Log in

Static behaviour of rammed earth: experimental testing and finite element modelling

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper presents an experimental program aiming at assessing the mechanical performance of rammed earth walls, namely under compression and shear loading. Axial compression and diagonal compression tests were carried out for this purpose, which allowed determining important mechanical parameters, such as compressive strength, Young’s modulus, Poisson’s ratio, shear strength and shear modulus. Furthermore, it allowed assessing the level of non-linear behaviour of the respective stress–strain relationships as well as the failure modes. The experimental results were then used in the calibration of numerical models (finite element method) for simulating the non-linear behaviour of rammed earth under shear loading. Both macro- and micro modelling approaches were considered for this purpose. The total strain rotating crack model was used to simulate the behaviour of the rammed earth material, while the Mohr–Coulomb failure criterion was used to simulate the behaviour of interfaces between layers. In general, the numerical models achieved good agreement with the experimental results, but uncertainties related to the definition of the input parameters required to perform a sensitivity analysis. The compressive strength, the Poisson’s ratio, the tensile strength and the tensile fracture energy revealed to be the most important parameters in the analyses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Houben H, Guillaud H (2008) Earth construction: a comprehensive guide. CRATerre—EAG, Intermediate Technology Publication, London

  2. Jaquin PA (2013) One third of world’s population live in earth buildings? Personal communication at http://historicrammedearth.com/one-third-of-worlds-population-live-in-earth-buildings/. Accessed 11 Oct 2013

  3. Hall M, Djerbib Y (2004) Moisture ingress in rammed earth: part 1—the effect of soil particle-size distribution on the rate of capillary suction. Constr Build Mater 18:269–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hall M, Djerbib Y (2006) Moisture ingress in rammed earth: part 2—the effect of soil particle-size distribution on the absorption of static pressure-driven water. Constr Build Mater 20:374–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hall M, Djerbib Y (2006) Moisture ingress in rammed earth: part 3—sorptivity, surface receptiveness and surface inflow velocity. Constr Build Mater 20:384–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jaquin PA, Augarde CE, Gerrard CM (2007) Historic rammed earth structures in Spain: construction techniques and a preliminary classification. In: Proceedings of international symposium on earthen structures

  7. Jaquin PA, Augarde CE, Gerrard CM (2006) Analysis of historical rammed earth construction. In: Proceeding of 9th young geotechnical engineers conference 2006, Belfast

  8. Vargas-Neumann J (1993) Earthquake resistant rammed-earth (tapial) buildings. In: Proceedings of 7th international conference on the study and conservation of earthen architecture, TERRA 93, Silves, Portugal, 24th–29th Oct 1993, pp 140–151

  9. Röhlen U, Ziegert C (2010) Lehmbau Praxis—Planung und Ausführung. Bauwerk, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dierks K, Ziegert C (2000) Kapelle der Versöhnung—Schlussbericht zur Fremdüberwachtung Forschungs– und Seminarbericht des Fachgebietes Tragwerkslehre und Baukonstruktion der TU Berlin

  11. Bui QB, Morel JC (2009) Assessing the anisotropy of rammed earth. Constr Build Mater 23:3005–3011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hall M, Djerbib Y (2014) Rammed earth sample production: context, recommendations and consistency. Constr Build Mater 18:281–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lilley DM, Robinson J (1995) Ultimate strength of rammed earth walls with openings. Proc ICE Struct Build 110:278–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Maniatidis V, Walker P, Heath A, Hayward S (2007) Mechanical and thermal characteristics of rammed earth. In: Proceedings international symposium on earthen structures

  15. Maniatidis V, Walker P (2008) Structural capacity of rammed earth in compression. J Mater Civil Eng 20:230–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jaquin PA, Augarde CE, Gerrard CM (2004) Analysis of Tapial structures for modern use and conservation. In: Proceedings of 4th international conference on structural analysis of historical constructions, Padova, 10–13 Nov 2004, pp 1315–1321

  17. Gomes I, Lopes M, Brito J (2012) Seismic resistance of earth construction in Portugal. Eng Struct 33:932–941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Miccoli L, Müller U, Fontana P (2014) Mechanical behaviour of earthen materials: a comparison between earth block masonry, rammed earth and cob. Constr Build Mater 61:327–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Miccoli L, Müller U (2012) Characterisation of earthen materials. A comparison between earth block masonry, rammed earth and cob. In: Proceedings of 8th international conference on structural analysis of historical constructions

  20. TNO (2009) Displacement method analyser (DIANA) user’s manual. Release 9.4, Netherlands

  21. Mendes NM, Lourenço PB (2009) Seismic assessment of masonry ‘‘Gaioleiro’’ buildings in Lisbon, Portugal. J Earthq Eng 14:80–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Volhard F, Röhlen U (2009) Lehmbau Regeln, Begriffe—Baustoffe—Bauteile. 3. Überarbeitete Auflage, Herausgegeben vom Dachverband Lehm e.V. Vieweg + Teubner Verlag, Wiesbaden

  23. Krebs R (2009) Der Einfluss des Abgleichmörtels und der relative Luftfeuchte auf die Druckfestigkeit von industriell hergestellten Lehmsteinen. Bachelor thesis, University of Applied Sciences for Engineering and Economics, Berlin

  24. Müller U, Ziegert C, Kaiser C, Röhlen U (2012) Eigenschaften industrieller lehmbauprodukte für den mauerwerksbau und verhalten von lehmsteinmauerwerk. Mauerwerk 16:17–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. ASTM E 519-10 (2010) Standard test method for diagonal tension (Shear) in masonry assemblages. American society for testing and materials, West Conshohocken

  26. Figueiras J (1983) Ultimate load analysis of anisotropic and reinforced concrete plates and shells. PhD thesis, University of Wales, Swansea

  27. Damjamic F, Owen D (1984) Practical considerations for modeling of post-cracking concrete behavior for finite element analysis of reinforced concrete structures. In: Proceedings of the international conference on computer aided analysis and design of concrete structures, pp 693–706

  28. Póvoas R (1991) Non-linear models of analysis and design. PhD thesis, University of Porto

  29. Mendes NM (2012) Seismic assessment of ancient masonry buildings: shacking table tests and numerical analysis. PhD thesis, University of Minho, Guimarães

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the European Commission within the framework of the project NIKER dealing with improving immovable Cultural Heritage assets against the risk of earthquakes (contract No. 244123) and by the Portuguese Science and Technology Foundation through project FCOMP-01-0124-FEDER-028864 (FCT-PTDC/ECM-EST/2396/2012). The authors wish to express their gratitude to Mr. André Gardei for his important support in the test setup.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lorenzo Miccoli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Miccoli, L., Oliveira, D.V., Silva, R.A. et al. Static behaviour of rammed earth: experimental testing and finite element modelling. Mater Struct 48, 3443–3456 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-014-0411-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-014-0411-7

Keywords

Navigation