This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

7. References

  • Abowitz, K. (2001). Charter Schooling and Social Justice. Educational Theory, 51(2), 151–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, D., & Chapman, D. W. (1998). Education and National Development in Asia: Trends and Issues. International Journal of Educational Research, 29(7), 583–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambler, J. (1994). Who Benefits from Educational Choice? Some Evidence from Europe. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 13(4), 454–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, L. (2000). Farewell to Grant Maintained Status: The Future of Self-Governing Schools. School Leadership & Management, 20(3), 371–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angrist, J., Bettinger, E., Bloom, E., King, E., & Kremer, M. (2001). Vouchers for Private Schooling in Colombia: Evidence from a Randomised Natural Experiment (Working Paper No. 8343). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apple, M. (2000). Official Knowledge: Democratic Education in a Conservative Age, 2nd edition. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arenas, A. (2000). Ecological Education: Schooling, Economics, and Sustainability. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnaut, A. (1999). La Federalización Educativa y el Sindicato Nacional de Trabajadores de la Educación (Educational Federalisation and the National Union of Educational Workers). In M. del C. Pardo (Ed.), Federalización e Innovación Educativa en México (Federalisation and Educational Innovation in Mexico). Mexico City: Colegio de México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnove, R. F. (1997). Neoliberal Education Policies in Latin America: Arguments in Favor and Against. In C. A. Torres & A. Puiggrós (Eds.), Latin American Education: Comparative Perspectives (pp. 79–100). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, M. (1998). Financing Education in Develo** Asia: Themes, Tensions, and Policies. International Journal of Educational Research, 29(7), 627–642.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, M., & Borevskaya, N. (2001). Financing Education in Transitional Societies: Lessons from Russia and China. Comparative Education, 37(3), 345–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnoy, M. (1998). National Voucher Plans in Chile and Sweden: did Privatization Reforms Make for Better Education? Comparative Education Review, 42(3), 309–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, C. D., & Glass, G. V. (1999). Ethnic Segregation in Arizona Charter Schools. Education Policy Analysis Archive, 7(1). Retrieved July 1, 2004 from the World Wide Web: http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v7n1/

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, P. (1998). Parent, Student, and Teacher Collaboration: The Power of Three. Thousand Oaks, CA: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, E. B., & Ladd, H. F. (2000). When Schools Compete: A Cautionary Tale. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1962), Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M., & Watson, N. (2000). School-Based Management: Reconceptualizing to Improve Learning Outcomes. School Effectiveness & School Improvement, 11(4), 453–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, B. (1996). Is School Choice Working? Educational Leadership, 37(2). Retrieved July 1, 2004 from the World Wide Web: http://www.ascd.org/publications/ed_lead/199610/toc.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, B. (Ed.). (2001). Inside Charter Schools: The Paradox of Radical Decentralization. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gershberg, A. I. (1999). Education ‘Decentralisation’ Processes in Mexico and Nicaragua: Legislative Versus Ministry-led Reform Strategies. Comparative Education, 35(1), 63–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, E. M. (1995). Democratization and Decentralization in Colombian Education. Comparative Education Review, 39(1), 101–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyneman, S. P. (1997). Educational Choice in Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union: A Review Essay. Education Economics, 5(3), 333–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamens, D. H., Meyer, J. W., & Benavot, A. (1996). Worldwide Patterns in Academic Secondary Education Curricula. Comparative Education Review, 40(2), 116–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, A. (2000). The Case Against Standardized Testing. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuehn, L. (1995). Ten Problems with Charter Schools. Vancouver: British Columbia Teachers’ Federation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, B. (1999). Choice Matters: Policy Alternatives and Implications for Charter Schools. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauglo, J. (1995a). Forms of Decentralisation and Their Implications for Education. Comparative Education, 31(1), 5–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauglo, J. (1995b). Populism and Education in Norway. Comparative Education Review, 39(1), 255–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., & Menzies, T. (1998). A Review of Research Concerning the Implementation of Site-Based Management. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9(3), 233–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lelièvre, C. (2000). The French Model of the Educator State. Journal of Education Policy, 15(1), 5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemieux, V. (2001). Décentralisation, Politiques Publiques et Relations de Pouvoir (Decentralisation, Public Policy, and Power Relations). Montreal: Presses de l’Université de Montréal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, J. W. (1999). Teachers’ Professional Development in the Context of High School Reform: Findings from a Three-Year Study of Restructuring Schools. Washington, DC: The National Partnership for Excellence and Accountability in Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maclure, R. (1994). Misplaced Assumptions of Decentralisation and Participation in Rural Communities: Primary School Reform in Burkina Faso. Comparative Education, 30(3), 239–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maskin, V. V. (1996). Financial Mechanisms of Education at the Municipal Level. Russian Education and Society, 38(12), 40–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEwan, P. J. (2001). The Effectiveness of Public, Catholic, and Non-Religious Private Schools in Chile’s Voucher System. Education Economics, 9(2), 103–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEwan, P. J., & Benveniste, L. (2001). The Politics of Rural School Reform: Escuela Nueva in Colombia. Journal of Education Policy, 16(6), 547–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinn, N., & Pereira, L. (1992). Why States Change the Governance of Education: An Historical Comparison of Brazil and the United States. Comparative Education, 28(2), 167–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narodowski, M., & Nores, M. (2002). Socio-economic Segregation with (without) Competitive Education Policies: A Comparative Analysis of Argentina and Chile. Comparative Education, 38(4), 429–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nownes, A. J. (2001). Pressure and Power: Organized Interests in American Politics. New York: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Psacharopoulos, G., Rojas, C., & Velez, E. (1993). Achievement Evaluation of Colombia’s Escuela Nueva: Is Multigrade the Answer? Comparative Education Review, 37(3), 263–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivarola, M., & Fuller, B. (1999). Nicaragua’s Experiment to Decentralize Schools: Contrasting Views of Parents, Teachers, and Directors. Comparative Education Review, 43(4), 489–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. (1999). The Dance of Change. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shchetinin, V. P., Musarskii, M. M., &, Savelev, S. G. (1998). Who Pays for Education: The Family or the State? Russian Education and Society, 40(5), 6–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, A. (2001). ‘Fellow Travellers’ and ‘True Believers’: A Case Study of Religion and Politics in Alberta Schools. Journal of Education Policy, 16(1), 15–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, L. (1995). Regional Economic Variation and Basic Education in Rural China, Economic Development Institute, Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (1993). Viet Nam: Transition to the Market. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zogla, I. (2001). Democratisation in Latvian Education: Teachers’ Attitudinal Change. European Journal of Teacher Education, 24(2), 143–156.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Arenas, A. (2005). Decentralisation of Education Policies in a Global Perspective. In: Zajda, J., et al. International Handbook on Globalisation, Education and Policy Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2960-8_36

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation