Abstract

Shared decision-making is a central component of patient-centered care in the emergency department (ED) and the intensive care unit (ICU). It is defined by the American College of Critical Care Medicine as “a collaborative process that allows patients, or their surrogates, and clinicians to make health care decisions together, taking into account the best scientific evidence available, as well as the patient’s values, goals, and preferences.” In this chapter, we will see that involving patients and/or family members in shared decision-making in the ED and the ICU can be a challenging task. We also describe strategies to help clinicians to better include patients and/or families in decision-making processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. White DB, Braddock CH, Bereknyei S, et al. Toward shared decision making at the end of life in intensive care units: opportunities for improvement. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:461–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kon AA, Davidson JE, Morrison W, et al. Shared decision making in ICUs: an American College of Critical Care Medicine and American Thoracic Society Policy Statement. Crit Care Med. 2016;44:188–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hess EP, Grudzen CR, Thomson R, et al. Shared decision-making in the emergency department: respecting patient autonomy when seconds count. Acad Emerg Med. 2015;22:856–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Schoenfeld EM, Goff SL, Elia TR, et al. Physician-identified barriers to and facilitators of shared decision-making in the emergency department: an exploratory analysis. Emerg Med J. 2019;36:346–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. McAdam JL, Arai S, Puntillo KA. Unrecognized contributions of families in the intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med. 2008;34:1097–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Johnson SK, Bautista CA, Hong SY, et al. An empirical study of surrogates' preferred level of control over value-laden life support decisions in intensive care units. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;183:915–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Azoulay E, Pochard F, Chevret S, et al. Half the family members of intensive care unit patients do not want to share in the decision-making process: a study in 78 French intensive care units. Crit Care Med. 2004;32:1832–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tilden VP, Tolle SW, Garland MJ, et al. Decisions about life-sustaining treatment. Impact of physicians’ behaviors on the family. Arch Intern Med. 1995;155:633–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Heyland DK, Rocker GM, Dodek PM, et al. Family satisfaction with care in the intensive care unit: results of a multiple center study. Crit Care Med. 2002;30:1413–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Azoulay E, Pochard F, Kentish-Barnes N, et al. Risk of post-traumatic stress symptoms in family members of intensive care unit patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005;171:987–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wendler D, Rid A. Systematic review: the effect on surrogates of making treatment decisions for others. Ann Intern Med. 2011;154:336–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Heyland DK, Davidson J, Skrobik Y, et al. Improving partnerships with family members of ICU patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2018;19:3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pochard F, Darmon M, Fassier T, et al. Symptoms of anxiety and depression in family members of intensive care unit patients before discharge or death. A prospective multicenter study. J Crit Care. 2005;20:90–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Azoulay E, Pochard F, Chevret S, et al. Family participation in care to the critically ill: opinions of families and staff. Intensive Care Med. 2003;29:1498–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Azoulay E, Chevret S, Leleu G, et al. Half the families of intensive care unit patients experience inadequate communication with physicians. Crit Care Med. 2000;28:3044–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ho A. Relational autonomy or under pressure? Family’s role in medical decision-making. Scand J Caring Sci. 2008;22:128–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Schenker Y, Crowley-Matoka M, Dohan D, et al. I don’t want to be the one saying ‘we should just let him die’: intrapersonal tensions experienced by surrogate decision makers in the ICU. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27:1657–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Majesko A, Hong SY, Weissfeld L, et al. Identifying family members who may struggle in the role of surrogate decision maker. Crit Care Med. 2012;40:2281–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Davidson JE, Aslakson RA, Long AC, et al. Guidelines for family-centered care in the neonatal, pediatric, and adult ICU. Crit Care Med. 2017;45:103–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Curtis JR, Patrick DL, Shannon SE, et al. The family conference as a focus to improve communication about end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: opportunities for improvement. Crit Care Med. 2001;29(Suppl):N26–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Curtis JR, White DB. Practical guidance for evidence-based ICU family conferences. Chest. 2008;134:835–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lautrette A, Darmon M, Megarbane B, et al. A communication strategy and brochure for relatives of patients dying in the ICU. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:469–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Michalsen A, Long AC, DeKeyser GF, et al. Interprofessional shared decision-making in the ICU: a systematic review and recommendations from an expert panel. Crit Care Med. 2019;47:1258–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wirpsa J, Johnson E, Bieler J, et al. Interprofessional models for shared decision making: the role of the health care chaplain. J Health Care Chaplain. 2019;25:20–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Curtis JR, Treece PD, Nielsen EL, et al. Randomized trial of communication facilitators to reduce family distress and intensity of end-of-life care. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;193:154–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. White DB, Angus DC, Shields AM, et al. A randomized trial of a family-support intervention in intensive care units. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:2365–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Azoulay E, Timsit JF, Sprung CL, et al. Prevalence and factors of intensive care unit conflicts: the conflicus study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009;180:853–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. White DB, Ernecoff N, Buddadhumaruk P, et al. Prevalence of and factors related to discordance about prognosis between physicians and surrogate decision makers of critically ill patients. JAMA. 2016;315:2086–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Paris JJ, Ahluwalia J, Cummings BM, et al. The Charlie Gard case: British and American approaches to court resolution of disputes over medical decisions. J Perinatol. 2017;37:1268–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Latrelle PL. Workplace mediation: a thematic review of the Acas/CIPD evidence [online]. Acas Research Paper 2011; 13/11 (London). http://www.acas.org.uk/media/pdf/l/7/1311_Thematic_review_of_workplace_mediation.pdf.

  31. Curtis JR. The use of informed assent in withholding cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the ICU. Virtual Mentor. 2012;14:545–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nancy Kentish-Barnes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kentish-Barnes, N., Danbury, C., Benbenishty, J., Azoulay, E. (2020). Shared Decision-Making With Patients and Families. In: Michalsen, A., Sadovnikoff, N. (eds) Compelling Ethical Challenges in Critical Care and Emergency Medicine. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43127-3_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43127-3_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-43126-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-43127-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation