Abstract
Letters are more difficult to detect in function words than in content words, presumably because function words serve to cue sentential structure but recede to the background as meaning unfolds. This function disadvantage was found for the definite article in German for all three genders and all four cases, but it was more pronounced when the article appeared in a nominative noun phrase than in an object noun phrase. It was also more pronounced for the typical subject-predicate-object sentential format than for the object-predicate-subject sentential format and also when the definite article unequivocally specified the case of a phrase than when it was ambiguous. The results suggest that the structural frames established on line in reading are finely tuned to both phrase-level and sentence-level organization.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bates, E., Devescovi, A., Hernandez, A., &Pizzamiglio, L. (1996). Gender priming in Italian.Perception & Psychophysics,58, 992–1004.
Buck-Gengler, C., &Healy A. F. (1993). Letter detection in German silent reading: Issues of unitization and syllable-final devoicing. InProceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Convention of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 277–282). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Crawley, R. A., Stevenson, R. J., &Kleiman, D. (1990). The use of heuristic strategies in the interpretation of pronouns.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,19, 245–264.
Drewnowski, A., &Healy, A. F. (1977). Detection errors onthe and and: Evidence for reading units larger than the word.Memory & Cognition,5, 636–647.
Ferreira, F. (1994). Choice of passive voice is affected by verb type and animacy.Journal of Memory & Language,33, 715–736.
Frazier, L. (1987). Sentence processing: A tutorial review. In M. Coltheart (Ed.),Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 559–586). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Frazier, L. (1995). Constraint satisfaction as a theory of sentence processing.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,24, 437–468.
Givon, T. (1992). The grammar of referential coherence as mental processing instruction.Linguistics,30, 5–55.
Greenberg, S. N., &Koriat, A. (1991). The missing-letter effect for common function words depends on their linguistic function in the phrase.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 1051–1061.
Grober, E. H., Beardsley, W., &Caramazza, A. (1978). Parallel function strategy in pronoun assignment.Cognition,6, 117–133.
Healy, A. F. (1976). Detection errors on the word “the”: Evidence for reading units larger than letters.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,2, 235- 242.
Healy, A. F. (1994). Letter detection: A window to unitization and other cognitive processes in reading text.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,1, 333–344.
Healy, A. F., &Drewnowski, A. (1983). Investigating the boundaries of reading units: Letter detection in misspelled words.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,9, 413–426.
Hemforth, B. (1993).Kognitives Parsing: Repräsentation und Verarbeitung sprachlichen Wissens [Cognitive parsing: Representation and processing of linguistic knowledge]. Sankt Augustin, Germany: Infix.
Konieczny, L., Hemforth, B., Scheepers, C., &Strube, G. (1996). Reanalysen vs. interne Reparaturen beim Sprachverstehen [Reanalyses vs. internal repairs in language comprehension]. In C. Habel, S. Kanngießer, & G. Rickheit (Eds.),Perspektiven der kognitiven Linguistik (pp. 161–183). Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Koriat, A., &Greenberg, S. N. (1991). Syntactic control of letter detection: Evidence from English and Hebrew nonwords.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 1033–1048.
Koriat, A., &Greenberg, S. N. (1994). The extraction of phrase structure during reading: Evidence from letter detection errors.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,1, 345–356.
Koriat, A., &Greenberg, S. N. (1996). The enhancement effect in letter detection: Further evidence for the structural model of reading.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 1184–1195.
Koriat, A., Greenberg, S. N., &Goldshmid, Y. (1991). The missingletter effect in Hebrew: Word frequency or word function?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 66–80.
MacDonald, M. C. (1996). Representation and activation in syntactic processing. In T. Inui & J. L. McClelland (Eds.),Attention and performance XVI: Information integration in perception and communication (pp. 433–456). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Mecklinger, A., Schriefers, H., Steinhauer, K., &Friederici, A. D. (1995). Processing relative clauses varying on syntactic and semantic dimensions: An analysis with event-related potentials.Memory & Cognition,23, 477–494.
Moravcsik, J. E., &Healy, A. F. (1995). Effect of meaning on letter detection.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 82–95.
Moravcsik, J. E., &Healy, A. F. (1998). Effect of syntactic role and syntactic prominence on letter detection.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,5, 96–100.
Müsseler, J. (1995). Focusing and the process of pronominal resolution. In G. Rickheit & C. Habel (Eds.),Focus and coherence in discourse processing (pp. 52–73). Berlin: de Gruyter.
Pechmann, T., Uszkoreit, H., Engelkamp, J., &Zerbst, D. (1996). Wortstellung im deutschen Mittelfeld: Linguistische Theorie und psycholinguistische Evidenz [Word sequence in German midfield: Linguistic theories and psycholinguistic evidence]. In C. Habel, S. Kanngießer & G. Rickheit (Eds.),Perspektiven der kognitiven Linguistik (pp. 257–299). Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Radeau, M., &van Berkum, J. J. A. (1996). Gender decision.Language & Cognitive Processes,11, 605–610.
Rickheit, G., Günther, U., &Sichelschmidt, L. (1992). Coherence and coordination in written text: Reading time studies. In D. Stein (Ed.),Cooperating with written texts: The pragmatics and comprehension of written texts (pp. 103–127). Berlin: de Gruyter.
Rösler, F., Pechmann, T., Streb, J., Röder, B., &Henninghausen, E. (1998). Parsing of sentences in a language with varying word order: Word-by-word variations of processing demands are revealed by event-related brain potentials.Journal of Memory & Language,38, 150–176.
Saint-Aubin, J., &Poirier, M. (1997). The influence of word function in the missing-letter effect: Further evidence from French.Memory & Cognition,25, 666–676.
Schriefers, H., Friederici, A. D., &Rose, U. (1998). Context effects in visual word recognition: Lexical relatedness and syntactic context.Memory & Cognition,26, 1292–1303.
Sidner, C. L. (1983). Focusing and discourse.Discourse Processes,6, 107–130.
Steinhauer, K., Mecklinger, A., Friederici, A. D., &Meyer, M. (1997). Wahrscheinlichkeit und Strategie: Eine EKP-Studie zur Verarbeitung syntaktischer Anomalien [Probability and strategy: An ERP-study on the process of syntactic anomalies].Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie,44, 305–331.
van Dijk, T. A., &Kintsch, W. (1983).Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by Grant DFG Mu 1298/3 from the German Science Foundation.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
MÜsseler, J., Koriat, A. & Nißlein, M. Letter-detection patterns in German: A window to the early extraction of sentential structure during reading. Memory & Cognition 28, 993–1003 (2000). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209347
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209347