Go with the Flow: Personalized Task Sequencing Improves Online Language Learning

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 13916))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 3499 Accesses

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) based adaptive learning promises great improvements in personalized learning for various learning contexts. However, it is necessary to look into the effectiveness of different interventions in specific learning areas. We conducted an online-controlled experiment to compare an online learning environment for spelling to an ML based implementation of the same learning platform. The learning platform is used in schools from all types in Germany. Our study focuses on the role of different machine learning-based adaptive task sequencing interventions that are compared to the control group. We evaluated nearly 500,000 tasks using different metrics. In total almost 6,000 students from class levels 5 to 13 (ages from 11–19) participated in the experiment. Our results show that the relative number of incorrect answers significantly decreased in both intervention groups. Other factors such as dropouts or competencies reveal mixed results. Our experiment showed that personalized task sequencing can be implemented as ML based interventions and improves error rates and dropout rates in language learning for students. However, the impact depends on the specific type of task sequencing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    10.17605/OSF.IO/3R5Y7.

References

  • Chen, C.-M., Lee, H.-M., Chen, Y.-H.: Personalized e-learning system using Item Response Theory. Comput. Educ. 44(3), 237–255 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cock, J., Meier, B.:. Task sequencing and learning. In: Seel, N.M. (ed.) Springer reference. Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning: With 68 Tables, pp. 3266–3269. Springer (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_514

  • Corbalan, G., Kester, L., van Merriënboer, J.J.: Selecting learning tasks: effects of adaptation and shared control on learning efficiency and task involvement. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 33(4), 733–756 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.02.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Flow: The psychology of Optimal Experience (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • Embretson, S.E., Reise, S.P.: Item Response Theory for Psychologists. Multivariate Applications Book Series. Psychology Press (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghysels, J., Haelermans, C.: New evidence on the effect of computerized individualized practice and instruction on language skills. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 34(4), 440–449 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooshyar, D., Yousefi, M., Lim, H.: A procedural content generation-based framework for educational games: toward a tailored data-driven game for develo** early english reading skills. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 56(2), 293–310 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117706909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitrovic, A., Martin, B.: Evaluating adaptive problem selection. In: De Bra, P.M.E., Nejdl, W. (eds.) AH 2004. LNCS, vol. 3137, pp. 185–194. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-27780-4_22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Narvekar, S., Sinapov, J., Stone, P.: Autonomous task sequencing for customized curriculum design in reinforcement learning. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization (2017). https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2017/353

  • Ronimus, M., Eklund, K., Westerholm, J., Ketonen, R., Lyytinen, H.: A mobile game as a support tool for children with severe difficulties in reading and spelling. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 36(6), 1011–1025 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rzepka, N., Simbeck, K., Müller, H.‑G., Pinkwart, N.: An Online controlled experiment design to support the transformation of digital learning towards adaptive learning platforms. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Computer Supported Education. SCITEPRESS – Science and Technology Publications (2022). https://doi.org/10.5220/0010984000003182

  • Shute, V., Hansen, E., Almond, R.: Evaluating ACED: The impact of feedback and adaptivity on learning. In: Luckin, R., Koedinger, K.R., Greer, J.E. (eds.) Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 158. Artificial intelligence in Education: Building Technology Rich Learning Contexts that Work. IOS Press (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, T., Park, S.: The effect of technology-supported, student-centered instruction on seventh grade students’ learning in english/language arts. In: McBride, R., Searson, M. (eds.) SITE 2013, pp. 2431–2439. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE) (2013). https://www.learntechlib.org/p/48467/

  • Taylor, M. E., Stone, P.: Transfer learning for reinforcement learning domains: a survey (2009). https://www.jmlr.org/papers/volume10/taylor09a/taylor09a.pdf?ref=https://codemonkey.link

  • van Oostendorp, H., van der Spek, E.D., Linssen, J.: Adapting the complexity level of a serious game to the proficiency of players. EAI Endorsed Trans. Game-Based Learn. 1(2), e5 (2014). https://doi.org/10.4108/sg.1.2.e5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanbecelaere, S., van den Berghe, K., Cornillie, F., Sasanguie, D., Reynvoet, B., Depaepe, F.: The effectiveness of adaptive versus non-adaptive learning with digital educational games. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 36(4), 502–513 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, B.D.: Solving measurement problems with the Rasch model. J. Educ. Meas. 14(2), 97–116 (1977). http://www.jstor.org/stable/1434010

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nathalie Rzepka .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Rzepka, N., Simbeck, K., Müller, HG., Pinkwart, N. (2023). Go with the Flow: Personalized Task Sequencing Improves Online Language Learning. In: Wang, N., Rebolledo-Mendez, G., Matsuda, N., Santos, O.C., Dimitrova, V. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13916. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36272-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36272-9_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-36271-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-36272-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation