SpringerLink
Log in

Relationships

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ethics of Medical AI

Part of the book series: The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology ((ELTE,volume 24))

  • 100 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, I analyze the impact of MAI on relationships as well as roles within healthcare. I identify three crucial relationships, the therapeutic relationships between doctors and patient, the nursing relationship, and the therapeutic alliance between therapists and patients in mental health. The crucial assumption is that MAI is an artificial agent that breaks up these hitherto dyadic relationships. I discuss several potential roles for doctors, nurses, therapists, patients, and artificial agents and address the question whether healthcare professionals can and should be replaced by MAI. Smart data practices will transform the epistemology of healthcare professionals and the phenomenology of patients and change how healthcare professionals encounter, perceive, and view patients. Since this transformation process affects the clinical encounter, smart data practices will also transform relationships in healthcare. These relationships are heterogenous and complex, since healthcare comprises different professions and contexts. Doctors, nurses, and therapists each form their own specific relationships with patients. Although there is a set of values all healthcare professionals share, like the respect for autonomy or the duty to help, each profession has their specific values and principles. It will therefore be necessary to analyze the impact of MAI on the relationships in each field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 93.08
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
EUR 116.04
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abbasgholizadeh Rahimi, S., Cwintal, M., Huang, Y., Ghadiri, P., Grad, R., Poenaru, D., Gore, G., Zomahoun, H. T. V., Légaré, F., & Pluye, P. (2022). Application of artificial intelligence in shared decision making: Sco** review. JMIR Medical Informatics, 10(8), e36199. https://doi.org/10.2196/36199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abdi, J., Al-Hindawi, A., Ng, T., & Vizcaychipi, M. P. (2018). Sco** review on the use of socially assistive robot technology in elderly care. BMJ Open, 8(2), e018815. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aguirre, C. A., Harrigian, K., & Dredze, M. (2021). Gender and racial fairness in depression research using social media. In EACL – 16th conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2021. Proceedings of the conference. https://doi.org/10.48550/ar**v.2103.10550

  • Ahuja, A. S. (2019). The impact of artificial intelligence in medicine on the future role of the physician. PeerJ, 7, e7702. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alonso, S. G., De La Torre-Díez, I., Hamrioui, S., López-Coronado, M., Barreno, D. C., Nozaleda, L. M., & Franco, M. (2018). Data mining algorithms and techniques in mental health: A systematic review. Journal of Medical Systems, 42, 161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-018-1018-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alqahtani, F., Al Khalifah, G., Oyebode, O., & Orji, R. (2019). Apps for mental health: An evaluation of behavior change strategies and recommendations for future development. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 2, 30. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2019.00030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aminololama-Shakeri, S., & López, J. E. (2018). The doctor-patient relationship with artificial intelligence. AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology, 212, 308–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aquino, Y. S. J., Rogers, W. A., Braunack-Mayer, A., Frazer, H., Win, K. T., Houssami, N., Degeling, C., Semsarian, C., & Carter, S. M. (2023). Utopia versus dystopia: Professional perspectives on the impact of healthcare artificial intelligence on clinical roles and skills. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 169, 104903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archibald, M. M., & Barnard, A. (2018). Futurism in nursing: Technology, robotics and the fundamentals of care. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 27, 2473–2480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ardito, R. B., & Rabellino, D. (2011). Therapeutic alliance and outcome of psychotherapy: Historical excursus, measurements, and prospects for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 270. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, D. (1983). The fabrication of nurse-patient relationships. Social Science & Medicine, 17, 457–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayers, J. W., Poliak, A., Dredze, M., Leas, E. C., Zhu, Z., Kelley, J. B., Faix, D. J., Goodman, A. M., Longhurst, C. A., Hogarth, M., & Smith, D. M. (2023). Comparing physician and artificial intelligence Chatbot responses to patient questions posted to a public social media forum. JAMA Internal Medicine, 183(6), 589–596. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.1838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrera, A., Gee, C., Wood, A., Gibson, O., Bayley, D., & Geddes, J. (2020). Introducing artificial intelligence in acute psychiatric inpatient care: Qualitative study of its use to conduct nursing observations. Evidence-Based Mental Health, 23, 34–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, M., Boyne, J., Brandts, J., et al. (2019). Artificial intelligence supported patient self-care in chronic heart failure: A paradigm shift from reactive to predictive, preventive and personalised care. EPMA Journal, 10, 445–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13167-019-00188-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartneck, C., Lütge, C., Wagner, A., & Welsh, S. (2021). Responsibility and liability in the case of AI systems. In: Bartneck, C. Lütge, C. Wagner, A. & Welsh, S. (eds.). An introduction to ethics in robotics and AI. Springer, 39–44 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51110-4_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (1991). The social manipulation of morality: Moralizing actors, adiaphorizing action. Theory, Culture and Society, 8, 137–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/026327691008001007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2006). Liquid fear. Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z., & Lyon, D. (2013). Liquid surveillance: A conversation. Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beeker, T., Mills, C., Bhugra, D., Te Meerman, S., Thoma, S., Heinze, M., & Von Peter, S. (2021). Psychiatrization of society: A conceptual framework and call for transdisciplinary research. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergamin, J., Luigjes, J., Kiverstein, J., Bockting, C. L., & Denys, D. (2022). Defining autonomy in psychiatry. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12, 645556. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.645556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berridge, C., Zhou, Y., Robillard, J. M., & Kaye, J. (2023). Companion robots to mitigate loneliness among older adults: Perceptions of benefit and possible deception. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1106633. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1106633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berrouiguet, S., Perez-Rodriguez, M. M., Larsen, M., Baca-García, E., Courtet, P., & Oquendo, M. (2018). From eHealth to iHealth: Transition to participatory and personalized medicine in mental health. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 20(1), e2. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolsinger, J., Jaeger, M., Hoff, P., & Theodoridou, A. (2020). Challenges and opportunities in building and maintaining a good therapeutic relationship in acute psychiatric settings: A narrative review. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 10, 965. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boonstra, A., Vos, J., & Rosenberg, L. (2022). The effect of electronic health records on the medical professional identity of physicians: A systematic literature review. Procedia Computer Science, 196, 272–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bordin, E. S. (1979). The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy, 16, 252–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, P. F., & Bakken, S. (2015). Nursing needs big data and big data needs nursing. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 47, 477–484. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. E. H., & Halpern, J. (2021). AI chatbots cannot replace human interactions in the pursuit of more inclusive mental healthcare. SSM – Mental Health, 1, 100017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmmh.2021.100017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, C., Howitt, M. L., Wilson, R., Booth, R. G., Risling, T., & Bamford, M. (2020). Predicted influences of artificial intelligence on the domains of nursing: Sco** review. JMIR Nursing, 3(1), e23939. https://doi.org/10.2196/23939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buiten, M., De Streel, A., & Peitz, M. (2023). The law and economics of AI liability. Computer Law and Security Review, 48, 105794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charon, R. (2001). Narrative medicine: Form, function, and ethics. Annals of Internal Medicine, 134, 83–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charon, R. (2016a). Clinical contributions of narrative medicine. In: Charon, R. Dasgupta, S., Hermann, N., et al. (eds.). The principles and practice of narrative medicine. Oxford University Press, 292–310. https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780199360192.003.0014

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Charon, R. (2016b). Close reading: The signature method of narrative medicine. In: Charon, R. Dasgupta, S., Hermann, N., et al. (eds.). The principles and practice of narrative medicine. Oxford University Press, 157–179. https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780199360192.003.0008.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, A., Wang, C., & Zhang, X. (2022). Reflection on the equitable attribution of responsibility for artificial intelligence-assisted diagnosis and treatment decisions. Intelligent Medicine, 3(2), 139–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imed.2022.04.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, A. E., Shim, J. K., Mamo, L., Fosket, J. R., & Fishman, J. R. (2003). Biomedicalization: Technoscientific transformations of health, illness, and U.S. biomedicine. American Sociological Review, 68, 161–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coeckelbergh, M. (2016). Care robots and the future of ICT-mediated elderly care: A response to doom scenarios. AI & Society, 31, 455–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coeckelbergh, M. (2020). Artificial intelligence, responsibility attribution, and a relational justification of explainability. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26, 2051–2068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coghlan, S. (2022). Robots and the possibility of humanistic care. International Journal of Social Robotics, 14, 2095–2108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-021-00804-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David, L., Popa, S. L., Barsan, M., Muresan, L., Ismaiel, A., Popa, L. C., Perju-Dumbrava, L., Stanculete, M. F., & Dumitrascu, D. L. (2022). Nursing procedures for advanced dementia: Traditional techniques versus autonomous robotic applications (review). Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 23(2), 124. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2021.11047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delaney, C. W., & Simpson, R. L. (2017). Why big data? Why nursing? In: Delaney, C., Weaver, C., Warren, J., Clancy, T. & Simpson, R. (eds.). Big data-enabled nursing (Health informatics). Springer, 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53300-1_1.

  • Devault, D., Artstein, R., Benn, G., et al. (2014). SimSensei kiosk: A virtual human interviewer for healthcare decision support. In Proceedings of the 2014 international conference on Autonomous agents and multi-agent systems (AAMAS ‘14). International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Richland, SC, pp. 1061–1068. Available at: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/2615731.2617415. Accessed 15 Aug 2023.

  • Deveugele, M., Derese, A., Van Den Brink-Muinen, A., Bensing, J., & De Maeseneer, J. (2002). Consultation length in general practice: Cross sectional study in six European countries. BMJ, 325(7362), 472. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.325.7362.472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diaz Milian, R., & Bhattacharyya, A. (2023). Artificial intelligence paternalism. Journal of Medical Ethics, 49, 183–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillard-Wright, J. (2019). Electronic health record as a panopticon: A disciplinary apparatus in nursing practice. Nursing Philosophy, 20(2), e12239. https://doi.org/10.1111/nup.12239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellefsen, B., Kim, H. S., & Ja Han, K. (2007). Nursing gaze as framework for nursing practice: A study from acute care settings in Korea, Norway and the USA. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 21, 98–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emanuel, E. J., & Emanuel, L. L. (1992). Four models of the physician-patient relationship. JAMA, 267, 2221–2226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erbe, D., Eichert, H. C., Riper, H., & Ebert, D. D. (2017). Blending face-to-face and internet-based interventions for the treatment of mental disorders in adults: Systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(9), e306. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng, S., Mäntymäki, M., Dhir, A., & Salmela, H. (2021). How self-tracking and the quantified self promote health and well-being: Systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(9), e25171. https://doi.org/10.2196/25171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, A., Henningsen, P., & Buyx, A. (2019). Your robot therapist will see you now: Ethical implications of embodied artificial intelligence in psychiatry, psychology, and psychotherapy. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(5), e13216. https://doi.org/10.2196/13216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, R., & Hansen, A. (2019). Disruption ahead: Navigating and leading the future of nursing. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 43(3), 212–221. https://doi.org/10.1097/NAQ.0000000000000354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Gutiérrez, M. S., Navarrete, F., Sala, F., Gasparyan, A., Austrich-Olivares, A., & Manzanares, J. (2020). Biomarkers in psychiatry: Concept, definition, types and relevance to the clinical reality. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11, 432. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greg, I., Ana Luisa, N., Hajira, D.-M., Ai, O., Hiroko, T., Anistasiya, V., & John, H. (2017). International variations in primary care physician consultation time: A systematic review of 67 countries. BMJ Open, 7(10), e017902. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grobbel, C., Van Wynsberghe, A., Davis, R., & Poly-Droulard, L. (2019). Designing nursing care practices complemented by robots: Ethical implications and application of caring frameworks. International Journal of Human Caring, 23, 132–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grodzinsky, F. S., Miller, K. W., & Wolf, M. J. (2015). Develo** automated deceptions and the impact on trust. Philosophy and Technology, 28, 91–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunkel, D. J. (2018). Robot rights. MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gunkel, D. J. (2020). Mind the gap: Responsible robotics and the problem of responsibility. Ethics and Information Technology, 22, 307–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannah Louise, B., Katie Jane, E., Rhona, W., Serge, T., & Ray, B. J. (2019). Companion robots for older people: Importance of user-centred design demonstrated through observations and focus groups comparing preferences of older people and roboticists in South West England. BMJ Open, 9(9), e032468. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, N., Slight, R. D., Bimpong, K., Weiand, D., Vellinga, A., Morgan, G., & Slight, S. P. (2021). Clinicians’ and patients’ perceptions of the use of artificial intelligence decision aids to inform shared decision making: A systematic review. Lancet, 398, S80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02623-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Häyrinen, K., Saranto, K., & Nykänen, P. (2008). Definition, structure, content, use and impacts of electronic health records: A review of the research literature. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 77, 291–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, O., Short, B. L., Chalup, S. K., & Wilson, R. L. (2023). Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) based decision support systems in mental health: An integrative review. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 32(4), 966–978. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.13114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hindocha, S., & Badea, C. (2022). Moral exemplars for the virtuous machine: The clinician’s role in ethical artificial intelligence for healthcare. AI and Ethics, 2, 167–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, A. J. (2019). Social and medical models of disability and mental health: Evolution and renewal. CMAJ, 191(1), E16–E18. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.181008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hojat, M., Maio, V., Pohl, C. A., & Gonnella, J. S. (2023). Clinical empathy: Definition, measurement, correlates, group differences, erosion, enhancement, and healthcare outcomes. Discover Health Systems, 2, 8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44250-023-00020-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, D., & Murray, S. J. (2011). Civilizing the ‘Barbarian’: A critical analysis of behaviour modification programmes in forensic psychiatry settings. Journal of Nursing Management, 19, 293–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holtz, B., Nelson, V., & Poropatich, R. K. (2022). Artificial intelligence in health: Enhancing a return to patient-centered communication. Telemedicine Journal and E-Health, 29(6), 795–797. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2022.0413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huda, A. S. (2021). The medical model and its application in mental health. International Review of Psychiatry, 33, 463–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hung, L., Liu, C., Woldum, E., Au-Yeung, A., Berndt, A., Wallsworth, C., Horne, N., Gregorio, M., Mann, J., & Chaudhury, H. (2019). The benefits of and barriers to using a social robot PARO in care settings: A sco** review. BMC Geriatrics, 19, 232. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1244-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, L. M., Bell, H. S., Baker, A. M., & Howard, H. A. (2017). Electronic health records and the disappearing patient. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 31, 403–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurwitz, B., & Vass, A. (2002). What’s a good doctor, and how can you make one? BMJ, 325(7366), 667–668. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.325.7366.667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Counsil Of Nurses (ICN). (2022). The global mental health nursing workforce: Time to prioritize and invest in mental health and wellbeing. Available at: https://www.icn.ch/sites/default/files/inline-files/ICN_Mental_Health_Workforce_report_EN_web.pdf. Accessed 14 Aug 2023.

  • Jane, J. S., Oltmanns, T. F., South, S. C., & Turkheimer, E. (2007). Gender bias in diagnostic criteria for personality disorders: An item response theory analysis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 116, 166–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayakumar, P., Moore, M. G., Furlough, K. A., Uhler, L. M., Andrawis, J. P., Koenig, K. M., Aksan, N., Rathouz, P. J., & Bozic, K. J. (2021). Comparison of an artificial intelligence–enabled patient decision aid vs educational material on decision quality, shared decision-making, patient experience, and functional outcomes in adults with knee osteoarthritis: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Network Open, 4(2), e2037107. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.37107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. G. (2006). Computer systems: Moral entities but not moral agents. Ethics and Information Technology, 8, 195–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. G., & Miller, K. W. (2008). Un-making artificial moral agents. Ethics and Information Technology, 10, 123–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, S., & Šabanović, S. (2019). Robots for inter-generational interactions: Implications for nonfamilial community settings. In 14th ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (HRI), Daegu, Korea (South) (pp. 478–486). https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2019.8673167

  • Kaminski, M. E., Rueben, M., Smart, W. D., & Grimm, C. (2017). Averting robot eyes. Md L Rev, 76, 983. U of Colorado law legal studies research paper no. 17–23. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3002576. Accessed 14 Aug 2023.

  • Kazzazi, F. (2021). The automation of doctors and machines: A classification for AI in medicine (Adam framework). Future Healthcare Journal, 8(2), e257–e262. https://doi.org/10.7861/fhj.2020-0189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerasidou, A. (2020). Artificial intelligence and the ongoing need for empathy, compassion and trust in healthcare. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 98, 245–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerst, A., Zielasek, J., & Gaebel, W. (2020). Smartphone applications for depression: A systematic literature review and a survey of health care professionals’ attitudes towards their use in clinical practice. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 270, 139–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, A. I., Abuzainah, B., Gutlapalli, S. D., Chaudhuri, D., Khan, K. I., Al Shouli, R., Allakky, A., Ferguson, A. A., & Hamid, P. (2023). Effect of major depressive disorder on stroke risk and mortality: A systematic review. Cureus, 15(6), e40475. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, B. F., Jr. (2018). Artificial intelligence and radiology: What will the future hold? Journal of the American College of Radiology, 15, 501–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuziemsky, C., Maeder, A. J., John, O., Gogia, S. B., Basu, A., Meher, S., & Ito, M. (2019). Role of artificial intelligence within the telehealth domain. Yearbook of Medical Informatics, 28, 35–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langer, A., Feingold-Polak, R., Mueller, O., Kellmeyer, P., & Levy-Tzedek, S. (2019). Trust in socially assistive robots: Considerations for use in rehabilitation. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 104, 231–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, E. E., Torous, J., De Choudhury, M., Depp, C. A., Graham, S. A., Kim, H.-C., Paulus, M. P., Krystal, J. H., & Jeste, D. V. (2021). Artificial intelligence for mental health care: Clinical applications, barriers, facilitators, and artificial wisdom. Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging, 6, 856–864.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leong, B., & Selinger, E. (2019). Robot eyes wide shut: Understanding dishonest anthropomorphism. In Proceedings of the association for computing machinery’s conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency (pp. 299–308). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3762223

  • Levine, T. R. (2014). Truth-default theory (TDT): A theory of human deception and deception detection. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33, 378–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liaschenko, J. (1994). The moral geography of home care. ANS. Advances in Nursing Science, 17, 16–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipschitz, J., Miller, C. J., Hogan, T. P., Burdick, K. E., Lippin-Foster, R., Simon, S. R., & Burgess, J. (2019). Adoption of Mobile apps for depression and anxiety: Cross-sectional survey study on patient interest and barriers to engagement. JMIR Mental Health, 6(1), e11334. https://doi.org/10.2196/11334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X., Keane, P. A., & Denniston, A. K. (2018). Time to regenerate: The doctor in the age of artificial intelligence. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 111, 113–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzini, G., Arbelaez Ossa, L., Shaw, D. M., & Elger, B. S. (2023). Artificial intelligence and the doctor–patient relationship expanding the paradigm of shared decision making. Bioethics, 37, 424–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lupton, D. (2013). The digitally engaged patient: Self-monitoring and self-care in the digital health era. Social Theory and Health, 11, 256–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lupton, D. (2016). The quantified self. A sociology of self-tracking. Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupton, D. (2017). Self-tracking, health and medicine. Health Sociology Review, 26, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/14461242.2016.1228149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luxton, D. D. (2014). Recommendations for the ethical use and design of artificial intelligent care providers. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 62, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2014.06.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luxton, D.D., Anderson, S.L., & Anderson, M. (2016). Ethical issues and artificial intelligence technologies in behavioral and mental health care. In: D.D. Luxton (ed.). Artificial intelligence in behavioral and mental health care. Academic, 255–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-420248-1.00011-8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Manalili, M. A. R., Pearson, A., Sulik, J., Creechan, L., Elsherif, M., Murkumbi, I., Azevedo, F., Bonnen, K. L., Kim, J. S., Kording, K., Lee, J. J., Obscura, M., Kapp, S. K., Röer, J. P., & Morstead, T. (2023). From puzzle to progress: How engaging with neurodiversity can improve cognitive science. Cognitive Science, 47(2), e13255. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Martin, N. (2021). Minding the AI: Ethical challenges and practice for AI mental health care tools. In: Jotterand, F. & Ienca, M. (eds.). Artificial intelligence in brain and mental health: Philosophical, ethical & policy issues. Springer, 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74188-4_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Maslej, M. M., Kloiber, S., Ghassemi, M., Yu, J., & Hill, S. L. (2023). Out with AI, in with the psychiatrist: A preference for human-derived clinical decision support in depression care. Translational Psychiatry, 13(1), 210. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-023-02509-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthias, A. (2004). The responsibility gap: Ascribing responsibility for the actions of learning automata. Ethics and Information Technology, 6, 175–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthias, A. (2015). Robot lies in health care: When is deception morally permissible? Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 25, 169–192. https://doi.org/10.1353/ken.2015.0007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, C. (1992). Nursing work, nurses’ knowledge, and the subjectification of the patient. Sociology of Health & Illness, 14, 472–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mcdougall, R. J. (2019). Computer knows best? The need for value-flexibility in medical AI. Journal of Medical Ethics, 45, 156–160. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2018-10511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mcgrow, K. (2019). Artificial intelligence: Essentials for nursing. Nursing, 49, 46–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mcparlin, Z., Cerritelli, F., Friston, K. J., & Esteves, J. E. (2022). Therapeutic Alliance as active inference: The role of therapeutic touch and synchrony. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 783694. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.783694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittelstadt, B. (2021). The impact of artificial intelligence on the doctor-patient relationship. Commissioned by the Steeing Committee for Human Rights in the Fields of Biomedicine and Health (CDBIO), Council of Europe 2021. Available at https://www.coe.int/en/web/bioethics/report-impact-of-ai-on-the-doctor-patient-relationship. Accessed 14 Aug 2023.

  • Montemayor, C., Halpern, J., & Fairweather, A. (2022). In principle obstacles for empathic AI: Why we can’t replace human empathy in healthcare. AI & Society, 37, 1353–1359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morozov, E. (2013). To save everything, click here: The folly of technological solutionism. Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyle, W., Bramble, M., Jones, C. J., & Murfield, J. E. (2019). “She had a smile on her face as wide as the great Australian bite”: A qualitative examination of family perceptions of a therapeutic robot and a plush toy. Gerontologist, 59, 177–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulvenna, M. D., Bond, R., Delaney, J., Dawoodbhoy, F. M., Boger, J., Potts, C., & Turkington, R. (2021). Ethical issues in democratizing digital phenotypes and machine learning in the next generation of digital health technologies. Philosophy and Technology, 34, 1945–1960. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-021-00445-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nortvedt, P. (1998). Sensitive judgement: An inquiry into the foundations of nursing ethics. Nursing Ethics, 5, 385–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, K., Muller Neff, D., & Pitman, S. (2018). Burnout in mental health professionals: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence and determinants. European Psychiatry, 53, 74–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnabhain, R., & Friedman, N. D. (2018). What makes a good doctor? Internal Medicine Journal, 48, 879–882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, A., & Schwan, D. (2023). More process, less principles: The ethics of deploying AI and robotics in medicine. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 24, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180123000087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey, A. K., & Gelin, R. (2018). A mass-produced sociable humanoid robot: Pepper: The first machine of its kind. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, 25(3), 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1109/Mra.2018.2833157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patil, T., & Giordano, J. (2010). On the ontological assumptions of the medical model of psychiatry: Philosophical considerations and pragmatic tasks. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, 5, 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/1747-5341-5-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, S., & Pickard, H. (2009). The moral content of psychiatric treatment. BJPsych, 195, 281–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pepito, J. A., & Locsin, R. (2019). Can nurses remain relevant in a technologically advanced future? International Journal of Nursing Science, 6, 106–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peplau, H.E. (1988). Roles in nursing. In: Peplau, H.E. (ed.). Interpersonal relations in nursing: A conceptual frame of reference for psychodynamic nursing. Macmillan Education UK, 43–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-10109-2_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Petrakaki, D., Hilberg, E., & Waring, J. (2021). The cultivation of digital health citizenship. Social Science & Medicine, 270, 113675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pihlaja, S., Stenberg, J. H., Joutsenniemi, K., Mehik, H., Ritola, V., & Joffe, G. (2018). Therapeutic alliance in guided internet therapy programs for depression and anxiety disorders – A systematic review. Internet Interventions, 11, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radden, J. (2002). Notes towards a professional ethics for psychiatry. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 36, 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1614.2002.00989.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robert, N. (2019). How artificial intelligence is changing nursing. Nursing Management, 50, 30–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubeis, G. (2020a). The disruptive power of artificial intelligence. Ethical aspects of gerontechnology in elderly care. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 91, 104186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2020.104186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubeis, G. (2020b). Strange bedfellows. The unlikely alliance between artificial intelligence and narrative medicine. Dilemata, 32, 49–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubeis, G. (2021a). E-mental health applications for depression: An evidence-based ethical analysis. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 271, 549–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubeis, G. (2021b). Guardians of humanity? The challenges of nursing practice in the digital age. Nursing Philosophy, 22(2), e12331. https://doi.org/10.1111/nup.12331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubeis, G. (2023). Adiaphorisation and the digital nursing gaze: Liquid surveillance in long-term care. Nursing Philosophy, 24(1), e12388. https://doi.org/10.1111/nup.12388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubeis, G., Dubbala, K., & Metzler, I. (2022). “Democratizing” artificial intelligence in medicine and healthcare: Map** the uses of an elusive term. Frontiers in Genetics, 13, 902542. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.902542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Šabanović, S., Chang, W.-L., Bennett, C. C., Piatt, J. A., & Hakken, D. (2015). A robot of my own: Participatory design of socially assistive robots for independently living older adults diagnosed with depression. In: Zhou, J. & Salvendy, G. (eds.). Human aspects of IT for the aged population (Design for aging) (Vol. 9193). Springer, 104–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20892-3_11

  • Sacchi, L., Rubrichi, S., Rognoni, C., Panzarasa, S., Parimbelli, E., Mazzanti, A., Napolitano, C., Priori, S. G., & Quaglini, S. (2015). From decision to shared-decision: Introducing patients’ preferences into clinical decision analysis. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 65, 19–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sætra, H. S. (2021). Social robot deception and the culture of trust. Paladyn, 12(1), 276–286. https://doi.org/10.1515/pjbr-2021-0021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandry, E. (2015). Re-evaluating the form and communication of social robots. International Journal of Social Robotics, 7, 335–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sapci, A. H., & Sapci, H. A. (2019). Innovative assisted living tools, remote monitoring technologies, artificial intelligence-driven solutions, and robotic systems for aging societies: Systematic review. JMIR Aging, 2(2), e15429. https://doi.org/10.2196/15429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauerbrei, A., Kerasidou, A., Lucivero, F., & Hallowell, N. (2023). The impact of artificial intelligence on the person-centred, doctor-patient relationship: Some problems and solutions. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 23, 73. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-023-02162-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheutz, M. (2012). The inherent dangers of unidirectional emotional bonds between humans and social robots. In: Lin, P.A.K. & Bekey, G. (eds.). Robot ethics: The ethical and social implications of robotics. MIT Press, 205–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schüll, N. D. (2016). Data for life: Wearable technology and the design of self-care. BioSocieties, 11, 317–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, I. A., Carter, S. M., & Coiera, E. (2021). Exploring stakeholder attitudes towards AI in clinical practice. BMJ Health Care Information, 28, e100450. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2021-100450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedlakova, J., & Trachsel, M. (2023). Conversational artificial intelligence in psychotherapy: A new therapeutic tool or agent? AJOB, 23, 4–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sensmeier, J. (2015). Big data and the future of nursing knowledge. Nursing Management, 46(4), 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NUMA.0000462365.53035.7d

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shan, Y., Ji, M., **e, W., Lam, K.-Y., & Chow, C.-Y. (2022). Public trust in artificial intelligence applications in mental health care: Topic modeling analysis. JMIR Human Factors, 9(4), e38799. https://doi.org/10.2196/38799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharkey, A., & Sharkey, N. (2012). Granny and the robots: Ethical issues in robot care for the elderly. Ethics and Information Technology, 14, 27–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharkey, A., & Sharkey, N. (2021). We need to talk about deception in social robotics! Ethics and Information Technology, 23, 309–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-020-09573-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slemon, A. (2018). Embracing the wild profusion: A Foucauldian analysis of the impact of healthcare standardization on nursing knowledge and practice. Nursing Philosophy, 19(4), e12215. https://doi.org/10.1111/nup.12215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H. (2021). Clinical AI: Opacity, accountability, responsibility and liability. AI & Society, 36, 535–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snowden, L. R. (2003). Bias in mental health assessment and intervention: Theory and evidence. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 239–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solans Noguero, D., Ramírez-Cifuentes, D., Ríssola, E. A., & Freire, A. (2023). Gender bias when using artificial intelligence to assess anorexia nervosa on social media: Data-driven study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25, e45184. https://doi.org/10.2196/45184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorell, T., & Draper, H. (2017). Second thoughts about privacy, safety and deception. Connection Science, 29, 217–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparrow, R. (2016). Robots in aged care: A dystopian future? AI & Society, 31, 445–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparrow, R., & Hatherley, J. (2020). High hopes for “deep medicine”? AI, economics, and the future of care. The Hastings Center Report, 50, 14–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.1079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparrow, R., & Sparrow, L. (2006). In the hands of machines? The future of aged care. Minds and Machines, 16, 141–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Specker, J., Focquaert, F., Sterckx, S., & Schermer, M. H. N. (2020). Forensic practitioners’ views on stimulating moral development and moral growth in forensic psychiatric care. Neuroethics, 13, 73–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, R., & San Miguel González, B. (2022). The role of empathy for artificial intelligence accountability. Journal of Responsible Technology, 9, 100021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrt.2021.100021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, L., & Hoey, J. (2021). The ethics of emotion in artificial intelligence systems. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency (pp. 782–793). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445939

  • Steiner-Hofbauer, V., Schrank, B., & Holzinger, A. (2018). What is a good doctor? Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 168, 398–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinhubl, S. R., & Topol, E. J. (2018). Digital medicine, on its way to being just plain medicine. NPJ Digit Med, 1, 20175. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-017-0005-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straw, I., & Callison-Burch, C. (2020). Artificial intelligence in mental health and the biases of language based models. PLoS One, 15(12), e0240376. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney, P. (2023). Trusting social robots. AI Ethics, 3, 419–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szasz, T. S. (1960). The myth of mental illness. American Psychologist, 15, 113–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tai, A. M. Y., Albuquerque, A., Carmona, N. E., Subramanieapillai, M., Cha, D. S., Sheko, M., Lee, Y., Mansur, R., & Mcintyre, R. S. (2019). Machine learning and big data: Implications for disease modeling and therapeutic discovery in psychiatry. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 99, 101704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2019.101704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thanler, R., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, N. (2018). Mental health and Well-being. Alternatives to the medical model. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, T., & Lucas, P. (2011). On the very idea of a recovery model for mental health. Journal of Medical Ethics, 37, 24–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timmons, A. C., Duong, J. B., Simo Fiallo, N., Lee, T., Vo, H. P. Q., Ahle, M. W., Comer, J. S., Brewer, L. C., Frazier, S. L., & Chaspari, T. (2022). A call to action on assessing and mitigating bias in artificial intelligence applications for mental health. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 18, 1062–1096. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916221134490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Topol, E. (2015). The patient will see you now: The future of medicine is in your hands. Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Topol, E. (2019). Deep medicine: How artificial intelligence can make healthcare human again. Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triberti, S., Durosini, I., & Pravettoni, G. (2020). A “third wheel” effect in health decision making involving artificial entities: A psychological perspective. Frontiers in Public Health, 8, 117. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaidyam, A. N., Wisniewski, H., Halamka, J. D., Kashavan, M. S., & Torous, J. B. (2019). Chatbots and conversational agents in mental health: A review of the psychiatric landscape. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 64(7), 456–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/0706743719828977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vainauskienė, V., & Vaitkienė, R. (2022). Foresight study on online health community: The perspective of knowledge empowerment for patients with chronic diseases. The International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 37(4), 2354–2375. https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vallverdú, J., & Casacuberta, D. (2015). Ethical and technical aspects of emotions to create empathy in medical machines. In: van Rysewyk, S. & Pontier, M. (eds.). Machine medical ethics. Intelligent systems, control and automation: Science and engineering (Vol. 74). Springer, 341–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08108-3_20

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Van Wynsberghe, A. (2014). To delegate or not to delegate: Care robots, moral agency and moral responsibility. In Paper presented at 50th anniversary AISB convention 2014, London, United Kingdom. Available at: http://doc.gold.ac.uk/aisb50/AISB50-S17/AISB50-S17-vanWynsberghe-Paper.pdf. Accessed 9 Aug 2023.

  • Van Wynsberghe, A. (2022). Social robots and the risks to reciprocity. AI & Society, 37, 479–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandemeulebroucke, T., Dierckx De Casterlé, B., & Gastmans, C. (2018). The use of care robots in aged care: A systematic review of argument-based ethics literature. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 74, 15–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verdicchio, M., & Perin, A. (2022). When doctors and AI interact: On human responsibility for artificial risks. Philosophy and Technology, 35(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-022-00506-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Humboldt, S., Mendoza-Ruvalcaba, N. M., Arias-Merino, E. D., Costa, A., Cabras, E., Low, G., & Leal, I. (2020). Smart technology and the meaning in life of older adults during the Covid-19 public health emergency period: A cross-cultural qualitative study. International Review of Psychiatry, 32, 713–722. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540261.2020.1810643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallach, W., & Allen, C. (2009). Moral machines: Teaching robots right from wrong. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., Womack, J., & Papadakos, S. (2020). Rise of the robots: Is artificial intelligence a friend or foe to nursing practice? Critical Care Nursing Quarterly, 43(3), 303–311. https://doi.org/10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weissglass, D. E. (2022). Contextual bias, the democratization of healthcare, and medical artificial intelligence in low- and middle-income countries. Bioethics, 36, 201–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westra, B. L., Delaney, C. W., Konicek, D., & Keenan, G. (2008). Nursing standards to support the electronic health record. Nursing Outlook, 56(5), 258–266.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2008.06.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitby, B. (2015). Automating medicine the ethical way. In: van Rysewyk, S. & Pontier, M. (eds.). Machine medical ethics. Intelligent systems, control and automation: Science and engineering (Vol. 74). Springer, 223–232). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08108-3_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. L., Higgins, O., Atem, J., Donaldson, A. E., Gildberg, F. A., Hooper, M., Hopwood, M., Rosado, S., Solomon, B., Ward, K., & Welsh, B. (2023). Artificial intelligence: An eye cast towards the mental health nursing horizon. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing (IJMHN), 32, 938–944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organisation (WHO). (2017). Depression and other common mental disorders: Global Health estimates. World Health Organization. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/254610. Accessed 14 Aug 2023.

  • World Health Organization (WHO). (2022). World mental health report: Transforming mental health for all. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240049338. Accessed 14 Aug 2023.

  • Yeung, K. (2017). ‘Hypernudge’: Big data as a mode of regulation by design. Information, Communication & Society, 20, 118–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, T., Schoene, A. M., Ji, S., & Ananiadou, S. (2022). Natural language processing applied to mental illness detection: A narrative review. npj Digital Medicine, 5(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-022-00589-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, W., Yang, C., Cao, Z., Li, Z., Zhuo, L., Tan, Y., He, Y., Yao, L., Zhou, Q., Gong, Q., Sweeney, J. A., Shi, F., & Lui, S. (2023). Detecting individuals with severe mental illness using artificial intelligence applied to magnetic resonance imaging. eBioMedicine, 90, 104541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104541

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Biomedical and Public Health Ethics, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Krems an der Donau, Austria

    Giovanni Rubeis

Authors
  1. Giovanni Rubeis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rubeis, G. (2024). Relationships. In: Ethics of Medical AI. The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology, vol 24. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55744-6_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation