A Second-Order Adaptive Social-Cognitive Agent Model for Prisoner Recidivism

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Highlights in Practical Applications of Agents, Multi-Agent Systems, and Trust-worthiness. The PAAMS Collection (PAAMS 2020)

Abstract

In this study, a second-order adaptive social-cognitive agent model is introduced to examine prisoner recidivism. For comparison between different kinds of prisons and prison policies, recidivism rates from Norway and the USA are used. Two scenarios were used to model the effects of environmental, prison-related, and personal influences on recidivism rates. The presented adaptive social-cognitive agent model is based on a second-order reified network model. The model allows to computationally explore the effects on prisoner recidivism and the learning process for a prisoner’s social-cognitive state of mind as a main determinant of recidivism risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Skardhamar, T., Telle, K.: Post-release employment and recidivism in Norway. J. Quant. Criminol. 28(4), 629–649 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baumer, E.: Levels and predictors of recidivism: the Malta experience. Criminology 35, 601–628 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Langan, P., Levin, D.: Recidivism of prisoners released in 1994. US Department of Justice, Washington, DC (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cullen, F., Jonson, C., Nagin, D.: Prisons do not reduce recidivism: the high cost of ignoring science. Prison J. 91(3), 48–65 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. US Department of Justice: Why recidivism is a core criminal justice concern (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Andersen, S., Skardhamar, T.: Pick a number: map** recidivism measures and their consequences. Crime Delinquency 5, 613–635 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ugelvik, T., Dullum, J.: Nordic Prison Practice and Policy - Exceptional Or Not? Nordic Prison Policy and Practice. Routledge, London (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sterbenz, C.: Why Norway’s prison system is so successful. Bus. Insider 11 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yukhnenko, D., Sridhar, S., Fazel, S.: A systematic review of criminal recidivism rates worldwide: 3-year update. Wellcome Open Res. 4, 28 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Berg, M., Huebner, B.: Reentry and the ties that bind: an examination of social ties, employment, and recidivism. Justice Q. 28(2), 382–410 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nagin, D., Cullen, F., Jonson, C.: Imprisonment and reoffending. Crime Justice 38, 115–200 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Visher, C., Travis, J.: Transitions from prison to community: understanding individual pathways. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 29, 89–113 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mitchell, O., Cochran, J., Mears, D., Bales, W.: Examining prison effects on recidivism: a regression discontinuity approach. Justice Q. 4, 571–596 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cullen, F., Gendreau, P.: Assessing Correctional Rehabilitation: Policy, Practice, and Prospects. Policies, Processes, and Decisions of the Criminal Justice System, pp. 109–175 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gideon, L., Sung, H.-E.: Rethinking Corrections: Rehabilitation, Reentry, and Reintegration. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Adams, K.: Adjusting to prison life. Crime Justice 16, 275–359 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mears, D., Cochran, J., Siennick, S., Bales, W.: Prison visitation and recidivism. Justice Q. 29(6), 888–918 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Treur, J.: Network-Oriented Modeling for Adaptive Networks: Designing Higher-Order Adaptive Biological, Mental and Social Network Models. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol. 251. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31445-3

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Treur, J.: Network-Oriented Modeling: Addressing Complexity of Cognitive, Affective and Social Interactions. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45213-5

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Kuipers, B., Kassirer, J.: How to discover a knowledge representation for causal reasoning by studying an expert physician. In: Proceedings of IJCAI 1983 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kuipers, B.: Commonsense reasoning about causality: deriving behavior from structure. Artif. Intell. 24, 169–203 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pearl, J.: Causality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Treur, J.: A modeling environment for reified temporal-causal networks: modeling plasticity and metaplasticity in cognitive agent models. In: Baldoni, M., Dastani, M., Liao, B., Sakurai, Y., Zalila Wenkstern, R. (eds.) PRIMA 2019. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 11873, pp. 487–495. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33792-6_33

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Treur, J.: Modeling higher-order adaptive evolutionary processes by multilevel adaptive agent models. In: Baldoni, M., Dastani, M., Liao, B., Sakurai, Y., Zalila Wenkstern, R. (eds.) PRIMA 2019. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 11873, pp. 505–513. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33792-6_35

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Hebb, D.: The Organisation of Behavior. Wiley, New York (1949)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Garcia, R.: Stress, metaplasticity, and antidepressants. Curr. Mol. Med. 2(7), 629–638 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kirschbaum, C., Wolf, O., May, M., Wippich, W., Hellhammer, D.: Stress- and treatment-induced elevations of cortisol levels associated with impaired declarative memory in healthy adults. Life Sci. 58(17), 1475–1483 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lupien, S., et al.: Stress-induced declarative memory impairment in healthy elderly subjects: relationship to cortisol reactivity. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 82(7), 2070–2075 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Treur .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Melman, D., Ploeger, J.B., Treur, J. (2020). A Second-Order Adaptive Social-Cognitive Agent Model for Prisoner Recidivism. In: De La Prieta, F., et al. Highlights in Practical Applications of Agents, Multi-Agent Systems, and Trust-worthiness. The PAAMS Collection. PAAMS 2020. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1233. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51999-5_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51999-5_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-51998-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-51999-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation