School Leadership in Norway: Key Characteristics and Current Challenges

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Education and Democracy in the Nordic Countries

Abstract

This chapter discusses the role and practices of Norwegian school principals in a policy context of increased monitoring and regulation and in a context of dealing with value dilemmas related to upholding a focus on democracy and inclusion. Research has shown that Norwegian school principals work under a loyalty dilemma with increasing pressure to improve student outcomes, which does not always align with other pressing local priorities or the diverse needs of students and student welfare. The chapter (first/initially) describes how the Norwegian education system is built on democratic practices and inclusion and then presents the school principal’s role and position, responsibilities and governance expectations. Moreover, the chapter builds on a sco** review of research on the school principal’s role and practices in a changing policy context. The country report is based on national policy documents and findings from current Norwegian and international research concerning leadership and policy in schools. In the concluding remarks, we state that there is a large room for manoeuvre and discretion, which means opportunities to determine how policy initiatives should be dealt with in the school context. The school principal’s role is closely connected to social influence and relational bargaining as a strategy to promote social justice and student well-being, as well as the school’s academic results. The school principal’s discretionary role in promoting social justice and relational bargaining contributes to the knowledge relevant to the notion of a Nordic model of school leadership.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 117.69
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
EUR 160.49
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/stmeld-nr-030-2003-2004-/id404433/

  2. 2.

    https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/806ed8f81bef4e03bccd67d16af76979/no/pdfs/stm200720080031000dddpdfs.pdf

  3. 3.

    https://www.udir.no/tall-og-forskning/evaluering-av-kunnskapsloftet/

  4. 4.

    https://www.udir.no/tall-og-forskning/finn-forskning/rapporter/Evaluering-av-Nasjonalt-kvalitetsutviklingssystem/

  5. 5.

    https://www.udir.no/lk20/overordnet-del/3.-prinsipper-for-skolens-praksis/3.5-profesjonsfellesskap-og-skoleutvikling/?lang=nob

References

  • Aas, M., & Skedsmo, G. (2014). Kollektiv kunnskapsbygging og profesjonalisering av. lederteam. [Collective knowledge building and professionalisation of leader teams]. In E. Elstad & K. Helstad (Eds.), Profesjonsutvikling i skolen [Professional development in school] (pp. 278–291). Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aas, M., & Törnsen, M. (2016). Examining Norwegian and Swedish leadership training programs in light of international research. Nordic Studies in Education, 36(2), 173–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aasen, P., Prøitz, T. S., & Sandberg, N. (2014). Knowledge regimes and contradictions in education reforms. Educational Policy, 28(5), 718–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrahamsen, H. (2018). Redesigning the role of deputy heads in Norwegian schools–tensions between control and autonomy? International Journal of Leadership in Education, 21(3), 327–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrahamsen, H., & Aas, M. (2016). School leadership for the future: Heroic or distributed? Translating international discourses in Norwegian policy documents. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 48(1), 68–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. J., Junemann, C., & Santori, D. (2017). Edu. net: Globalisation and education policy mobility. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blossing, U., Imsen, G., & Moos, L. (2014). The Nordic education model. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Camphuijsen, M. K. (2021). Co** with performance expectations: Towards a deeper understanding of variation in school principals’ responses to accountability demands. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 33(3), 427–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camphuijsen, M., Møller, J. & Skedsmo, G. (2020). Test-based accountability in the Norwegian context: exploring drivers, expectations, and strategies. Journal of Educational Policy. Published online 11 March. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2020.1739337

  • Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2011). Democracy and administrative policy: Contrasting elements of new public management (NPM) and post-NPM. European Political Science Review, 3(1), 125–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunnulfsen, A. E. (2017). School leaders’ and teachers’ work with national test results: Lost in translation? Journal of Educational Change, 18(4), 495–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunnulfsen, A., & Larsen, E. (2021). The Norwegian case of school reform, external quality control, and the call for democratic practice. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. Retrieved 24 Jan. 2023, from https://oxfordre.com/education/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.001.0001/acrefore-9780190264093-e-1680.

  • Gunnulfsen, A. E., & Møller, J. (2017). National testing: Gains or strains? School leaders’ responses to policy demands. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 16(3), 455–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helstad, K., & Møller, J. (2013). Leadership as relational work: Risks and opportunities. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 16(3), 245–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopmann, S. T. (2008). No child, no school, no state left behind: Schooling in the age of accountability. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40(4), 417–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imsen, G., Blossing, U., & Moos, L. (2017). Resha** the Nordic education model in an era of efficiency. Changes in the comprehensive school project in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden since the millennium. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 61(5), 568–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, E. S. (2011). Et skolelederperspektiv på tilpasset opplæring [A school leader perspectrive on differentiated education]. Høgskolen i Sogn og Fjordane, Norsk Pedagogisk Tidsskrift nr. 3/2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karseth, B., Kvamme, O. A., & Ottesen, E. (2020). Fagfornyelsens læreplanverk: Politiske intensjoner, arbeidsprosesser og innhold [The subject renewal: Political intentions, working processes and content]. Det utdanningsvitenskapelige fakultet [Faculty of Educational Sciences], University of Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, E. & Mathé, N. E. (2023). Teachers’ perceptions of their schools’ democratic character. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 67(2), 327–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2021.2021437

  • Lysø, I. H., Stensaker, B., Aamodt, P. O., & Mjøen, K. (2011). Ledet til ledelse: Nasjonal rektorutdanning i et internasjonalt perspektiv. [Lead to leadership: National principal preparation in an international perspective). Delrapport 1 fra Evaluering av den nasjonale rektorutdanningen. NIFU. Report 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maroy, C. (2015). Comparing accountability policy tools and rationales. In H. G. Kotthoff & E. Klerides (Eds.), Governing educational spaces (pp. 35–56). SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-265-3_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mausethagen, S. (2013). Accountable for what and to whom? Changing representations and new legitimation discourses among teachers under increased external control. Journal of Educational Change, 14(4), 423–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mausethagen, S., Prøitz, T., & Skedsmo, G. (2018). Teachers’ use of knowledge sources in ‘result meetings’: Thin data and thick data use. Teachers and Teaching, 24(1), 37–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mausethagen, S., Prøitz, T., & Skedsmo, G. (2020). Data Use in Recent School Reforms. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. Retrieved 24 Jan. 2023, from https://oxfordre.com/education/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.001.0001/acrefore-9780190264093-e-853

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education and Research. (2007). White Paper No. 31 (2007–2008). Kvalitet i skolen [Quality in school].

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education and Research. (2015). White Paper No. 28 (2015–2016). Fag – Fordypning – Forståelse — En fornyelse av Kunnskapsløftet. (Subjects – Specialization – Comprehension. A renewal of the knowledge promotion).

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller, J. (2009). School leadership in an age of accountability: Tensions between managerial and professional accountability. Journal of Educational Change, 10(1), 37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Møller, J. (2011). Promoting equity and social justice: A task too heavy for individual school principals? Counterpoints, 409, 279–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller, J. (2012). The construction of a public face as a school principal. International Journal of Educational Management, 26(5), 452–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller, J. (2016). Kvalifisering som skoleleder i en norsk kontekst: Et historisk tilbakeblikk og perspektiver på utdanning av. skoleledere. [Qualification of school leaders: A historical retroperspective on the education of school leaders]. Acta Didactica Norge, 10(4), 7–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Møller, J., & Skedsmo, G. (2013). Modernising education: New public management reform in the Norwegian education system. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 45(4), 336–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2008). Improving school leadership: Policy and practice. OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ottesen, E. (2016). Et kunnskapsgrunnlag for skoleledelse. [A knowledge base for school leadership]. Acta Didactica Norge, 10(4), 69–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prøitz, T., Mausethagen, S., & Skedsmo, G. (2019). District Administrators’ Governing Styles in the Enactment of Data Use Practices. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 24(2), 244–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2018.1562097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seland, I., Olsen, M. S., Solem, A., Lysø, I. H., Aamodt, P. O., & Røsdal, T. (2012). Spørsmål om tid. En studie av arbeidsbetingelser og tidsbruk for ledere av skoler og sykehjem [A question of time. A study of work conditions and time use for leaders in schools and nursing homes]. NIFU Rapport 18/2012. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skedsmo, G. (2011). Formulation and realisation of evaluation policy: Inconsistencies and problematic issues. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 23(1), 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skedsmo, G. (2018). Comparison and benchmarking as key elements in governing processes in Norwegian schools. In L. M. Carvalho, L. Levasseur, M. Liu, R. Normand, & D. A. Oliveira (Eds.), Education Policies and the Restructuring of the Educational Profession (pp. 137–158). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Skedsmo, G. & Aas, M. (2017): Selvvurdering og gruppecoaching: Nye muligheter for refleksjon og læring for skoleledere [Self-Assessment and group coaching: New opprtunities for reflection and learning for school leaders]. In: Paulsen, J.M. & Aas, M. (Eds.), Ledelse i fremtidens skole [Leadership in future schools] (pp. 333–356). Fagbokforlaget,.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skedsmo, G., & Camphuijsen, M. K. (2022). The battle for whole-child approaches: Examining the motivations, strategies and successes of a parents’ resistance movement against a performance regime in a local Norwegian school system. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 30(136). https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.30.6452

  • Skedsmo, G., & Møller, J. (2016). Governing by new performance expectations in Norwegian schools. In H. Gunter, D. Hall, R. Serpieri, & E. Grimaldi (Eds.), New public management and the reform of education (pp. 71–83). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spillane, J. P. (2012). Data in practice: Conceptualizing the data-based decision-making phenomena. American Journal of Education, 118(2), 113–141. https://doi.org/10.1086/663283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Norway. (2022). Retrieved February 16, 2022 from https://www.ssb.no/en/utdanning/grunnskoler/statistikk/elevar-i-grunnskolen

  • Telhaug, A. O., Mediås, A. O., & Aasen, P. (2006). The Nordic model in education: Education as part of the political system in the last 50 years. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50(3), 245–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiplic, D. & Elstad, E. (2021). Forhold ved skolen som påvirker skolelederens tilfredshet med jobben [School aspects that affect the school leader’s job satisfaction]. In J. K. Björnsson (Ed.), Hva kan vi lære av TALIS 2018? Gode relasjoner som grunnlag for læring [What can we learn from TALIS 2018? Good relations as a foundation for learning] (Kap. 2, pp. 21–33). Cappelen Damm Akademisk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tjeldvoll, A., Wales, C., & Welle-Strand, A. (2005). School leadership training under globalisation: Comparisons of the UK, the US and Norway. Managing Global Transitions, 3(1), 23–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verger, A., Parcerisa, L., & Fontdevila, C. (2019). The growth and spread of large-scale assessments and test-based accountabilities: A political sociology of global education reforms. Educational Review, 71(1), 5–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vibe, N. (2010). Spørsmål til Skole-Norge høsten 2010. Resultater og analyser fra Utdanningsdirektoratets spørreundersøkelse blant skoler og skoleeiere [Questions to the schools in Norway 2010. Results and analysis from the survey of Directorate of Education and Training, to schools and municipal school authorities]. NIFU STEP Rapport 40/2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vibe, N., Aamodt, P. O., & Carlsten, T. C. (2009). Å være ungdomsskolelærer i Norge. Resultater fra OECDs internasjonale studie av undervisning og læring [Being a lower secondary teacher in Norway. Results from OECD’s study of teaching and learning]. NIFU STEP Rapport 23/2009.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guri Skedsmo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gunnulfsen, A.E., Skedsmo, G. (2023). School Leadership in Norway: Key Characteristics and Current Challenges. In: Gunnulfsen, A.E., Ärlestig, H., Storgaard, M. (eds) Education and Democracy in the Nordic Countries. Educational Governance Research, vol 21. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-33195-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-33195-4_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-33194-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-33195-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation