Abstract
Politics are the elephant in the room of heritage and landscape studies. Since the nineteenth century, heritage management has been seen as a national task. The sha** of national identities has been a part of agendas for preservation. In wartime, destruction of heritage is often part of cruel efforts to weaken opponents. The World Heritage List shows the tension between global intentions and national aims. Landscape and heritage can be used to exclude groups, but at the same time, they also have the potential to be inclusive.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The expression refers to some a problem or controversial issue that’s obviously present but which everyone ignores or avoids mentioning, usually because it’s politically or socially embarrassing. http://www.worldwidewords.org/qa/qa-ele2.htm [accessed 28 February 2021].
- 2.
In fact, Willemstad was originally listed for the Netherlands Antilles, but when this country was dissolved in 2010, Curaçao decided to become an independent nation within the Kingdom of the Netherlands.
- 3.
References
Bevan, R. (2006). The destruction of memory: Architecture at war. Reaktion.
Fairclough, G., & Rippon, S. (2002). Europe’s cultural landscape: Archaeologists and the management of change (EAC Occasional Paper 2). Europae Archaeologiae Consilium.
Fowler, C. (2020). Green unpleasant land: Creative responses to rural England’s colonial connections. Peepal Tree.
Haghnazarian, A., & Wickmann, D. (2003/2008). Azerbaijan. Destruction of the Armenian Cemetery at Djulfa. In D. Bumbaru, S. Burke, J. Harrington, M. Petzet, & J. Ziesemer (Eds.), Heritage at risk: ICOMOS World Report 2002/2003 on monuments and sites in danger (pp. 44–47). Saur.
Hislop Brown, A. (2003). Landscape: Icon of Scottish national identity [MA thesis]. Simon Fraser University.
Legnér, M. (2018). Post-conflict reconstruction and the heritage process. Journal of Architectural Conservation, 24(2), 78–90.
Meskell, L. (2018). A future in ruins: UNESCO, World Heritage, and the dream of peace. Oxford University Press.
Mostert, E. (2020). Water and national identity in the Netherlands: The history of an idea. Water History, 12(3), 311–329.
Olwig, K. R. (2007). The practice of landscape ‘conventions’ and the just landscape: The case of the European Landscape Convention. Landscape Research, 32(5), 579–594.
Parveen, N. (2020, December 2). The BAME women making the outdoors more inclusive. The Guardian.
Ronnes, H. (2006). Architecture and élite culture in the United Provinces, England and Ireland, 1500–1700. Amsterdam University Press/Pallas.
Rössler, M. (2006). World Heritage cultural landscapes: A UNESCO flagship programme 1992–2006. Landscape Research, 31(4), 333–353.
Ruser, N., Leibold, J., Munro, K., & Hoja, T. (2020). Cultural erasure: Tracing the destruction of Uyghur and Islamic spaces in **njiang. Australian Strategic Policy Institute (Policy Brief/Report 38/2020).
Sharp, J. P. (2009). Geographies of postcolonialism: Spaces of power and representation.
Smith, L. (2006). Uses of heritage. Routledge.
Tiemeijer, W. (2021). Project Nederland. Van feitelijke naar gewenste nationale identiteit. Wetenschappelijke Raad voor het Regeringsbeleid.
Watenpaugh, H. Z. (2014). Preserving the medieval city of Ani: Cultural heritage between contest and reconciliation. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, 73(4), 528–555.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Renes, H. (2022). Concluding Remarks. In: Landscape, Heritage and National Identity in Modern Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09536-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09536-8_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-09535-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-09536-8
eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)