Improving Clustering and Cluster Validation with Missing Data Using Distance Estimation Methods

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Computational Sciences and Artificial Intelligence in Industry

Abstract

Missing data introduces a challenge in the field of unsupervised learning. In clustering, when the form and the number of clusters are to be determined, one needs to deal with the missing values both in the clustering process and in the cluster validation. In the previous research, the clustering algorithm has been treated using robust clustering methods and available data strategy, and the cluster validation indices have been computed with the partial distance approximation. However, lately special methods for distance estimation with missing values have been proposed and this work is the first one where these methods are systematically applied and tested in clustering and cluster validation. More precisely, we propose, implement, and analyze the use of distance estimation methods to improve the discrimination power of clustering and cluster validation indices. A novel, robust prototype-based clustering process in two stages is suggested. Our results and conclusions confirm the usefulness of the distance estimation methods in clustering but, surprisingly, not in cluster validation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 160.49
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 213.99
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
EUR 213.99
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://cs.uef.fi/sipu/datasets/.

  2. 2.

    http://users.jyu.fi/~mapeniem/CVI/Data/.

References

  1. Arthur D, Vassilvitskii S (2007) K-means++: the advantages of careful seeding. In: Proceedings of the 18th annual ACM-SIAM symposium on discrete algorithms. SIAM, pp 1027–1035.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Äyrämö S (2006) Knowledge mining using robust clustering. PhD thesis, University of Jyväskylä

    Google Scholar 

  3. Eirola E, Doquire G, Verleysen M, Lendasse A (2013) Distance estimation in numerical data sets with missing values. Inform Sci 240:115–128

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Eirola E, Lendasse A, Vandewalle V, Biernacki C (2014) Mixture of Gaussians for distance estimation with missing data. Neurocomputing 131:32–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fu W, Perry PO (2020) Estimating the number of clusters using cross-validation. J Comput Graph Stat 29(1):162–173

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Gower J (1971) A general coefficient of similarity and some of its properties. Biometrics 27(4):857–871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hämäläinen J, Jauhiainen S, Kärkkäinen T (2017) Comparison of internal clustering validation indices for prototype-based clustering. Algorithms 10(3)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hämäläinen J, Kärkkäinen T, Rossi T (2018) Scalable robust clustering method for large and sparse data. In: Proceedings of ESANN2018 – 26th european symposium on artificial neural networks, computational intelligence and machine learning. ESANN, pp 449–454

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kärkkäinen T, Heikkola E (2004) Robust formulations for training multilayer perceptrons. Neural Comput 16(4):837–862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kärkkäinen T, Toivanen J (2001) Building blocks for odd-even multigrid with applications to reduced systems. J Comput Appl Math 131(1–2):15–33

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Lin W-C, Tsai C-F (2020) Missing value imputation: a review and analysis of the literature (2006–2017). Artif Intell Rev 53(2):1487–1509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mesquita DPP, Gomes JPP, Souza Junior AH, Nobre JS (2017) Euclidean distance estimation in incomplete datasets. Neurocomputing 248:11–18

    Google Scholar 

  13. Niemelä M, Äyrämö S, Kärkkäinen T (2018) Comparison of cluster validation indices with missing data. In: Proceedings of ESANN2018 – 26th european symposium on artificial neural networks, computational intelligence and machine learning. ESANN, pp 461–466

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rouaud M (2013) Probability. Propagation of uncertainties in experimental measurement, statistics and estimation

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Academy of Finland for the financial support (grants 311877 and 315550).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marko Niemelä .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Niemelä, M., Kärkkäinen, T. (2022). Improving Clustering and Cluster Validation with Missing Data Using Distance Estimation Methods. In: Tuovinen, T., Periaux, J., Neittaanmäki, P. (eds) Computational Sciences and Artificial Intelligence in Industry. Intelligent Systems, Control and Automation: Science and Engineering, vol 76. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70787-3_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation