SpringerLink
Log in

The Determinants of EU Trade: Evidence from Panel Data Gravity Model

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cooperation and Enlargement: Two Challenges to be Addressed in the European Projects—2022

Part of the book series: Studies in Systems, Decision and Control ((SSDC,volume 500))

  • 100 Accesses

Abstract

The European Union is the biggest trading bloc in the world. It is the second-largest exporter and third-largest importer of goods. However, many challenges, such as the financial crisis, the migrant crisis, BREXIT, and the COVID-19 crisis, influence negatively the prospect of increased trade liberalization among countries. The member states are imposing restraints on internal trade flows, thus jeopardizing the positive effects of trade liberalization. This paper gives a detailed overview of the trade profile of the European Union and explores the determinants of EU trade. We apply the gravity model to estimate the aggregate benefits of intra-trade or benefits from free trade agreements with third countries. We measure the influence of GDP, population, land and capital endowment, EU membership, and signed free trade agreements with the trading partners on EU trade as a dependent variable. The analysis includes data for the 82 biggest EU trading partners (including members) over a period of 60 years (from 1960 to 2020). The European Economic Community was created in 1957, but the elimination of customs duties and measures that have an equivalent effect was achieved in 1968 with the creation of the Customs Union. Due to different stages in regional integration, in particular the creation of the internal market, we estimate subsequent equations with different time periods. The main research question of this paper is: can the internal market still be the driving force for economic growth, or is widening trade relations with third countries much more important for sustaining the dominant trading position of the EU? The results show that the EU’s trade is directly proportional to the trade partner’s GDP and population. Regarding the coefficient of EU membership, it does not significantly change its value as we shorten the time periods, proving that the average trade advantage due to EU membership increases over time. On the contrary, as we shortened the time periods in the analysis, we obtained a positive but decreasing coefficient for the variable free trade agreements. This confirms that trade exchange within the EU has had a more significant effect than extra-EU trade, especially since the creation of the Internal Market.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cini, M., Perez-Solorzano Borragan, N.: European Union Politics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2022)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Howarth, D., Sadeh, T.: The ever incomplete single market: differentiation and the evolving frontier of integration. J. Eur. Publ. Policy 17(7), 922–935 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2010.499220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Camisão, I., Guimarães, M.H.: The commission, the single market and the crisis: the limits of purposeful opportunism. J. Common Mark. Stud. 55(2), 223–239 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Egan, M.: The internal market of the European Union: from indivisibility to differentiated integration. In: Laursen, F. (ed.) The Oxford Encyclopaedia of European Union Politics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ambroziak, A.A.: Does the European single market exist in the era of a coronavirus pandemic? The case of intra and extra-EU trade in COVID-19-related products. Studia Europejskie-Stud. Eur. Aff. 25(1), 63–83 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Baldwin, R.E., Wyplosz, C.: The Economics of European Integration. McGraw-Hill Education, London (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Toshevska-Trpchevska, K.: Multilateral Trading System. University Ss. Cyril and Methodius in Skopje, Faculty of Economics-Skopje (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jovanovik, M.: The Economics of International Integration. Edward Elgar, London (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Baldwin, R.E., Wyplosz, C.: Economics of European Integration. McGraw-Hill Companies, Washington (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  10. World Trade Organization: International Trade Statistics 2021. WTO, Geneva (2022). Accessed 1 April 2023

    Google Scholar 

  11. Eurostat: International trade in goods for the EU - an overview (2022). Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=International_trade_in_goods_for_the_EU_-_an_overview&oldid=454291#International_trade_in_goods_-_intra-EU_and_extra-EU_flows. Accessed 2 April 2023

  12. Eurostat: International trade in services (2023). Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statisticsexplained/index.php?title=International_trade_in_services#General_overview. Accessed 2 April 2023

  13. Eurostat: Intra-EU trade in goods-main features (2023). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statisticsexplained/index.php?title=Intra-EU_trade_in_goods_-_main_features. Accessed 2 April 2023

  14. Garrett, G.: International cooperation and institutional choice: The European Community’s internal market. Int. Organ. 46(2), 533–560 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. in‘t Veld, J.: Quantifying the Economic Effects of the Single Market in a Structural Macromodel. European Commission (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Badinger, H.: Growth effects of economic integration: evidence from the EU member states. Rev. World Econ./Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 141(1), 50–78 (2005). http://www.jstor.org/stable/40441034

  17. Campos, N.F., Coricelli, F., Moretti, L.: Economic Growth and Political Integration: Estimating the Benefits from Membership in the European Union Using the Synthetic Counterfactuals Method. IZA Discussion Paper No. 8162 (2014). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2432446 or https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2432446

  18. Lehtimäki, J., Sondermann, D.: Baldwin versus Cecchini revisited: the growth impact of the European single market. Empir. Econ. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-021-02161-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Thissen, M., Oort, F., Diodato, D.: Integration and Convergence in Regional Europe: European Regional Trade Flows from 2000 to 2010, ERSA Conference Papers, European Regional Science Association (2013). https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa13p1116

  20. Dijkstra, M.: Economies of Scale and Scope in the European Banking Sector 2002–2011. Amsterdam Law School Research Paper No. 2013-44, Amsterdam Center for Law & Economics Working Paper No. 2013-11 (2013). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2311267 or https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2311267

  21. Bogdanova, O., Orlovska, A.: Competitiveness of Nations in Global Economy Competitive Perspectives of the European Union. Econ. Manag. 446–452 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Davis, D., Gift, T.: The positive effects of the Schengen Agreement on European trade. World Econ. 37(11), 1541–1557 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lejour, A.M., De Mooij, R., Nahuis, R.: EU Enlargement: Economic Implications for Countries and Industries (2001). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=287847 or https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.287847

  24. Baldwin, R.E., Francois, J.F., Portes, R.: The costs and benefits of eastern enlargement: the impact on the EU and central Europe. Econ. Policy 12(24), 125–176 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0327.00018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Aturupane, C., Djankov, S., Hoekman, B.: Determinants of Intra-Industry Trade Between East and West Europe, No. 1721, CEPR Discussion Papers, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Clark, D.P., Stanley, D.L.: Determinants of intra-industry trade between develo** countries and the United States. J. Econ. Dev. 24(2), 79–94 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bergstrand, J.H.: The gravity equation in international trade: some microeconomic foundations and empirical evidence. Rev. Econ. Stat. 67(3), 474–481 (1985). https://doi.org/10.2307/1925976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Anderson, J.E., Wincoop, E.V.: Gravity with gravitas: a solution to the border puzzle. Am. Econ. Rev. 93(1), 170–192 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Anderson, J.E.: The gravity model. Annu. Rev. Econ. 3, 133–160 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Head, K., Mayer, T.: The United States of Europe: a gravity model evaluation of the four freedoms. J. Econ. Perspect. 35(2), 23–48 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Cai, M.: A calibrated gravity model of interregional trade. Spat. Econ. Anal. 18(3), 89–107 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/17421772.2022.2081715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Freeman, D., Meijerink, G., Teulings, R.: Trade Benefits of the EU and the Internal Market. CPB Communication (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kox, K., Lejour, A., Montizaan, R.: The Free Movement of Services Within the EU. CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Leitner, S.M. et al.: The Evolving Composition of Intra-EU Trade. wiiw Research Report, No. 414, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies (wiiw), Vienna (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Nitsch, V.: National borders and international trade: evidence from the European Union. Can. J. Econ./Revue canadienne d’économique 33(4), 1091–1105 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Spornberger, J.: EU integration and structural gravity: a comprehensive quantification of the border effect on trade. Rev. Int. Econ. 30(1), 1–24 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Zaninović, V.: The intra-industry trade dynamics in CEE countries July 2022. Zbornik Radova Ekonomskog Fakulteta u Rijeci/Proc. Rijeka School Econ. 40(1), 129–145 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Bojnec, Š, Fertő, I., Fogarasi, J.: Quality of institutions and the BRIC countries’ agro-food exports. China Agric. Econ. Rev. 6(3), 379–394 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Chen, N.: Intra-national versus international trade in the European Union: why do national borders matter? J. Int. Econ. 63(1), 93–118 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. McCarthy, C.: Regional Integration: Part of the Solution or Part of the Problem? Page, S., Bilal, S. (2001). Regional Integration in Western Africa. Report Prepared for and Financed by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Netherlands, ODI, London (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Huyên, T.K.: Trade relationship of Vietnam from the perspective of the China-US trade War 2019: a comparison study using the Gravity Model. Int. J. Manag. Innov. Entrepreneurial Res. 9(1), 01–13 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Gul, N., Yasin, H.M.: The trade potential of Pakistan: an application of gravity model. Lahore J. Econ. 16(1), 23–62 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Nguyen, K.: Gravity model by panel data approach: an empirical application with implications for the ASEAN free trade area. ASEAN Econ. Bull. 26(3), 266–277 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Lawrence, R., Weinstein, D.: Trade and Growth: Import-Led or Export-Led? Evidence From Japan and Korea. NBER Working Papers 7264, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Tinbergen, J.: Sha** the World Economy; Suggestions for an International Economic Policy. Twentieth Century Fund, New York (1962). http://hdl.handle.net/1765/16826. Accessed 16 April 2023

  46. Helpman, E., Melitz, M., Rubinstein, Y.: Estimating trade flows: trading partners and trading volumes. Q. J. Econ. 123(2), 441–487 (2008)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  47. Almog, A., Bird, R., Garlaschelli, D.: Enhanced gravity model of trade: reconciling macroeconomic and network models. Front. Phys. 7, 55 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Rose, A.: One money, one market: estimating the effect of currency unions on trade. Econ. Policy 15, 7–46 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Feenstra, R.C., Markusen, J.R., Rose, A.K.: Using the gravity model equation to differentiate among alternative theories of trade. Can. J. Econ. 34, 430–447 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Soloaga, I., Winters, L.A.: Regionalism in the nineties: what effect on trade? North Am. J. Econ. Finance 12, 1–29 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Yamarik, S., Ghosh, S.: A sensitivity analysis of the gravity model. Int. Trade J. 19(1), 83–126 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/08853900590905784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Frankel, J.A.: Is Japan creating a yen bloc in East Asia and the Pacific? NBER Working Papers, Series (4050) (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Rahman, M.M., Dutta, D.: A panel data analysis of Bangladesh’s trade: the gravity model approach. J. Asia-Pac. Bus. 13, 263–286 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. MinKyoung, K., Cho, G.D., Koo, W.W.: Determining Bilateral Trade Patterns Using a Dynamic Gravity Equation. Agribusiness & Applied Economics Report, No. 525 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Sandberg, H.M., Seale, J.J.L., Taylor, T.G.: History, regionalism and CARICOM trade: gravity model analysis. J. Dev. Stud. 5(42), 795–811 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Nguyen, B.X.: The determinants of Vietnamese export flows: static and dynamic panel gravity approach. Int. J. Econ. Financ. 2(4), 122–129 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Bayoumi, T., Eichengreen, B.: Ever closer to heaven? An optimum-currency-area index for European countries. Eur. Econ. Rev. 41(3–5), 761–770 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Evenett, S.J., Hutchinson, W.K.: The gravity equation in international economics: theory and evidence. Scott. J. Polit. Econ. 49(5), 489–490 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Bergstrand, J.H.: The Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson model, the Linder hypothesis, and the determinants of bilateral intra-industry trade. Econ. J. 100, 1216–1229 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Linder, S.B.: An Essay on Trade and Transformation. Wiley, New York (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  61. Gunnella, V., Lebastard, L., Lopez-Garcia, P., Serafini, R., Mattioli, A.Z.: The Impact of the Euro on Trade: Two Decades into Monetary Union. ECB Occasional Paper (2021/283) (2021)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Economics-Skopje, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, Blvd. Goce Delchev 9V, 1000, Skopje, North Macedonia

    Elena Makrevska Disoska

  2. Iustinianus Primus Faculty of Law-Skopje, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University-Skopje, Blvd. Goce Delchev 9B, 1000, Skopje, North Macedonia

    Katerina Shapkova Kocevska

Authors
  1. Elena Makrevska Disoska
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Katerina Shapkova Kocevska
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katerina Shapkova Kocevska .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Université Grenoble, Alpes, France

    Ghislaine Pellat

  2. Saints Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, North Macedonia

    Jovan Zafiroski

  3. Comenius University, Bystrica, Slovakia

    Marian Šuplata

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Disoska, E.M., Kocevska, K.S. (2024). The Determinants of EU Trade: Evidence from Panel Data Gravity Model. In: Pellat, G., Zafiroski, J., Šuplata, M. (eds) Cooperation and Enlargement: Two Challenges to be Addressed in the European Projects—2022. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol 500. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42253-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42253-9_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-42252-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-42253-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation