Artefact in Physiological Data Collected from Patients with Brain Injury: Quantifying the Problem and Providing a Solution Using a Factorial Switching Linear Dynamical Systems Approach

  • Chapter
Intracranial Pressure and Brain Monitoring XV

Abstract

Introduction: High-resolution, artefact-free and accurately annotated physiological data are desirable in patients with brain injury both to inform clinical decision-making and for intelligent analysis of the data in applications such as predictive modelling. We have quantified the quality of annotation surrounding artefactual events and propose a factorial switching linear dynamical systems (FSLDS) approach to automatically detect artefact in physiological data collected in the neurological intensive care unit (NICU). Methods: Retrospective analysis of the BrainIT data set to discover potential hypotensive events corrupted by artefact and identify the annotation of associated clinical interventions. Training of an FSLDS model on clinician-annotated artefactual events in five patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Results: In a subset of 187 patients in the BrainIT database, 26.5 % of potential hypotensive events were abandoned because of artefactual data. Only 30 % of these episodes could be attributed to an annotated clinical intervention. As assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve metric, FSLDS model performance in automatically identifying the events of blood sampling, arterial line dam** and patient handling was 0.978, 0.987 and 0.765, respectively. Discussion: The influence of artefact on physiological data collected in the NICU is a significant problem. This pilot study using an FSLDS approach shows real promise and is under further development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Donald R, Howells T, Piper I et al (2012) Early warning of EUSIG-defined hypotensive events using a Bayesian Artificial Neural Network. Acta Neurochir Suppl 114:39–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Guiza F, Depreitere B, Piper I, Van den Berghe G, Meyfroidt G (2013) Novel methods to predict increased intracranial pressure during intensive care and long-term neurologic outcome after traumatic brain injury: development and validation in a multicenter dataset. Crit Care Med 41:554–564

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Marmarou A, Anderson RL, Ward JD et al (1991) Impact of ICP instability and hypotension on outcome in patients with severe head trauma. J Neurosurg 75:S59–S66

    Google Scholar 

  4. McHugh GS, Engel DC, Butcher I et al (2007) Prognostic value of secondary insults in traumatic brain injury: results from the IMPACT study. J Neurotrauma 24:287–293

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Piper I, Citerio G, Chambers I et al (2003) The BrainIT group: concept and core dataset definition. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 145:615–628, discussion 28–29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Quinn JA, Williams CK, McIntosh N (2009) Factorial switching linear dynamical systems applied to physiological condition monitoring. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 31:1537–1551

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the work of the BrainIT group of investigators and participating centres in the BrainIT data set. CH and IP are supported by a grant from the National Institute of Academic Anaesthesia. As stated above, funding from the Chief Scientist Office (Scotland) is supporting the further development of this work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher Hawthorne .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Georgatzis, K. et al. (2016). Artefact in Physiological Data Collected from Patients with Brain Injury: Quantifying the Problem and Providing a Solution Using a Factorial Switching Linear Dynamical Systems Approach. In: Ang, BT. (eds) Intracranial Pressure and Brain Monitoring XV. Acta Neurochirurgica Supplement, vol 122. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22533-3_60

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22533-3_60

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-22532-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-22533-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation