Log in

Exploration of Overlapped Endogenous Mineralization Using the Results of Paleovolcanic Reconstructions

  • Published:
Moscow University Geology Bulletin Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Problems of exploring blind and overlapped deposits are currently very urgent. Geological and prospecting works can be highly efficient only during complex studies that enable one to identify structural units of the studied area and evaluate its geological and geochemical potential. The structural and geochemical criterion developed by the authors is considered. Its use is preceded by definition of the structural and geological characteristic of the territory based on the method of paleovolcanic reconstructions. At a later stage, areas that are promising for detection of ore mineralization are delineated based on confinement of various types of mineralization to specified structural units of paleovolcanic structures. Geochemical survey within the prospective areas makes it possible to evaluate prospects of the areas, distinguish the most promising sites, and to give a preliminary geochemical assessment of the overlapped mineralization zones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Arun, K., The Crater Lake of Oregon, USA: A collapsed caldera of Mount Mazama Volcano, Earth Sci. India (Popular Iss.), 2012, vol. V (IV), pp. 1–22.

  2. Dickinson, W.R. and Hatherton, T., Andesitic volcanism and seismicity around the Pacific, Science, 1967, vol. 157, no. 3790, pp. 801–803. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.157.3790.801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dyakonov, V.V., Medno-porfirovye mestorozhdeniya—usloviya lokalizatsii i poiska (Copper-Porphyry Deposits: Conditions of Location and Prospecting), Moscow: RUDN, 2010.

  4. Dyakonov, V.V., Phanerozoic paleovolcanic structures and ore mineralization of copper-molybdenum porphyritic type, Doctoral (Geol.-Mineral.) Dissertation, Moscow, 2011.

  5. Dyakonov, V.V., Yapaskurt, O.V., Kotelnikov, A.E., et al., The structural and textural features of felsic volcanics of the Sarbai Formation (Southern Urals), Moscow Univ. Geol. Bull., 2017, vol. 72, pp. 320–325. Cited June 15, 2020.https://doi.org/10.3103/S0145875217050027

  6. Dyakonov, V.V., Kotelnikov, A.A., Mahmoud, A.S., and Kotelnikova, E.M., Reconstruction of volcanic structures: examples from Kazakhstan and Egypt, IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci., 2020, vol. 471, 012015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/471/1/012015

  7. Korchuganova, N.I. and Korsakov, A.K., Distantsionnye metody geologicheskogo kartirovaniya: Uchebnik (Remote Methods of Geological Map**. Textbook), Moscow: KDU, 2009.

  8. Kosarev, A.M., Paleozoic volcanism in the Southern Urals: A Relationship Between formations and petrogenetic series, evolution of volcanism, geodynamics, in Magmatizm i metamorfizm v istorii Zemli: Tez. dokl. XI Vseross. petrograf. soveshch. T. 1 (Proc. XI All. Russ. Petrogr. Conf. “Magmatism and Metamorphism in the Earth’s History: Vol. 1), Yekaterinburg: Inst. Geol. Geofiz. Ural. Otd. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2010, pp. 332–333.

  9. Kotel’nikov, A.E., Mednogorsk paleovolcanic structure and prospects of its ore-bearing potential, Cand. (Geol.-Mineral.) Dissertation, Moscow, 2013.

  10. Krivtsov, A.I. and Migachev, I.F., Metallogeniya andezitoidnykh vulkano-plutonicheskikh poyasov (Metallogeny of Andesitoid Volcano-Plutonic Belts), Moscow: Tsentral. Nauchno-Issled. Geol. Inst. Tsvetn. Blagorodn. Metallov, 1997, Pt. 1.

  11. Krivtsov, A.I., Metallogeniya andezitoidnykh vulkano-plutonicheskikh poyasov (Metallogeny of Andesitoid Volcano-Plutonic Belts), Moscow: Tsentral. Nauchno-Issled. Geol. Inst. Tsvetn. Blagorodn. Metallov, 1999, Pt. 2.

  12. Kuznetsov, Yu.A., Glavnye tipy magmaticheskikh formatsii. Izbr. Tr. T. 2 (Main Types of Igneous Formations. Selective Works. Vol. 2), Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1989.

  13. Troll, V.R. and Carracedo, J., The Geology of Tenerife. Ch. 5, in Geology of the Canary Islands, 2016, pp. 227–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2015-0-04268-X. Cited June 15, 2020.

  14. Yapaskurt, O.V., Lithology. Processes and factors of the epigenesis of rocks: Diagnostics and systematic analysis, Zh. Estestvennonauchn. Issled., 2016, vol. 1, no. 1. Cited May 10, 2020.https://doi.org/10.12737/17332

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to A. E. Kotel’nikov, V. V. Dyakonov or A. L. Dergachev.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Translated by L. Mukhortova

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kotel’nikov, A.E., Dyakonov, V.V. & Dergachev, A.L. Exploration of Overlapped Endogenous Mineralization Using the Results of Paleovolcanic Reconstructions. Moscow Univ. Geol. Bull. 76, 617–623 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0145875221060053

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0145875221060053

Keywords:

Navigation