The Internal Dynamics of the Judiciary: Recruitment and Judicial Career

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Legal Culture, Sociopolitical Origins and Professional Careers of Judges in Mexico
  • 21 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter is dedicated to exploring judges’ recruitment and judicial career, and follows up on their social origins and professional trajectory. It presents data on the entry paths into the federal judiciary, the career trajectories within it, and the perceptions regarding the functioning of the judicial career and the factors that matter for promotion. As a starting point, it examines the different models of judicial governance that have operated or are currently operating in judicial systems, including the patronage model, the recognition model, and the professional career service model. To different extents, these models continue to be part of the recruitment logic within the Mexican judiciary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 32.09
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
EUR 42.79
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Borrego, F. (2017). Study on Family and Client Networks in the Federal Judiciary Council. Mexican Journal of Justice, 29–30, 159–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caballero, J. (2006). The Jurisdictional Profile of Federal Judges. Journal of the Federal Judiciary Institute, 22, 281–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpizo, J. (2001). Twenty-two Years of Mexican Presidentialism: 1978–2000. A Recapitulation. Mexican Bulletin of Comparative Law, 24(100), 71–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coke, Sir Edward. (1986). Institutes of the Laws of England I. J.H. Thomas Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cossío, J. R. (1996). Notebooks for Judicial Reform: Federal Jurisdiction and Judicial Career in Mexico. IIJ-UNAM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Federico, G. (2005). Recruitment, Professional Evaluation and Career of Judges and Prosecutors in Europe: Austria, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and Spain. Lo Scarabeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreyra, G. (2018). Unpacking the Mexican Federal Judiciary: An Inner Look at the Ethos of the Judicial Branch. Mexican Law Review, 11(1), 57–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garoupa, N., & Ginsburg, T. (2008). Guarding the Guardians: Judicial Councils and Judicial Independence. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 57(1), 103–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garoupa, N., & Ginsburg, T. (2011). Hybrid Judicial Career Structures: Reputation versus Legal Tradition. Journal of Legal Analysis, 3(2), 411–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garoupa, N., Gili, M., & Gómez-Pomar, F. (2012). Political Influence and Career Judges: An Empirical Analysis of Administrative Review by the Spanish Supreme Court. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 9(4), 795–826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgakopoulos, N. (2000). Discretion in the Career and Recognition Judiciary. Chicago Law School Roundtable, 7(1), 205–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guarnieri, C. (2004). Appointment and Career of Judges in Continental Europe: The Rise of Judicial Self-Government. Legal Studies, 24(1–2), 169–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guarnieri, C. (2008). Magistrates in Europe: Independence, Professionalism, Responsibility: The Italian Case. Studi Urbinati, A - Juridical, Political and Economic Sciences, 59(2), 255–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guarnieri, C. (2011). Berlusconi on Trial: Some Lessons for Judicial Accountability. The Foundation for Law, Justice and Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judicial Power Database in Mexico, (2019). Available under request at https://aguiarazul.wordpress.com/contact

  • Magaloni, B. (2003). Authoritarianism, Democracy and the Supreme Court: Horizontal Exchange and the Rule of Law in Mexico. In S. Mainwaring & C. Welna (Eds.), Democratic Accountability in Latin America (pp. 266–306). Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Owens, R., Tahk, A., Wohlfarth, P., & Bryan, A. (2015). Nominating Commissions, Judicial Retention, and Forward-Looking Behavior on State Supreme Courts: An Empirical Examination of Selection and Retention Methods. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 15(2), 211–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, T. (2009). The Merits of Merit Selection. Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 32(1), 67–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piana, D. (2010). Judicial Accountabilities in New Europe. From Rule of Law to Quality of Justice. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pozas-Loyo, A., & Ríos-Figueroa, J. (2018). Anatomy of an Informal Institution: The ‘Gentlemen’s Pact’ and Judicial Selection in Mexico, 1917–1994. International Political Science Review, 39(5), 647–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ríos-Figueroa, J. (2018, August 27). The Meritocratic Deficit. Nepotism and Family Networks in the Federal Judicial Power. Nexos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (2009). Merit Selection: Choosing Judges Based on Their Politics under the Veil of a Disarming Name. Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 32(1), 97–101.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Azul A. Aguiar Aguilar .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Aguiar Aguilar, A.A. (2024). The Internal Dynamics of the Judiciary: Recruitment and Judicial Career. In: Legal Culture, Sociopolitical Origins and Professional Careers of Judges in Mexico. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52909-2_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation