Abstract
The acoustic emission (AE) technique has been successfully used for decades to monitor fracture processes during laboratory testing. This final chapter discusses deliberations necessary when the technique is employed under the often harsh practical conditions that exist on real structures and the application of AE techniques is thus more challenging. As a result, many statements are on the more cautious side and less enthusiastic than what they might be coming from an optimistic perspective of a basic researcher or a system developer. Nevertheless, the authors believe that testing and monitoring approaches based on the AE technique provide significant benefits for both condition assessment and structural health monitoring (SHM) of structures not only in the laboratory but also on real structures, if employed appropriately. One main aspect of AE monitoring is the choice of the analysis technique to be utilized. Some approaches may work with data from only a few sensors and are thus computationally efficient and simple to apply. However, those typically allow only for qualitative assessments. In contrast, approaches that might provide detailed quantitative information regarding the physics of AE events require extensive sensor networks, involve sophisticated computations, and might fail under harsh real-world conditions. To illustrate these points, select examples of AE monitoring studies on real structures are provided. These help to understand the value and limitations of various signal- and parameter-based AE techniques and serve as a basis for decisions about appropriate monitoring strategies. Site conditions, cost, safety, and other aspects are discussed as well, in an attempt to provide a potential user with practical advice on AE monitoring of large-scale and real structures with high noise levels and limited access. While most statements and recommendations are transferable, the focus of this chapter is on concrete structures.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anay L, Lane A, Jauregui DV, Weldon BD, Soltangharaei V, Ziehl P (2020) On-site acoustic-emission monitoring for a prestressed concrete BT-54 AASHTO girder bridge. J Perform Constr Facil 34(3):04020034
Bayane I, Brühwiler E (2020) Structural condition assessment of reinforced-concrete bridges based on acoustic emission and strain measurements. J Civ Struct Health Monit 10:1037–1055
Federal Highway Administration Homepage (2005) Guidelines for the Installation, Inspection, Maintenance and Repair of Structural Supports for Highway Signs, Luminaries, and Traffic Signals, 28 Nov 2020. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/signinspection.cfm
Fricker S, Vogel T (2006) Site installation and testing of a continuous acoustic monitoring. Constr Build Mater 21(3):501–510
Golaski L, Gebski P, Ono K (2002) Diagnostics of reinforced concrete bridges by acoustic emission. J Acoust Emiss 20:83–98
Grosse CU, Schumacher T (2013) Acoustic emission monitoring applications for concrete structures (in German) Bautechnik 90(11), 721–731.
Hafiz A, Schumacher T, Dusicka P, Niederleithinger E (2019) Post-earthquake damage evaluation of concrete structures using ultrasonic monitoring: a proof-of concept laboratory study. In: Proceedings of the international conference on sustainable materials, systems and structures (SMSS2019), pp 112–119
International Organization for Standardization: ISO 9712 Non-destructive Testing—Qualification and Certification of NDT Personnel. International Standard (2012)
Katsaga T, Sherwood EG, Collins PC, Young RP (2007) Acoustic emission imaging of shear failure in large reinforced concrete structures. Int J Fract 148:29–45
Kocur GK, Saenger EH, Grosse CU, Vogel T (2016) Time reverse modeling of acoustic emissions in a reinforced concrete beam. Ultrasonics 65:96–104
Köppel S (2002) Acoustic emission analysis for the evaluation of concrete structures (in German). PhD dissertation and IBK Report No. 272. Institute of Structural Engineering ETH Zurich.
Köppel S, Vogel T (2000) Acoustic emission analysis applied at tests with structural concrete (in German). IBK Report No 259. Institute of Structural Engineering ETH Zurich, Birkhäuser, Basel
Lacidogna G, Manuello A, Niccolini G, Carpinteri A (2015) Acoustic emission monitoring of italian historical buildings and the case study of the athena temple in syracuse. Archit Sci Rev 58(4):290–299
Mhamdi L (2015) Seismology-based approaches for the quantitative acoustic emission monitoring of concrete structures. PhD dissertation, University of Delaware, Newark, DE
Niederleithinger E, Wolf J, Mielentz F, Wiggenhauser H, Pirskawetz S (2015) Embedded ultrasonic transducers for active and passive concrete monitoring. Sensors 15(5):9756–9772
Pullin R, Holford KM, Lark RJ, Eaton M (2008) Acoustic emission monitoring of bridge structures in the field and laboratory. J Acoust Emiss 26:172–181
Schumacher T, Higgins C, Lovejoy S (2013) Acoustic emission monitoring of conventionally reinforced concrete highway bridges under service conditions. In: Nondestructive testing of materials and structures. RILEM Bookseries, vol 6, pp 847–853
Schumacher T, Higgins C, Lovejoy S (2011) Estimating operating load conditions on reinforced concrete highway bridges with b-value analysis from acoustic emission monitoring. Struct Health Monit 10(1):17–32
Schumacher T (2008). Acoustic emission techniques applied to conventionally reinforced concrete bridge girders. Research report SPR 633, Oregon Department of Transportation, Salem, OR
Schumacher T, Higgins CC, Lovejoy SC (2010) Detection of vehicles with studded tires using acoustic emission sensors mounted to highway bridges. J Transp Eng 136(5):480–487
Shiotani T, Aggelis DG, Makishima O (2009) Global monitoring of large concrete structures using acoustic emission and ultrasonic techniques: case study. J Bridg Eng 14(3):188–192
Tozser O, Elliott P (2000) Continuous acoustic monitoring of prestressed structures. In: Proceedings, 2000 annual conference Canadian society of civil engineers—3rd structural specialty conference. London, Ontario
Ziehl P, Lamanna AJ (2003) Monitoring of the bonnet carre spillway bridge during extreme overload. LTRC project No 03-6ST. LA: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tulane University
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schumacher, T., Schechinger, B., Vogel, T. (2022). AE Monitoring of Real Structures: Applications, Strengths, and Limitations. In: Grosse, C.U., Ohtsu, M., Aggelis, D.G., Shiotani, T. (eds) Acoustic Emission Testing. Springer Tracts in Civil Engineering . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67936-1_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67936-1_24
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-67935-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-67936-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)