A Capacity Management Tool for a Portfolio of Industrialization Projects

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Trends and Innovations in Information Systems and Technologies (WorldCIST 2020)

Abstract

The management of a project portfolio is a complex decision process because it encompasses the achievement of multiple objectives. A critical point that increases the complexity in the decision-making process of a portfolio manager is the allocation of human resources to manage the projects of the portfolio, project managers, which is crucial to the organization’s performance. In this case, the project manager can manage more than one project simultaneously and it is necessary to assign project managers to the projects, considering that project activities have an amount of work to be accomplished. The main objective of this work was to provide support for this capacity management problem, which aims to provide an easier decision-making process for the capacity management of an industrialization project portfolio. Therefore, it was developed: a hybrid model that creates a schedule respecting the resource constraints and the established due dates; a recommendation system that considers project managers’ allocation and projects requirements; and, an automatic status report that allows identifying the project portfolio capacity usage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abrantes, R., Figueiredo, J.: Resource management process framework for dynamic NPD portfolios. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 33, 1274–1288 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.03.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Oh, J., Yang, J., Lee, S.: Managing uncertainty to improve decision-making in NPD portfolio management with a fuzzy expert system. Expert Syst. Appl. 39, 9868–9885 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.02.164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Manole, A.L., Grabara, I.: Methodologies and visualization tools of effective project management. Polish J. Manag. Stud. 14, 137–149 (2016). https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2016.14.2.13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Perrotta, D., Araújo, M., Fernandes, G., Tereso, A., Faria, J.: Towards the development of a methodology for managing industrialization projects. Procedia Comput. Sci. 121, 874–882 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chirumalla, K.: Managing product introduction projects in operations: key challenges in heavy-duty vehicle industry. J. Mod. Proj. Manag. 5, 108–118 (2018). https://doi.org/10.19255/JMPM01512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Radujković, M., Sjekavica, M.: Project management success factors. Procedia Eng. 196, 607–615 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.08.048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ponsteen, A., Kusters, R.J.: Classification of human- and automated resource allocation approaches in multi-project management. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 194, 165–173 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tian, X., Yuan, S.: Genetic algorithm parameters tuning for resource-constrained project scheduling problem. In: AIP Conference Proceedings, p. 040059 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chakrabortty, R.K., Sarker, R., Essam, D.L.: A comparative study of different integer linear programming approaches for resource-constrained project scheduling problems. Presented at the (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kolisch, R., Hartmann, S.: Experimental investigation of heuristics for resource-constrained project scheduling: an update. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 174, 23–37 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2005.01.065

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Borak, S., Karl, W.: Matheuristics. Springer, Boston (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Artigues, C., Brucker, P., Knust, S., Koné, O., Lopez, P., Mongeau, M.: A note on “event-based MILP models for resource-constrained project scheduling problems”. Comput. Oper. Res. 40, 1060–1063 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2012.10.018

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Maniezzo, V., Stutzle, T.: Matheuristics 2016 - Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Model-based Metaheuristics. IRIDIA, Bruxelles (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., Thornhill, A.: Research Methods for Business Students (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shrestha, A., Cater-Steel, A., Toleman, M., Rout, T.: Benefits and relevance of International Standards in a design science research project for process assessments. Comput. Stand. Interfaces. 60, 48–56 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2018.04.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang, D., Wan, K., Song, X., Liu, Y.: Provincial allocation of coal de-capacity targets in China in terms of cost, efficiency, and fairness. Energy Econ. 78, 109–128 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.11.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tereso, A., Araújo, M., Elmaghraby, S.: Adaptive resource allocation in multimodal activity networks. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 92, 1–10 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2003.09.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Peck, R., Devore, J.L.: Statistics - The exploration & Analysis of data. Brooks/Cole (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Keser, İ.K., Kocakoç, İ.D., Şehirlioğlu, A.K.: A new descriptive statistic for functional data: functional coefficient of variation. Alphanumeric J. 4, (2016). https://doi.org/10.17093/aj.2016.4.2.5000185408

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by: European Structural and Investment Funds in the FEDER component, through the Operational Competitiveness and Internationalization Programme (COMPETE 2020) [Project nº 39479; Funding Reference: POCI-01-0247-FEDER-39479].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caio Lima .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lima, C., Tereso, A., Araújo, M. (2020). A Capacity Management Tool for a Portfolio of Industrialization Projects. In: Rocha, Á., Adeli, H., Reis, L., Costanzo, S., Orovic, I., Moreira, F. (eds) Trends and Innovations in Information Systems and Technologies. WorldCIST 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1159. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45688-7_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation