Abstract

Healthcare providers demonstrate wide variability in their skill at performing medical procedures safely. Objective measures of clinical skills are rarely used in making high-stakes personnel decisions. Hospitals and other privileging, licensing, and credentialing bodies use aggregate number systems to determine if individual healthcare providers are safe and ready to perform clinical procedures. However, many studies show that neither clinical experience (number of procedures performed) nor provider self-confidence correlate with actual procedural skill. Simulation-based mastery learning (SBML) can be used to ensure that individual healthcare providers are competent to perform invasive procedures. In this chapter, we discuss how SBML has been used to boost bedside procedural skills. Specifically, we describe how SBML curricula were developed using the Thomas and Kern framework for bedside procedural skills including thoracentesis, paracentesis, central venous catheter (CVC) insertion, and CVC maintenance. We also review how translational science outcomes are used to provide validity evidence about the effectiveness of these curricula.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. How many procedures makes competency? Hosp Peer Rev. 2014;39(11):121–3.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education [Internet]. Chicago: ACGME; 2000–2018 [cited 2018 Oct 8]. Milestones. Available from: http://www.acgme.org/acgmeweb/tabid/430/ProgramandInstitutionalAccreditation/NextAccreditationSystem/Milestones.aspx.

  3. Internal Medicine Policies [Internet]. Philadelphia: American Board of Internal Medicine; 2018 [cited 2018 Oct 8]. Available from: http://www.abim.org/certification/policies/imss/im.aspx-procedures.

  4. American Board of Surgery Update [Internet]. Philadelphia: ABS; 2015 [cited 2018 Oct 8]. Update. Available from: http://www.absurgery.org/xfer/APDS_2015.pdf.

  5. Barsuk JH, Ahya SN, Cohen ER, McGaghie WC, Wayne DB. Mastery learning of temporary hemodialysis catheter insertion by nephrology fellows using simulation technology and deliberate practice. Am J Kidney Dis. 2009;54(1):70–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Barsuk JH, Cohen ER, Nguyen D, Mitra D, O’Hara K, Okuda Y, et al. Attending physician adherence to a 29-component central venous catheter bundle checklist during simulated procedures. Crit Care Med. 2016;44(10):1871–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Barsuk JH, McGaghie WC, Cohen ER, Balachandran JS, Wayne DB. Use of simulation-based mastery learning to improve the quality of central venous catheter placement in a medical intensive care unit. J Hosp Med. 2009;4(7):397–403.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Barsuk JH, McGaghie WC, Cohen ER, O’Leary KJ, Wayne DB. Simulation-based mastery learning reduces complications during central venous catheter insertion in a medical intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(10):2697–701.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Barsuk JH, Cohen ER, Mikolajczak A, Seburn S, Slade M, Wayne DB. Simulation-based mastery learning improves central line maintenance skills of ICU nurses. J Nurs Adm. 2015;45(10):511–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Barsuk JH, Cohen ER, Caprio T, McGaghie WC, Simuni T, Wayne DB. Simulation-based education with mastery learning improves residents’ lumbar puncture skills. Neurology. 2012;79(2):132–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Wayne DB, Barsuk JH, O’Leary KJ, Fudala MJ, McGaghie WC. Mastery learning of thoracentesis skills by internal medicine residents using simulation technology and deliberate practice. J Hosp Med. 2008;3(1):48–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Choudhry NK, Fletcher RH, Soumerai SB. Systematic review: the relationship between clinical experience and quality of health care. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142(4):260–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Duloy AM, Kaltenbach TR, Keswani RN. Assessing colon polypectomy competency and its association with established quality metrics. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87(3):635–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Barsuk JH, Cohen ER, Feinglass J, McGaghie WC, Wayne DB. Residents’ procedural experience does not ensure competence: a research synthesis. J Grad Med Educ. 2017;9(2):201–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. McGee DC, Gould MK. Preventing complications of central venous catheterization. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(12):1123–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cohen J, Cohen SA, Vora KC, Xue X, Burdick JS, Bank S, et al. Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of virtual-reality simulator training in acquisition of competency in colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;64(3):361–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Birkmeyer JD, Finks JF, O’Reilly A, Oerline M, Carlin AM, Nunn AR, et al. Surgical skill and complication rates after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(15):1434–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cohen ER, Barsuk JH, Hertz JR, Wayne DB, Okuda Y, Mitra D, et al. Healthcare providers’ awareness and perceptions of competency requirements for central venous catheter insertion. AMEE MedEDPublis; 2018. Available at: https://doi.org/10.15694/mep.2018.0000012.1.

  19. McGaghie WC, Siddall VJ, Mazmanian PE, Myers J, American College of Chest Physicians Health and Science Policy Committee. Lessons for continuing medical education from simulation research in undergraduate and graduate medical education: effectiveness of continuing medical education: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Educational Guidelines. Chest. 2009;135(3 Suppl):62S–8S.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cook DA, Brydges R, Zendejas B, Hamstra SJ, Hatala R. Mastery learning for health professionals using technology-enhanced simulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Med. 2013;88(8):1178–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Didwania A, McGaghie WC, Cohen ER, Butter J, Barsuk JH, Wade LD, et al. Progress toward improving the quality of cardiac arrest medical team responses at an academic teaching hospital. J Grad Med Educ. 2011;3(2):211–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Cohen ER, Barsuk JH, Wayne DB. Medical education featuring mastery learning with deliberate practice can lead to better health for individuals and populations. Acad Med. 2011;86(11):e8–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Barsuk JH, Cohen ER, Vozenilek JA, O’Connor LM, McGaghie WC, Wayne DB. Simulation-based education with mastery learning improves paracentesis skills. J Grad Med Educ. 2012;4(1):23–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Wayne DB, Butter J, Siddall VJ, Fudala MJ, Wade LD, Feinglass J, et al. Mastery learning of advanced cardiac life support skills by internal medicine residents using simulation technology and deliberate practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(3):251–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. McGaghie WC. Medical education research as translational science. Sci Transl Med. 2010;2(19):19cm8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Cohen ER, Barsuk JH, Wayne DB. Translational educational research: a necessity for effective health-care improvement. Chest. 2012;142(5):1097–103.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Barsuk JH, Szmuilowicz E. Evaluating medical procedures: evaluation and transfer to the bedside. In: Pangaro LN, McGaghie WC, editors. Handbook on medical student evaluation and assessment. North Syracuse: Gegensatz Press; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Butter J, McGaghie WC, Cohen ER, Kaye M, Wayne DB. Simulation-based mastery learning improves cardiac auscultation skills in medical students. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(8):780–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Barsuk JH, Cohen ER, Feinglass J, McGaghie WC, Wayne DB. Use of simulation-based education to reduce catheter-related bloodstream infections. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(15):1420–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cohen ER, Feinglass J, Barsuk JH, Barnard C, O’Donnell A, McGaghie WC, et al. Cost savings from reduced catheter-related bloodstream infection after simulation-based education for residents in a medical intensive care unit. Simul Healthc. 2010;5(2):98–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Barsuk JH, Cohen ER, Potts S, Demo H, Gupta S, Feinglass J, et al. Dissemination of a simulation-based mastery learning intervention reduces central line-associated bloodstream infections. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014;23(9):749–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Udani AD, Macario A, Nandagopal K, Tanaka MA, Tanaka PP. Simulation-based mastery learning with deliberate practice improves clinical performance in spinal anesthesia. Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2014;2014:659160.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Gossett DR, Gilchrist-Scott D, Wayne DB, Gerber SE. Simulation training for forceps-assisted vaginal delivery and rates of maternal perineal trauma. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128(3):429–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ahn J, Yashar MD, Novack J, Davidson J, Lapin B, Ocampo J, et al. Mastery learning of video laryngoscopy using the glidescope in the emergency department. Simul Healthc. 2016;11(5):309–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Barsuk JH, Cohen ER, Feinglass J, McGaghie WC, Wayne DB. Clinical outcomes after bedside and interventional radiology paracentesis procedures. Am J Med. 2013;126(4):349–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Barsuk JH, Cohen ER, Feinglass J, Kozmic SE, McGaghie WC, Ganger D, et al. Cost savings of performing paracentesis procedures at the bedside after simulation-based education. Simul Healthc. 2014;9(5):312–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Robinson JK, Jain N, Marghoob AA, McGaghie W, MacLean M, Gerami P, et al. A randomized trial on the efficacy of mastery learning for primary care provider melanoma opportunistic screening skills and practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2018;33(6):855–62.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Ahya SN, Barsuk JH, Cohen ER, Tuazon J, McGaghie WC, Wayne DB. Clinical performance and skill retention after simulation-based education for nephrology fellows. Semin Dial. 2012;25(4):470–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Barsuk JH, Cohen ER, Williams MV, Scher J, Feinglass J, McGaghie WC, et al. The effect of simulation-based mastery learning on thoracentesis referral patterns. J Hosp Med. 2016;11(11):792–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Barsuk JH, Cohen ER, Williams MV, Scher J, Jones SF, Feinglass J, et al. Simulation-based mastery learning for thoracentesis skills improves patient outcomes: a randomized trial. Acad Med. 2018;93(5):729–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ericsson KA. Acquisition and maintenance of medical expertise: a perspective from the expert-performance approach with deliberate practice. Acad Med. 2015;90(11):1471–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ericsson KA. Peak: secrets from the new science of expertise. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt; 2016. xxiii, 307 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Huang GC, Smith CC, Gordon CE, Feller-Kopman DJ, Davis RB, Phillips RS, et al. Beyond the comfort zone: residents assess their comfort performing inpatient medical procedures. Am J Med. 2006;119(1):71 e17–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Stufflebeam DL. The checklists development checklist [Internet]. Kalamazoo: Western Michigan University Evaluation Center; 2000 [cited 2018 Oct 8]. Available at: https://www.wmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u350/2014/guidelines_cdc.pdf.

  45. Barsuk JH, Cohen ER, Wayne DB, Siddall VJ, McGaghie WC. Develo** a simulation-based mastery learning curriculum: lessons from 11 years of advanced cardiac life support. Simul Healthc. 2016;11(1):52–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Hospital Acquired Conditions [Internet]. Baltimore: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services; 2018 [cited 2018 Oct 8]. Available from: https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/HospitalAcqCond/Hospital-Acquired_Conditions.html.

  47. Barsuk JH, Cohen ER, McGaghie WC, Wayne DB. Long-term retention of central venous catheter insertion skills after simulation-based mastery learning. Acad Med. 2010;85(10 Suppl):S9–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Barsuk JH, Cohen ER, Feinglass J, McGaghie WC, Wayne DB. Unexpected collateral effects of simulation-based medical education. Acad Med. 2011;86(12):1513–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Cohen ER, Barsuk JH, McGaghie WC, Wayne DB. Raising the bar: reassessing standards for procedural competence. Teach Learn Med. 2013;25(1):6–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Damschroder LJ, Banaszak-Holl J, Kowalski CP, Forman J, Saint S, Krein SL. The role of the champion in infection prevention: results from a multisite qualitative study. Qual Saf Health Care. 2009;18(6):434–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Cameron KA, Cohen ER, Hertz JR, Wayne DB, Mitra D, Barsuk JH. Barriers and facilitators to central venous catheter insertion: a qualitative study. J of Patient Saf. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000000477. [Epub ahead of print].

  52. Clark E, Paparello JJ, Wayne DB, Edwards C, Hoar S, McQuillian R, et al. Use of a national continuing medical education meeting to provide training in temporary hemodialysis catheter insertion skills for nephrology trainees: a pretest-posttest study. Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2014;1:25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. McQuillan RF, Clark E, Zahirieh A, Cohen ER, Paparello JJ, Wayne DB, et al. Performance of temporary hemodialysis catheter insertion by nephrology fellows and attending nephrologists. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;10(10):1767–72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Cohen ER, Barsuk JH, Moazed F, Caprio T, Didwania A, McGaghie WC, et al. Making July safer: simulation-based mastery learning during intern boot camp. Acad Med. 2013;88(2):233–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Zendejas B, Cook DA, Bingener J, Huebner M, Dunn WF, Sarr MG, et al. Simulation-based mastery learning improves patient outcomes in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2011;254(3):502–9; discussion 9–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Melchiors J, Petersen K, Todsen T, Bohr A, Konge L, von Buchwald C. Procedure-specific assessment tool for flexible pharyngo-laryngoscopy: gathering validity evidence and setting pass-fail standards. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018;275(6):1649–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Achieving competency-based time-variable health professions education. Recommendations from the Macy Foundation Conference. Macy Foundation Conference; July 14–17; Atlanta, GA. www.macyfoundation.org: Josiah Macy Jr. Foundation; 2017. p. 1–24.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey H. Barsuk .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendix 13.1: Thoracentesis Checklist

Thoracentesis

Skill key: A = done correctly B = done incorrectly/not done

Informed consent obtained

 Benefits

 Risks

 Permission given

A

B

Call “time-out”

A

B

Wash hands

A

B

Identify the landmarks based on ultrasound (identify fluid, the lung, and the diaphragm)

A

B

Mark the site using ultrasound

A

B

Clean area with chlorhexidine solution

A

B

Put on sterile gloves

A

B

Drape the area

A

B

Set up the kit using the catheter/tubing/stop cock system (making sure the flow is from needle to syringe; this is the default position)

A

B

Use 1% lidocaine to anesthetize the skin area above the rib (wheal)

A

B

Using lidocaine, anesthetize to the bone and pleura with a longer needle

A

B

Aspirate pleural fluid with this needle

A

B

Using the thoracentesis needle (catheter/needle complex), enter the skin above the rib while aspirating (two hands)

A

B

Once the catheter is about to enter the skin, nick the skin with a scalpel at the entry site, and continue to advance the catheter/needle unit

A

B

Identify that the catheter and needle have entered the pleural space. White changes to red to white again, and aspirate fluid

A

B

Advance the catheter over the needle until it is in the pleural space, and withdraw the needle syringe unit

A

B

Turn the stop cock to direct the flow from the catheter in the pleural space to the tubing

A

B

Connect the tubing to syringe, and using the “push and pull method,” aspirate fluid into the bag

A

B

Aspirate no more than 1.5 L of fluid (1 L is acceptable) unless no symptoms (ask how much are you removing?)

  

Withdraw catheter/syringe while patient exhales (resident must communicate)

A

B

Place dressing

A

B

Demonstrate knowledge as to whether to order a chest x-ray

A

B

Blood cx inoculated at the bedside (can verbalize)

  

Transfer fluid into appropriate vials, and send for appropriate studies: LDH, protein, cell count, gram stain and culture, cytology, and pH

A

B

Communicate with the nurse about procedure completion

A

B

Maintain sterile technique

A

B

Appendix 13.2: Central Line Insertion Checklist for Internal Jugular (IJ) and Subclavian (SC) Veins

Central Line Insertion (IJ)

Skill key: A = done correctly B = done incorrectly/not done

Informed consent obtained

 Benefits (medicines, fluids)

 Risks (infection, bleeding, pneumothorax)

 Consent given

A

B

Call “time-out,” and site mark if appropriate

(must be done before any needles enter the skin)

A

B

Wash hands

A

B

Place the patient in slight Trendelenburg position

A

B

Area is cleaned with chlorhexidine

(30 seconds, scrub back forth)

If scrubbing back and forth can ask “how long do you need to scrub?”

A

B

Don sterile gown, gloves, hat, and mask

A

B

Area is draped in usual sterile fashion

(must be full-body drape)

A

B

The US probe is properly set up and draped, and sonographic gel is used on inside and outside of sheath (more important inside)

A

B

Test each port, and flush the lines with sterile saline

A

B

Clamp each port (okay to keep distal port open), or use caps (caps must be flushed)

A

B

Keep distal port open to accommodate guidewire

A

B

The vein is localized using anatomical landmarks with the ultrasound machine

A

B

The skin is anesthetized with 1% lidocaine in a small wheal

A

B

The deeper structures are anesthetized

A

B

Using the large-needle (or catheter) syringe complex, cannulate the vein while aspirating with proper US technique

A

B

Remove the syringe from the needle, or advance the catheter into the vein (must be hubbed) removing both the syringe and needle

A

B

Advance the guidewire into the vein no more than about 15 cm (range 10–20 cm)

A

B

Make sure to nick the skin to advance the dilator (scalpel)

A

B

Advance the dilator over the guidewire, and dilate the tissue tract

A

B

Advance the triple lumen over the wire, holding the guidewire steady as moving forward with the catheter

A

B

Never let go of the guidewire

A

B

Once the line is in place, remove the guidewire in its entirety

A

B

Advance the line to approx. 14–16 cm for right side and 16–18 cm for left side

A

B

Ensure there is blood flow/flush each port (must aspirate before flushing). Place caps here if not done earlier, and flush through

A

B

Secure the line in place using the connector correctly (suturing should be verbalized only)

A

B

Place sterile dressing

A

B

Get a chest x-ray to confirm location

State “the cxr shows no ptx, and you are at the RA SVC junction (if proper depth of insertion)”

A

B

Notify nurse that line is okay to use

A

B

Maintain sterile technique

A

B

Central Line Placement (Subclavian)

Skill key: A = done correctly B = done incorrectly/not done. **Only one step in italics is used depending on if ultrasound is used

Informed consent obtained

 Benefits (medicines, fluids)

 Risks (infection, bleeding, pneumothorax)

 Consent given

A

B

Call “time-out,” and site mark if appropriate

(must be done before any needles enter the skin)

A

B

Wash hands

A

B

Place the patient in slight Trendelenburg position

A

B

Area is cleaned with chlorhexidine

(30 seconds, scrub back forth)

If scrubbing back and forth, can ask “how long do you need to scrub?”

A

B

Don sterile gown, gloves, hat, and mask

A

B

Area is draped in usual sterile fashion

(must be full-body drape)

A

B

**The US probe is properly set up and draped, and sonographic gel is used on both sides of the sheath (must do if using ultrasound)

A

B

Test each port, and flush the lines with sterile saline

A

B

Clamp each port (okay to leave distal port open), or use caps (caps must be flushed)

A

B

Keep distal port open to accommodate guidewire

A

B

The vein is localized using ultrasound machine or anatomical landmarks verbalized. “I am going 1 cm under the clavicle at 1/3:2/3 the way”

Okay to ask “how did you determine the site of needle entry?”

A

B

The skin is anesthetized with 1% lidocaine in a small wheal

A

B

The deeper structures are anesthetized using a larger needle (must numb the periosteum of the clavicle)

A

B

Using the large-needle (or catheter) syringe complex, cannulate the vein while aspirating

(optional, confirmed by US)

A

B

**If US was not used then expected to state or demonstrate they must direct the needle to the sternal notch (must verbalize) (if US was used, may omit)

Okay to ask “what direction is your needle pointed, toward what anatomic structure?”

A

B

Remove the syringe from the needle, or advance the catheter into the vein (must be hubbed) removing both the syringe and needle

A

B

Advance the guidewire into the vein no more than 15 cm (range 10–20 cm)

A

B

Make sure to nick the skin to advance the dilator (scalpel)

A

B

Advance the dilator over the guidewire, and dilate the tissue tract

A

B

Advance the triple lumen over the wire, holding the guidewire steady as moving forward with the catheter

A

B

Never let go of the guidewire

A

B

Once the line is in place, remove the guidewire in its entirety

A

B

Advance the line to approx. 14–16 cm for right side and 16–18 cm for left side

A

B

Ensure there is blood flow/flush each port (must aspirate before flushing). Place caps here if not done earlier, and flush through

A

B

Secure the line in place using the connector correctly (suturing should be verbalized only)

A

B

Place sterile dressing

A

B

Get a chest x-ray to confirm location

State “the cxr shows no ptx, and you are at the RA SVC junction (if proper depth of insertion)”

A

B

Notify nurse that line is okay to use

A

B

Maintain sterile technique

A

B

Appendix 13.3: Central Line Maintenance Checklists

Central Line Maintenance: PICC and CVC

Skill key: 1 = done correctly 0 = done incorrectly/not done

Task

Correct

Incorrect

Medication administration (IV push or piggyback)

Maintain aseptic technique and standard precautions during the procedure

1

0

Perform hand hygiene

1

0

Don gloves

1

0

Scrub injection cap with CHG solution for 15 seconds, and allow to dry for at least 15 seconds (or for units using 70% isopropyl alcohol-impregnated port protectors: Remove and discard port protector)

1

0

Attach a pre-filled NS syringe to the injection cap

1

0

If present, open catheter clamp

1

0

Slowly inject 10 mL NS flush solution

1

0

Scrub injection cap with CHG solution for 15 seconds, and allow to dry for at least 15 seconds

1

0

Administer IV push medication (if IV piggyback, luer lock the secondary infusion pump tubing to the cleansed port. Procedure ends here for IV piggyback medications)

1

0

Scrub injection cap with CHG solution for 15 seconds, and allow to dry for at least 15 seconds

1

0

Flush with 10 mL NS (as described above)

1

0

Detach syringe first to activate the positive pressure valve; then clamp catheter

1

0

For units using 70% isopropyl alcohol-impregnated port protectors, apply port protectors to all CVAD access ports that do not have active infusions

1

0

Tubing change: connection to injection cap or hub

Maintain aseptic technique and standard precautions during the procedure

1

0

Perform hand hygiene

1

0

Don gloves

1

0

Close the catheter clamp

1

0

Disconnect old tubing and discard

1

0

Scrub the CVAD injection cap with CHG solution for 15 seconds, place on sterile 4 × 4 gauze, and allow to dry for at least 15 seconds

1

0

Connect new infusion tubing to CVAD injection cap/hub. If connecting to the hub, don a mask before disconnection

1

0

Open catheter clamp

1

0

Restart infusion pump(s)

1

0

Apply “date to be changed” label to tubing

1

0

For units using 70% isopropyl alcohol-impregnated port protectors, apply port protectors to all CVAD access ports that do not have active infusions

1

0

Injection cap change

Correct

Incorrect

Maintain aseptic technique and standard precautions during the procedure

1

0

Perform hand hygiene

1

0

Don mask and non-sterile gloves

1

0

Mask the patient if the patient is able to tolerate; otherwise instruct the patient to turn his or her head away from the procedure

1

0

Without removing protective covering from the new injection cap, prime the injection cap with normal saline using aseptic technique. The covering is a flush-through covering

1

0

Close the catheter clamp on CVAD

1

0

Remove and dispose of the old injection cap

1

0

Scrub the CVAD hub with CHG solution for 15 seconds, place on sterile 4 × 4 gauze, and allow to dry for at least 15 seconds

1

0

Connect the new injection cap

1

0

Open catheter clamp on CVAD

1

0

Slowly inject NS flush solution

1

0

Detach syringe first to activate the positive pressure valve; then close clamp on catheter

1

0

For units using 70% isopropyl alcohol-impregnated port protectors, apply port protectors to all CVAD access ports that do not have active infusions

1

0

Indirect blood draw through injection cap

Correct

Incorrect

Maintain aseptic technique and standard precautions during the procedure

1

0

Perform hand hygiene

1

0

Don non-sterile gloves

1

0

Stop all infusion(s)

1

0

Clamp all CVAD lumens

1

0

Scrub injection cap for 15 seconds with CHG solution, place on sterile 4 x 4 gauze, and allow to dry at least 15 seconds

1

0

Attach the first of two 10 mL NS syringes to the CVAD cap; slowly inject NS

1

0

Remove syringe

1

0

Scrub the injection cap with CHG solution for 15 seconds, and allow to dry for at least 15 seconds

1

0

Attach second of two 10 mL NS syringes to the injection cap; slowly inject NS

1

0

Using the same syringe, aspirate 10 mL of blood for waste

1

0

Remove 10 mL waste syringe and discard

1

0

Scrub the injection cap with CHG solution for 15 seconds, and allow to dry for at least 15 seconds

1

0

Attach 10 or 20 mL syringe

1

0

Aspirate a minimum of 10 mL but no more than 20 mL of blood

1

0

Remove syringe, and place on sterile 4 × 4 gauze

1

0

Scrub the injection cap with CHG solution for 15 seconds, and allow to dry for at least 15 seconds

1

0

Attach the first of 2 mL NS syringes to injection cap of catheter

1

0

Slowly inject NS; detach syringe

1

0

Scrub the injection cap with CHG solution for 15 seconds, and allow to dry for at least 15 seconds

1

0

Attach the second 10 mL NS syringe to the injection cap; slowly inject NS

1

0

Detach syringe first to activate the positive pressure valve; then clamp catheter if not being used for infusion(s)

1

0

Unclamp CVAD lumen(s) being used for infusion(s)

1

0

Restart infusion pump(s)

1

0

For units using 70% isopropyl alcohol-impregnated port protectors, apply port protectors to all CVAD access ports that do not have active infusions

1

0

Dressing change

Correct

Incorrect

Maintain aseptic technique and standard precautions during the procedure

1

0

Perform hand hygiene

1

0

Don non-sterile gloves

1

0

Open the central line dressing kit maintaining sterility at all times. Add additional sterile supplies needed for procedure to sterile field prior to beginning the procedure

1

0

Don mask found in the kit

1

0

Mask the patient if the patient is able to tolerate a mask; otherwise instruct the patient to turn his or her head away during the procedure

1

0

Remove the entire dressing; loosen the edges without touching the area under the dressing

1

0

Remove non-sterile gloves, and discard

1

0

Perform hand hygiene

1

0

Don sterile gloves

1

0

Remove securing device if present (must be done with sterile gloves)

1

0

Cleanse catheter insertion site using CHG solution. Scrub the skin with a back and forth motion for 30 seconds, covering a 4 inch surface

1

0

Allow the CHG solution to dry for at least 30 seconds

1

0

If applicable, attach a securing device to the PICC line

1

0

If sutures are loose or no longer intact, secure catheter with sterile tape strips to prevent catheter migration

1

0

Optional: Apply tincture of benzoin to the perimeter of the dressing area – avoid insertion site – to increase adherence of dressing to the skin, if necessary. Allow to dry

1

0

When site is completely dry, apply the TSM dressing. Ensure occlusiveness (if the dressing is not occlusive, a new dressing must be reapplied. Do not attempt to secure TSM dressing with tape)

1

0

Apply date label with date of change to dressing and initial. TSM dressings are changed 24 hours post CVAD insertion and every 6 days (to coincide with IV tubing changes), whenever the dressing is no longer occlusive or there is blood, other drainage, or signs of inflammation present

1

0

Appendix 13.4: Paracentesis Checklist

Paracentesis

Skill key: A = done correctly B = done incorrectly/not done

Informed consent obtained

 Benefits (relief, diagnosis)

 Risks (infection, bleeding)

 Consent given

A

B

Call “time-out,” and site mark if appropriate

A

B

Wash hands

A

B

Identify the landmarks based on percussion or ultrasound

A

B

Clean area with sterilizing solution (chlorhexidine)

A

B

Put on sterile gloves

A

B

Drape the area

A

B

Set up the kit

A

B

Use lidocaine to anesthetize the skin (wheal)

A

B

Using lidocaine, anesthetize deeper

A

B

Use Z technique, lift and drop, or angle

A

B

Using the Safe-T-Centesis needle (catheter/needle complex), enter the skin while aspirating (one hand holding the needle plush on the chest wall and the other on the syringe)

A

B

Once the catheter is about to enter the skin, nick the skin with a scalpel at the entry site, and continue to advance the catheter/needle unit while aspirating

A

B

Identify that the catheter and needle have entered the fluid space. White changes to red to white again, and aspirate fluid

A

B

Advance the catheter over the needle until it is in the space, and withdraw the needle syringe unit (care not to advance the needle)

A

B

Turn the stop cock to direct the flow from the catheter into the tubing

A

B

Connect the tubing to a 1 L Vacutainer or the apparatus connected to the aspirating syringe, and inject fluid into the bag

A

B

Will you give the patient albumin and how much?

A

B

Withdraw catheter/syringe

A

B

Place dressing

A

B

Position the patient with area up

A

B

Blood cx inoculated at the bedside

(can verbalize)

A

B

What studies need to be sent? Must say cell count, gram stain and culture, albumin

A

B

Notify the nurse the procedure is done, and give post-procedure orders

A

B

Sterile technique is maintained

A

B

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Barsuk, J.H., Cohen, E.R., Wayne, D.B. (2020). Mastery Learning of Bedside Procedural Skills. In: McGaghie, W., Barsuk, J., Wayne, D. (eds) Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation: Mastery Learning in Health Professions Education. Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34811-3_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34811-3_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-34810-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-34811-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation