Abstract
The recent infusion of digital platforms into different aspects of innovation and entrepreneurship has supported digital entrepreneurship; however, the altered entrepreneurial processes are yet to be explored. This chapter aims to explore the role of digital platforms as external enablers in the entrepreneurial processes. It focuses on digital platform-based startups of Pakistan and draws on entrepreneurial bricolage theory to understand the enabling external resources. The authors followed multiple qualitative case study approach and collected data through semi-structured interviews from six startups operating solely on digital platforms, 1) XYLEXA, 2) Toycycle, 3) PaakHealth, 4) DadaJee.com, 5) Qurbani App and 6) PriceOye. The findings show that entrepreneurial process is a continuous process. Digital platforms have made entrepreneurial processes less bounded i.e., the products and services keep on evolving even after they have been endorsed to the end user. Moreover, platform-based startups having limited resources can pass through the entire entrepreneurial process by combining available resources efficiently and effectively. Entrepreneurial bricolage helps as a catalyst in successfully develo** and exploiting the opportunity with existing resources.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Armstrong, M.: Competition in two-sided markets. RAND J. Econ. 37(3), 668–691 (2006)
Baker, T., Nelson, R.: Creating something from nothing: resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Adm. Sci. Q. 50(3), 329–366 (2005)
Baron, R.A.: Opportunity recognition as pattern recognition: how entrepreneurs connect the dots to identify new business opportunities. Acad. Manag. Perspect. 20(1), 104–119 (2006)
Boudreau, K., Lakhani, K.: How to manage outside innovation: competitive markets or collaborative communities? MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 50, 69–75 (2009)
Cennamo, C., Santalo, S.: Platform competition: strategic trade-offs in platform markets. Strategic Manag. J. 34(11), 1331–1350 (2013)
Cusumano, M.A., Gawer, A., Yoffie, D.B.: The Business of Platforms: Strategy in the Age of Digital Competition, Innovation and Power. Harper Business, New York (2019)
Davidsson, P.: Entrepreneurial opportunities and the entrepreneurship nexus: a re-conceptualization. J. Bus. Ventur. 30(5), 674–695 (2015)
de Reuver, M., Sørensen, C., Basole, R.C.: The digital platform: a research agenda. J. Inf. Technol. 33, 124–135 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41265-016-0033-3
Desa, G., Basu, S.: Optimization or bricolage? Overcoming resource constraints in global social entrepreneurship. Strateg. Entrepreneurship J. 7(1), 26–49 (2013)
Di Domenico, M., Haugh, H., Tracey, P.: Social bricolage: theorizing social value creation in social enterprises. Entrepreneurship Theory Pract. 34(4), 681–703 (2010)
Du, W., Pan, S., Zhou, N., Ouyang, T.: From a marketplace of electronics to a digital entrepreneurial ecosystem (DEE): the emergence of a meta-organization in Zhongguancun, China. Inf. Syst. J. 28(6), 158–1175 (2017)
Evans, D., Schmalensee, R.: Markets with two-sided platforms. Issues Competition Law Policy 20, 667–693 (2008)
Fan, W.S., Huang, K.C., Chiang, P.Y.: An empirical application of entrepreneurial bricolage theory to resource integration using data from small and medium-sized enterprises in Taiwan. Int. J. Bus. Soc. Sci. 10(7), 65–77 (2019)
Garud, R., Karnoe, P.: Bricolage versus breakthrough: distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Res. Policy 32(2), 277–300 (2003)
Garud, R., Giuliani, A.: A narrative perspective on entrepreneurial opportunities. Acad. Manag. Rev. 38(1), 157–160 (2013)
Gregoire, D.A., Shepherd, D.A.: Technology market combinations and the identification of entrepreneurial opportunities. Acad. Manag. J., 753–758 (2012)
Guo, H., Su, Z., Ahlstrom, D.: Business model innovation: The effects of exploratory orientation, opportunity recognition, and entrepreneurial bricolage in an emerging economy. Asia Pacific J. Manag. 33(2), 533–549 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-015-9428-x
Gustafsson, J.: Single Case Studies vs. Multiple Case Studies: A Comparative Study, pp. 1–15 (2017)
Hsiao, R., Ou, S., Chen, H.: Innovating under disadvantages: bricolage behaviors in Van Gogh art curation. Sun Yat-Sen Manag. Rev. 22(2), 323–367 (2014)
Hsiao, R., Ou, S., Su, Y.: Inversing the powerful: process of resource construction through bricolage. NTU Manag. Rev. 27(4), 1–32 (2017)
Hsiao, R., Ou, S., Wu, Y.: Making-do within adversity: resource constraints as a source of innovation. Sun Yat-Sen Manag. Rev. 25(1), 219–268 (2017)
Jeff, V., Winkel, D., Malewicki, D., Dougan, W.L., Bronson, J.: Varieties of bricolage and the process of entrepreneurship. New Engl. J. Entrepreneurship 53–66 (2011)
Kenney, M., Zysman, J.: Choosing a Future in the Platform Economy: The Implications and Consequences of Digital Platforms. Kauffman Foundation New Entrepreneurial Growth Conference, pp. 1–23. Florida (2015)
Kiss, A.N., Danis, W.M., Cavusgil, S.T.: International entrepreneurship research in emerging economies: a critical review and research agenda. J. Bus. Ventur. 27(2), 266–290 (2012)
Koskinen, K., Bonina, C., Eaton, B., Gawer, A.: Digital platforms for development: foundations and research agenda. Inf. Syst. J. 31(6), 869–902 (2021)
Mainela, T., Puhakka, V., Servais, P.: The concept of international opportunity in international entrepreneurship: a review and research agenda. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 16(1), 105–129 (2014)
Markus, L.M., Loebbecke, C.: Commoditized digital processes and business community platforms: new opportunities and challenges for digital business strategies. MIS Q. 37(2), 649–653 (2013)
Martin, K., Todorov, I.: How will digital platforms be harnessed in 2020, and how will they change the way people interact with brands? J. Interact. Advert. 10(2), 61–66 (2013)
McIntyre, D., Srinivasan, A.: Networks, platforms and strategy: emerging views and next steps. Strateg. Manag. J. 38(1), 141–160 (2017)
McKelvie, A.H.: Unpacking the uncertainty construct: implications for entrepreneurial action. J. Bus. Ventur. 26(3), 273–292 (2011)
Nambisan, S.: Digital entrepreneurship: toward a digital technology perspective of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory Pract. 41(6), 1029–1055 (2016)
Nambisan, S., Sawhney, M.: Orchestration processes in network-centric innovation: evidence from the field. Acad. Manag. Perspect. 25(3), 40–57 (2011)
Phillips, N., Tracey, P.: Opportunity recognition, entrepreneurial capabilities and bricolage: connecting institutional theory and entrepreneurship in strategic organization. Strateg. Organ. 5(3), 313–320 (2007)
De Reuver, M., Sorensen, C., Basole, R.C.: The digital platform: a research agenda. J. Inf. Technol. 33(2), 124–135 (2018)
Ries, E.: The Lean Startup: How Today’s Entrepreneurs Use Continuous Innovation to Create Radically Successful Businesses. Crown Publishing, New York (2011)
Santarelli, E., D’Altri, S.: The diffusion of e-commerce among SMEs: theoretical implications and empirical evidence. Small Bus. Econ. 21, 273–283 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025757601345
Sarasvathy, S.D., Dew, N.: New market creation through transformation. J. Evol. Econ. 15, 533–565 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-005-0264-x
Saunders, M., Lewis, P., Thornhill, A.: Research Methods for Business Students. Pearson Education Limited, Essex (2016)
Shane, S., Venkatraman, N.: The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Acad. Manag. Rev. 25(1), 217–226 (2000)
Shane, S.: Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organ. Sci. 11(4), 448–469 (2000)
Shen, K., Lindsay, V., Yunjie, X.: Special issue on: digital entrepreneurship. Inf. Syst. J. (2015)
Shepherd, D., Williams, T., Patzelt, H.: Thinking about entrepreneurial decision making: review and research agenda. J. Manag. 41(1), 11–46 (2015)
Short, J., Ketchen, D., Shook, C., Ireland, R.: The concept of “opportunity” in entrepreneurship research: past accomplishments and future challenges. J. Manag. 36(1), 40–65 (2010)
Srinivasan, A., Venkatraman, N.: Entrepreneurship in digital platforms: a network-centric view. Strateg. Entrepreneurship J. 12(1), 54–71 (2018)
Steininger, D.M.: Linking information systems and entrepreneurship: a review and agenda for IT-associated and digital entrepreneurship research. Inf. Syst. J. 29(2), 363–407 (2019)
Tindiwensi, C., Munene, J.C., Abaho, E., Serwanga, A., Dawa, R.: Farm management skills, entrepreneurial bricolage and market orientation. J. Agribus. Dev. Emerg. Econ. 10(5), 717–730 (2020)
Tiwana, K.A., Bush, A.A.: Platform evolution: coevolution of platform architecture, governance and environmental dynamics. Inf. Syst. Res. 21(4), 675–687 (2010)
Van de Kaa, G., Van den Ende, J., de Vries, H.J., Van Heck, E.: Factors for winning interface format battles: a review and synthesis of the literature. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 78(8), 1397–1411 (2011)
Venkatraman, N., Lee, C.: Preferential linkage and network evolution: a conceptual model and empirical test in the US videogame sector. Acad. Manag. J. 47(6), 876–892 (2004)
von Briel, F., Davidsson, P., Recker, J.: Digital Technologies as external enablers of new venture creation in the IT hardware sector. Entrepreneurship Theory Pract. 42(1), 47–69 (2018)
William, L., Bronson, J., Winkel, D., Malewicki, D.: Varieties of bricolage and the process of entrepreneurship. New Engl. J. Entrepreneurship 53–66 (2011)
Yu, X., Li, Y., Chen, D.Q., Meng, X., Tao, X.: Entrepreneurial bricolage and online store performance in emerging economies. Electron. Mark. 29, 1–19 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-018-0302-9
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nassar, H., Malik, F. (2022). Role of Digital Platforms in Entrepreneurial Processes: The Resource Enabling Perspective of Startups in Pakistan. In: Abdelnour-Nocera, J., Makori, E.O., Robles-Flores, J.A., Bitso, C. (eds) Innovation Practices for Digital Transformation in the Global South. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 645. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12825-7_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12825-7_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-12824-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-12825-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)