Peace Processes: Business as Usual?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Gender Roles in Peace and Security
  • 1034 Accesses

Abstract

Despite international frameworks such as the WPS agenda that promotes women’s inclusion and full participation, the structure of peace processes and the power dynamics they reflect continues to drive women’s de facto exclusion from them. While there is literature problematising women’s exclusion from formal peace processes, little knowledge exists on the more hidden and informal processes that drive these gendered exclusions. This article builds on the IR literature by also drawing insights from business and management literature—a sector which has advanced more rapidly than other sectors in acknowledging and breaking down the barriers to women’s advancement.

Based on interviews with people active in peace processes, this article indicates that male “homosociality” is expressed in how competence is defined and in access to informal meetings, which play a role in reproducing men’s overrepresentation in peace processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Studies and discussions on women’s participation in peace processes often refer to data conducted by UN Women showing that 4% of the signatories to the peace agreements between 1992 and 2011 were women, 2% were chief mediators and 9% of the negotiators were women. This data is bit old and needs to be updated, but for want of more recent data these figures still indicate the status of women’s participation. More recent figures from Aggestam and Svensson based on 36 cases from 1991 and 2014 show that women were actively engaged as mediators in 8% of the cases (Aggestam and Svensson 2018: 153; UN Women 2012).

References

  • Aggestam, K., & Svensson, I. (2018). Where are the women in peace mediation? In K. Aggestam & A. E. Towns (Eds.), Gendering diplomacy and international negotiation (pp. 149–168). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Aggestam, K., & Town, A. E. (2018). Gendering diplomacy and international negotiations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Anderlini, S. N., & Tirman, J. (2010). What the women say: Participation and UNSCR 1325. International Civil Society Action Network and the MIT Center for International Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, C. (2015). Research paper: Text and context evaluating peace agreements for their ‘gender perspective’. New York: UN Women.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brahimi, L., & Ahmed, S. (2008). In pursuit of sustainable peace: The seven deadly sins of mediation. New York University: Center on International Cooperation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadbridge, A., & Simpson, R. (2011). 25 Years on: Reflecting on the past and looking to the future in gender and management research. British Journal of Management, 22, 470–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chrensaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. The University of Chicago Legal Forum, 8, 139–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, C. (2000). “How can she claim equal rights when she doesn’t have to do as many push-ups as I do?” The framing of men’s opposition to women’s equality in the military. Men and Masculinities, 3, 131–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, C. (2018). The perils of mixing masculinity and missiles. New York Times. Retrieved December 13, 2018, from https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/05/opinion/security-masculinity-nuclear-weapons.html

  • Collinson, D. L., & Hearn, J. (1994). Naming men as men: Implications for work, organization and management. Gender, Work and Organization, 1, 2–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. (1987). Gender and power: Society, the person and sexual politics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. (1998). Masculinities and globalization. Men and Masculinities, 1, 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender and Society, 19, 829–859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darby, J. (2008). Conclusion: Peace processes, present, and future. In J. Darby & R. Mac Ginty (Eds.), Contemporary peacemaking: Conflict, peace processes and post-war reconstruction (pp. 352–372). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ellerby, K. (2013). (En)gendered security? The complexities of women’s inclusion in peace processes. International Interactions, 39, 435–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellerby, K. (2016). A seat at the table is not enough: Understanding women’s substantive representation in peace processes. Peacebuilding, 4, 136–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ely, R. J. (1995). The power in demography: Women’s social construction of gender identity at work. Academy of Management, 38, 589–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enloe, C. (1989). Bananas beaches and bases: Making feminist sense of international politics. London: Pandora.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enloe, C. (2014). Bananas beaches and bases: Making feminist sense of international politics. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Enloe, C. (2016). Globalization and militarism: Feminists make the link. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, J. K. (2004). The paradox of postheroic leadership: An essay on gender, power and transformational change. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 647–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galvanek, J. B., & Planta, K. (2017). Peaceful coexistence? ‘Traditional’ and ‘non-traditional’ conflict resolution mechanisms. Berlin: Berghof Foundation Operations.

    Google Scholar 

  • González, N. C., & Osorio, M. M. (2016). Negotiating from the margins: The political participation of women in the Colombian peace processes (1982–2016). Bogotá: Dejusticia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagen, J. J. (2016). Queering women, peace and security. International Affairs, 92, 313–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hearn, J. (1998). Theorizing men and men’s theorizing: Varieties of discursive practices in men’s theorizing of men. Theory and Society, 27, 781–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hearn, J. (2015). Men of the world: Genders, globalization, transnational times. London: SAGE.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Henley, J. (2017). Emmanuel Macron: My handshake with Trump was ‘a moment of truth’. The Guardian. Retrieved July 31, 2018, from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/may/28/emmanuel-macron-my-handshake-with-trump-was-a-moment-of-truth

  • Herbert, M. S. (2000). Camouflage isn’t only for combat: Gender, sexuality, and women in the military. New York: NYU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Höghammar, T., Bjertén-Günther, E., & Irwin, R. (2016). The development of the women, peace and security agenda. In SIPRI (Ed.), SIPRI yearbook 2016: Armaments, disarmament and international security (pp. 323–331). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holgersson, C. (2013). Recruiting managing directors: Doing homosociality. Gender, Work and Organization, 20(4), 454–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Issac Carol, A., Kaatz, A., & Carnes, M. (2012). Deconstructing the glass ceiling. Sociology Mind, 2, 80–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, M., et al. (2014). Engaging men, changing gender norms: Directions for gender transformative action. Retrieved August 29, 2018, from https://www.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/resource-pdf/Advocacy%20Brief-%20Gender%20Norms-1.pdf

  • Khurana, R. (2002). Searching for a corporate saviour: The irrational quest for charismatic CEOs. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kronsell, A. (2005). Gendered practices in institutions of hegemonic masculinity: Reflections from feminist standpoint theory. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 7, 280–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kronsell, A. (2016). Methods for studying silences: Gender analysis in institutions of hegemonic masculinity. In B. A. Ackerly, M. Stern, & J. True (Eds.), Feminist methodologies for international relations (pp. 108–128). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanz, D. (2011). Who gets a seat at the table? A framework for understanding the dynamics of inclusion and exclusion in peace negotiations. International Negotiations, 16, 275–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leimeitre, J., & Sandvik, K. B. (2014). Beyond sexual violence in transnational justice: Political insecurity as gendered harm. Feminist Legal Studies, 22, 243–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs, 30, 1771–1800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moosa, Z., Rahmani, M., & Webster, L. (2013). From the private to the public sphere: New research on women’s participation in peace-building. Gender & Development, 21, 453–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, D. (2012). Anchoring the peace: Civil society actors in peace accords and durable peace. International Interactions, 38, 243–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paffenholz, T., Ross, N., Dixon, S., Schluchter, A.-L., & True, J. (2016). Making women count—Not just counting women: Assessing women’s inclusion and influence on peace negotiations. Geneva: Inclusive Peace and Transition Initiative and UN Women.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patil, V. (2009). Contending masculinities: The gendered (re) negotiation of colonial hierarchy in the United Nations debates on decolonization. Theory and Society, 38(2), 195–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puechguirbal, N. (2010). Discourses on gender, patriarchy and resolution 1325: A textual analysis of UN documents. International Peacekee**, 17, 172–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research—A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, L. J. (2016). Making war safe for women? National Action Plans and the militarisation of the Women, Peace and Security agenda. International Political Science Review, 37, 324–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svedberg, E. (2018). East–West negotiations. In K. Aggestam & A. E. Towns (Eds.), Gendering diplomacy and international negotiations (pp. 259–275). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • UN Women. (2012). Women’s participation in peace negotiations: Connections between and influence. Retrieved July 30, 2018, from http://www.unwomen.org//media/headquarters/attachments/sections/library/publications/2012/10/wpssourcebook-03a-womenpeacenegotiations-en.pdf?la=en&vs=1159

  • United Nations. (2017, September). System-wide strategy on gender parity. Retrieved August 29, 2018, from https://www.un.int/sites/www.un.int/files/Permanent%20Missions/delegate/17-00102b_gender_strategy_report_13_sept_2017.pdf

  • United Nations Department of Political Affairs. (2017). Guidance and inclusive mediation strategies. Retrieved July 31, 2018, from https://peacemaker.un.org/sites/peacemaker.un.org/files/1.%20English%20-GIMS.pdf

  • United Nations, Division for the Advancement of Women. (2003). Expert group meeting on peace agreements as a means for promoting gender equality and ensuring participation of women. Retrieved December 13, 2018, from http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/egm/peace2003/reports/BPChinkin.PDF

  • United Nations Secretary General. (2017). Secretary-general’s remarks to the fifth committee of the general assembly on the proposed programme budget for the biennium 2018–2019 [as delivered]. Retrieved July 30, 2018, from https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/sg/statement/2017-10-11/secretary-generals-remarks-fifth-committee-general-assembly-proposed

  • Von Burg, C. (2015). On inclusivity: The role of norms in international peace mediation. Swisspeace. Retrieved July 30, 2018, from http://www.swisspeace.ch/fileadmin/user_upload/Media/Publications/Essentials/3_2015_Inclusivity_online.pdf

  • Wahl, A. (2014). Male managers challenging and reinforcing the male norm in management. NORA – Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 22, 131–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wahl, A., & Höök, P. (2007). Changes in working with gender equality in management in Sweden. Equal Opportunities International, 26, 435–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wanis-St. John, A., & Kew, D. (2008). Civil society and peace negotiations: Confronting exclusion. International Negotiations, 13, 11–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. (2018). The hands did the talking during Macron’s visit. CNN. Retrieved July 31, 2018, from https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/24/politics/macron-visit-gifs/index.html

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Yeonju Jung, research assistant at SIPRI, for her assistance with the background research as well as for providing wise comments on the article. The author would also like to thank Dr. Amiera Sawas, Researcher at SIPRI, and Dr. Manuela Scheuermann, Member of Faculty and Researcher, University of Würzburg, for comments that greatly improved this paper as well as the anonymous interviewees for sharing their experiences. Any errors are my own and are no reflection on these helpful contributions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bjertén-Günther, E. (2020). Peace Processes: Business as Usual?. In: Scheuermann, M., Zürn, A. (eds) Gender Roles in Peace and Security. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21890-4_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation