An IGA Framework for PDE-Based Planar Parameterization on Convex Multipatch Domains

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Isogeometric Analysis and Applications 2018 (IGAA 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering ((LNCSE,volume 133))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The first step towards applying isogeometric analysis techniques to solve PDE problems on a given domain consists in generating an analysis-suitable map** operator between parametric and physical domains with one or several patches from no more than a description of the boundary contours of the physical domain. A subclass of the multitude of the available parameterization algorithms are those based on the principles of Elliptic Grid Generation (EGG) which, in their most basic form, attempt to approximate a map** operator whose inverse is composed of harmonic functions. The main challenge lies in finding a formulation of the problem that is suitable for a computational approach and a common strategy is to approximate the map** operator by means of solving a PDE-problem. PDE-based EGG is well-established in classical meshing and first generalization attempts to spline-based descriptions (as is mandatory in IgA) have been made. Unfortunately, all of the practically viable PDE-based approaches impose certain requirements on the employed spline-basis, in particular global C ≥1-continuity.

This paper discusses an EGG-algorithm for the generation of planar parameterizations with locally reduced smoothness (i.e., with support for locally only C 0-continuous bases). A major use case of the proposed algorithm is that of multipatch parameterizations, made possible by the support of C 0-continuities. This paper proposes a specially-taylored solution algorithm that exploits many characteristics of the PDE-problem and is suitable for large-scale applications. It is discussed for the single-patch case before generalizing its concepts to multipatch settings. This paper is concluded with three numerical experiments and a discussion of the results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 117.69
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 160.49
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
EUR 160.49
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. B. N. Azarenok. Generation of structured difference grids in two-dimensional nonconvex domains using map**s. Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, 49(5):797–809, 2009.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. L. T. Biegler and V. M. Zavala. Large-scale nonlinear programming using IPOPT: An integrating framework for enterprise-wide dynamic optimization. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 33(3):575–582, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. F. Buchegger and B. Jüttler. Planar multi-patch domain parameterization via patch adjacency graphs. Computer-Aided Design, 82:2–12, 2017.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. F. Buchegger, B. Jüttler, and A. Mantzaflaris. Adaptively refined multi-patch B-splines with enhanced smoothness. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 272:159–172, 2016.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. A. Falini and B. Jüttler. Thb-splines multi-patch parameterization for multiply-connected planar domains via template segmentation. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 349:390–402, 2019.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. L. Gao and V. M. Calo. Fast isogeometric solvers for explicit dynamics. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 274:19–41, 2014.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. W. J. Gordon and C. A. Hall. Transfinite element methods: Blending-function interpolation over arbitrary curved element domains. Numerische Mathematik, 21(2):109–129, 1973.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. J. Gravesen, A. Evgrafov, D.-M. Nguyen, and P. Nørtoft. Planar parametrization in isogeometric analysis. In International Conference on Mathematical Methods for Curves and Surfaces, pages 189–212. Springer, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. Hinz, M. Möller, and C. Vuik. Elliptic grid generation techniques in the framework of isogeometric analysis applications. Computer Aided Geometric Design, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Hinz, M. Möller, and C. Vuik. Spline-based parameterization techniques for twin-screw machine geometries. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, volume 425, page 012030. IOP Publishing, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. A. Knoll and D. E. Keyes. Jacobian-free Newton–Krylov methods: A survey of approaches and applications. Journal of Computational Physics, 193(2):357–397, 2004.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. P. Lamby and K. Brakhage. Elliptic grid generation by B-spline collocation. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Numerical Grid Generation in Computational Field Simulations, FORTH, Crete, Greece, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. Manke. A tensor product B-spline method for numerical grid generation. Technical report, Washington Univ., Seattle, WA (USA). Dept. of Applied Mathematics, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. M. Schoen and S.-T. Yau. Lectures on harmonic maps, volume 2. Amer Mathematical Society, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. C. Seiler and F. A. Seiler. Numerical recipes in C: The art of scientific computing. Risk Analysis, 9(3):415–416, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. A. M. Winslow. Adaptive-mesh zoning by the equipotential method. Technical report, Lawrence Livermore National Lab., CA (USA), 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  17. S. **ao, H. Kang, X.-M. Fu, and F. Chen. Computing iga-suitable planar parameterizations by polysquare-enhanced domain partition. Computer Aided Geometric Design, 62:29–43, 2018.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jochen Hinz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hinz, J., Möller, M., Vuik, C. (2021). An IGA Framework for PDE-Based Planar Parameterization on Convex Multipatch Domains. In: van Brummelen, H., Vuik, C., Möller, M., Verhoosel, C., Simeon, B., Jüttler, B. (eds) Isogeometric Analysis and Applications 2018. IGAA 2018. Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering, vol 133. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49836-8_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation