This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bach, K., Thought and Reference. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1987.
Barton, E., Nonsentential Constituents. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 1990.
Bertolet, R., “On A Fictional Ellipsis.” Erkenntnis 21 (1984): 189–194.
Cappelen, H., and Lepore, E., “Unarticulated Constituents and Hidden Indexicals: An Abuse of Context in Semantics.” Forthcoming in M. O’Rourke and C. Washington (eds.), Essays in Honor of John Perry. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. 2003.
Cappelen, H., and Lepore, E., “Indexicality, Binding, Anaphora and A Priori Truth.” Analysis 62(11) (2002): 271–281.
Carstairs-McCarthy, A., The Origins of Complex Language: An Inquiry into the Evolutionary Beginnings of Sentences, Syllables, and Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1999.
Carston, R., “Implicature, Explicature and Truth-Theoretic Semantics.” In R. Kempson (ed.) Mental Representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1988: 155–181.
Carruthers, P., Language, Thought and Consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1996.
Chomsky, N., The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. 1995.
Chomsky, N., “Some notes on economy of derivation and representation.” MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 10 (1989): 43–74.
Dalrymple, M., Shieber, S.M., and Pereira, F.C.N., “Ellipsis and higher-order unification.” Linguistics & Philosophy 14(4) (1991): 399–452.
Devitt, M., Designation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. 1981.
Dummett, M., Frege: Philosophy of Language. Oxford: Duckworth. 1973.
Elugardo, R., and Stainton, R.J., “Shorthand, Syntactic Ellipsis, and the Pragmatic Determinants of What is Said.” Mind & Language 19(4) (2004): 442–471.
Elugardo, R., and Stainton, R.J., “Gras** Objects and Contents.” In A. Barber (ed.) The Epistemology of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2003: 257–302.
Elugardo, R., and Stainton, R.J., “Logical Form and the Vernacular.” Mind and Language 16(4) (2001): 393–424.
Fiengo, R., and May, R., Indices and Identity. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. 1994.
Grice, H.P., “Logic and Conversation.” In P. Cole and J. Morgan (eds.) Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech-Acts. New York: Academic Press. 1975: 41–58.
Hankamer, J., and Sag, I., “Deep and Surface Anaphora”. Linguistic Inquiry 7(3) (1976): 391–428.
Jackendoff, R., Foundations of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2000.
King, J., and Stanley, J., “Semantics, Pragmatics, and the Role of Semantic Content.” In Z. Szabo (ed.) Semantics versus Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2004: 111–164.
Kripke, S., “Semantic Reference and Speaker Reference.” In P.A. French, T.E. Uehling, Jr. and H.K. Wettstein (eds.) Contemporary Perspectives in the Philosophy of Language. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. 1977: 6–27.
Lewis, D., “Truth in Fiction.” American Philosophical Quarterly 15(1) (1978): 37–46.
Ludlow, P., Semantics, Tense and Time. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. 1999.
Merchant, J., “Fragments and Ellipsis.” University of Chicago Manuscript, 2003. Forthcoming in Linguistics and Philosophy.
Neale, S., “On Being Explicit: Comments on Stanley and Szabo, and on Bach.” Mind&Language 15 (2000): 284–294.
Perry, J., “Thought Without Representation.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. Supplemental Volume LX (1986): 263–283.
Recanati, F., “Unarticulated Constituents.” Linguistics & Philosophy 25 (2002): 299–345.
Russell, B., “Knowledge by Acquaintance and Knowledge by Description.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 11. Reprinted in N. Salmon & S. Soames (eds.) (1988) Propositions and Attitudes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1911.
Sag, I., Deletion and Logical Form. Ph.D. Thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1976.
Sellars, W., “Presupposing.” The Philosophical Review 63 (1954): 197–215.
Stainton, R.J., “The Pragmatics of Nonsentences.” In L. Horn & G. Ward (eds.) Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell. 2004a: 266–287.
Stainton, R.J., “In Defense of Nonsentential Assertion.” In Z. Szabo (ed.) Semantics vs. Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2004b: 383–457.
Stainton, R.J., “The Meaning of ‘sentences’.” Nous 34 (2000): 441–454.
Stainton, R.J., “Quantifier Phrases, Meaningfulness ‘in Isolation’, and Ellipsis.” Linguistics & Philosophy 21 (1998): 311–340.
Stainton, R.J., “What assertion is not.” Philosophical Studies 85(1) (1997): 57–73.
Stainton, R.J., “Non-Sentential Assertions and Semantic Ellipsis.” Linguistics and Philosophy 18(3) (1995): 281–296.
Stanley, J., “Context and Logical Form.” Linguistics & Philosophy 23 (2000): 391–434.
Stanley, J., and Szabo, Z., “On Quantifier Domain Restriction.” Mind & Language 15 (2000): 219–261.
Williams, E., “Discourse and Logical Form.” Linguistic Inquiry 8(1) (1977): 101–139.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Elugardo, R., Stainton, R.J. (2005). Introduction. In: Elugardo, R., Stainton, R.J. (eds) Ellipsis and Nonsentential Speech. En]Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, vol 81. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2301-4_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2301-4_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-2299-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-2301-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)