Evolving Specialisation, Altruism, and Group-Level Optimisation Using Tags

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Multi-Agent-Based Simulation II (MABS 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2581))

Abstract

We present a model that demonstrates the evolution of groups composed of cooperative individuals performing specialised functions. Specialisation and cooperation results from an evolutionary process in which selection and reproduction is based on individual fitness. Specialists come to help (through the donation of resources) their non-kin group members, optimising their behaviour as a team and producing a fitter group. The mechanism that promotes this benevolent, cooperative group behaviour is based on the concept of a “tag”. Tags1 are observable markings, cues or displays. Individuals can observe the tags of others and take alternative actions based on those observations (e.g. to altruistically2 help or not). We show that even random (or dumb) searching for appropriate partners produces significant levels of specialisation and cooperation. Additionally we demonstrate that non-random (or smart) searching dramatically increases the effect.

The concept of “tags” in the context of structuring social interactions among agents was first outlined by Holland [6] and applied to repeated interactions by Riolo [7].

By altruism, we mean that agents sacrifice fitness for others even though such donations may not be returned (i.e. without reciprocity).

In these previous models when identical agents are paired they must act altruistically.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hales, D.: Cooperation without Space or Memory: Tags, Groups and the Prisoner’s Dilemma. In Moss, S., Davidsson, P. (Eds.) Multi-Agent-Based Simulation. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 1979. Berlin: Springer-Verlag (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hales, D.:Tag Based Cooperation in Artificial Societies. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Essex (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hales, D.: Cooperation and Specialisation without Kin Selection using Tags. CPM Working Paper 02-88. The Centre for Policy Modelling, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK (2002a).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hales, D.: Smart Agents Don’t Need Kin — Evolving Specialisation and Cooperation with Tags. CPM Working Paper 02-89. The Centre for Policy Modelling, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK (available at: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/cpmreps.html), (2002b).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hales, D.: Wise-Up!-Smart Tag Pairing Evolves and Persists. CPM Working Paper 02-90. The Centre for Policy Modelling, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK (available at: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/cpmreps.html), (2002c).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Holland, J.: The Effect of Labels (Tags) on Social Interactions. SFI Working Paper 93-10-064. Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM, (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Riolo, R.:The Effects of Tag-Mediated Selection of Partners in Evolving Populations Playing the Interated Prisoner’s Dilemma. SFI Working Paper 97-02-16. Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM. (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Riolo, R., Cohen, M. & Axelrod, R.: Cooperation without Reciprocity. Nature 414, 441–443. (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pedone, R. & Parisi, D.:In What Kinds of Social Groups can Altruistic Behaviour Evolve? In Conte, R., Hegselmann, R. and Terna, P., Eds., Simulating Social PhenomenaLNEMS 456, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.(1997).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sigmund & Nowak: Tides of tolerance. Nature 414, 403–405. (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Watts, J. D.: Small Worlds — The Dynamics of Networks between Order and Randomness. Princeton, New Jersey, USA. (1999).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hales, D. (2003). Evolving Specialisation, Altruism, and Group-Level Optimisation Using Tags. In: Simão Sichman, J., Bousquet, F., Davidsson, P. (eds) Multi-Agent-Based Simulation II. MABS 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2581. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36483-8_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36483-8_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-00607-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36483-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation