Abstract
Water, one of the valuable resources of nature, nurtures and takes care of almost all forms of life, without which life is impossible. Once known to be abundant in quantity, potable water is now scarce for a variety of reasons, growing population, climate change, increasing levels of pollution, and urbanization being some of them. Irrespective of the great importance and irreplaceable nature that it holds, humans have taken it for granted, making it now a scarce resource that should be used judiciously. Water pollution is one of the major causes involved in the wastage of huge amounts of water, leading to devastating effects not only on the lives of humans, but also possess threat to the lives of other coexisting living beings on the planet. Water pollution not only limits the amount of potable water, but also spreads waterborne diseases and causes various other health problems which can cause temporary or permanent impairment. To achieve the utmost simplicity and accuracy in understanding problems related to the quality of water and to assess water quality, several results mathematical models and computational approaches are designed and implemented which are a means of finding the best social, economic, and efficient solutions to water problems. This chapter will highlight various statistical, mathematical, and computational models that are potent enough to tackle the above-mentioned issues related to water and assess the quality of water with special emphasis on the most current topics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abbaspour KC, Yang J, Maximov I, Siber R, Bogner K, Mieleitner J, Zobrist J, Srinivasan R (2007) Modelling hydrology and water quality in the pre-alpine/alpine Thur watershed using SWAT. J Hydrol 333(2–4):413–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.09.014
Abbaspour KC, Rouholahnejad E, Vaghefi SRI, Srinivasan R, Yang H, Kløve B (2015) A continental-scale hydrology and water quality model for Europe: calibration and uncertainty of a high-resolution large-scale SWAT model. J Hydrol 524:733–752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.03.027
Adelagun ROA, Etim EE, Godwin OE (2021) Application of water quality index for the assessment of water from different sources in Nigeria. Promising Tech Wastewater Treatment Water Qual Assess 267:25. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.98696
Atshan SM, Hamoud AA, Sharif AA, Ghadle KP (2020) Mathematical model for the concentration of pollution and river water quality modelling. J **dian Univ 14(4):1272–1280. https://doi.org/10.37896/jxu14.4/149
Badjana HM, Cloke HL, Verhoef A, Julich S, Camargos C, Collins S, Macdonald DM, McGuire PC, Clark J (2023) Can hydrological models assess the impact of natural flood management in groundwater‐dominated catchments? J Flood Risk Manage, e12912. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12912
Cherif R, Bouteffeha M, Gargouri-Ellouze E, Eslamian S (2023) Hydrologic models classification, calibration, and validation. In: Handbook of hydroinformatics. Elsevier, pp 155–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-821961-4.00023-3
Chidiac S, El Najjar P, Ouaini N, El Rayess Y, El Azzi D (2023) A comprehensive review of water quality indices (WQIs): history, models, attempts and perspectives. Rev Environ Sci Bio/technol 22(2):349–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-023-09650-7
Cho K, Kim Y (2022) Improving streamflow prediction in the WRF-Hydro model with LSTM networks. J Hydrol 605:127297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127297
Dehotin J, Braud I (2008) Which spatial discretization for distributed hydrological models? Proposition of a methodology and illustration for medium to large-scale catchments. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 12(3):769–796. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-12-769-2008
Dutta D, Goel S (2017) Applications of remote sensing and GIS in solid waste management–A review. In: Advances in solid and hazardous waste management, pp 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57076-1_7
EL-Nwsany RI, Maarouf I, Abd el-Aal W (2019) Water management as a vital factor for a sustainable school. Alexandria Eng J 58(1):303–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2018.12.012
Ghobadi F, Kang D (2023) Application of machine learning in water resources management: a systematic literature review. Water 15(4):620. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15040620
Gomes Jr MN, Lago CAFD, Rápalo LMC, Oliveira PTS, Giacomoni MH, Mendiondo EM (2023) HydroPol2D—distributed hydrodynamic and water quality model: challenges and opportunities in poorly-gauged catchments. ar**v preprint ar**v:2304.11099. https://doi.org/10.48550/ar**v.2304.11099
Guo K, Guan M, Yan H, **a X (2023) A spatially distributed hydrodynamic model framework for urban flood hydrological and hydraulic processes involving drainage flow quantification. J Hydrol 625:130135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.130135
Hasnain A, Sheng Y, Hashmi MZ, Bhatti UA, Hussain A, Hameed M, Sahabuddin M, Wagan RA, Zha Y (2022) Time series analysis and forecasting of air pollutants based on prophet forecasting model in Jiangsu province, China. Front Environ Sci 10:945628. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.945628
Hua L, Li W, Zhai L, Yen H, Lei Q, Liu H, Ren T, **a Y, Zhang F, Fan X (2019) An innovative approach to identifying agricultural pollution sources and loads by using nutrient export coefficients in watershed modeling. J Hydrol 571:322–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.01.043
Irving K, Kuemmerlen M, Kiesel J, Kakouei K, Domisch S, Jähnig SC (2018) A high-resolution streamflow and hydrological metrics dataset for ecological modeling using a regression model. Sci Data 5(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3906376
Kachiashvili K, Gordeziani D, Lazarov R, Melikdzhanian D (2007) Modeling and simulation of pollutants transport in rivers. Appl Math Model 31(7):1371–1396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2006.02.015
Khadri SFR, Pande C (2016) Ground water flow modeling for calibrating steady state using MODFLOW software: a case study of Mahesh River basin, India. Model Earth Syst Environ 2:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-015-0049-7
Kulwant M, Patel D, Shirin S, Sharma SN, Yadav AK (2024) Future frameworks for fluoride and algorithms for environmental system. In: Advanced treatment technologies for fluoride removal in water: water purification, pp 343–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38845-3_19
Kumar A, Chava R, Gupta S, Shirin S, Jamal A, Yadav AK (2024) Environmental and health effects of fluoride contamination and treatment of wastewater using various technologies. In: Advanced treatment technologies for fluoride removal in water: water purification. Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, pp 323–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38845-3_18
Lamon L, Asturiol D, Vilchez A, Ruperez-Illescas R, Cabellos J, Richarz A, Worth A (2019) Computational models for the assessment of manufactured nanomaterials: development of model reporting standards and map** of the model landscape. Comput Toxicol 9:143–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comtox.2018.12.002
Leake SA (1997) Modeling ground-water flow with MODFLOW and related programs. US Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/fs12197
Li YR, Wang JX, Han TT, Wang Y, He D, Quan WJ, Ma ZQ (2019) Using multiple linear regression method to evaluate the impact of meteorological conditions and control measures on air quality in Bei**g during APEC 2014. Huan **g ke Xue Huan**g Kexue 40(3):1024–1034. https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.201807044
Loucks DP, van Beek E, Loucks DP, van Beek E (2017) Water quality modeling and prediction. In: Water resource systems planning and management: an introduction to methods, models, and applications, pp 417–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44234-1_10 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.01.043
McKinney DC, Cai X (2002) Linking GIS and water resources management models: an object-oriented method. Environ Model Softw 17(5):413–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-8152(02)00015-4
Meran G, Siehlow M, von Hirschhausen C, Meran G, Siehlow M, von Hirschhausen C (2021). Integrated water resource management: principles and applications. In: The economics of water: rules and institutions, pp 23–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48485-9_3
Moges E, Demissie Y, Larsen L, Yassin F (2021) Sources of hydrological model uncertainties and advances in their analysis. Water 13(1):28. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13010028
Mujumdar PP (2001) Flood wave propagation: the saint venant equations. Resonance 6(5):66–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02839085
Okuyade WIA, Abbey TM, Abbey ME (2022) Application of the Dupuit-Forchheimer model to groundwater flow into a well. Model Earth Syst Environ 8(2):2359–2367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-021-01224-2
Panagopoulos G (2012) Application of MODFLOW for simulating groundwater flow in the Trifilia karst aquifer, Greece. Environ Earth Sci 67(7):1877–1889. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-012-1630-2
Patel D, Kulwant M, Shirin S, Varshney R, Pandey G, Yadav AK (2024) Fluoride removal from aqueous solution using iron-based materials: preparation, characterization, and applications. In: Advanced treatment technologies for fluoride removal in water: water purification. Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, pp 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38845-3_4
Pohle I, Baggaley N, Palarea‐Albaladejo J, Stutter M, Glendell M (2021) A framework for assessing concentration‐discharge catchment behavior from low‐frequency water quality data. Water Resour Res 57(9):e2021WR029692. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR029692
Reddy KV, Eldho TI, Rao EP (2007) Simulation of runoff from watershed using finite element based kinematic wave model. ISH J Hydraul Eng 13(2):15–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/09715010.2007.10514868
Shirin S, Yadav AK (2021) Assessment and suitability for the dum** of flyash in an abandoned mine. Environ Challenges 4:100111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2021.100111
Shirin S, Jamal A, Ranjan P, Yadav AK (2019) Study on assessment of slope stability and mixed disposal of overburden in voids of Singrauli Coalfield. Environ Qual Manage 28(3):131–139. https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.21616
Shirin S, Jamal A, Emmanouil C, Yadav AK (2021) Assessment of characteristics of acid mine drainage treated with fly ash. Appl Sci 11(9):3910. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11093910
Shirin S, Jamal A, Emmanouil C, Singh VP, Yadav AK (2023) Assessment and characterization of waste material used as backfilling in an abandoned mine. Int J Coal Prep Util 43(8):1402–1410. https://doi.org/10.1080/19392699.2022.2118259
Shirin S, Yadav AK (2014) Physico-chemical analysis of municipal wastewater discharge in Ganga river, Haridwar district of Uttarakhand, India. Curr World Environ 9(2):536–543. https://doi.org/10.12944/CWE.9.2.39
Song HS, Cannon WR, Beliaev AS, Konopka A (2014) Mathematical modeling of microbial community dynamics: a methodological review. Processes 2(4):711–752. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr2040711
Thangarajan M (2007) Groundwater models and their role in assessment and management of groundwater resources and pollution. In: Groundwater: resource evaluation, augmentation, contamination, restoration, modeling and management. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 189–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5729-8_8
Thuy PT, Tuan PT, Khai NM (2016) Industrial water mass balance analysis. Int J Environ Sci Dev 7(3):216. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJESD.2016.V7.771
Uddin MG, Nash S, Olbert AI (2021) A review of water quality index models and their use for assessing surface water quality. Ecol Ind 122:107218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107218
Vigiak O, Grizzetti B, Udias-Moinelo A, Zanni M, Dorati C, Bouraoui F, Pistocchi A (2019) Predicting biochemical oxygen demand in European freshwater bodies. Sci Total Environ 666:1089–1105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.252
Wang H (2020) Groundwater storage in confined aquifers. The Groundwater Project, Guelph, Ontario, Canada. ISBN: 978-1-7770541-7-5. https://gw-project.org/books/groundwater-storage-in-confined-aquifers/
Yadav AK, Sahoo SK, Mahapatra S, Kumar AV, Pandey G, Lenka P, Tripathi RM (2014) Concentrations of uranium in drinking water and cumulative, age-dependent radiation doses in four districts of Uttar Pradesh, India. Toxicol Environ Chem 96(2):192–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/02772248.2014.934247
Yang XE, Wu X, Hao HL, He ZL (2008) Mechanisms and assessment of water eutrophication. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 9:197–209. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.B0710626
Zerihun YT (2018) Extension of the Dupuit-Forchheimer model for non-hydrostatic flows in unconfined aquifers. Fluids 3(2):42. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids3020042
Acknowledgements
The authors extend their heartfelt appreciation to our esteemed institute and all individuals who have played a role, directly or indirectly, in contributing to this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kumar, D., Khurana, P., Kumar, D. (2024). Mathematical Models and Computational Approaches for Assessing Water Quality in Rural Area of India. In: Yadav, A.K., Yadav, K., Singh, V.P. (eds) Integrated Management of Water Resources in India: A Computational Approach. Water Science and Technology Library, vol 129. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-62079-9_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-62079-9_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-62078-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-62079-9
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)