Abstract
Current professional guidance for doctors emphasises that the ethical standards and principles that apply to the civilian practice of medicine should be applied, without modification, to military medical practice. In particular, that respect for patient autonomy is upheld. In the UK, the decision to join the military is voluntary and made in the knowledge that it means joining a chain of command that modifies certain freedoms to make decisions for oneself. One such is the wearing of personal protective equipment. Medical prophylaxis has features in common with personal protective equipment but medical personnel, unlike the nonmedical chain of command, cannot insist on compliance because to do so would contravene professional codes of conduct. In the resource-limited, high-risk, and intimately interdependent environments in which the military operate, the decisions individuals make impact on those around them. In these circumstances, the common features of prophylaxis of all kinds, including medical, may justify ordering personnel to comply. We describe how the ethical imperatives of a military unit differ from those of civilian society and how these build a case for why the right to respect for autonomy may take secondary consideration to the principles of beneficence and justice in such a setting. Medical prophylaxis is discussed as an example of a medical intervention that best describes the need for a new approach. We discuss how to overcome current limitations, either by delivering mandated prophylaxis by those without a professional registration or through a fundamental reappraisal of the ethical priorities that take precedence under different military circumstances.
This work is the personal opinion of the authors and does not represent British military doctrine or policy
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
We accept that as far as the law is concerned in England and Wales, having capacity is sufficient for a patient’s decision to be authoritative, even though capacity as defined in law may fall short of autonomy as it is defined in philosophy.
- 2.
Of course, there is a body of literature that questions the whether this conceptualisation of autonomy is ever appropriate and proposes a model of relational autonomy that give more weight to social context and emotional, embodied decision-making. This may be particularly true in the case of health promotion (see for instance https://academic.oup.com/phe/article-abstract/8/1/50/1590159?redirectedFrom=fulltext)
- 3.
I.e. leaving aside some philosophical thought experiment deliberately designed to place consequential pressure on the decision
References
Abel, Sharon M. 2008. Barriers to hearing conservation programs in combat arms occupations. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine 79 (6): 591–598.
Arie, Sophie. 2017. Compulsory vaccination and growing measles threat. BMJ: British Medical Journal (Online) 358: j3429.
Battlefield Casualty Drills – Aide Memoire. 2007.
Beauchamp, Tom L., and James F. Childress. 2001. Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
BMA. 2018. Armed forces ethics tool kit. https://www.bma.org.uk/advice/employment/ethics/armed-forces-ethics-toolkit. Accessed Sept 2018.
Cappelen, Alexander W., and Ole Frithjof Norheim. 2005. Responsibility in health care: A liberal egalitarian approach. Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (8): 476–480.
Chan, Sarah W., Ed Tulloch, E. Sarah Cooper, Andrew Smith, Wojtek Wojcik, and Jane E. Norman. 2017. Montgomery and informed consent: Where are we now? BMJ 357: j2224.
Downs, Julie S., Wändi Bruine de Bruin, and Baruch Fischhoff. 2008. Parents’ vaccination comprehension and decisions. Vaccine 26 (12): 1595–1607.
Eisenstein, Neil, David Naumann, Daniel Burns, Sarah Stapley, and Heather Draper. 2017. Left of Bang interventions in Trauma: Ethical implications for military medical prophylaxis. Journal of Medical Ethics: Medethics 2017 (104299).
GMC. 2014. Good medical practice: General medical council. London: General Medical Council.
Gøtzsche, Peter C., Ole J. Hartling, Margrethe Nielsen, John Brodersen, and Karsten Juhl Jørgensen. 2009. Breast screening: The facts—Or maybe not. Cancer 1: 2.
Gross, Michael L., and Don Carrick. 2016. Military medical ethics for the 21st century. London: Routledge.
Hall, Andrew J. 2010. The United Kingdom joint committee on vaccination and immunisation. Vaccine 28: A54–A57.
Kant, Immanuel. 2017. Kant: The metaphysics of morals. Trans. M. Gregor. Revised Aufl. Cambridge texts in the history of philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kaufman, Bradley, David Ben-Eli, Glenn Asaeda, Dario Gonzalez, Doug Isaacs, John Freese, and David Prezant. 2013. Comparison of disaster triage methods. Annals of Emergency Medicine 62 (6): 644–645.
Kirke, Charles. 2010. Military cohesion, culture and social psychology. Defence & Security Analysis 26 (2): 143–159.
Larsen, Brianna, Kevin Netto, and Brad Aisbett. 2011. The effect of body armor on performance, thermal stress, and exertion: A critical review. Military Medicine 176 (11): 1265–1273.
Larsen, Brianna, Kevin Netto, Daniel Skovli, Kim Vincs, Sarah Vu, and Brad Aisbett. 2012. Body armor, performance, and physiology during repeated high-intensity work tasks. Military Medicine 177 (11): 1308–1315.
Levers, Jane. 2018. Children’s division immunisation procedure for school nursing teams: Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust.
Manson, Neil C., and Onora O’Neill. 2007. Rethinking informed consent in bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
NATO. 2018. Allied joint doctrine for medical support AJP-4.10(B): NATO Standardization Office.
Powers, Penny. 2007. Persuasion and coercion: A critical review of philosophical and empirical approaches. HEC Forum 19: 125–143. Springer.
Public Health (Control of Disease) Act. 1984. United Kingdon.
Resnik, David B. 2007. Responsibility for health: Personal, social, and environmental. Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (8): 444–445.
Robertson-Steel, Iain. 2006. Evolution of triage systems. Emergency Medicine Journal 23 (2): 154–155.
Smith, Arthur M., and C. Hooper. 2016. The mosquito can be more dangerous than the mortar round-the obligations of command. Journal of Military and Veterans Health 24 (3): 60.
Wardrope, Alistair. 2014. Relational autonomy and the ethics of health promotion. Public Health Ethics 8 (1): 50–62.
WMA. 2006. World medical association international code of medical ethics.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Eisenstein, N., Draper, H. (2020). Medical Prophylaxis in the Military: A Case for Limited Compulsion. In: Messelken, D., Winkler, D. (eds) Ethics of Medical Innovation, Experimentation, and Enhancement in Military and Humanitarian Contexts. Military and Humanitarian Health Ethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36319-2_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36319-2_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-36318-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-36319-2
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)