A Digital Twin Description Framework and Its Map** to Asset Administration Shell

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development (MODELSWARD 2021, MODELSWARD 2022)

Abstract

The pace of reporting on Digital Twin (DT) projects continues to accelerate both in industry and academia. However, these experience reports often leave out essential characteristics of the DT, such as the scope of the system-under-study, the insights and actions enabled, and the time-scale of processing. A lack of these details could therefore hamper both understanding of these DTs and development of DT tools and techniques. Our previous work developed a DT description framework with fourteen characteristics as a checklist for experience report authors to better describe the capabilities of their DT projects. This report provides an extended example of reporting to highlight the utility of this description framework, focusing on the DT of an industrial drilling machine. Furthermore, we provide a map** from our description framework to the Asset Administration Shell (AAS) which is an emerging standard for Industry 4.0 system integration. This map** aids practitioners in understanding how our description framework relates to AAS, potentially aiding in description or implementation activities.

B. Oakes carried out the majority of this work at the University of Antwerp.

S. Van Mierlo is now employed at EP &C Patent Attorneys, Belgium.

A. Parsai is now employed at Agfa Offset and Inkjet Solutions, Belgium.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.flandersmake.be/en.

  2. 2.

    https://unity.com, https://godotengine.org/.

  3. 3.

    https://www.zvei.org.

  4. 4.

    https://opcfoundation.org/about/opc-technologies/opc-ua/.

References

  1. Adolphs, P., Bedenbender, H., et al.: Reference Architecture Model Industrie 4.0 (RAMI4.0). ZVEI and VDI, Status report (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bayha, A., Bock, J., et al.: Describing capabilities of Industrie 4.0 components. German Electrical and Electronics Manufacturers Association, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bedenbender, H., Billmann, M., et al.: Examples of the Asset Administration Shell for Industrie 4.0 components-basic part. ZVEI white paper (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bey-Temsamani, A., Ooijevaar, T., Depraetere, B.: An assessment of two technologies for high performance composite machining; adaptive fixturing and in process tool profile monitoring. Procedia CIRP 85, 201–206 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Blair, G.S.: Digital twins of the natural environment. Patterns 2(10), 100359 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chhetri, S.R., Faezi, S., et al.: QUILT: quality inference from living digital twins in IoT-enabled manufacturing systems. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Internet of Things Design and Implementation, pp. 237–248. ACM, April 2019. https://doi.org/10.1145/3302505.3310085

  7. Flanders Make: Smart clam** mechanism. Patent application 2020554, Octrooicentrum Nederland, March 2018

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fuller, A., Fan, Z., et al.: Digital twin: enabling technologies, challenges and open research. IEEE Access 8, 108952–108971 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Govindasamy, H.S., Ramya, J., et al.: Air quality management: an exemplar for model-driven digital twin engineering. In: First International Workshop on Model-Driven Engineering for Digital Twins, ModDiT 2021 co-located with MODELS 2021 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Grieves, M., Vickers, J.: Digital twin: mitigating unpredictable, undesirable emergent behavior in complex systems. In: Kahlen, F.-J., Flumerfelt, S., Alves, A. (eds.) Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Complex Systems, pp. 85–113. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38756-7_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Iñigo, M.A., Porto, A., et al.: Towards an Asset Administration Shell scenario: a use case for interoperability and standardization in Industry 4.0. In: NOMS 2020–2020 IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium, pp. 1–6. IEEE (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jones, D., Snider, C., et al.: Characterising the digital twin: a systematic literature review. CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol. 29, 36–52 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2020.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Karadeniz, A.M., Arif, I., et al.: Digital twin of eGastronomic things: a case study for ice cream machines. In: IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, pp. 1–4, May 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/iscas.2019.8702679

  14. Kritzinger, W., Karner, M., et al.: Digital twin in manufacturing: a categorical literature review and classification. IFAC-PapersOnLine 51(11), 1016–1022 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Leinen, R.: Driving the digital enterprise in product development and manufacturing. In: Presented at 6th CSIR conference, October 2017

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lietaert, P., Meyers, B., Van Noten, J., Sips, J., Gadeyne, K.: Knowledge graphs in digital twins for AI in production. In: Dolgui, A., Bernard, A., Lemoine, D., von Cieminski, G., Romero, D. (eds.) APMS 2021. IAICT, vol. 630, pp. 249–257. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85874-2_26

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Lindström, J., Larsson, H., et al.: Towards intelligent and sustainable production: combining and integrating online predictive maintenance and continuous quality control. Procedia CIRP 63, 443–448 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu, Y., Zhang, L., et al.: A novel cloud-based framework for the elderly healthcare services using digital twin. IEEE Access 7, 49088–49101 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2909828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ludvigsen, K.B., Jamt, L.K., et al.: Digital twins for design, testing and verification throughout a vessel’s life cycle. In: Proceedings 15th International Conference on Computer and IT Applications in the Maritime Industries, pp. 448–456 (2016). http://data.hiper-conf.info/compit2016_lecce.pdf

  20. Madni, A.M., Madni, C.C., Lucero, S.D.: Leveraging digital twin technology in model-based systems engineering. Systems 7(1), 7 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/systems7010007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Malakuti, S., Juhlin, P., et al.: An architecture and information meta-model for back-end data access via digital twins. In: IEEE 26th International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation, September 2021

    Google Scholar 

  22. Malik, A.A., Bilberg, A.: Digital twins of human robot collaboration in a production setting. Procedia Manuf. 17, 278–285 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.10.047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Miller, A.M., Alvarez, R., Hartman, N.: Towards an extended model-based definition for the digital twin. Comput.-Aided Des. Appl. 15(6), 880–891 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/16864360.2018.1462569

  24. Min, Q., Lu, Y., et al.: Machine learning based digital twin framework for production optimization in petrochemical industry. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 49, 502–519 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mohammadi, N., Taylor, J.: Knowledge discovery in smart city digital twins. In: Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 1656–1664 (2020). https://doi.org/10.24251/hicss.2020.204

  26. Oakes, B., Parsai, A., et al.: Digital Twin experience report analysis (2020). https://msdl.uantwerpen.be/git/bentley/2020.MODELSWARD.DT

  27. Oakes, B.J., Meyers, B., et al.: Structuring and accessing knowledge for historical and streaming digital twins. In: Proceedings First Workshop on Ontology-Driven Conceptual Modeling of Digital Twins (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Oakes, B.J., Parsai., A., et al.: Improving digital twin experience reports. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development - Volume 1: MODELSWARD, pp. 179–190. INSTICC, SciTePress (2021). https://doi.org/10.5220/0010236101790190

  29. Pokharel, S., Mutha, A.: Perspectives in reverse logistics: a review. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 53(4), 175–182 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2008.11.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Rasheed, A., San, O., Kvamsdal, T.: Digital twin: values, challenges and enablers from a modeling perspective. IEEE Access 8, 21980–22012 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.2970143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rowley, J.: The wisdom hierarchy: representations of the DIKW hierarchy. J. Inf. Sci. 33(2), 163–180 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ruohomäki, T., Airaksinen, E., et al.: Smart city platform enabling digital twin. In: 2018 International Conference on Intelligent Systems (IS), pp. 155–161. IEEE, September 2018. https://doi.org/10.1109/is.2018.8710517

  33. Singh, V., Willcox, K.E.: Engineering design with digital thread. AIAA J. 56(11), 4515–4528 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Söderberg, R., Wärmefjord, K., et al.: Toward a digital twin for real-time geometry assurance in individualized production. CIRP Ann. 66(1), 137–140 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2017.04.038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Tao, F., Cheng, J., et al.: Digital twin-driven product design, manufacturing and service with big data. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 94(9–12), 3563–3576 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0233-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Tao, F., Sui, F., et al.: Digital twin-driven product design framework. Int. J. Prod. Res. 57(12), 3935–3953 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1443229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Traoré, M.K., Muzy, A.: Capturing the dual relationship between simulation models and their context. Simul. Model. Pract. Theory 14(2), 126–142 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2005.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Uhlemann, T.H.J., Lehmann, C., Steinhilper, R.: The digital twin: realizing the cyber-physical production system for Industry 4.0. Procedia CIRP 61, 335–340 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Van Acker, B., Mertens, J., De Meulenaere, P., Denil, J.: Validity frame supported digital twin design of complex cyber-physical systems. In: 2021 Annual Modeling and Simulation Conference (ANNSIM), pp. 1–12. IEEE (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Van Mierlo, S., Oakes, B.J., Van Acker, B., Eslampanah, R., Denil, J., Vangheluwe, H.: Exploring validity frames in practice. In: Babur, Ö., Denil, J., Vogel-Heuser, B. (eds.) ICSMM 2020. CCIS, vol. 1262, pp. 131–148. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58167-1_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  41. Werner, A., Zimmermann, N., Lentes, J.: Approach for a holistic predictive maintenance strategy by incorporating a digital twin. Procedia Manuf. 39, 1743–1751 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.01.265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Worden, K., Cross, E.J., Gardner, P., Barthorpe, R.J., Wagg, D.J.: On digital twins, mirrors and virtualisations. In: Barthorpe, R. (ed.) Model Validation and Uncertainty Quantification, Volume 3. CPSEMS, pp. 285–295. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12075-7_34

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  43. Wuest, T., Hribernik, K., Thoben, K.D.: Accessing servitisation potential of PLM data by applying the product avatar concept. Prod. Plann. Control 26(14–15), 1198–1218 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2015.1033494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Zeigler, B.P., Kim, T.G., Praehofer, H.: Theory of modeling and simulation: integrating discrete event and continuous complex dynamic systems. Academic press, San Diego (2000). https://www.elsevier.com/books/theory-of-modeling-and-simulation/zeigler/978-0-08-051909-8

  45. Zhidchenko, V., Malysheva, I., et al.: Faster than real-time simulation of mobile crane dynamics using digital twin concept. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1096, 012071 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1096/1/012071

  46. Zhuang, C., Liu, J., **ong, H.: Digital twin-based smart production management and control framework for the complex product assembly shop-floor. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 96(1–4), 1149–1163 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-1617-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Flanders Make, the strategic research centre for the manufacturing industry, and was partially funded by the DTDesign ICON (Flanders Innovation & Entrepreneurship FM/ICON : : HBC.2019.0079) project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bentley James Oakes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Oakes, B.J. et al. (2023). A Digital Twin Description Framework and Its Map** to Asset Administration Shell. In: Pires, L.F., Hammoudi, S., Seidewitz, E. (eds) Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development. MODELSWARD MODELSWARD 2021 2022. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1708. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38821-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38821-7_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-38820-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-38821-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation