Hardness and Algorithms for Electoral Manipulation Under Media Influence

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Frontiers of Algorithmics (IJTCS-FAW 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 12874))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 294 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper, we study a generalization of the classic bribery problem known as electoral manipulation under media influence (EMMI). This model is motivated by modern political campaigns where candidates try to convince voters through advertising in media (TV, newspaper, Internet). When compared with the classical bribery problem, the attacker in this setting cannot directly change opinions of individual voters, but instead can execute influences via a set of manipulation strategies (e.g., advertising on a TV channel). Different manipulation strategies incur different costs and influence different subsets of voters. Once receiving a significant amount of influence, a voter will change opinion. To characterize the opinion change of each voter, we adopt the well-accepted threshold model. We prove the NP-hardness of the EMMI problem and give a dynamic programming algorithm that runs in polynomial time for a restricted case of the EMMI problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brandt, F., Conitzer, V., Endriss, U., Lang, J., Procaccia, A.D.: Handbook of Computational Social Choice. Cambridge University Press, New York (2016)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Bredereck, R., Chen, J., Faliszewski, P., Nichterlein, A., Niedermeier, R.: Prices matter for the parameterized complexity of shift bribery. Inf. Comput. 251, 140–164 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Bredereck, R., Faliszewski, P., Niedermeier, R., Talmon, N.: Complexity of shift bribery in committee elections. In: Proceedings of the 30th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 2452–2458 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brelsford, E., Faliszewski, P., Hemaspaandra, E., Schnoor, H., Schnoor, I.: Approximability of manipulating elections. In: Proceedings of the 23rd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 1, pp. 44–49 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Castiglioni, M., Ferraioli, D., Gatti, N.: Election control in social networks via edge addition or removal. In: Proceedings of the 34th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 34, pp. 1878–1885 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chekuri, C., Clarkson, K.L., Har-Peled, S.: On the set multicover problem in geometric settings. ACM Trans. Algorithms 9(1), 1–17 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, L., et al.: Protecting election from bribery: new approach and computational complexity characterization. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 1894–1896 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Corò, F., Cruciani, E., D’Angelo, G., Ponziani, S.: Vote for me! Election control via social influence in arbitrary scoring rule voting systems. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 1895–1897 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Elkind, E., Faliszewski, P.: Approximation algorithms for campaign management. In: Internet and Network Economics, pp. 473–482 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Elkind, E., Faliszewski, P., Slinko, A.: Swap bribery. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Algorithmic Game Theory, pp. 299–310 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Faliszewski, P., Gonen, R., Kouteckỳ, M., Talmon, N.: Opinion diffusion and campaigning on society graphs. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 219–225 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Faliszewski, P., Hemaspaandra, E., Hemaspaandra, L.A.: How hard is bribery in elections? J. Artif. Intell. Res. 35, 485–532 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Faliszewski, P., Hemaspaandra, E., Hemaspaandra, L.A.: Multimode control attacks on elections. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 40, 305–351 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Faliszewski, P., Reisch, Y., Rothe, J., Schend, L.: Complexity of manipulation, bribery, and campaign management in bucklin and fallback voting. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 1357–1358 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fowler, E.F., Franz, M., Ridout, T.N.: The big lessons of political advertising in 2018. The Conversation (2018). http://theconversation.com/the-big-lessons-of-political-advertising-in-2018-107673. Accessed 3 Dec

  16. Guo, J., Niedermeier, R.: Exact algorithms and applications for tree-like weighted set cover. J. Discrete Algorithms 4(4), 608–622 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Hua, Q.S., Yu, D., Lau, F.C., Wang, Y.: Exact algorithms for set multicover and multiset multicover problems. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation, pp. 34–44 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lin, B.: The parameterized complexity of k-biclique. In: Proceedings of the 26th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pp. 605–615 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mehrizi, M.A., D’Angelo, G.: Multi-winner election control via social influence: hardness and algorithms for restricted cases. Algorithms 13(10), 251 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Parkes, D.C., **a, L.: A complexity-of-strategic-behavior comparison between Schulze’s rule and ranked pairs. In: Proceedings of the 26th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1429–1435 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Van Bevern, R., Chen, J., Hüffner, F., Kratsch, S., Talmon, N., Woeginger, G.J.: Approximability and parameterized complexity of multicover by c-intervals. Inf. Process. Lett. 115(10), 744–749 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Wilder, B., Vorobeychik, Y.: Controlling elections through social influence. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 265–273 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  23. **a, L.: Computing the margin of victory for various voting rules. In: Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, pp. 982–999 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This material is based upon work supported by the “New Generation of AI 2030” major project (2018AAA0100902) and the National Science Foundation under grant no. 1433817.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Tao, L. et al. (2022). Hardness and Algorithms for Electoral Manipulation Under Media Influence. In: Chen, J., Li, M., Zhang, G. (eds) Frontiers of Algorithmics. IJTCS-FAW 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12874. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97099-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97099-4_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-97098-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-97099-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation