The Challenge to Predict Material Failure in Crashworthiness Applications: Simulation of Producibility to Serviceability

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Predictive Modeling of Dynamic Processes

Abstract

In recent years, the requirements on passive safety of cars have grown to high standards, leading to a permanent demand on an increase in simulation accuracy. Additionally, demands on fuel efficiency and CO2 – reduction are confronting the car body designers with the need of substantial weight reduction. Here the increasing use of high and ultrahigh strength steel grades for bodies in white can be identified as major trend. At the same time simulation techniques are urged to predict formability and crashworthiness performance better and better. The present contribution will focus on one of the most urging challenges in sheet metal forming and crashworthiness simulation for high strength steels, namely alternative or enhanced constitutive formulations to predict failure and cracking of the blank and furthermore the inclusion of forming results in crashworthiness finite element models in order to predict material failure in such numerical investigations. In a broader view this simulation process chain may be termed as ’producibility to serviceability’ since the diving force behind forming simulations used to be the question if a certain part can be produced on certain press equipment with a defined number of forming stages from a specific material of given initial thickness. Carrying over the forming results to other simulation disciplines like crashworthiness or NVH, where the serviceability of the designed structure is investigated further, will eventually give more insight into the effects of pre-straining and possible pre-damaging emerging from production processes on the target discipline. The whole topic is rather demanding since nowadays the crashworthiness of bodies in white is assessed to a major extend by finite element simulations without taking the production history into account. In this context, high strength steel qualities are known to be more problematic. The present contribution discusses two possible engineering driven approaches to close the constitutive gap between the forming and crashworthiness world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bridgman PW, (1952), Studies in Large Plastic Flow and Fracture,With Special Emphasis on the Effects of Hydrostatic Pressure, McGraw Hill Inc., New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Tvergaard V, Needleman A, (1984), Analysis of the Cup-Cone Fracture in a Round Tensile Bar. Archive of Mechanics 32, pp. 157–169.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Johnson GR, Cook WH, (1985), Fracture Characteristics of Three Metals Subjected to Various Strains, Strain Rates, Temperatures and Pressures. Eng. Fracture Mechanics 21, pp. 31–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Barlat F, Lege DJ, Brem JC, (1991), A Six-Component Yield Function for Anisotropic Materials, Int. Journal of Plasticity 7, pp. 693–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Müschenborn W, Sonne H-M, (1975), Influence of the Strain Path on the Forming Limits of Sheet Metal, Arch. Eisenhttenwesen 46(9), pp. 597–602.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bai Y, Wierzbicki T, (2008,) Forming Severity Concept for Predicting Sheet Necking Under Complex Loading Histories, Int. Journal of Mechanical Sciences 50, pp. 1012–1022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Weck A, Wilkinson DS, Toda H, Maire E, (2006), 2D and 3D Visualization of Ductile Fracture, Advanced Engineering Materials 8 (6), pp. 469–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lemaitre J, (1985), A Continuous Damage Mechanics Model for Ductile Fracture, Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology 107, pp. 83–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. De Borst R, Sluys L J,Mühlhaus H-B, Pamin J, (1993), Fundamental Issues in Finite Element Analyses of Localization of Deformation, Engineering Computations 10, pp. 99–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Schmeing F, Haufe A, Feucht M, (2007), Forming and Crash Induced Damage Evolution and Failure Prediction. Part I: Extension of the Gurson Model to Forming Simulations, 6th German LS-DYNA Forum H-I-01.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Part of this work was supported by funds of the project ‘WING’ by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), grant # 03X0501E.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to André Haufe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Haufe, A., Feucht, M., Neukamm, F. (2009). The Challenge to Predict Material Failure in Crashworthiness Applications: Simulation of Producibility to Serviceability. In: Hiermaier, S. (eds) Predictive Modeling of Dynamic Processes. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0727-1_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0727-1_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-0726-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-0727-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation