Crowdsourcing a Moral Machine in a Pluralistic World

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Rethinking Technology and Engineering

Part of the book series: Philosophy of Engineering and Technology ((POET,volume 45))

  • 250 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter explores the propriety of incorporating crowdsourced public input when programming morally contentious decisions to be made by automated vehicles (AVs). The chapter argues that moral values are necessarily pluralistic and require diverse action plans based on mutual interpretability among moral agents within a particular (relative) perspective. Thus, for a machine to be understood as acting morally requires that it be interpreted as acting morally from within that perspective. This calls for programming context-dependent AV behaviors, rather than a uniform, ‘global’ standard. Using as a test case crowdsourced responses to the MIT Media Lab’s Moral Machine Experiment (MME), the chapter locates some potentially diverse and morally contentious AV behaviors, evaluates the relevance and feasibility of such crowdsourced responses, and explores some potential ways to incorporate these responses into public deliberations on moral AV behavior, including Value Sensitive Design and Participatory Technology Assessment. The diverse results of the MME, including identifiable pluralism among countries and regions, can serve as a useful preliminary input into these more comprehensive methods for understanding relevant moral contexts of AV behaviors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 117.69
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
EUR 149.79
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Western cluster includes North America and much of Europe. The Eastern cluster includes much of the “far east,” as well as the Islamic countries of Asia. The Southern cluster includes the Latin American countries of Central and South America, as well as France and French-influenced nations in North Africa (Awad et al., 2018).

References

  • Appiah, K. A. (2008). Experiments in ethics. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Awad, E. (2017). Moral machine: Perception of moral judgment made by machines [M.S. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology].

    Google Scholar 

  • Awad, E., Dsouza, S., Kim, R., Schulz, J., Henrich, J., Shariff, A., Bonnefon, J.-F., & Rahwan, I. (2018). The moral machine experiment. Nature, 563, 59–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Awad, E., Dsouza, S., Bonnefon, J.-F., Shariff, A., & Rahwan, I. (2020). Crowdsourcing moral machines. Communications of the ACM, 63(3), 48–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durán, J., & Pirtle, Z. (2020). Epistemic standards for participatory technology assessment: Suggestions based upon well-ordered science. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(3), 1709–1741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gogoll, J., & Müller, J. F. (2017). Autonomous cars: In favor of a mandatory ethics setting. Science and Engineering Ethics, 23(3), 681–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gold, N., Colman, A., & Pulford, B. D. (2014). Cultural differences in responses to real-life and hypothetical trolley problems. Judgment and Decision making, 9(1), 65–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Himmelreich, J. (2018). Never mind the trolley: The ethics of autonomous vehicles in mundane situations. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 21(3), 669–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kain, P. J. (1990). Rousseau, the general will, and individual liberty. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 7, 315–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lester, C. (2019, January 24). A study on driverless-car ethics offers a troubling look into our values. The New Yorker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luetge, C. (2017). The German ethics code for automated and connected driving. Philosophy and Technology, 30(4), 547–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nature Video. (2018). Moral machines: How culture changes values. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jPo6bby-Fcg

  • Rahwan, I. (2018). Society-in-the-loop: Programming the algorithmic social contract. Ethics and Information Technology, 20(1), 5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, S. (2019). A misdirected principle with a catch: Explicability for AI. Minds and Machines, 29(4), 495–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Umbrello, S., & van de Poel, I. (2021). Map** value sensitive design onto AI for social good principles. AI and Ethics, 1(3), 283–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Umbrello, S., & Yampolskiy, R. V. (2022). Designing AI for explainability and verifiability: A value sensitive design approach to avoid artificial stupidity in autonomous vehicles. International Journal of Social Robotics, 14(2), 313–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velleman, J. D. (2015). Foundations for moral relativism (2nd expanded ed.). Open Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbeek, P.-P. (2011). Moralizing technology: Understanding and designing the morality of things. University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Firenze .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Firenze, P. (2023). Crowdsourcing a Moral Machine in a Pluralistic World. In: Fritzsche, A., Santa-María, A. (eds) Rethinking Technology and Engineering. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol 45. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25233-4_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation