Résumé
L’espace est une dimension fondamentale intervenant dans la perception, et les liens entre cerveau et espace posent la question de savoir comment sont représentées, mémorisées, perçues et utilisées les relations spatiales des objets entre eux, et des objets par rapport au corps. L’intégration de la dimension spatiale, qui ne peut s’établir qu’à partir des actes sensoriels, moteurs et cognitifs engagés, permet de guider les interactions avec le monde extérieur. Ce dialogue sensori-moteur contribue finalement autant à l’élaboration des représentations spatiales que corporelles.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Références
Paillard J (1991) Motor and representation framing of space. In: Paillard J (ed), Brain and space. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p. 163–82
Bisiach E, Perani D, Vallar G, Berti A (1986) Unilateral neglect: personal and extra personal. Neuropyschologia 24: 759–67
Rizzolatti G, Matelli M, Pavesi G (1983) Deficits in attention and movement following the removal of postarcuate (area 6) and prearcuate (area 8) cortex in macaque monkeys. Brain106: 655–73
Halligan PW, Marshall JC (1991) Left neglect for near but not for far space in man. Nature 350: 498–500
Guariglia C, Padovani A, Pantano P, Pizzamiglio L (1993) Unilateral neglect restricted to visual imagery. Nature 363: 2357
Moscovitch M, Behrmann M (1994) Coding of spatial information in the somatosensory system: evidence from patients with neglect following parietal lobe damage. J Cogn Neurosci 6: 151–5
Mort D, Malhotra P, Mannan S, et al. (2003) The anatomy of visual neglect. Brain 126: 1986–97
Andersen RA, Bracewell RM, Barash S et al. (1990) Eye position effects on visual, memory, and saccade-related activity in areas LIP and 7a of macaque. J Neurosci 10: 1176–96
Buneo CA, Andersen RA (2006) The posterior parietal cortex: sensorimotor interface for the planning and online control of visually guided movements. Neuropsychologia 44: 2594–606
Bartolomeo P, D’Erme P, Gainotti G (1994) The relationship between visuospatialand representational neglect. Neurology 44: 1710–4
André JM, Beis JM, Morin N, Paysant J (2000) Buccalhemineglect. Arch Neurol 57: 1734–41
Rossetti Y, Rode G, Pisella L et al (1998) Prism adaptation to a rightward optical deviation rehabilitates left hemispatial neglect. Nature 395: 166–9
Rode G, Pisella L, Rossetti Y et al. (2003) Bottom-up transfer of sensory-motor plasticity to recovery of spatial cognition: visuomotor adaptation and spatial neglect. Prog Brain Res 142: 273–87
Pisella L, Rode G, Farnè A et al. (2006) Prism adaptation in the rehabilitation of patients with visuo-spatial cognitive disorders. Curr Opin Neurol 19: 534–42
Luauté J, Halligan P, Rode G et al. (2006) Prism adaptation first among equals in alleviating left neglect. A review. Restor Neurol Neurosci 24: 409–18
Jacquin-Courtois S, Rode G, Pavani F et al (2010) Effect of prism adaptation on left dichotic listening deficit in neglect patients: glasses to hear better? Brain 133: 895–908
Maravita A, Posteraro L, Husain M et al. (2007) Looking at human eyes affects contral-esional stimulus processing after right hemispheric stroke. Neurology 69: 1619–21
Rode G, Vallar G, Jacquin-Courtois S et al. (2010) Bodily representations disorders and sensory manipulations Rev Neuropsychol 2: 235–43
Rossetti Y, Rode G (2002) Reducing spatial neglect by visual and other sensory manipulations: non-cognitive (physiological) routes to the rehabilitation of a cognitive disorder. In: Karnath HO, Milner AD, Vallar G (eds) The cognitive and neural bases of spatial neglect. New York, Oxford: University Press, p. 375–396
Legrain V, Guérit JM, Bruyer R, Plaghki L (2002) Attentional modulation of the nociceptive processing into the human brain: selective spatial attention, probability of stimulus occurrence, and target detection effects on laser evoked potentials. Pain 99: 21–39
Van Ryckeghem DML, Van Damme S, Crombez G et al. (2011) The role of spatial attention in attentional control over pain: an experimental investigation. Exp Brain Res 208: 269–75
Longo MR, Betti V, Aglioti SM, Haggard P (2009) Visually induced analgesia: seeing the body reduces pain. J Neurosci 29: 12125–30
Gallace A, Torta DME, Moseley GL, Iannetti GD (2011) The analgesic effect of crossingthe arms. Pain 152: 1418–23
Mancini F, Longo MR, Kammers MP, Haggard P (2011) Visual distortion of body size modulates pain perception. Psychol Sci 22: 325–30
Legrain V, Iannetti GD, Plaghki L, Mouraux A (2011) The pain matrix reloaded. A salience detection system for the body. Prog Neurobiol 93: 111–24
Moseley GL (2004) Why do people with complex regional pain syndrome take longer to recognize their affected hand? Neurology 64: 2182–6
Galer BS, Jensen M (1999) Neglect-like symptoms in complex regional pain syndrome: results of a self-administrated survey. J Pain Symptom Manage 18: 213–7
Moseley GL, Parsons TJ, Spence C (2008) Visual distortion of a limb modulates the pain and swelling evoked by movement. Curr Biol 18: R1047–8
Lewis JS, Kersten P, McPherson KM et al. (2010) Wherever is my arm? Impaired upper limb position accuracy in complex regional pain syndrome. Pain 149: 463–9
Moseley GL (2005) Distorted body image in complex regional pain syndrome. Neurology 65: 773
Schwoebel J, Friedman R, Duda N, Coslett HB (2001) Pain and the body schema. Evidence for peripheral effects on mental representations of movement. Brain 124: 2098–104
Moseley GL, Gallace A, Spence C (2009) Space-based, but not arm-based, shift in tactile processing in complex regional pain syndrome and its relationship to cooling of the affecting limb. Brain 132: 3142–51
Marinus J, Moseley GL, Birklein F et al. (2011) Clinical features and pathophysiology of complex regional pain syndrome. Lancet Neurol 10: 637–48
Sumitani M, Rossetti Y, Shibata M et al. (2007) Prism adaptation to optical deviation alleviates pathologic pain. Neurology 68: 128–33
Sumitani M, Shibata M, Iwakura T et al. (2007) Pathologic pain distorts visuospatial perception. Neurology 68: 152–4
Bultitude JH, Rafal RD (2010) Derangement of body representation in complex regional pain syndrome: report of a case treated with mirror and prisms. Exp Brain Res 204: 409–18
Schwenkreis P, Maier C, Tegenthoff M (2009) Functional imaging of central nervous system involvement in complex regional pain syndrome. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 30: 1279–84
Legrain V (2011) Where is my pain? Pain 152: 467–8
Legrain V, Bultitude JH, De Paepe A, Rossetti Y (2012) Pain, body, and space. What do patients with complex regional pain syndrome really neglect? Pain (à compléter)
Heilman KM, Bowers D, Watson RT (1983) Performance on hemispatial pointing task by patients with neglect syndrome. Neurology 33: 661–4
Reinersmann A, Landwehrt J, Krumova EK et al. (2012) Impaired spatial body representation in complex regional pain syndrome type 1 (CRPS I). Pain 153: 2174–81
Van Damme S, Legrain V (2012) How efficient is the orienting of spatial attention to pain? An experimental investigation. Pain 153: 1226–31
Jacquin-Courtois S, O’Shea J, Luauté J et al. (2013). Rehabilitation of spatial neglect by prism adaptation: a peculiar expansion of sensori-motor after-effects to spatial cognition. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 37(4): 594–609
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Paris
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rossetti, Y., Jacquin-Courtois, S., Legrain, V., Bultitude, J., O’Shea, J. (2013). Le syndrome douloureux régional complexe à la lumière des troubles de la cognition spatiale: des opportunités physiopathologiques et thérapeutiques?. In: Syndromes douloureux chroniques en médecine physique et de réadaptation. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0439-2_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0439-2_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Paris
Print ISBN: 978-2-8178-0438-5
Online ISBN: 978-2-8178-0439-2