Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
7. References
Abowitz, K. (2001). Charter Schooling and Social Justice. Educational Theory, 51(2), 151–170.
Adams, D., & Chapman, D. W. (1998). Education and National Development in Asia: Trends and Issues. International Journal of Educational Research, 29(7), 583–602.
Ambler, J. (1994). Who Benefits from Educational Choice? Some Evidence from Europe. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 13(4), 454–476.
Anderson, L. (2000). Farewell to Grant Maintained Status: The Future of Self-Governing Schools. School Leadership & Management, 20(3), 371–385.
Angrist, J., Bettinger, E., Bloom, E., King, E., & Kremer, M. (2001). Vouchers for Private Schooling in Colombia: Evidence from a Randomised Natural Experiment (Working Paper No. 8343). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Apple, M. (2000). Official Knowledge: Democratic Education in a Conservative Age, 2nd edition. New York: Routledge.
Arenas, A. (2000). Ecological Education: Schooling, Economics, and Sustainability. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
Arnaut, A. (1999). La Federalización Educativa y el Sindicato Nacional de Trabajadores de la Educación (Educational Federalisation and the National Union of Educational Workers). In M. del C. Pardo (Ed.), Federalización e Innovación Educativa en México (Federalisation and Educational Innovation in Mexico). Mexico City: Colegio de México.
Arnove, R. F. (1997). Neoliberal Education Policies in Latin America: Arguments in Favor and Against. In C. A. Torres & A. Puiggrós (Eds.), Latin American Education: Comparative Perspectives (pp. 79–100). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Bray, M. (1998). Financing Education in Develo** Asia: Themes, Tensions, and Policies. International Journal of Educational Research, 29(7), 627–642.
Bray, M., & Borevskaya, N. (2001). Financing Education in Transitional Societies: Lessons from Russia and China. Comparative Education, 37(3), 345–365.
Carnoy, M. (1998). National Voucher Plans in Chile and Sweden: did Privatization Reforms Make for Better Education? Comparative Education Review, 42(3), 309–337.
Cobb, C. D., & Glass, G. V. (1999). Ethnic Segregation in Arizona Charter Schools. Education Policy Analysis Archive, 7(1). Retrieved July 1, 2004 from the World Wide Web: http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v7n1/
Coleman, P. (1998). Parent, Student, and Teacher Collaboration: The Power of Three. Thousand Oaks, CA: Westview Press.
Fiske, E. B., & Ladd, H. F. (2000). When Schools Compete: A Cautionary Tale. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
Friedman, M. (1962), Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Fullan, M., & Watson, N. (2000). School-Based Management: Reconceptualizing to Improve Learning Outcomes. School Effectiveness & School Improvement, 11(4), 453–473.
Fuller, B. (1996). Is School Choice Working? Educational Leadership, 37(2). Retrieved July 1, 2004 from the World Wide Web: http://www.ascd.org/publications/ed_lead/199610/toc.html
Fuller, B. (Ed.). (2001). Inside Charter Schools: The Paradox of Radical Decentralization. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Gershberg, A. I. (1999). Education ‘Decentralisation’ Processes in Mexico and Nicaragua: Legislative Versus Ministry-led Reform Strategies. Comparative Education, 35(1), 63–80.
Hanson, E. M. (1995). Democratization and Decentralization in Colombian Education. Comparative Education Review, 39(1), 101–119.
Heyneman, S. P. (1997). Educational Choice in Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union: A Review Essay. Education Economics, 5(3), 333–339.
Kamens, D. H., Meyer, J. W., & Benavot, A. (1996). Worldwide Patterns in Academic Secondary Education Curricula. Comparative Education Review, 40(2), 116–138.
Kohn, A. (2000). The Case Against Standardized Testing. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Kuehn, L. (1995). Ten Problems with Charter Schools. Vancouver: British Columbia Teachers’ Federation.
Lane, B. (1999). Choice Matters: Policy Alternatives and Implications for Charter Schools. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.
Lauglo, J. (1995a). Forms of Decentralisation and Their Implications for Education. Comparative Education, 31(1), 5–29.
Lauglo, J. (1995b). Populism and Education in Norway. Comparative Education Review, 39(1), 255–279.
Leithwood, K., & Menzies, T. (1998). A Review of Research Concerning the Implementation of Site-Based Management. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9(3), 233–285.
Lelièvre, C. (2000). The French Model of the Educator State. Journal of Education Policy, 15(1), 5–10.
Lemieux, V. (2001). Décentralisation, Politiques Publiques et Relations de Pouvoir (Decentralisation, Public Policy, and Power Relations). Montreal: Presses de l’Université de Montréal.
Little, J. W. (1999). Teachers’ Professional Development in the Context of High School Reform: Findings from a Three-Year Study of Restructuring Schools. Washington, DC: The National Partnership for Excellence and Accountability in Teaching.
Maclure, R. (1994). Misplaced Assumptions of Decentralisation and Participation in Rural Communities: Primary School Reform in Burkina Faso. Comparative Education, 30(3), 239–254.
Maskin, V. V. (1996). Financial Mechanisms of Education at the Municipal Level. Russian Education and Society, 38(12), 40–50.
McEwan, P. J. (2001). The Effectiveness of Public, Catholic, and Non-Religious Private Schools in Chile’s Voucher System. Education Economics, 9(2), 103–129.
McEwan, P. J., & Benveniste, L. (2001). The Politics of Rural School Reform: Escuela Nueva in Colombia. Journal of Education Policy, 16(6), 547–559.
McGinn, N., & Pereira, L. (1992). Why States Change the Governance of Education: An Historical Comparison of Brazil and the United States. Comparative Education, 28(2), 167–80.
Narodowski, M., & Nores, M. (2002). Socio-economic Segregation with (without) Competitive Education Policies: A Comparative Analysis of Argentina and Chile. Comparative Education, 38(4), 429–451.
Nownes, A. J. (2001). Pressure and Power: Organized Interests in American Politics. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
Psacharopoulos, G., Rojas, C., & Velez, E. (1993). Achievement Evaluation of Colombia’s Escuela Nueva: Is Multigrade the Answer? Comparative Education Review, 37(3), 263–276.
Rivarola, M., & Fuller, B. (1999). Nicaragua’s Experiment to Decentralize Schools: Contrasting Views of Parents, Teachers, and Directors. Comparative Education Review, 43(4), 489–521.
Senge, P. (1999). The Dance of Change. New York: Doubleday.
Shchetinin, V. P., Musarskii, M. M., &, Savelev, S. G. (1998). Who Pays for Education: The Family or the State? Russian Education and Society, 40(5), 6–23.
Taylor, A. (2001). ‘Fellow Travellers’ and ‘True Believers’: A Case Study of Religion and Politics in Alberta Schools. Journal of Education Policy, 16(1), 15–37.
West, L. (1995). Regional Economic Variation and Basic Education in Rural China, Economic Development Institute, Washington, DC: The World Bank.
World Bank. (1993). Viet Nam: Transition to the Market. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Zogla, I. (2001). Democratisation in Latvian Education: Teachers’ Attitudinal Change. European Journal of Teacher Education, 24(2), 143–156.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Arenas, A. (2005). Decentralisation of Education Policies in a Global Perspective. In: Zajda, J., et al. International Handbook on Globalisation, Education and Policy Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2960-8_36
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2960-8_36
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-2828-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-2960-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)