The Reasons Why the Narrative of Memory and not Storytelling: Reconstructing the Past, Present, and Future

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Collective Memory Narratives in Contemporary Culture
  • 186 Accesses

Abstract

Narrative (the activity of narrating) occupies a central role in the social life of individuals, while also taking on the function of actualising the past to construct a perspective of the future and reshape the present social world. The real issue, however, for social science scholars is not the distinction between the telling of true stories and false ones (this seems to be a practical rather than a theoretical problem) but the value of narrativity as a way of making sense of reality—both the factual reality of real events and the moral and symbolic reality of fictions. “Narrative”, in this process, translates into the narrativity that enables individuals to know, understand and make sense of the social world, and it is through narratives and narrativity that narrative identities are constituted (integration between the two major classes of historical narratives and fictions). Narrative identity, therefore, is closely linked to memory and also shares its form. Therefore, this contribution will clarify, starting from the difference between narratives and storytelling, how narratives re-actualise the past in a future perspective since they preserve the memory of actions over time allowing them to become models to be imitated and/or surpassed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Ontological narratives are the stories that individuals use to make sense of and, consequently, act in their lives (they define who individuals are). The relationship between narratives and ontology is presented as a reflexive cycle of the identities of individuals situated temporally and spatially; public narratives are those linked not to the individual but to larger social organisations (starting with the family and ending with large international institutions); conceptual narratives are all the concepts and explanations that social researchers construct through a vocabulary that can be used to reconstruct and trace in time and space the ontological narratives and relationships of individuals, as well as the public and cultural narratives that involve the lives of individuals; and, finally, metanarrativity, which constitutes all those “masternarratives” in which social individuals are included as contemporary actors within the story.

  2. 2.

    The metaphor is a mimesis. It is the word that is sometimes translated as “imitation” others as “representation”, but always as something that makes us say that mimesis is the imitation of an action (a metaphor for reality). Ricœur breaks down the process of mimesis into three phases (mimesis1, mimesis2, and mimesis3) with the second phase (mimesis2) constituting the central node of his analysis since it is the phase that opens the individual to the world of the plot of narrative. Mimesis1 is the “pre-understanding of the world of action” and, in particular, of its intelligible structures, its symbolic elements and its temporal nature; mimesis2 is proper representation and regards the narrative function of integrating the data acquired from the world of action by transforming them into the world of text (or verb); and, finally, mimesis3 is the phase that closes the mimetic circularity and refers to the real world in which the action takes place (as opposed to mimesis1) because a new autonomous universe is re-created.

References

  • Abbott, H. P. (2002). The Cambridge introduction to narrative. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. (1953). Understanding and politics. Partisan Review, 20(4), 377–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. (1961). Between past and future. Six exercises of political thought. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. (1963). Eichmann in Jerusalem: A report on the banality of evil. Viking Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. (1964, August 6). Personal responsibility under dictatorship. The Listener, 185–187 and 205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. (1968). Men in dark times. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. (1978). The life of the mind, Vol. 2. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Assmann, J. (2011). Cultural memory and early civilization: Writing, remembrance, and political imagination. Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1992).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Assmann, J., & Czaplicka, J. (1995). Collective memory and cultural identity. New German Critique, 65, 125–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barthes, R. (1975). An introduction to the structural analysis of narrative (L. Duisit, Trans.) New Literary History, 6(2), 237–272. (Original work published 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, R. J., & Quinney, R. (2004). The narrative turn in social inquiry. In R. J. Berger & R. Quinney (Eds.), Storytelling sociology: Narrative as social inquiry. Lynne Rienner Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. (1987). Life as narrative. Social Research, 54(1), 11–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. (1991). The narrative construction of reality. Critical Inquiry, 18(1), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavarero, A. (2000). Relating narratives. Storytelling and selfhood. (P. A. Kottman, Trans.). Routledge. (Original work published 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatman, S. (1975). Towards a theory of narrative. New Literary History, 6(2), 295–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czarniawska, B. (2004). Narratives in social science research. Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H.-G. (2004). Truth and method (2nd ed., J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Marshall, Trans.). Continuum. (Original work published 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Halbwachs, M. (1992). On collective memory (L.A. Coser, Trans.). University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1950).

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, D., Phelan, J., Rabinowitz, P. J., Richardson, B., & Warhol, R. (2012). Narrative theory. Core concepts and critical debates. The Ohio State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluckhohn, C., & Kroeber, A. L. (1952). Culture. A critical review of concepts and definitions. Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreiswirth, M. (2005). Narrative turn in the humanities. In D. Herman, M. Jahn, & M.-L. Ryan (Eds.), Routledge encyclopedia of narrative theory. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristeva, J. (2001). Hannah Arendt. Life is a narrative. University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge (G. Bennington & B. Massumi, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press (Original work published 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maffesoli, M. (1996). Ordinary knowledge: An introduction to interpretative sociology. Polity (Original work published 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangone, E. (2022). Narratives and social change. Social Reality in Contemporary Society. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, W. J. T. (1980). Editor’s note: On narrative. Critical Inquiry, 7(1), 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norberg, J. (2013). The banality of narrative: Hannah Arendt’s Eichmann in Jerusalem. Textual Practice, 27(5), 743–761. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950236X.2012.751447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phelan, J. (1996). Narrative as rhetoric. Technique, audiences, ethics, ideology. Ohio State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polkinghorne, D. E. (1988). Narrative knowing and the human sciences. State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prince, G. (2005). Narrativity. In D. Herman, M. Jahn, & M.-L. Ryan (Eds.), Routledge encyclopedia of narrative theory. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raine, S. (2013). The narrative turn: Interdisciplinary methods and perspectives. Student Anthropologist, 3(3), 64–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricœur, P. (1959). Le symbole donne a penser. Esprit, 7–8, 60–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricœur, P. (1971). The model of the text: Meaningful action considered as a text. Social Research, 38(3), 529–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricœur, P. (1974). The conflict of interpretations. In Essayes in Hermeneutics (D. Ihde, Trans.). Northwestern University Press. (Original work published 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricœur, P. (1975). Phenomenology and hermeneutics. Noûs, 9(1), 85–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricœur, P. (1977). La sémantique de l’action. Première partie: Le discours de l’action. Editions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. (1984). Time and narrative, Vol. I (K. McLaughlin & D. Pellauer, Trans.). The University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricœur, P. (1985). Time and narrative, Voll. II (K. McLaughlin & D. Pellauer, Trans.). The University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricœur, P. (1986). Life: A story in search of a narrator. In M. C. Doeser & J. N. Kraay (Eds.), Facts and values (pp. 121–132). Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. (1988). Time and narrative, Vol. III (K. McLaughlin & D. Pellauer, Trans.). The University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricœur, P. (1991a). Narrative identity. (M. S. Muldoon, Trans.). Philosophy Today, 35(1), 73–81. (Original work published 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricœur, P. (1991b). From text to action: Essays in hermeneutics, II. (K. Blamey & J. B. Thompson, Trans.). Northwestern University Press. (Original work published 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricœur, P. (1992). Oneself as another (K. Blamey, Trans.). The University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Riessman, C. K. (1993). Narrative analysis. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, M.-L. (2005). Narrative. In D. Herman, M. Jahn, & M.-L. Ryan (Eds.), Routledge encyclopedia of narrative theory. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schütz, A. (1967). The phenomenology of the social world (G. Walsh, & F. Lehnert, Trans.). Northwestern University Press. (Original work published 1932).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott-Baumann, A. (2011). Text as action, action as text? Ricoeur, λογοσ and the affirmative search for meaning in the ‘universe of discourse’. Discourse Studies, 13(5), 593–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Somers, M. R. (1994). The narrative construction of identity: A relational and network approach. Theory and Society, 23, 605–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Eynde, J., & Veno, A. (1999). Co** with disastrous events: An empowering model of community healing. In R. Gist & B. Lubin (Eds.), Response to disaster. Psychosocial community and ecological approaches (pp. 167–192). Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H. (1980). The value of narrativity in the representation of reality. Critical Inquiry, 7(1), 5–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emiliana Mangone .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mangone, E. (2023). The Reasons Why the Narrative of Memory and not Storytelling: Reconstructing the Past, Present, and Future. In: Pocecco, A., Gualda, E., Mangone, E. (eds) Collective Memory Narratives in Contemporary Culture. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41921-8_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41921-8_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-41920-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-41921-8

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation