Log in

Evaluation of the Use of a Molybdenum Filter for Dose Reduction in Pediatric Digital X-ray Imaging

  • Published:
Journal of the Korean Physical Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pediatric dosimetry requires extra attention as young children are three times more sensitive to radiation than the average population. Soft tissues of patients absorb low-energy photons without affecting useful diagnostic information. X-ray filters can decrease the exposure dose of radiation by removing low-energy photons from the X-ray beam. Several studies have dealt with the advantages of a conventional filter, copper (Cu), in pediatric digital X-ray radiography. Only a few studies, however, have examined the use of molybdenum (Mo) filters and their impact on the radiation dose and image quality in pediatric digital X-ray imaging. In this study, we investigated the impact of a Mo filter on the image quality and the entrance surface exposure (ESE) in pediatric X-ray imaging and assessed the potential of additional dose reduction compared to a conventional Cu filter. The performance of the Mo filter was investigated and compared with that of Cu filter. Two types of phantoms were used: a customized quantitative phantom (Phantom A) for quantitative comparison and a computational anthropomorphic extended cardiac-torso (XCAT) phantom for qualitative comparison. A clinical radiography system was modeled, and the clinical setting for pediatric chest X-ray imaging was considered. Geant4 simulations using Monte Carlo toolkits were performed to obtain the images for pediatric chest X-ray examinations. Quantitative and qualitative comparisons using the quantitative phantom (Phantom A) and the XCAT phantom, respectively, were performed for both filters. From the customized quantitative phantom study, the ESE for the Mo filter was compared with that for the Cu filter when contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was equal. In addition, to validate our Monte Carlo model, we compared simulated and experimentally acquired images. From the results, the ESE for the Cu filter was 22.62 μGy while the ESE for the Mo filter was 18.18 μGy for 5-mm soft tissue. The use of a Mo filter results in a reduction in the dose by 19.60%. From the XCAT phantom study, the image for the Mo filter was superior to that for Cu filter in terms of noise and recognition of blood vessels. The performance characteristics of the Mo filter were evaluated in terms of image quality and radiation dose by comparing those characteristics to the ones for a conventional Cu filter. Our results demonstrated that the use of the Mo filter can significantly reduce the radiation dose. Based on this result, Mo filters are recommended for use in pediatric digital X-ray imaging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ICRP, Managing Patient Dose in Digital Radiology, ICRP Publication 93, Ann. ICRP 34, 1 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  2. ICRP, 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, ICRP Publication 60, Ann. ICRP 21, 1 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. J. A. Seibert, Pediatr. Radiol. 34, S183 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. D. J. Brenner, C. D. Elliston, E. J. Hall and W. E. Berdon, Am. J. Roentgenol. 176, 289 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Uffmann and C. S. Prokop, Eur. J. Radiol. 72, 202 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. R. Schaetzing, Pediatr. Radiol. 34, S207 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. J. Stecke, A. D. Cruz, S. M. Almeida and F. N. Boscolo, Dentomaxillofac. Radiol. 41, 361 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. P. Brosi et al., Radiol. Phys. Technol. 4, 148 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. European guidelines on quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images. Luxembourg, European Commission (1996).

  10. S. Agostinelli et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 506, 250 (2003).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. J. Allison et al., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 53, 398 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. J-F. Carrier, L. Archambault, L. Beautieum and R. Roy, Med. Phys. 31, 484 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Lechner, M. G. Pia and M. Sudhakar, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 56, 398 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. G. Poludniowski et al., Phys. Biol. Med. 54, N433 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. W. P. Segars and B. M. W. Tsui, Proc. IEEE 97, 1954 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. ICRP, Basic Anatomical and Physiological Data for Use in Radiological Protection Reference Values. ICRP Publication 89. Ann. ICRP 32, 3 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Su-** Park.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Park, SJ., Kim, J., Han, J.C. et al. Evaluation of the Use of a Molybdenum Filter for Dose Reduction in Pediatric Digital X-ray Imaging. J. Korean Phys. Soc. 77, 1253–1259 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.77.1253

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.77.1253

Keywords

Navigation