Improving Change Management in Large Engineering Projects: A Case Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Good Practices and New Perspectives in Information Systems and Technologies (WorldCIST 2024)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 987))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 74 Accesses

Abstract

Engineering change management is an essential component in the development of products, requiring many resources and time. A usual problem is the lack of standardized activities and the inexistence of activity tracking, usually resulting in increased time to complete and costs. This research aimed to identify and propose improvements in these topics within a manufacturing company. The first proposal consists of a revised standard for the activities in each Engineering Change Request phase, suggesting when each one of the activities should be started, as well as the advisable action for the Project Manager (PM). Then, the second proposal is related to the Engineering Change Request deadlines compliance, with two possible approaches. Approach 1 suggests the dates tracking in an Excel file, while approach 2 suggests using Power BI dashboards. Both proposals are expected to improve the normal flow of activities, resulting in higher compliance with the planned deadlines and ultimately reducing cost and the implementation time of the change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Maceika, A., Toločka, E.: The motivation for engineering change in the industrial company. Bus. Theory Pract. 22(1), 98–108 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2021.13042

  2. Jarratt, T., Clarkson, J., Eckert, C.: Engineering change. In: Clarkson, J., Eckert, C. (eds.) Design Process Improvement: A Review of Current Practice, pp. 262–285. Springer, London (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-061-0_11

  3. Perrotta, D., Faria, J., Araújo, M., Tereso, A., Fernandes, G.: Project Change Request: A Proposal for Managing Change in Industrialization Projects, pp. 1525–1529 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM.2017.8290148

  4. Jarratt, T., Eckert, C.M., Caldwell, N.H., Clarkson, P.J.: Engineering change: an overview and perspective on the literature. Res. Eng. Design 22, 103–124 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-010-0097-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wasmer, A., Staub, G., Vroom, R.W.: An industry approach to shared, cross-organisational engineering change handling - the road towards standards for product data processing. Computer-Aided Design 43(5), 533–545 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2010.10.002.(Emerging Industry Needs for Frameworks and Technologies for Exchanging and Sharing Product Lifecycle Knowledge)

  6. Wilberg, J., Elezi, F., Tommelein, I.D., Lindemann, U.: Using a systemic perspective to support engineering change management. Procedia Comput. Sci. 61, 287–292 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.09.217. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877050915030471 (Complex Adaptive Systems San Jose, CA November 2–4, 2015)

  7. PMI. Managing Change in Organizations: A Practice Guide. Project Management Institute, Newtown Square (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Eckert, C., Clarkson, P.J., Zanker, W.: Change and customisation in complex engineering domains. Res. Eng. Design 15, 1–21 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-003-0031-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Iakymenko, N., Romsdal, A., Semini, M., Strandhagen, J.O.: Engineering change management in the engineer-to-order production environment: insights from two case studies. In: Moon, I., Lee, G.M., Park, J., Kiritsis, D., von Cieminski, G. (eds.) APMS 2018. IAICT, vol. 535, pp. 131–138. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99704-9_17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. PMI: A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK®guide), 7th edn. Project Management Institute Inc., Newtown Square (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hamraz, B., Caldwell, N.H., Clarkson, P.J.: A holistic categorization framework for literature on engineering change management. Syst. Eng. 16(4), 473–505 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.21244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Iakymenko, N., Romsdal, A., Alfnes, E., Semini, M., Strandhagen, J.O.: Status of engineering change management in the engineer-to-order production environment: insights from a multiple case study. Int. J. Prod. Res. 58(15), 4506–4528 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1759836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hamraz, B., Clarkson, P.J.: Industrial evaluation of FBS linkage–a method to support engineering change management. J. Eng. Des. 26(1–3), 24–47 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2015.1015783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Habib, H., Menhas, R., McDermott, O.: Managing engineering change within the paradigm of product lifecycle management. Processes 10(9), 1770 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10091770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., Thornhill, A.: Research Methods for Business Students, 6th edn. Pearson Education Limited (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods, 6th edn. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  17. PMI: A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® guide), 6th edn. Project Management Institute Inc., Newtown Square (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cooper, R.G.: Perspective: the stage-gate® idea-to-launch process—update, what’s new, and NexGen systems*. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 25(3), 213–232 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2008.00296.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pan, Y., Stark, R.: An interpretable machine learning approach for engineering change management decision support in automotive industry. Comput. Ind. 138, 103633 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sabouni, C.E.: Improving Engineering Change Processes in a Local Forestry Machine Manufacturer. Savonia University of Applied Sciences, Finland (2023)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia within the R&D Units Project Scope: UIDB/00319/2020.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anabela Tereso .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Santos, J., Tereso, A., Santos, C. (2024). Improving Change Management in Large Engineering Projects: A Case Study. In: Rocha, Á., Adeli, H., Dzemyda, G., Moreira, F., Poniszewska-Marańda, A. (eds) Good Practices and New Perspectives in Information Systems and Technologies. WorldCIST 2024. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 987. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60221-4_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation