Abstract

This chapter presents a business case for simulation-based mastery learning (SBML). SBML projects in medical education often yield downstream return on investment (ROI) which can be calculated using the Phillips ROI model. The Phillips ROI model first involves performing a business alignment needs assessment, determining the cost of an identified problem, and assessing how SBML can be a solution. Subsequently, the ROI model evaluates both inputs (cost) and outputs (outcomes) to ensure that institutions receive maximum effect from improvement initiatives. The chapter has four sections: (a) description of the Phillips ROI methodology, (b) an example of use of the ROI model with SBML, (c) additional examples of ROI, and (d) stakeholder engagement: convincing the C-suite. The chapter concludes with a brief coda.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 106.99
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 139.09
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brennan TA, Leape LL, Laird NM, Hebert L, Localio AR, Lawthers AG, et al. Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. N Engl J Med. 1991;324(6):370–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Duffy FD, Holmboe ES. What procedures should internists do? Ann Intern Med. 2007;146(5):392–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Giraud T, Dhainaut JF, Vaxelaire JF, Joseph T, Journois D, Bleichner G, et al. Iatrogenic complications in adult intensive care units: a prospective two-center study. Crit Care Med. 1993;21(1):40–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rubins HB, Moskowitz MA. Complications of care in a medical intensive care unit. J Gen Intern Med. 1990;5(2):104–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rosenthal MB. Nonpayment for performance? Medicare’s new reimbursement rule. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(16):1573–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Leape LL, Brennan TA, Laird N, Lawthers AG, Localio AR, Barnes BA, et al. The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study II. N Engl J Med. 1991;324(6):377–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Joshi M, Ransom ER, Nash DB, Ransom SB. The healthcare quality book: vision, strategy, and tools. 3rd ed. Chicago: Health Administration Press; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Barsuk JH, Cohen ER, Feinglass J, McGaghie WC, Wayne DB. Use of simulation-based education to reduce catheter-related bloodstream infections. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(15):1420–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Barsuk JH, Cohen ER, Potts S, Demo H, Gupta S, Feinglass J, et al. Dissemination of a simulation-based mastery learning intervention reduces central line-associated bloodstream infections. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014;23(9):749–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Barsuk JH, Cohen ER, Williams MV, Scher J, Jones SF, Feinglass J, et al. Simulation-based mastery learning for thoracentesis skills improves patient outcomes: a randomized trial. Acad Med. 2018;93(5):729–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Barsuk JH, McGaghie WC, Cohen ER, O’Leary KJ, Wayne DB. Simulation-based mastery learning reduces complications during central venous catheter insertion in a medical intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(10):2697–701.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Didwania A, McGaghie WC, Cohen ER, Butter J, Barsuk JH, Wade LD, et al. Progress toward improving the quality of cardiac arrest medical team responses at an academic teaching hospital. J Grad Med Educ. 2011;3(2):211–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gossett DR, Gilchrist-Scott D, Wayne DB, Gerber SE. Simulation training for forceps-assisted vaginal delivery and rates of maternal perineal trauma. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128(3):429–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Schwab B, Teitelbaum EN, Barsuk JH, Soper NJ, Hungness ES. Single-stage laparoscopic management of choledocholithiasis: an analysis after implementation of a mastery learning resident curriculum. Surgery. 2018;163(3):503–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Swensen SJ, Dilling JA, Mc Carty PM, Bolton JW, Harper CM Jr. The business case for health-care quality improvement. J Patient Saf. 2013;9(1):44–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Buzachero VV, Phillips J, Phillips PP, Phillips ZL. Measuring ROI in healthcare: tools and techniques to measure the impact and ROI in healthcare improvement projects and programs. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  18. CMS’s Value Based Programs. Available from: https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/Value-Based-Programs/Value-Based-Programs.html.

  19. Cohen ER, Feinglass J, Barsuk JH, Barnard C, O’Donnell A, McGaghie WC, et al. Cost savings from reduced catheter-related bloodstream infection after simulation-based education for residents in a medical intensive care unit. Simul Healthc. 2010;5(2):98–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Barsuk JH, Cohen ER, Feinglass J, Kozmic SE, McGaghie WC, Ganger D, et al. Cost savings of performing paracentesis procedures at the bedside after simulation-based education. Simul Healthc. 2014;9(5):312–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Barsuk JH, Cohen ER, Mikolajczak A, Seburn S, Slade M, Wayne DB. Simulation-based mastery learning improves central line maintenance skills of ICU nurses. J Nurs Adm. 2015;45(10):511–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. AHRQ. Engaging stakeholders to improve the quality of children’s health care. Available from: https://www.ahrq.gov/policymakers/chipra/demoeval/what-we-learned/implementation-guides/implementation-guide1/index.html.

  23. Jeffery N. Stakeholder engagement: a road map to meaningful engagement. Doughty Centre for Corporate Responsibility. Cranfield University School of Management. 2009. Available from: http://www.som.cranfield.ac.uk/som/dinamic-content/media/CR%20Stakeholder.pdf.

  24. Preskill H, Jones N. A practical guide for engaging stakeholders in develo** evaluation questions. 2009. Available from: http://www.rwjf.org/content/dam/farm/toolkits/toolkits/2009/rwjf48595.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey H. Barsuk .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Barsuk, J.H., Barsuk, S.A., Wayne, D.B. (2020). Return on Investment from Simulation-Based Mastery Learning. In: McGaghie, W., Barsuk, J., Wayne, D. (eds) Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation: Mastery Learning in Health Professions Education. Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34811-3_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34811-3_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-34810-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-34811-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation