The National Capital Region, Delhi, India: An Empirical Exploration

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Asian Megacity Region

Part of the book series: The Urban Book Series ((UBS))

  • 410 Accesses

Abstract

The National Capital Region, (NCR, Delhi) in India is one of the first and foremost examples of extensive regional planning efforts in South Asia, created with the goal of containing the growth of the core, while controlling and regulating the development of the surrounding region for sustainability. A hybrid and evolving urban-rural region, the NCR, can thus be considered a laboratory for both theoretical and empirical exploration. The uneven urban-rural linkages, flows and traits, produced by exogenous and endogenous forces, that characterize the urban-rural interface of the city region are widely acknowledged; calls for holistically examining these, at localized or micro-scales for targeted planning purposes, are rising. In this chapter, I incorporate aspects of my tri-pronged approach—the concurrent consideration of multidimensionality, urban-rural interface (URI), and scalar variations—in an exploratory study at a disaggregated observational scale representing both urban and rural elements. I observe intra-regional variations and changes in urban-developmental patterns within the NCR vis-à-vis the NCR planning objectives. Principal Component and Cluster analyses are used to observe static structural patterns in 2001 and 2011, as well as changes that took place between the two periods. In each model, results reveal distinct clusters, with intra-group similarities and inter-group differences in traits indicating mixed success of the NCR plan. The results also underscore the potential applications of my approach for sustainable developmental planning for the Asian MCR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 85.59
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 106.99
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
EUR 106.99
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    My conceptualization of the ‘spread region’ (SR) and the URI has been discussed in Chapter 4.

  2. 2.

    For example, see “the measures to policy instruments”, NGO’s role in development; multi-stakeholder’s platforms; green rating for integrated Habitat assessment (GRIHA); Joint forest management (JFM); Women’s empowerment under Integrated Infrastructural Development (IFD); National Knowledge Network (NKN); and Waste Minimization Circles (WMC).

  3. 3.

    There are two types of administrative units characterizing urban settlements in India: statutory towns (defined by a statute, e.g., municipal corporation, municipal council, etc.) and ‘census towns’ (defined by a set of population and workforce criteria), and six classes of urban centers marked by population size. Class I: 100,000 and more; Class II: 50,000–99,999; Class III: 20,000–49,999; Class IV: 10,000–19,999; Class V: 5000–9999; and Class VI: less than 5000 population (Census of India 2001). In line with the recommendation of the National Commission on Urbanization (1988), we excluded the three smallest classes below 20,000 population from our study. For a view that many urban centers (‘quasi-urban’) below 20,000 population did not meet the basic ‘functional and other’ urban characteristics, see Bose (1994, p. 7).

  4. 4.

    The difference between the total areal size as noted in the Regional Plan 2021, and the information presented here is due to reorganization, e.g., Panipat district in Haryana, Palwal in U.P., and as per reporting of the Government of Rajasthan, for the Rajasthan sub-region of the NCR (see, Regional Plan 2021, NCRPB 2013).

  5. 5.

    Interestingly, no mention of areal sizes for the respective zones can be found in the corresponding sections in the 2013 update of the Regional Plan 2021.

  6. 6.

    Even a cursory search with keywords related to the NCR would reveal an impressive range and size of literature on the geographic area in and around Delhi.

  7. 7.

    FAO = Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

  8. 8.

    Obviously, the smaller spatial footprint of a high-rise apartment building does not compensate for the immense environmental and infrastructural footprints (in the form of water, sewage, garbage disposal, etc.) it adds to the equation.

  9. 9.

    Statistically, the PCA model’s ability to handle collinearity helped the decision to include some variables with high inter-collinearity.

  10. 10.

    A Discriminant Analysis was used to calculate the hit ratios as another indicator of the ‘validity of the cluster solutions’ (Hill et al. 1998, pp. 1944–1946) that are included at the bottom of the respective diagrams presenting the salient traits of the nested hierarchical clusters, as in 2001, 2011, and 2001–11 changes.

  11. 11.

    To repeat a comment made in Sect. 6.3.1, although crop** intensity is generally considered to be a measure of efficient utilization of agricultural land, the long-term impact of increased crop** intensity on the soil appears to be uncertain and debatable (e.g., Verma et al. 2017). However, irrespective of the positions taken, sustainability implications of this practice on the agricultural future of megacity regions remain an important issue.

  12. 12.

    Given that the three measures of density (population, household, and housing units per sq. km) increased in all the clusters over the decade, Cluster 5 experienced the smallest increase in all three measures.

  13. 13.

    In this sense, the 120% average growth rate as shown in Table 6.8 masks the distinct growth dynamics of the two sole Priority Towns in this cluster.

  14. 14.

    Manesar and Farruknagar were combined with Gurgaon for this study, hence they are not shown in Fig. 6.2.

References

  • Aldenderfer M, Blashfield R (1984) Cluster analysis. Sage, Beverly Hills

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacherjee A (2012) Social science research: principles, methods and practices. Textbooks Collections 3. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/oa-textbooks/3

  • Bose A (1994) India’s urban population. Wheeler Publishing, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Delamater PL, Shortridge AM, Messina JP (2013) Regional health care planning: a methodology to cluster facilities using community utilization patterns. BMC Health Serv Res 13:333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglass M (1998) A regional network strategy for reciprocal rural-urban linkages: an agenda for policy research with reference to Indonesia. Third World Plan Rev 20:1–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Everitt BS (1993) Cluster analysis. Halsted Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann J, Douglass M (1978) Agropolitan development: toward a new strategy for regional planning in Asia. In: Lo F, Salih K (eds) Growth pole strategy and regional development policy. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 163–192

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Geyer HS, Du Plessis D, Geyer HS Jr., van Eeden (2012) Recent urbanization trends in South Africa—updating the differential urbanization concept. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264174108-en

  • Ginsburg N, Koppel B, McGee TG (eds) (1991) The extended metropolis: settlement transition in Asia. University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of India (2000) Agricultural Census of India, 2000–01, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of India (2001) Primary Census Abstract, Census of India, 2001, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of India (2010) Agricultural Census of India, 2010–11, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of India (2011) Primary Census Abstract, Census of India, 2011, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith DA, Amrhein CG (1997) Multivariate statistics for geographers. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Guin D (2018) From large villages to small towns: a study of rural transformation in new census towns, India. Int J Rural Manag 14:87–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahs AK, McDonnell MJ (2006) Selecting independent measures to quantify Melbourne’s urban-rural gradient. Landsc Urban Plan 78:435–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, J, Hoyler, M (2015) Megaregions: globalization’s new urban form? Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill EW, Brennan JF, Wolman HL (1998) What is a central city in the United States? applying a statistical technique for develo** taxonomies. Urban Stud 35:1935–1969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain M (2013) Analysing effectivity of urban growth management in the national capital region, Delhi, India. Shaker Verlag, Aachen

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain M (2018a) The effect of distance on urban transformation in the capital region, India. Int Plan Stud 23:37–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain M (2018b) Contemporary urbanization as unregulated growth in India: the story of census towns. Cities 73:117–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain M, Knieling J (2018) Growth of census towns in capital region of India: informal urbanization as a symptom of counter-urbanization? In: Benna U, Benna I (eds) Urbanization and its impact on socio-economic growth in develo** regions. IGI Global, Hershey, PA, pp 109–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain M, Korzhenevych, A (2017) Spatial disparities, transport infrastructure and decentralization policy in the Delhi Region. J Urban Plan Dev 143

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain M, Pallagst K (2015) Land use beyond control. Plan Rev 51:29–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain M, Siedentop S, Taubenbock H, Namperumal S (2013) From suburbanization to counterurbanization? investigating urban dynamics in the National Capital Region Delhi, India. Environ Urban ASIA 4:247–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones GW, Douglass M (eds) (2008) Mega-urban regions in Pacific Asia: urban dynamics in a global era. NUS Press, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Kundu A (2009) Exclusionary urbanization in Asia: a macro overview. Econ Polit Wkly XLIV:48–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Kundu A, Saraswati LR (2012) Migration and exclusionary urbanization in India 47:219–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Mbiba B, Huchzermeyer M (2002) Contentious development: peri-urban studies in sub-Saharan Africa. Prog Dev Stud 2:113–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikelbank BA (2004) A typology of U.S. suburban places. Hous Policy Debate 15:935–964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitra A, Kumar R (2015) New patterns in Indian urbanization: emergence of census towns. Environ Urban ASIA, Natl Inst Urban Aff 6:18–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mookherjee D, Geyer HS, Hoerauf E (2014) Delhi and its peripheral region: perspectives on settlement growth. In: O’Donoghue DP (ed) Urban transformations: centers, peripheries and systems. Ashgate, Farnham, UK, pp 197–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Mookherjee D, Geyer HS, Hoerauf G (2015) Dynamics of an evolving city-region in the develo** world: the National Capital Region of India revisited. Int Plan Stud 20:146–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mookherjee D, White J (2011) Urban-regional dualism in India: an exploration of developmental indicators across urban size classes. Asian Geogr 28:21–31

    Google Scholar 

  • National Commission on Urbanization (1988) Report of the National Commission on Urbanization. Government of India, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • NCRPB (National Capital Region Planning Board) (1988) Regional Plan 2001: National Capital Region. NCRPB, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • NCRPB (National Capital Region Planning Board) (2000) National Capital Region. NCRPB, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • NCRPB (National Capital Region Planning Board) (2005) Regional Plan 2021: National Capital Region. NCRPB, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • NCRPB (National Capital Region Planning Board) (2013) Regional Plan 2021: National Capital Region. NCRPB, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacione M (2011) Introduction: urban growth patterns, trends, and policy issues. In: Geyer HS (ed) International handbook of urban policy, vol 3. Edward Elgar. Cheltenham, UK, pp 3–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Planning Commission (2013) Twelfth Five Year Plan (2012–2017). Government of India, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson HW (1977) City size and national strategies in develo** countries. Staff Working Paper, No. 252. World Bank, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson HW (1980) Polarization reversal in develo** countries. Pap Reg Sci Assoc 45:67–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayre NF (2005) Ecological and geographical scale: parallels and potential for integration. Prog Hum Geogr 29:276–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayre NF (2009) Scale. In: Castree N, Demeritt D, Liverman D, Rhoads B (eds) A companion to environmental geography. Malden, MA, Wiley-Blackwell, pp 138–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Sekhar TV, Hatti N (2005) Discrimination of female children in modern India: from conception through childhood. Presented at International Union for the Scientific Study of Population, 25 International Population Conference. http://iussp2005.princeton.edu

  • Sivaramakrishnan KC, Kundu A, Singh BN (2005) Handbook of urbanization in India. Oxford University Press, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen A, Okata J (eds) (2011) Megacities: urban form, governance and sustainability. Springer, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Taubenbock H, Wegmann M, Berger C, Breunig M, Roth A, Mehl H (2008) Spatiotemporal analysis of Indian megacities. The International Archives of the Photogammetry: Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences xxxviii (Part B2)

    Google Scholar 

  • TCPO (Town and Country Planning Organisation (2007) Evaluation study of DMA towns in the National Capital Region (NCR). Ministry of Urban Development, Government of India, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Verma TP, Moharana PC, Naitam RK, Meena RL, Kumar S, Singh R, Tailor BL, Singh RS, Singh SK (2017) Impact of crop** intensity on soil properties and plant available nutrients in hot arid environment of North-Western India. J Plant Nutr 40(20):2872–2888. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2017.1381732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyly EK (1999) Continuity and change in the restless in the restless urban landscape. Econ Geogr 75:309–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Debnath Mookherjee .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mookherjee, D. (2020). The National Capital Region, Delhi, India: An Empirical Exploration. In: The Asian Megacity Region. The Urban Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42649-1_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation