Abstract
Automated decision-making is prevalent in numerous areas of the public sector. Based on the results of a qualitative, event-based study of how robotic process automation (RPA) is discussed and implemented in social work in Sweden, two questions are answered in this paper: What actors, intentions and network formations appear in the dissemination of RPA in the management of applications for social assistance in Sweden? What are the key, sometimes conflicting, intentions from a social work and a general public sector perspective? A spectrum of national, municipal and local actors—including technologies such as e-applications and RPA—are actively involved in the dissemination. A few important intentions are, for example, promoting the use of RPA, saving time and resources and answering the issue of ‘why’ RPA should be implemented. From a social work perspective, a key consideration and conflict relates to the core of social work, especially regarding the intention of hel** people to become self-supporting. The more general considerations are related to intentions about implementing RPA to improve efficiency and effectiveness, as well as caseworkers’ discretion in view of laws regulating automated decision-making. Future research should focus on the actual effects of RPA on efficiency and effectiveness and caseworkers’ discretion in view of new laws and longer experiences with RPA.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Asatiani, A., Penttinen, E., Rinta-Kahila, T., & Salovaara, A. (2019). Implementation of automation as distributed cognition in knowledge work organizations: Six recommendations for managers. In Proceedings of international conference on information systems. Association for Information Systems.
Ballantyne, N. (2015). Human service technology and the theory of the Actor-Network. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 33(1), 104–117.
Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen in St Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge (pp. 196–233). Routledge.
Cho, S., Mathiassen, L., & Nilsson, A. (2008). Contextual dynamics during health information systems implementation: An event-based actor-network approach. European Journal of Information System, 17, 614–630.
Coles-Kemp, L., Ashenden, D., Morris, A., & Yuille, J. (2020). Digital welfare: Designing for more nuanced forms of access. Policy Design and Practice, 3(2), 177–188.
Cordella, A., & Hesse, J. (2015). E-government in the making: An actor network perspective. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 9(1), 104–125.
Czarniawska, B., & Joerges, B. (1996). Travel of ideas. In B. Czarniawska & G. Sevon (Eds.), Translating organizational change (pp. 13–47). de Gruyter.
Devlieghere, J., Bradt, L., & Roose, R. (2017). Policy rationales for electronic information systems: An area of ambiguity. British Journal of Social Work, 47, 1500–1516.
Erkers, H., & Vinge, S. (2020). Unauthorized algorithm make decisions in social work [Obehörig algoritm fattar beslut i socialtjänsten]. Svenska Dagbladet, 18. January 2020. Akademikerförbundet SSR.
Erkers, H., & Vinge, S. (2021). There must be full transparency regarding algorithms in the public sector [Full insyn måste råda i offentliga algoritmer]. Dagens Nyheter, 26 July, 5.
Gillingham, P. (2018a). Decision-making about the adoption of information technology in social welfare agencies: Some key considerations. European Journal of Social Work, 21(4), 521–529.
Gillingham, P. (2018b). From bureaucracy to technocracy in social welfare agency: A cautionary tale. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and development. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185385.2018.1523023
Gillingham, P. (2021). Algorithmically based decision support tools: Skeptical thinking about the inclusion of previous involvement. Practice, 33(1), 37–50.
Gjersøe, H. M. (2021). Providing help or restrictions? Frontline workers´ understanding of behavioral conditionality for health-related social insurance and social assistance benefits in a joined-up governance context. European Journal of Social Work. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2021.1934412
Gustafsson, M. S., & Wihlborg, E. (2019). “It is always an individual assessment”: A case study on challenges of automation of income support services. In Lindgren I et al. (Eds.) EGOV 2019, LNCS (pp. 45–56). Springer.
Houy, C., Hamberg, M., & Fettke, P. (2019). Robotic process automation in public administration, Digitalisierung von Staat und Verwaltung. Lecture Notes in Informatics (LNI) (pp. 62–74).
Kaun, A. (2021). Suing the algorithm: The mundanization of automated decision-making in public services through litigation. Information, Communication & Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1924827
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor network-theory. Oxford University Press.
Lagsten, J., & Andersson, A. (2018). Use of information systems in social work – Challenges and an agenda for future research. European Journal of Social Work, 21(6), 850–862.
Laurent, V. (2008). ICT and social work: A question of identities? In S. Fischer-Hübner, P. Duquenoy, A. Zuccato, & L. Martucci (Eds.), The future of identity in the information (pp. 375–386). Springer.
Lindgren I, Toll D, Melin U (2021) Automation as a driver of digital transformation in local government, DG.O’21, June 09-1, ACM.
Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-level bureacracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services (30th anniversary ed.). Russel Sage Foundation.
NAV. (2021). Economic assistance [Økonomisk sosialhjelp]. Norwegian Welfare and Labour Organization. https://www.nav.no/sosialhjelp/nodsituasjon. Accessed 25 May 2021.
Persson, E. (2018). The successful Trelleborg-model causes resistance: “Too much copying” [Succémodellen i Trelleborg möter motstånd: “Man kopierar”]. Arbetsvärlden. January 12. https://www.arbetsvarlden.se/succemodellen-i-trelleborg-moter-motstand-mankopierar/. Accessed 30 September 2018.
Petersen, A. C. M., Christensen, L. R., & Hildebrandt, T. T. (2020). The role of discretion in the age of automation. Computer Supported Cooperative Work. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-020-09371-3
Ranerup, A. (2012). The socio-material pragmatics of e-governance mobilization. Government Information Quarterly, 29, 413–423.
Ranerup, A., & Henriksen, H. Z. (2019). Value positions viewed through the lens of automated decision-making: The case of social services. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101377.
Ranerup, A., & Henriksen, H. Z. (2020). Digital discretion: Unpacking human and technological agency in automated decision-making in Sweden’s social services. Social Science Computer Review, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439320980434
SALAR. (2018a). Automation in case management. Saving time to increase value (Automatiserad ärendehantering. Att frigöra tid för värdeskapande arbete). SALAR.
SALAR. (2018b). Invitation for bidding in the public procurement process regarding advanced project leadership and dissemination of experiences in the implementation of a digital co-worker in case management of social assistance [Förfrågningsunderlag. Upphandling av kvalificerade processledartjänster för erfarenhetsspridning och införandeprojekt av digital medarbetare för handläggning av ekonomiskt bistånd]. Förenklat förfarande. SALAR.
SALAR, & PwC. (2018). Project plan – Qualified process support for dissemination and implementation of a Digital Co-worker in case management in social assistance (In Swedish): Projektplan – [Kvalificerad processledartjänst för erfarenhetsspridning och införandeprojekt av digital medarbetare för handläggning av ekonomiskt bistånd]. May 2018. SALAR.
Spielcamp, M. (Ed.) (2019). Automating society. Taking stock of automated decision-making in the EU. Algorithm Watch in cooperation with Bertelsmann Stiftung, supported by the Open Society Foundations.
Svensson, L. (2019a). Automation – to benefit or ruin? [Automatisering – till nytta eller fördärv?]. Socialvetenskaplig tidskrift, 3–4, 341–362.
Svensson, L. (2019b). The technology is the simple part – Implementing digital automation in case handling in social assistance [Tekniken är den enkla biten. Om att implementera digital automatisering i handläggningen av försörjningsstöd]. University of Lund & Akademikerförbundet SSR.
The Government. (2021). A well-functioning system for elections and decision-making in municipalities and regions [En väl fungerande ordning för val och beslutsfattande i kommuner och regioner]. SOU, 2021, 16. The Government.
Trelleborg Municipality. (2015). Just continue! A way to better quality [Orka fullfölja. Det är en kvalitetsfråga.] Trelleborg Municipality.
Trelleborg Municipality. (2017a). Report 2017: First 9 months – Labor Market Board [Delårsrapport 2 2017 Arbetsmarknadsnämnden]. Trelleborg Municipality.
Trelleborg Municipality. (2017b). The Trelleborg Model. Automation frees humans to meet other people! Newsletter, December 5, 2017. [Trelleborgsmodellen. Med automatisering frigörs resurser för det mänskliga mötet]. Trelleborg Municipality.
Wihlborg, E., Larsson, H., & Hedström, K. (2016). “The computer says no” – A case study on automated decision-making in public authorities. In Proceedings of the 49th Hawaii international conference on system sciences. IEEE.
Wirtz, B., Weyerer, J. C., & Geyer, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence and the public sector – Applications and challenges. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(7), 596–615.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Ethics declarations
Thanks are due to Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare grant no. 2019-00710 for funding our research.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ranerup, A., Svensson, L. (2022). Actors and Intentions in the Dissemination of Robotic Process Automation in Social Work. In: Juell-Skielse, G., Lindgren, I., Åkesson, M. (eds) Service Automation in the Public Sector. Progress in IS. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92644-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92644-1_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-92643-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-92644-1
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)