Abstract
A hot dispute currently rages as to the importance of money in influencing economic activity. But we would be wrong to think this a new controversy. Indeed, it is a very old controversy which has been with us for decades. Money was all-important in classical models of the economy but much less so in Keynesian models which gained predominance in the Great Depression and continued into the postwar period. Lately, however, there has been a strong revival of interest in monetary phenomena and this revival has led to the current heated dispute on the importance of money.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
De Leeuw and I have published articles in the Federal Reserve Bulletin for January, 1968, and June, 1969
Harold Shapiro and Robert Rasche have an article in the May, 1969, American Economic Review,
Ando and Modigliani have one in the May, 1969, American Economic Review.
See J. L. Jordan, “The Market for Deposit-Type Financial Assets,” UCLA PhD thesis, 1969.
An article by Michael Keran and Christopher Babb, two colleagues of Andersen and Jordan, in the June, 1969, St. Louis Review argues at length that free reserves is “the most reliable indicator of monetary policy” (John Wood’s phase).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2016 Edward M. Gramlich
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gramlich, E.M. (2016). 1969: The Role of Money in Economic Activity: Complicated or Simple?. In: Crow, R.T. (eds) The Best of Business Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-57251-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-57251-6_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-57417-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-57251-6
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)