Abstract
The chassis and swingarm are the main components of the motorbike frame. The dynamic response of these components strongly influences the frame flexibility and consequently the motorbike dynamics. However, there may be variability in nominally identical manufactured components. The uncertainty may arise from many sources including geometric tolerances, material properties, and variability in the manufacturing and assembling process, for example, adhesive bonding of hollow parts. The presence of uncertainties can significantly alter motorbike component dynamic response and modal properties, and thus their overall performance during a racing competition. Therefore, competitive riders test several components during the racing weekend to find the specific motorbike frame with which they are more comfortable.
In this chapter, experimental modal analyses have been carried out on the flexible components of a motorbike frame. The experimental campaign results have demonstrated significative differences in frequency response functions, natural frequencies and dam** of motorbike components. Modal assurance criterion and other indexes have been used to compare mode shapes of the seemingly identical components and to assess possible crossing and veering phenomena, due to uncertainty.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
29 March 2024
A correction has been published.
References
Sharp, R.S., Limebeer, D.J.: A motorcycle model for stability and control analysis. Multibody Sys. Dyn. 6, 123–142 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017508214101
Cossalter, V.: Motorcycle Dynamics. Lulu, Morrisville (2006)
Doria, A., Taraborrelli, L., Urbani, M.: A modal approach for the study of the transient behavior of motorcycle and scooter tires. In: Proceedings of ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences, August 17–20, 2014, Buffalo, USA, pp. 29–37 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2014-34023
Rovarino, D., Actis Comino, L., Bonisoli, E., Rosso, C., Venturini, S., Velardocchia, M., Baecker, M., Gallrein, A.: A methodology for automotive steel wheel life assessment. In: SAE 2020 World Congress, April 21–23, 2020, Detroit, Michigan, SAE Technical Paper 2020-01-1240, pp. 1–10 (2020). https://doi.org/10.4271/2020-01-1240
Cossalter, V., Lot, R.: A motorcycle multi-body model for real time simulations based on the natural coordinates approach. Veh. Syst. Dyn. 37(6), 423–447 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1076/vesd.37.6.423.3523
Sharp, R.S., Evangelou, S., Limebeer, D.J.: Advances in the modelling of motorcycle dynamics. Multibody Sys. Dyn. 12, 251–283 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MUBO.0000049195.60868.a2
Sequenzia, G., Oliveri, S., Fatuzzo, G., Calì, M.: An advanced multibody model for evaluating rider’s influence on motorcycle dynamics. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. K J. Multi-body Dyn. 229(2), 193–207 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/1464419314557686
Barbagallo, R., Sequenzia, G., Oliveri, S., Cammarata, A.: Dynamics of a high-performance motorcycle by an advanced multibody/control co-simulation. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. K J. Multi-body Dyn. 230(2), 207–221 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/1464419315602825
Olivieri, S.M., Calì, M., Catalano, L.: Dynamics of motorcycle using flexible elements. In: Proceedings of International Design Conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 2002, pp. 1227–1236 (2002)
Cossalter, V., Doria, A., Massaro, M., Taraborrelli, L.: Experimental and numerical investigation on the motorcycle front frame flexibility and its effect on stability. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 60, 452–471 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.02.011
Dixit, V.S., Nukulwar, M.R., Shinde, S.T., Pimpale, S.S.: Vibration response and optimization of swing arm through hardening. Int. J. Curr. Eng. Technol. 6, 562–567 (2016)
Lake, K., Thomas, R., Williams, O.: The influence of compliant chassis components on motorcycle dynamics: an historical overview and the potential future impact of carbon fibre. Int. J. Veh. Mech. Mobil. 50(7), 1043–1052 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/00423114.2011.647824
Bocciolone, M., Cheli, F., Pezzola, M., Viganò, R.: Static and dynamic properties of a motorcycle frame: experimental and numerical approach. WIT Trans. Model. Simul. 41, 517–526 (2005)
Maia, N.M.M., Silva, J.M.M.: Theoretical and Experimental Modal Analysis. Wiley, New York (1997)
Harshal, B.B.: Study of experimental modal analysis on two wheeler frame. Int. J. Eng. Sci. Res. Technol. 4(7), 2518–2520 (2015)
Hiremath, S., Kumar, N., Nagareddy, G., Rathod, L.: Modal analysis of two wheeler chassis. Int. J. Eng. Sci. Res. Technol. 5(7), 68–73 (2016)
Bonisoli, E., Lisitano, D., Dimauro, L.: Experimental and numerical mode shape tracing from components to whole motorbike chassis. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Noise and Vibration Engineering ISMA2018, September 17–19, 2018, Leuven, Belgium, pp. 3597–3604 (2018)
Bonisoli, E., Lisitano, D., Dimauro, L., Peroni, L.: Chapter 14: A proposal of dynamic behaviour design based on mode shape tracing: numerical application to a motorbike frame. In: Dynamic Substructures Proceedings of the 37th IMAC, A Conference and Exposition on Structural Dynamics 2019, Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series, vol. 4, 186 pp, pp. 149–158. Springer (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12184-6_14
Bonisoli, E., Marcuccio, G., Rosso, C.: Chapter 18: Crossing and veering phenomena in crank mechanism dynamics. In: Topics in Model Validation and Uncertainty Quantification Proceedings of the 31st IMAC, A Conference and Exposition on Structural Dynamics, Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series 2013, vol. 5, 264 pp, pp. 175–187. Springer (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6564-5_18
Bonisoli, E., Marcuccio, G., Venturini, S.: Interference fit estimation through stress-stiffening effect on dynamics. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 160, 107919–107942 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.107919
Bonisoli, E., Lisitano, D., Dimauro, L.: Detection of critical mode-shapes in flexible multibody systems dynamics: the case study of a racing motorcycle. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 180, 1–23, 109370 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.109370
Bonisoli, E., Vella, A.D., Venturini, S.: Chapter 13: Uncertainty effects on bike spoke wheel modal behaviour. In: Model Validation and Uncertainty Quantification Proceedings of the 40th IMAC, A Conference and Exposition on Structural Dynamics 2022, Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series, vol. 3, 150 pp, pp. 111–123. Springer (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04090-0_13
Mottershead, J.E., Mares, C., Friswell, M.I., James, S.: Selection and updating of parameters for an aluminum space-frame model. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 14(6), 923–944 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1006/mssp.2000.1303
Kyprianou, A., Mottershead, J.E.: Uncertain systems: modelling and updating. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Congress on Sound and Vibration (ICSV 2011), July 10–14, 2011, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, pp. 995–1002 (2011)
Banhart, J.: Manufacturing routes for metallic foams. J. Miner. Met. Mater. Soc. 52(12), 22–27 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-000-0062-8
Bonisoli, E., Delprete, C., Rosso, C.: Proposal of a modal-geometrical-based master nodes selection criterion in modal analysis. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 23(3), 606–620 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2008.05.012
Ibrahim, S.R.: Existence and normalization of complex modes for post experimental use in modal analysis. In: Modal Analysis and Testing NATO Science Series (Series E: Applied Sciences), vol. 363, pp. 441–452. Springer, Dordrecht (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4503-9_21
Peeters, B., Van der Auweraer, H., Guillaume, P., Leuridan, J.: The PolyMAX frequency-domain method: a new standard for modal parameter estimation? Shock. Vib. 11, 395–409 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1155/2004/523692
Vacher, P., Jacquier, B., Bucharles, A.: Extensions of the MAC criterion to complex modes. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Noise and Vibration Engineering ISMA2010, September 20–22, 2010, Leuven, Belgium, pp. 2713–2725 (2010)
Pappa, R.S., Elliott, K.B., Schenk, A.: Consistent-mode indicator for the eigensystem realization algorithm. J. Guid. Control. Dyn. 16(5), 852–858 (1993). https://doi.org/10.2514/3.21092
Bonisoli, E., Dimauro, L., Venturini, S., Lupos: Open-source scientific computing in structural dynamics. Proceedings of the 41st IMAC, A Conference and Exposition on Structural Dynamics, Austin, TX, USA, pp. 13–16 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34946-1_23
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Prof. Lorenzo Peroni, supervisor of Politecnico di Torino Racing Team called 2WheelsPoliTO, for the material and the constant support provided as well as for the opportunity to involve the authors in interesting works regarding motorcycle dynamics.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bonisoli, E., Dimauro, L., Venturini, S., Peroni, L. (2024). Assembling Uncertainty Effects on the Dynamic Response of Nominally Identical Motorbike Components. In: Platz, R., Flynn, G., Neal, K., Ouellette, S. (eds) Model Validation and Uncertainty Quantification, Volume 3. SEM 2023. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37003-8_32
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37003-8_32
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-37002-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-37003-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)