Global Systemic Anthropology and the Analysis of Globalization 

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Challenges of Globalization and Prospects for an Inter-civilizational World Order
  • 1300 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter outlines the basic arguments for a global systemic anthropology as it has developed since the late 1970s. These include the fundamental notions that social process can best be understood in terms of the larger context of reproduction within which they occur, that world history does not consist of an evolution from primitive to civilized to modern, nor from more local to more global orders. The development of the first so-called civilizations is very much about the emergence of large-scale imperial systems in which accumulation of wealth has been a central dynamic. The dynamics of such systems, which can be called “global systems” has been more or less stable throughout the past three thousand years. The cultural correlates of such systems include the formation and disintegration of cultural hierarchies and evolutionary representations, assimilation of minorities in periods of expansion, and an inverse process of cultural and political separation and autonomization in periods of decline.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The work on the new global division of labor and global shift documented the decentralization of capital accumulation and the movement of investment to new geographical areas. It is quite unlike the anthropological literature on globalization and closer to a global systemic perspective.

  2. 2.

    Attributing the capacity for action to culture is a serious error of misplaced concreteness and misplaced intentionality in which culture is understood as a subject, an actor that organizes behavior, that transforms itself over time. This is common in cultural deterministic schemes that have prevailed in anthropology for decades. The power of culture is always and everywhere the power of actors that possess culture. This, in the most elementary terms, is what socialization is all about.

  3. 3.

    Geertz insisted on the notion of “reading” culture as a text and each text was quite specific and different from all others.

  4. 4.

    In Europe, from the late 1970s, the Breton movement and the Occitanists, in France, the so-called “breakup” of Britain (Nairn 1977) with regionalist movements in Scotland, Wales, and even Cornwall, the rise to power of the Sami movement in Norway and Sweden, and proliferation of ethnic immigrant movements, all followed by the emergence of nationalist movements in many parts of Europe. In the United States, Black power is followed by Red power and the mobilization of American indigenous groups, the Hawaiian sovereignty movement, just to name a few.

  5. 5.

    The liberalism of the 19th and early 20th centuries is just as “neo-liberal” as that of the 21st, and it occurs with or without salient tendencies to flexibilization, which was of course prominent before the success of the union movements.

  6. 6.

    It is important to note here that the existence of hegemonic cycles is not contradicted by the long-term trend to competition-induced increases in technological productivity which generally raise levels of consumption in the world as shown in Fig. 1. Hegemony is about relative relations of political economic power and not about the general levels of consumption or even technological growth. The enormous growth of “wealth” in East Asia goes hand-in-hand with the decline of manufacturing in the USA and much of Western Europe.

References

  • Appadurai, A. 1988. Putting Hierarchy in its Place. Cultural Anthropology 3 (1): 36–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appadurai, A. 1996. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrighi, G. 1994. The Long Twentieth Century: Money, Power and the Origins of Our Times. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrighi, G. 1999. The World Market. Journal of World-Systems Research 2(Summer): 217–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braudel, F. 1979. Civilisation matérielle, économie et capitalisme, XVe-XVIIIe siècle. Paris: Colin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braudel, F. 1984. The Perspective of the World. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csordas, T. (ed.). 1994. Embodiment and Experience: The Existential Ground of Culture and Self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1980. Mille Plateaux. Paris: Editions de Minuit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dicken, P. 2015. Global Shift: Map** the Changing Contours of the World Economy. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duménil, G., and D. Lévy. 2004. Capital Resurgent: Roots of the Neoliberal Revolution Cambridge. Mass: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duménil, G., and D. Lévy. 2011a. The Crisis of Neoliberalism. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duménil, G., and D. Lévy. 2011b. The Crisis of the Early 21st Century: A Critical Review of Alternative Interpretations. Paris: CNRS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekholm, K. 1975. System av sociala system och determinanterna i den sociala evolutionen. Antropologiska Studier. 14: 15–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekholm, K. 1976a. Varför fungerar inte samhällen. Marxistisk Antropologi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekholm, K. 1976b. Om studiet av det globala systemets dynamik. Antropologiska Studier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekholm, K. 1977a. “Om studiet av riskgenerering i samhället och av hur risker kan avvärjas”, projektet Riskgenerering och Riskbedömning i ett samhälleligt perspektiv, SALFO, rapport 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekholm, K. 1977b. External Exchange and the Transformation of Central African Social Systems. In The Evolution of Social Systems, ed. Friedman and Rowlands. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekholm, K. 1980. On the Limitations of Civilization: The Structure and Dynamics of Global Systems. Dialectical Anthropology 5 (2): 155–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekholm, K., and J. Friedman. 1979. ‘Capital’ imperialism and exploitation in ancient world systems. In Power and Propaganda: A Symposium on Ancient Empires Also in Review, ed. Larsen with Jonathan Friedman. V. 1:1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekholm, K., and J. Friedman. 1980. Towards a Global Anthropology. In History and Underdevelopment, ed. Blussé et al., 61–76. Leiden and Paris. Republished with changes and an introduction in 1986 Critique of Anthropology 5, 1: 97-119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekholm, K., and J. Friedman. 2008. Historical Transformations: Vol I of The Anthropology of Global Systems. Lanham: Altamira Press (Rowman and Littlefield). Modernities, Class, and the Contradictions of Globalization: Vol II of The Anthropology of Global Systems. Lanham: Altamira Press (Rowman and Littlefield).

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, A.G. 1978. World Accumulation: 1492-1789. New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J. 1992. Narcissm, Roots and Postmodernity: The Constitution of Selfhood in the Global Crisis. In Modernity and Identity, ed. S. Lash and J. Friedman. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J. 1994. Cultural Identity and Global Process. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J. 1999. Indigenous Struggles and the Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie. Taja: Australian Journal of Anthropology 10:1. Reprinted in Journal of World Systems Research 5(2): 391–411 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J. 2002. Globalization and the Making of a Global Imaginary. In Global Encounters, ed. T. Tufte and G. Stald, 13–32. Luton: Luton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J. 2005. Plus ça change: On Not Learning from History. In Hegemonic Declines: Past and Present, ed. Friedman and Chase-Dunn, 89–116. Boulder: Paradigm Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J. 2007. Global Systems, Globalization, and Anthropological Theory. In Frontiers of Globalization Research: Theoretical and Methodological Approaches, ed. I. Rossi. Boston, MA: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J. 2008. Power, Pluralism and the Transformation of Governance in an Era of Declining Hegemony. In The Troubled Triangle: Unravelling the Linkages between Inequality, Pluralism and Environment, ed. W. Pansters, 65–84. Amsterdam: Rozenberg Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J. 2012. Diametric to Concentric Dualism: Cosmopolitan Elites, Cosmopolitan Intellectuals and the Re-Configuration of the State. In The State: Alternatives, Futures and Utopias, ed. A. Hobart and B. Kapferer, 261–290. Wantage, Oxon: Sean Kingston publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J. 2014. Capitalist Markets and the Kafkaesque World of Moralization. In Cash on the Table: Markets, Values and Moral Economies: Anthropological Engagements with Economics and Economies, ed. Edward F. Fischer, 51–66. Santa Fe: School of Advanced Research Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J. 2015. Global Systemic Crisis, Class and its Representations. In Anthropologies of Class: Power, Practice and Inequality, ed. J. Carrier and D. Kalb, 183–199. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J. 2016. The Kafka Connection: Structure, Lifeworld and the Cunning of History. In A Practice of Anthropology: The Thought and Influence of Marshall Sahlins, ed. A. Golub, D. Rosenblatt, J. Kelly, 203–236. Montreal: McGill Queens University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J. 2018. A Note on Populism and Economic Crisis. Economic Anthropology 5:135–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J. 2019. PC Worlds: Political Correctness and Rising Elites at the End of Hegemony. New York: Berghan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fröbel, F. Heinrichs, J., and Kreye, O. 1980. The New International Division of Labour: Structural Unemployment in Industrialised Countries and Industrialisation in Develo** Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, and Paris: Maison des Sciences de l’Homme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannerz, U. 1993. Cultural Complexity: Studies in the Social Organization of Meaning. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. 1989. The Condition of Postmodernity. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingham, Geoffrey. 1994. States and Markets in the Production of World Money: Sterling and Dollar. In Money, Power and Space, ed. R. Martin, N. Thrift, and S. Corbridge et al., 29–48. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapferer, B. 1997. The Feast of the Sorcerer: Practices of Consciousness and Power. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Cecla, F. 2007. Pasta and Pizza. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the Social. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lévi-Strauss, C. 1962. La Pensée Sauvage. Paris: Plon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lévi-Strauss, C. 1963. Do Dual Organizations Exist. In Structural Anthropology, 132–166. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lüthje, B. 2014. Why No Fordism in China? Regimes of Accumulation and Regimes of Production in Chinese Manufacturing Industries. IFS working paper 3; Institut für Sozialforschung, Frankfurt am Main.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannheim, K. 1982. Structures of Thinking. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nairn, T. 1977. The Break-Up of Britain: Crisis and Neo-Nationalism. London: New Left Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicas, J. 2019. A Tiny Screw Shows Why iPhones Won’t Be ‘Assembled in U.S.A. New York Times, January 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolis, G., and I. Prigogine. 1977. Self-Organization in Nonequilibrium Systems. New York: Wiley-Interscience.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohmae, K. 1990. The Boarderless World: Power and Strategy in the Interlinked Economy. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ong, A., and S. Collier (eds.). 2005. Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics and Ethics as Anthropological Problems. New York: Blackwell

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. 1990. The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: Free Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Quigley, C. 1981. The Anglo-American Establishment. New York: Books in Focus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radin, Paul. 1987. The Method and Theory of Ethnology: An Essay in Criticism. South Hadley, Mass: Bergin and Garvey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, R. 1992. Globalization: Social Theory and Global Culture. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholte, J.A. 2000. Globalization: A Critical Introduction. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sippett, A., and McKinney, C.J. 2016. U.K. Law: What Proportion is influenced by the EU. Full Fact, June 8. https://fullfact.org/europe/uk-law-what-proportion-influenced-eu/.

  • Strauss, C., and N. Quinn. 1994. A Cognitive/Cultural Anthropology. In Assessing Cultural Anthropology, ed. R. Borofsky, 284–297. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thom, R. 1989. Structural Stability and Morphogenesis: An Outline of a General Theory of Models. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Touraine, A. 1969. La société post-industrielle: naissance d’une société Paris: Denoël.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein. 1974. The Modern World System. New York Academic publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiewiorka, M. 1996. Une Société fragmentée: le multiculturalisme en débat. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, S. 2003. Introduction to Applied Dynamical Systems and Chaos. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan Friedman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Friedman, J. (2020). Global Systemic Anthropology and the Analysis of Globalization . In: Rossi, I. (eds) Challenges of Globalization and Prospects for an Inter-civilizational World Order. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44058-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44058-9_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-44057-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-44058-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation