Abstract
Thanks to the axiomatic of ‘social emergence’, mainstream sociology takes it for granted that normative social orders result from social action. This assumption is substantially challenged by the current legitimation crisis of societies. Accelerating qualitative societal differentiation compels social actors to enforce multiple competing social structuration processes. The creativity of social action is thus called upon to deliver ever new adaptation performances in a context of passive social structuration. Asymmetric social consensus substitutes actively advocated social orders founded on processes of democratic legitimation. The analysis of the micro-sociological limits of institutionalisation as well as of the anthropological limits of validity assists in pointing out the shortcomings of normative structuration processes in complex societies. The chapter thus shows how shifting legitimacy reaches its breaking point.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Literature
Durkheim, Émile (1893). De la division du travail social. Étude sur l’organisation des sociétés supérieures, Paris: Alcan. English: Durkheim, Émile (2014). The Division of Labor in Society. New York: Free Press.
Fitzi, Gregor (2004). Max Webers politisches Denken. Konstanz: UVK-UTB.
——— (2015). Grenzen des Konsenses. Rekonstruktion einer Theorie transnormativer Vergesellschaftung. Weilerswist: Velbrück Wissenschaft.
——— (2019a). The Challenge of Modernity. Simmel’s Sociological Theory. Abingdon-New York: Routledge.
——— (2019b). Max Weber’s Concept of ‘Modern Politics’. In: Max Weber’s ‘The Profession and Vocation of Politics’. Ed. by Gregor Fitzi and Bryan S. Turner. Special Issue of the Journal of Classical Sociology, 4/2019, 361–376.
Gehlen, Arnold (1988). Man, his Nature and Place in the World. New York: Columbia University Press.
Glauser, Andrea et al. (2021). The Sociology of Arts and Markets: New Developments and Persistent Patterns. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Habermas, Jürgen (1987). The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity. Twelve Lectures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lockwood, David (1964). ‘Social Integration and System Integration’. In: Explorations in Social Change. Ed. by George K. Zollschan and Walter Hirsch. London, 244–257.
Luhmann, Niklas (1972). Rechtssoziologie (19873). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Marcuse, Herbert (1965). ‘Über die philosophischen Grundlagen des wirtschaftswissenschaftlichen Arbeitsbegriffs’. In: Id. Kultur und Gesellschaft, vol. 2. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, pp. 7–48.
Orsello Montanari, Franca (1971). La teoria del Consensus in Augusto Comte. Padova: Marsilio.
Park, Robert E. (1960). Human Migration and the Marginal Man. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill, College Division.
——— (2005). Race and Culture. London: Routledge.
Parsons, Talcott (1968). ‘On the Concept of Value-Commitments’. Sociological Inquiry, 38, 135–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1968.tb00679.x
Parsons, Talcott, and Shils, Edward A. (Eds.) (1951). Toward a General Theory of Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Plessner, Helmuth (1981–1985). Gesammelte Schriften. Ed. by Günther Dux, Odo Marquard und Elisabeth Ströker unter Mitwirkung v. Richard W. Schmidt, Angelika Wetterer und Michael-Joachim Zemlin, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.
——— (1999). The limits of Community: A Critique of Social Radicalism. New York: Humanity Books.
——— (2019). Levels of Organic Life and the Human. An Introduction to Philosophical Anthropology. New York: Fordham University Press.
Rawls, John (1987). ‘The Idea of an Overlap** Consensus’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 7(1), S.1–25.
Schutz, Alfred (1973–1976). Collected Papers: 1. The Problem of Social Reality. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Simmel, Georg (1908). Soziologie. Untersuchungen über die Formen der Vergesellschaftung. Now in: Id. (1992), GSG 11, ed. by Otthein Rammstedt, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.
Weber, Max (1994). Political Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
——— (2012). Collected Methodological Writings. Ed. by Hans Henrik Bruns and Sam Whimster. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fitzi, G. (2022). Shifting Legitimacy: The Theoretical Issue of Social Validity. In: Normative Intermittency. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06174-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06174-5_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-06173-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-06174-5
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)