Abstract
This chapter critically discusses the importance of acknowledging diversity within entrepreneurship and some strategies to facilitate the richness of the phenomenon. It helps researchers and practitioners to understand the importance and benefits of having different but equally valid world views about the phenomenon, which is vital for entrepreneurship research to progress further. We acknowledge that there are already some established arguments to support inclusiveness within the current context of entrepreneurship research. The aim here is to strengthen these arguments with a brief literature rationale, which is informed by our research experience. One of the key advantages of acknowledging heterogeneity is that it can help scholars to convert any frustrations that is caused by not having common understanding to a fascination to embrace the wholeness of the phenomenon. Our understanding of how to appreciate diversity and inclusion is limited; as a solution, we encourage critical debates among multiple actors of entrepreneurship and urge to widen research adopting more innovative and creative approaches.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aluthgama-Baduge, C. J. (2017). Educating for enterprise: Exploring the role of the teacher. An interpretative phenomenological analysis [PhD thesis]. Abertay University.
Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organisations. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organisational behaviour (pp. 123–167). JAI Press.
Anderson, A. R., & Gaddefors, J. (2017). Is entrepreneurship research out of context? Journal of Asia Entrepreneurship and Sustainability, 13(4), 3–9.
Bacq, S., & Janssen, F. (2011). The multiple faces of social entrepreneurship: A review of definitional issues based on geographic and thematic criteria. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 23(5–6), 376–403.
Baker, T., & Nelson, R. (2005). Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 329–366.
Baker, T., & Welter, F. (2020). Contextualizing entrepreneurship theory. Routledge.
Berglund, H. (2015). Between cognition and discourse: Phenomenology and the study of entrepreneurship. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, 21(3), 472–488.
Berglund, K., & Johansson, A. W. (2007). Constructions of entrepreneurship: A discourse analysis of academic publications. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 01(1), 77–102.
Block, J. H., Fisch, C. O., & van Praag, M. (2017). The Schumpeterian entrepreneur: A review of the empirical evidence on the antecedents, behaviour and consequences of innovative entrepreneurship. Industry and Innovation, 24(1), 61–95.
Blundel, R., Lockett, N., & Wang, C. (2018). Exploring entrepreneurship (2nd ed.). Sage.
Brannback, M., & Carsrud, A. L. (2016). Understanding entrepreneurial cognitions through the lenses of context. In F. Welter & W. B. Gartner (Eds.), A research agenda for entrepreneurship and context (pp. 16–27). Edward Elgar.
Bridge, S. (2017). The search for entrepreneurship: Finding more questions than answers. Routledge.
Brzozowski, J., Cucculelli, M., & Surdej, A. (2018). Exploring transnational entrepreneurship. Immigrant entrepreneurs and foreign-born returnees in the Italian ICT sector. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 35(5), 413–431.
Burt, R. S., & Burzynska, K. (2017). Chinese entrepreneurs, social networks, and Guanxi. Management and Organization Review, 13(3), 221–260.
Chell, E. (2013). Review of skill and the entrepreneurial process. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 19(01), 6–31.
Davidsson, P, (2004). Researching entrepreneurship. Springer Science + Business Media.
Davidsson, P. (2016). Researching entrepreneurship: Conceptualization and design (2nd ed.). Springer.
Dobson, S., & McLuskie, P. (2020). Performative entrepreneurship: Identity, behaviour and place in adventure sports enterprise. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 16(3), 879–895.
Fraiberg, S. (2021). Introduction to special issue on innovation and entrepreneurship communication in the context of globalization. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 35(2), 175–184.
Fuller-Love, N., & Akiode, M. (2020). Transnational entrepreneurs dynamics in entrepreneurial ecosystems: A critical review. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, 06(1), 41–66.
Gaddefors, J., & Anderson, A. (2017). Entrepreneursheep and context: When entrepreneurship is greater than entrepreneurs. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 23(2), 267–278.
Gartner, W. B. (1988). Who is an entrepreneur’ is the wrong question. American Small Business Journal, 12(4), 1–31.
Gartner, W. B. (2012). Psychology, entrepreneurship, and the ‘critical mess’. In J. R. Baum, M. Frese & R. A. Baron (Eds.), The psychology of entrepreneurship (pp. 325–334). Psychology Press.
Gold, B. (2017). Silicon valley start-ups and corporate innovation: Approaches to resolve the innovator’s dilemma. Springer Gabler.
Haase, H., & Franco, M. (2020). Leadership and collective entrepreneurship: Evidence from the health care sector. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 33(3), 368–385.
Henry, E. Y., Dana, L., & Murphy, P. J. (2018). Telling their own stories: Māori entrepreneurship in the mainstream screen industry. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 30(1-2), 118–145.
Hlady-Rispal, M., & Jouison-Laffitte, E. (2014). Qualitative research methods and epistemological frameworks: A review of publication trends in entrepreneurship. Journal of Small Business Management, 54(4), 594–614.
Jones, O., & Li, H. (2017). Effectual entrepreneuring: A sensemaking in a family-based start-up. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 29(5-6), 67–499.
Joo, B., McLean, G., & Yang, B. (2013). Creativity and human resource development: An integrative literature review and a conceptual framework for future research. Human Resource Development Review, 12(4), 390–421.
Kirzner, I. M. (1973). Competition and entrepreneurship. The University of Chicago Press.
Lackéus, M. (2020). Comparing the impact of three different experiential approaches to entrepreneurship in education. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 26, 5937–5971.
Leitch, C. M., Hill, F. M., & Harrison, R. T. (2010). The philosophy and practice of interpretivist research in entrepreneurship: Quality validity and trust. Organizational Research Methods, 13(1), 67–84.
Lubart, T. I. (2001). Models of the creative process: Past, present and future. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3-4), 295–308.
Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135–172.
Mäkimurto-Koivumaa, I., & Belt, P. (2016). About, for, in or through entrepreneurship in engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 41(5), 512–529.
Marlow, S. (2020). Gender and entrepreneurship: Past achievements and future possibilities. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 12(1), 39–52.
McDonald, S., Gan, B. C., Fraser, S. S., Oke, A., & Anderson, A. R. (2015). A review of research methods in entrepreneurship 1985-2013. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 21(3), 291–315.
McKelvey, B. (2004). Toward a complexity science of entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(3), 313–341.
Nayak, A., & Chia, R. (2011). Thinking becoming. Process philosophy and organization studies. Philosophy and Organization Theory Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 32, 281–309.
OECD. (2021). Knowledge co-creation in the 21st century: A cross-country experience-based policy report (OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers No. 115). OECD Publishing. Retrieved June 20, 2021, from https://doi.org/10.1787/c067606f-en
Packard, M. D. (2017). Where did interpretivism go in the theory of entrepreneurship? Journal of Business Venturing, 32(5), 536–549.
Panicker, S., & Manimala, M. J. (2015). Successful turnarounds: The role of appropriate entrepreneurial strategies. Journal of Strategy and Management, 8(1), 21–40.
Paulsen, R. J., Alper, N., & Wassall, G. (2020). Arts majors as entrepreneurs and innovators. Small Business Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-020-00416-x.
Qian, H., Acs, Z. J., & Stough, R. R. (2012). Regional systems of entrepreneurship: The nexus of human capital, knowledge and new firm formation. Journal of Economic Geography, 13(4), 559–587.
Raco, J. R., & Tanod, R. H. M. (2014). The phenomenological method in entrepreneurship. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 22(3), 276–285.
Rae, D. (2015). Opportunity-centered entrepreneurship. Red Globe Press.
Rajasinghe, D., Aluthgama-Baduge, C., & Mulholland, G. (2021). Researching entrepreneurship: An approach to develop subjective understanding. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 27(4), 866–883.
Rajasinghe, D., & Mansour, H. F. (2019). Coaching as an entrepreneurship learning and development tool. In G. Mulholland & J. Turner (Eds.), Enterprising education in UK higher education: Challenges for theory and practice (pp. 51–69). Routledge.
Ratten, V. (2020). Coronavirus (covid-19) and entrepreneurship: Changing life and work landscape. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 32(5), 503–516.
Refai, D., Haloub, R., & Lever, J. (2018). Contextualizing entrepreneurial identity among Syrian refugees in Jordan: The emergence of destabilised habitus? International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 19(04), 250–260.
Reffstrup, T., & Christiansen, S. K. (2017). Nordic Entrepreneurship Islands: Status and potential map** and forecasting entrepreneurship education on seven selected Nordic Islands. Nordic Council Ministers.
Schaeffer, V., & Matt, M. (2016). Development of academic entrepreneurship in a non-mature context: The role of the university as a hub-organisation. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 28(9-10), 724–745.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Harvard University Press.
Schumpeter, J. A. (2017). Essays on entrepreneurs, innovations, business cycles and the evolution of capitalism. .
Stam, E. (2016). Theorising entrepreneurship in context. In F. Welter & W. B. Gartner (Eds.), A research agenda for entrepreneurship and context (pp. 93–108). Edward Elgar.
Steyaert, C. (2007). Entrepreneuring’ as a conceptual attractor. A review of process theories in 20 years of entrepreneurship studies. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 19, 453–477.
Steyaert, C., & Katz, J. (2004). Reclaiming the space of entrepreneurship in society: Geographical, discursive and social dimensions. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 16(3), 179–196.
Sun, H. (2020). Global social media design: Bridging differences across cultures. Oxford University Press.
Tang, J. (2020). Psychological capital and entrepreneurship sustainability. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(866), 01–07.
Van Burg, E., Cornelissen, J., Stam, W., & Jack, S. (2020). Advancing qualitative entrepreneurship research: Leveraging methodological plurality for achieving scholarly impact. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258720943051
Verheul, I., & Van Stel, A. J. (2010). Entrepreneurial diversity and economic growth. In J. Bonnet, D. Garcia, & H. van Auken (Eds.), The entrepreneurial society; How to fill the gap between knowledge and innovation (pp. 17–36). Edward Elgar.
Welter, F., Baker, T., Audretsch, D. B., & Gartner, W. B. (2017). Everyday entrepreneurship—A call for entrepreneurship research to embrace entrepreneurial diversity. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(3), 311–321.
Welter, F., Gartner, W. B., & Wright, M. (2016). The context of contextualizing contexts. In F. Welter & W. B. Gartner (Eds.), A research agenda for entrepreneurship and context (pp. 1–15). Edward Elgar.
Williams, S. D., Ammetller, G., Rodríguez-Ardura, I., & Li, X. (2020). Narratives of international women entrepreneurs: An exploratory case study of identity negotiation in technology startups. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 63(1), 39–51.
Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organisational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293–321.
Zhang, X., & Zhou, J. (2014). Empowering leadership, uncertainty avoidance, trust, and employee creativity: Interaction effects and a mediating mechanism. Organisational Behaviour and Human Decision, 124(2), 150–164.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Aluthgama-Baduge, C., Rajasinghe, D. (2022). Exploring Entrepreneurial Diversity: A Fascination or Frustration?. In: Leitão, J., Ratten, V. (eds) Strategic Innovation. Contributions to Management Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87112-3_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87112-3_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-87111-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-87112-3
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)