Pyrrhonians, a School of Skeptics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Francis Bacon’s Skeptical Recipes for New Knowledge

Abstract

From the Pyrrhonians, who recommended living by appearances, Francis Bacon learned how apparent knowledge is practical. If we can improve how reality appears, we can gain new power over nature. This idea is at the heart of his method of science. Pyrrhonians broke off from the Academy, for the first time forming a school proclaiming skepticism. They had to solve the problem of situational skepticism. Sextus Empiricus refused to endorse or deny any opinion about reality, assenting only to its appearances. Plato’s Academy had been accused of being impractical since they never wholeheartedly recommended a way of life, always doubting their best advice as less than knowledge (being actively fallible.) Pyrrhonians, mostly skeptical medical practitioners, countered that we do not need to follow philosophical opinions because we can live by appearances or how reality seems. If we stop fussing about what is really the case, we may get some ataraxia (peace of mind.) Francis Bacon took advantage of how appearances can be practically useful. He proposed making them even more practical by going beyond them to new knowledge of an underlying reality that gives us new powers over nature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Richard Bett (2000) makes a very good case that the “Pyrrhonian skepticism” of Sextus Empricus must be different from the kind of skepticism espoused by Pyrrho of Elis, if the latter was even a skeptic at all. It is also distinct from the skepticism propounded by Aenesidemus when he left the Academy, beven ased on the spotty record of his opinions. This would suggest that Sextus Empriricus was more original as a skeptic than often allowed.

  2. 2.

    For more information about the Hellenistic period of philosophy, the reader may consult Long and Sedley (1987).

  3. 3.

    Michael Frede (1987) brought to our attention the importance of the ancient study of medicine to philosophy and vice versa. Medicine was an early science to become autonomous, following Hippocrates, but like later sciences (physics, chemistry and biology for instance) philosophy always remains central to scientific thought, and vice versa.

  4. 4.

    See Owsei Temkin’s Introduction to the Gynaecology (Soranus 1956).

  5. 5.

    Soranus (1956) seem to have a well rounded approach to medicine in his gyaecology, obstetrics and pediatrics. He was also quite knowledgeable about anatomy and physiology, though the Methodists have been criticisized for their neglect of the subjects. Perhaps the Methodists did not neglect them, but it is to be noted that their methods or their tests could be performed without taking account of anatomy or physiology when evaluating their results.

References

  • Bernard, Claude. (1864) 1957. An Introduction to the Study of Experimental Medicine. Tr. H.C. Greene. New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bett, Richard. 2000. Pyrrho, his Antecedents, and his Legacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frede, Michael. 1987. Essays in Ancient Philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galen. 1985/2nd c. On Sects for Beginners. Tr. Michael Frede. In Three Treatises On the Nature of Science, ed. Richard Walzer, Michael Frede. Indianapolis: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, A.A., and D.N. Sedley. 1987. The Hellenistic Philosophers, Vol. I: Translations of the Texts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Popkin, Richard. 1960. The History of Scepticism from Erasmus to Descartes. New York, N.Y.: Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sextus Empiricus. 1990/2nd c. Outlines of Pyrrhonism. Tr. R.G. Bury. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sextus Empiricus. 1995/2nd c. CE .The Skeptic Way. Sextus Empiricus’s Outlines of Pyrrhonism. Tr. Benson Mates. New York, N.Y.: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sextus Empiricus. 2000b/2nd c. CE. Against the Ethicists. Tr. Richard Bett. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soranus. 1956/2nd c. CE. Gynaecology. Tr. Owsei Temkin. Baltimore, MD. Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jagdish Hattiangadi .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hattiangadi, J. (2024). Pyrrhonians, a School of Skeptics. In: Francis Bacon’s Skeptical Recipes for New Knowledge. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52585-8_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation