Doing the most good for your company and your cause. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, B. V., Flaherty, K. E., Zablah, A. R., Brown, T. J., & Wiener, J. L. (2008). Linking cause-related marketing to sales force responses and performance in a direct selling context. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(2), 271–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, E. M., Park, S. Y., & Lee, H. J. (2013). Employee perception of CSR activities: Its antecedents and consequences. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 1716–1724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leong, S. M., Busch, P. S., & John, D. R. (1989). Knowledge bases and salesperson effectiveness: A script-theoretic analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 26(2), 164–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin-Hi, N., & Müller, K. (2013). The CSR bottom line: Preventing corporate social irresponsibility. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 1928–1936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mead, N. A., & Rubin, D. L. (1985). Assessing listening and speaking skills. ERIC Digest ERIC Information Analysis, 071, 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moncrief, W. C., Babakus, E., Cravens, D. W., & Johnston, M. W. (2000). Examining gender differences in field sales organizations. Journal of Business Research, 49(3), 245–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NADA (2013). State-of-the-Industry report 2013. In NADA DATA.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, C., & Chatman, J. (1986). Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 492–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Öberseder, M., Schlegelmilch, B. B., & Murphy, P. E. (2013). CSR practices and consumer perceptions. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 1839–1851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, R. L. (2010). Satisfaction: A behavioral perspective on the consumer. New York: ME Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, J. E., & Holloway, B. B. (2003). Adaptive selling behavior revisited: An empirical examination of learning orientation, sales performance, and Job satisfaction. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 23(3), 239–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy & society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasad, A., & Holzinger, I. (2013). Seeing through smoke and mirrors: A critical analysis of marketing CSR. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 1915–1921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapp, A., Agnihotri, R., & Forbes, L. P. (2008). The sales force technology-performance chain: The role of adaptive selling and effort. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 28(4), 335–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Román, S., & Iacobucci, D. (2010). Antecedents and consequences of adaptive selling confidence and behavior: A dyadic analysis of salespeople and their customers. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38(3), 363–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Román, S., & Martín, P. J. (2008). Changes in sales call frequency: A longitudinal examination of the consequences in the supplier–customer relationship. Industrial Marketing Management, 37(5), 554–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, A., & Levy, M. (1995). Categorization of customers by retail salespeople. Journal of Retailing, 71(1), 71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiro, R. L., & Weitz, B. A. (1990). Adaptive selling: Conceptualization, measurement, and nomological validity. Journal of Marketing Research, 27(1), 61–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. E., & Fiske, S. T. (1991). Social cognition. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., Zamar, R., Marazzi, A., Yohai, V, Barrera, M., Maronna, R., et al. (2014). Robust Library. Retrieved May 15, 2009, from http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/robust/robust.pdf.

  • Weitz, B. A., Sujan, H., & Sujan, M. (1986). Knowledge, motivation, and adaptive behavior: A framework for improving selling effectiveness. Journal of Marketing, 50(4), 174–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, R. R., & Ruefli, T. W. (2005). Schumpeter’s ghost: Is hypercompetition making the best of times shorter? Strategic Management Journal, 26(10), 887–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, J. (2009). Introductory econometrics. Mason: South-Western Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, W., Bao, Y., & Verbeke, A. (2011). Integrating CSR initiatives in business: An organizing framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 101(1), 75–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jorge Fresneda .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Academy of Marketing Science

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fresneda, J., Korschun, D., Kothandaraman, P. (2016). CSR as an Adaptive Selling Tool: a Novel Framework and a Robust Analysis Proposal. In: Kim, K. (eds) Celebrating America’s Pastimes: Baseball, Hot Dogs, Apple Pie and Marketing?. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26647-3_78

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation