Assuring Confidence in Pharmaceutical Software

  • Conference paper
Safety and Reliability of Software Based Systems
  • 178 Accesses

Abstract

This paper provides a general introduction to the methodology employed by the pharmaceutical industry to assure confidence in software. This methodology has become known within the industry as Good Automated Manufacturing Practice (GAMP).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ‘Interview with Richard Klug’, Pharmaceutical Technology, 1994. [At the time this article was written Richard Klug was the Foreign Inspection Programme Director at the United States Food & Drug Administration].

    Google Scholar 

  2. Clark, S., ‘Computer System Validation: An Investigator’s View’, Pharma-ceutical Technology, 1988. [At the time this article was written Sam Clark was a United States FDA Investigator].

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tetzlaff, R., ‘GMP Documentation Requirements for Automated Systems,’ Pharmaceutical Technology, 1992. [At the time this article was written Ron Tetzlaff was a United States FDA Investigator].

    Google Scholar 

  4. Trill, A.J., ‘Computerised Systems and GMP A UK Perspective’, Parts 1,2 and 3, Pharmaceutical Technology, 1993. [At the time this article was written Tony Trill was a United Kingdom MCA Investigator].

    Google Scholar 

  5. United States Food & Drug Administration, Guide to Inspection of Computerised Systems in Drug Processing’ and ‘Software Development Activities’, Technical Reports, Reference Materials and Training Aids for Investigators.

    Google Scholar 

  6. United States Parenteral Drug Association, ‘Validation of Computer-Related Systems,’ Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  7. United Kingdom Pharmaceutical Industry Computer Systems Validation FORUM, ‘Validation of Automation Systems in Pharmaceutical Manu-facture’, (second draft 1994), Feb 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wingate, G.A.S., ‘Computer Systems Validation: A Historical Perspective,’ Pharmaceutical Engineering, Vol. 15, No. 4, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  9. FDA, ‘General Principles of Process Validation,’ 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hunt, J., Lucas, P.R., & Wingate, G.A.S., ‘FRESCO — An Investigation into a Framework for the Assessment of Safety-Critical Systems,’ DTI Safety-Critical Systems Symposium (SSS ’95), Brighton, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wingate, G., Smith, M., Lucas, P. (1997). Assuring Confidence in Pharmaceutical Software. In: Shaw, R. (eds) Safety and Reliability of Software Based Systems. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0921-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0921-1_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-76034-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-0921-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation