The estimation of the conceptual distance between patents is a critical issue for Computer-Aided patent portfolio analysis systems, an emerging class of computer tools for supporting R&D analyses and decisions, patent infringement risk evaluation, technology forecasting. The aim of the present work is the introduction of an original algorithm for patent comparison: since typical text analyses are biased by the writer’s style, the inventions similarity is here estimated by comparing the components and their hierarchical and functional interactions automatically extracted by means of a custom software tool. The whole procedure is clarified with an exemplary application in the field of electric current circuit breakers.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Fluck J., Zimmermann M., Kurapkat G., Hofmann M.: Information extraction technologies for the life science industry. Drug Discovery Today: Technologies, vol. 2, Issue 3, pp. 217-224 (2005).
Yoon B., Park Y.: A systematic approach for identifying technology opportunities: Keyword-based morphology analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 72, Issue 2, pp. 145-160 (2005).
Fabry B., Ernst H, Langholz J., Köster M.: Patent portfolio analysis as a useful tool for identifying R&D and business opportunities—an empirical application in the nutrition and health industry. World Patent Information, vol. 28, Issue 3, pp. 215-225 (2006).
Bergmann I., Butzke D., Walter L., Fuerste J. P., Moherle M. G., Erdmann V. A.: Evaluating The Risk of Patent Infringement By Means of Semantic Patent Analysis: The Case of DNA-Chips, Proceedings of the R&D Management Conference, 4-6 July 2007, Bremen, Germany, ISBN: 0-9549916-9-9 (2007).
Daim T. U., Rueda G., Martin H., Gerdsri P.: Forecasting emerging technologies: Use of bibliometrics and patent analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 73, Issue 8, pp. 981-1012 (2006).
Trappey A. J. C., Hsua F. C., Trappey C. V., Lin C.: Development of a patent document classification and search platform using a back-propagation network. Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 31, Issue 4, pp. 755-765 (2006).
Clough P.: Plagiarism in natural and programming languages: An overview of current tools and technologies. Internal Report CS-00-05, University of Sheffield (2000). Available at http://ir.shef.ac.uk/cloughie/papers/plagiarism2000.pdf. Last access 27 Apr 2008.
EVE Plagiarism Detection System. http://www.canexus.com. Last access 27 Apr 2008.
Turnitin. http://www.turnitin.com/static/home.html. Last access 27 Apr 2008.
Barrett R., Malcolm J., Lyon C.: Are we ready for large scale use of plagiarism detection tools? Proceedings of the 4th Annual LTSN-ICS Conference, NUI Galway, pp. 79-84 (2003).
Shivakumar N.: Detecting digital copyright violations on the internet. PhD thesis Stanford University (1999). Available at http://infolab.stanford.edu/∼shiva/thesis.html, Last access 27 Apr 2008.
Lopresti D.: A comparison of text-based methods for detecting duplication in document image databases. Proceedings of Document Recognition and Retrieval VII (IS and T SPIE Electronic Imaging) San Jose (USA), pp. 210-221, January (2000).
Schleimer A. A. S., Wilkerson D. S., Aiken A.: Winnowing: local algorithms for document fingerprinting. Proceedings of the 2003 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of data. ACM 1-58113-634-X/03/06. (2003). Available at http://theory.stanford.edu/∼aiken/publications/papers/sigmod03.pdf. Last access 27 Apr 2008.
Heintze N.: Scalable document fingerprinting. In Proceedings of the 1996 USENIX Workshop on Electronic Commerce, pp. 191-200 (1996). Available at http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/348631.html. Last access 27 Apr 2008.
. Koala Document Fingerprinting (KDF).http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs/user/nch/www/koala-info.html. Last access 27 Apr 2008.
Mandreoli P. F., Martoglia R.: Un metodo per il riconoscimento di duplicati in collezioni di documenti. Proceedings of the Eleventh Italian Symposium on Advanced Database Systems, SEBD. (2003).
Zini M., Fabbri M., Moneglia M., Panunzi A.: Plagiarism Detection Through Multilevel Text Comparison. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Automated Production of Cross Media Content for Multi-Channel Distribution table of contents, pp. 181-185, ISBN: 0-7695-2625-X (2006).
Levenshtein V.: Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions and reversals. Soviet Physics-Report, SEBD(10):707-710 (1966).
Cascini G.: System and Method for performing functional analyses making use of a plurality of inputs. Patent Application 02425149.8, European Patent Office, 14.3.2002, International Publication Number WO 03/077154 A2 (18 September 2003).
Cascini G., Russo D., Zini M.: Computer-Aided Patent Analysis: finding invention peculiarities. Proceedings of the 2nd IFIP Working Conference on Computer Aided Innovation, Brighton (MI), USA, 8-9 October, 2007, in Trends in Computer-Aided Innovation, Springer, pp. 167-178, ISBN 978-0-387-75455-0 (2007).
Cascini G., Neri F.: Natural Language Processing for patents analysis and classification. Proceedings of the TRIZ Future 4th World Conference, 3-5 November 2004, Florence, Firenze University Press, ISBN 88-8453-221-3 (2004).
Cascini G., Agili A., Zini M.: Building a patents small-world network as a tool for Computer-Aided Innovation. Proceedings of the 1st IFIP Working Conference on Computer Aided Innovation, Ulm, Germany, November 14-15 (2005).
Cascini G., Russo D.: Computer-Aided analysis of patents and search for TRIZ contradictions. International Journal of Product Development, Special Issue: Creativity and Innovation Employing TRIZ, vol. 4(1-2) (2007).
Yoon B., Park Y.: A text-mining-based patent network: Analytical tool for high-technology trend. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, vol. 15, Issue 1, pp. 37-50 (2004).
Khomenko N., De Guio R., Lelait L., Kaikov I.: A Framework for OTSM-TRIZ Based Computer Support to be used in Complex Problem Management. International Journal of Computer Application in Technology (IJCAT), vol. 30 Issue 1-2 (2007).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Cascini, G., Zini, M. (2008). Measuring patent similarity by comparing inventions functional trees. In: Cascini, G. (eds) Computer-Aided Innovation (CAI). The International Federation for Information Processing, vol 277. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09697-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09697-1_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-09696-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-09697-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)