Tissue Ty**, Crossmatching and the Allocation of Cadaveric Kidney Transplants

  • Chapter
Transplantation Surgery

Part of the book series: Springer Specialist Surgery Series ((SPECIALIST))

Abstract

This chapter deals with the relevance of the major histocompatibility complex (MFC) to the results of clinical transplantations and its role in public policy decisions regarding the allocation of donor spares.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

eBook
USD 9.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Terasaki PI, Bernoco D, Park MS, Ozturk G, Iwaki Y. Microdroplet testing for HLA-A,-B,-C and -D antigens. Am J Clin Pathol 1978; 69: 103–20.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bunce M, Young NT, Welsh KI. Molecular HLA ty**–the brave new world. Transplantation 1997; 64 (11): 1505–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Opelz G, Mytilineos J, Scherer S, Dunckley H, Trejaut J, Chapmen J, et al. Analysis of HLA-DR matching in DNA-typed cadaver kidney transplants. Transplantation 1993; 55: 782.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lau M, Terasaki PI, Park MS. International Cell Exchange, 1994. In: Terasaki PI, Cecka JM, editors. Clinical Transplants 1994. Los Angeles: UCLA Tissue Ty** Laboratory, 1995; 467–88.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Takemoto S, Terasaki PI, Gjertson DW, Cecka JM. Equitable allocation of HLA compatible kidneys for local pools and for minorities. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 760–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rodey GE, Fuller TC. Public epitopes and the antigenic structure of the HLA molecules. CRC Crit Rev Immunol 1987; 7 (3): 229.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ogura K, Terasaki PI, Johnson C, Mendez R, Rosenthal JT, Ettenger R, et al. The significance of a positive flow cytometry crossmatch test in primary kidney transplantation. Transplantation 1993; 56 (2): 294–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mahoney RJ, Ault KA, Given SR, Adams RJ, Breggia AC, Paris PA, et al. The flow cytometry crossmatch and early renal transplant loss. Transplantation 1990; 49 (3): 527–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Scornik JG, Brunson ME, Schaub B, Howard RJ, Pfaff WW. The crossmatch in renal transplantation: evaluation of flow cytometry as a replacement for standard cytotoxicity. Transplantation 1994; 57 (4): 621–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lazda VA. Identification of patients at risk for inferior renal allograft outcome by a strongly positive B cell flow cytometry crossmatch. Transplantation 1994; 57 (6): 964–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Terasaki PI, Cecka JM, Gjertson DW, Takemoto S. High survival rates of kidney transplants from spousal and living unrelated donors. N Engl J Med 1995; 333: 333–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hirata M, Terasaki PI. Regrafts. In: Terasaki PI, Cecka JM, editors. Clinical Transplants 1994. Los Angeles: UCLA Tissue Ty** Laboratory, 1995; 419–33.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gaston RS, Ayres I, Dooley LG, Diethelm AG. Racial equity in renal transplantation - the disparate impact of HLAbased allocation. JAMA 1993; 270: 1352.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Katznelson S, Gjertson DW, Cecka JM. The effect of race and ethnicity on kidney allograft outcome. In: Terasaki PI, Cecka JM, editors. Clinical Transplants 1995. Los Angeles: UCLA Tissue Ty** Laboratory, 1995; 379.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Brenner BM, Cohen RA, Milford. In renal transplantation one size may not fit all. J Am Soc Nephrol 1992; 3: 162–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Feldman HI, Fazio I, Roth D, Berlin JA, Brayman K, Burns JE, et al. Recipient body size and cadaveric renal allograft survival. J Am Soc Nephrol 1996; 7 (1): 151–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cecka JM, Terasaki PI. Matching kidneys for size in renal transplantation. Clin Transplant 1990; 4: 82–6.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Terasaki PI, Koyama H, Cecka JM, Gjertson DW. Hyperfiltration hypothesis in human renal transplantation. Transplantation 1994; 57 (10): 1450–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Katznelson, S., Terasaki, P.I., Danovitch, G.M. (2001). Tissue Ty**, Crossmatching and the Allocation of Cadaveric Kidney Transplants. In: Hakim, N.S., Danovitch, G.M. (eds) Transplantation Surgery. Springer Specialist Surgery Series. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3689-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3689-7_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84996-859-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-3689-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation