Log in

Self-Sampling by Adolescents at Home: Assessment of the Feasibility to Successfully Collect Blood Microsamples by Inexperienced Individuals

  • Research Article
  • Published:
The AAPS Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Blood microsampling has increasingly attracted interest in the past decades as a more patient-centric sampling approach, offering the possibility to collect a minimal volume of blood following a finger or arm prick at home. In addition to conventional dried blood spots (DBS), many different devices allowing self-sampling of blood have become available. Obviously, the success of home-sampling can only be assured when (inexperienced) users collect samples of good quality. Therefore, the feasibility of six different microsampling devices to collect capillary blood by inexperienced adolescents at home was evaluated. Participants (n = 95) were randomly assigned to collect blood (dried or liquid) at different time points using four of six different self-sampling devices (i.e., DBS, Mitra volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS), Capitainer B, Tasso M20, Minicollect tube and Tasso+ serum separator tube (SST)). The quality of the samples was visually inspected and analytically determined. Moreover, the participants’ satisfaction was assessed via questionnaires. Although a majority succeeded based on the visual inspection, the success rate differed largely between the different devices. In general, the lowest success rate was obtained for the Minicollect tubes, although there is an opportunity and need for improvement for the other self-sampling devices as well. Hence, this also emphasizes the importance to assess the quality of samples collected by the target population prior to study initiation. In addition, visual classification by a trained individual was confirmed based on assessment of the analytical variability between replicates. Finally, self-sampling at home was overall (very) positively received by the participants.

Graphical Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data supporting the findings of the presented study are available on request.

References

  1. Guthrie R, Susi A. A simple phenylalanine method for detecting phenylketonuria in large populations of newborn infants. Pediatrics. 1963;32:338–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Takahashi K, Hattori N, Yokoyama H, **no F, Ohtsuka H, Nakai K, et al. Impact of microsampling on toxicological evaluation in rodent safety studies. J Appl Toxicol. 2024;44(1):118–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/jat.4523.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Stove CP, Ingels AS, De Kesel PM, Lambert WE. Dried blood spots in toxicology: from the cradle to the grave? Crit Rev Toxicol. 2012;42(3):230–43. https://doi.org/10.3109/10408444.2011.650790.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sadones N, Capiau S, De Kesel PM, Lambert WE, Stove CP. Spot them in the spot: analysis of abused substances using dried blood spots. Bioanalysis. 2014;6(17):2211–27. https://doi.org/10.4155/bio.14.156.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Thevis M, Kuuranne T, Geyer H. Annual banned-substance review: Analytical approaches in human sports drug testing 2020/2021. Drug Test Anal. 2022;14(1):7–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.3199.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tey HY, See HH. A review of recent advances in microsampling techniques of biological fluids for therapeutic drug monitoring. J Chromatogr A. 2021;1635:461731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2020.461731.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Müller IR, Linden G, Charão MF, Antunes MV, Linden R. Dried blood spot sampling for therapeutic drug monitoring: challenges and opportunities. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2023;16(8):691–701. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512433.2023.2224562.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Vidal A, Belova L, Stove C, De Boevre M, De Saeger S. Volumetric absorptive microsampling as an alternative tool for biomonitoring of multi-mycotoxin exposure in resource-limited areas. Toxins (Basel). 2021;13(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins13050345.

  9. Koutsimpani-Wagner A, Quartucci C, Rooney JPK, Bose-O’Reilly S, Rakete S. Mercury biomonitoring in German adults using volumetric absorptive microsampling. Environ Monit Assess. 2022;194(4):315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-09962-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. González-Rubio JM, Domínguez-Morueco N, Pedraza-Díaz S, Cañas Portilla A, Lucena M, Rodriguez A, et al. A simple method for direct mercury analysis in dried blood spots (DBS) samples for human biomonitoring studies. Environ Int. 2023;177:107958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2023.107958.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Partington JM, Marchiandi J, Szabo D, Gooley A, Kouremenos K, Smith F, et al. Validating blood microsampling for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances quantification in whole blood. J Chromatogr A. 2024;1713:464522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2023.464522.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. De Kesel PM, Sadones N, Capiau S, Lambert WE, Stove CP. Hemato-critical issues in quantitative analysis of dried blood spots: challenges and solutions. Bioanalysis. 2013;5(16):2023–41. https://doi.org/10.4155/bio.13.156.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Velghe S, Delahaye L, Stove CP. Is the hematocrit still an issue in quantitative dried blood spot analysis? J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2019;163:188–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2018.10.010.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Delahaye L, Veenhof H, Koch BCP, Alffenaar JC, Linden R, Stove C. Alternative sampling devices to collect dried blood microsamples: state-of-the-art. Ther Drug Monit. 2021;43(3):310–21. https://doi.org/10.1097/ftd.0000000000000864.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Thangavelu MU, Wouters B, Kindt A, Reiss IKM, Hankemeier T. Blood microsampling technologies: innovations and applications in 2022. Anal Sci Adv. 2023;4(5–6):154–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/ansa.202300011.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Zuur MA, Veenhof H, Aleksa A, Vanʼt Boveneind-Vrubleuskaya N, Darmawan E, Hasnain MG, et al. Quality assessment of dried blood spots from patients with tuberculosis from 4 countries. Ther Drug Monit. 2019;41(6):714–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/ftd.0000000000000659.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Veenhof H, Koster RA, Junier LAT, Berger SP, Bakker SJL, Touw DJ. Volumetric absorptive microsampling and dried blood spot microsampling vs. conventional venous sampling for tacrolimus trough concentration monitoring. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020;58(10):1687–95. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2019-1260.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Delahaye L, Stove C. Alternative sampling strategies in therapeutic drug monitoring: Microsampling growing toward maturity. Ther Drug Monit. 2021;43(3):307–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/ftd.0000000000000893.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Van Uytfanghe K, Heughebaert L, Stove CP. Self-sampling at home using volumetric absorptive microsampling: coupling analytical evaluation to volunteers’ perception in the context of a large scale study. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2021;59(5):e185–7. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2020-1180.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Boons C, Timmers L, Janssen J, Swart EL, Hugtenburg JG, Hendrikse NH. Feasibility of and patients’ perspective on nilotinib dried blood spot self-sampling. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2019;75(6):825–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-019-02640-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Otten AT, van der Meulen HH, Steenhuis M, Loeff FC, Touw DJ, Kosterink JGW, et al. Clinical validation of a capillary blood home-based self-sampling technique for monitoring of Infliximab, Vedolizumab, and C-reactive protein concentrations in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1093/ibd/izad103.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Mohammed T, Brewer JVV, Pyatt M, Whitbourne SB, Gaziano JM, Edson C, et al. Evaluation of independent self-collected blood specimens for COVID-19 antibody detection among the US veteran population. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2022;104(2):115770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2022.115770.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Capiau S, Stove VV, Lambert WE, Stove CP. Prediction of the hematocrit of dried blood spots via potassium measurement on a routine clinical chemistry analyzer. Anal Chem. 2013;85(1):404–10. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac303014b.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Delahaye L, Heughebaert L, Luhr C, Lambrecht S, Stove CP. Near-infrared-based hematocrit prediction of dried blood spots: an in-depth evaluation. Clin Chim Acta. 2021;523:239–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2021.10.002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Boffel L, Heughebaert L, Lambrecht S, Luginbühl M, Stove CP. In-depth evaluation of automated non-contact reflectance-based hematocrit prediction of dried blood spots. Analyst. 2022;147(23):5445–54. https://doi.org/10.1039/d2an01642g.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Heughebaert L, Boffel L, Lühr C, Lambrecht S, Stove C. Near-infrared-based hematocrit determination of dried blood samples collected by volumetric absorptive microsampling: an in-depth evaluation. Microchem J. 2024. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4735643.

  27. Johar RS, Smith RP. Assessing gravimetric estimation of intraoperative blood loss. J Gynecol Surg. 1993;9(3):151–4. https://doi.org/10.1089/gyn.1993.9.151.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ekins R. Immunoassay design and optimization. In: Price CP, Newman DJ, editors. Principles and Practice of Immunoassay. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK; 1991. pp. 96–153.

  29. Deprez S, Heughebaert L, Boffel L, Stove CP. Application of non-contact hematocrit prediction technologies to overcome hematocrit effects on immunosuppressant quantification from dried blood spots. Talanta. 2023;254:124111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2022.124111.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. The Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Quality Assurance Programs. Pathology Tests 2024 [cited date: 14 March 2024]. https://www.rcpa.edu.au/Manuals/RCPA-Manual/Pathology-Tests.

  31. Verougstraete N, Lapauw B, Van Aken S, Delanghe J, Stove C, Stove V. Volumetric absorptive microsampling at home as an alternative tool for the monitoring of HbA1c in diabetes patients. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2017;55(3):462–9. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2016-0411.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Verougstraete N, Stove V, Stove C. Wet absorptive microsampling at home for HbA1c monitoring in diabetic children. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2018;56(12):e291–4. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2018-0207.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Veenhof H, van Boven JFM, van der Voort A, Berger SP, Bakker SJL, Touw DJ. Effects, costs and implementation of monitoring kidney transplant patients’ tacrolimus levels with dried blood spot sampling: a randomized controlled hybrid implementation trial. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2020;86(7):1357–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.14249.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Verstraete J, Stove C. Volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) as a reliable tool to assess thiamine status in dried blood microsamples: a comparative study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2021;114(3):1200–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqab146.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Wieske L, van Dam KPJ, Steenhuis M, Stalman EW, Kummer LYL, van Kempen ZLE, et al. Humoral responses after second and third SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory disorders on immunosuppressants: a cohort study. Lancet Rheumatol. 2022;4(5):e338–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2665-9913(22)00034-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Groenendijk WN, Griffin TP, Islam MN, Blake L, Wall D, Bell M, et al. Remote capillary blood collection for HbA(1c) measurement during the COVID-19 pandemic: a laboratory and patient perspective. Diabet Med. 2022;39(8):e14897. https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.14897.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Vethe NT, Åsberg A, Andersen AM, Heier Skauby R, Bergan S, Midtvedt K. Clinical performance of volumetric finger-prick sampling for the monitoring of tacrolimus, creatinine and haemoglobin in kidney transplant recipients. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2023;89(12):3690–701. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.15870.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kromdijk W, Mulder JW, Smit PM, Ter Heine R, Beijnen JH, Huitema AD. Therapeutic drug monitoring of antiretroviral drugs at home using dried blood spots: a proof-of-concept study. Antivir Ther. 2013;18(6):821–5. https://doi.org/10.3851/imp2501.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Solheim SA, Ringsted TK, Nordsborg NB, Dehnes Y, Levernaes MCS, Mørkeberg J. No pain, just gain: painless, easy, and fast dried blood spot collection from fingertip and upper arm in do** control. Drug Test Anal. 2021;13(10):1783–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.3135.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Heughebaert L, Stove CP. Is the stability of folates in dried blood microsamples sufficient to perform home-sampling studies? Analyst. 2024;149(3):895–908. https://doi.org/10.1039/d3an01004j.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Capiau S, Veenhof H, Koster RA, Bergqvist Y, Boettcher M, Halmingh O, et al. Official International Association for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology Guideline: Development and validation of dried blood spot-based methods for therapeutic drug monitoring. Ther Drug Monit. 2019;41(4):409–30. https://doi.org/10.1097/Ftd.0000000000000643.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Caroline Teughels, Karen Van Campenhout, Jelle Vlaanderen, Hilde Van De Maele, Adrian Covaci, Isabel De Boosere, Dries Vloemans, Maja Mampaey and Francesco Dal Dosso for their valuable input during our discussions. Moreover, the authors also want to thank Caroline Adriaensen, Karlien Willems and Iris Maldoy for their assistance during the recruitment of the participants.

Funding

This study was commissioned, financed and steered by the department of environment of the Flemish government.

LB would like to thank the FWO Research Foundation Flanders for granting her a PhD fellowship (11M2324N).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the conceptualization and design of the study. AVM and EDH were responsible for recruitment of the participants. LB and AVM contributed to the acquisition of the data and performed the data analyses. LB, KVU and CS drafted the manuscript. All authors contributed to the interpretation of the data and critically revised and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christophe P. Stove.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

Research involving human subjects complied with all relevant national regulations, institutional policies and is in accordance with the tenets of the Helsinki Declaration (as revised in 2013), and has been approved by the Antwerp University Hospital Ethical Committee (B3002023000118).

Informed Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all participants and one of their parents.

Competing Interest

None of the other authors has any competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOCX 19.3 MB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Boffel, L., Van Mensel, A., Pauwels, J. et al. Self-Sampling by Adolescents at Home: Assessment of the Feasibility to Successfully Collect Blood Microsamples by Inexperienced Individuals. AAPS J 26, 75 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-024-00947-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-024-00947-1

Keywords

Navigation