Introduction

Clinically, the restoration of bone defects resulting from various of pathological conditions, such as severe trauma, tumor resection, infection, degenerative diseases, etc., has been a major challenge for current surgical treatment, which also mean great economical burden for relevant patients [1]. Bone tissue has a certain ability to regenerate; nevertheless, for larger bone defects that are beyond the self-healing capability of bone tissue (often called critical bone defects), bone graft implantation is usually required to achieve effective therapeutic outcomes [2]. The bone grafts commonly used in clinical practice are mainly autologous and allogeneic bone grafts, but such grafts have several potential risks, such as limited sources, donor damage, immune rejection, and possible infection. Therefore, synthetic bone substitutes are being introduced. New bone grafts must not only fill the bone defect area but also promote bone regeneration and repair the normal physiological function of the damaged area. Consequently, the utilization of novel tissue engineering biomaterials that mimic the structural, mechanical and biological properties of natural bone is expected to produce better clinical outcomes for patients with bone defects, decreasing the suffering and economic burden of these patients in clinical practice [3, 4].

The healing process of bone tissues depends on three main aspects: osteoconduction, blood supply and osteoinduction [3, 5, 6]. Bone defect repair is divided into two main categories: primary bone healing, in which a fracture site less than 0.1 mm is firmly stabilized and the bone gap is filled directly by continuous ossification and subsequent Haversian remodeling; and secondary bone healing, which occurs more commonly when the fracture margin is less than half the diameter of the injured bone and involves multiple events, such as blood coagulation, inflammatory response, fibrous cartilage healing tissue formation, intramembranous and endochondral ossification, and bone remodeling. Nevertheless, in some extreme cases of bone healing, such as the healing of large segmental bone defects or critical size bone defects that exceed approximately half the diameter of injured bone tissues, extensive bone loss directly affects revascularization as well as tissue differentiation, ultimately leading to spontaneous fracture and the subsequent development of bone discontinuity without intervention [7, 8]. The function of bone substitutes is primarily a combination of mechanical support and bone regeneration, involving several critical biological properties, such as osteoconductivity, osteoinduction, osteogenesis and osteointegration. Osteoconduction is the capability to facilitate the adherence of osteoblasts and osteogenic progenitor cells and allow these cells to migrate and grow inward within the three-dimensional structure of the graft. Osteoinduction refers to the ability of the graft to induce primitive, undifferentiated and pluripotent cells to develop into a spectrum of osteogenic cells, thereby inducing osteogenesis. Osteogenesis is defined as the osteogenic differentiation and subsequent new bone formation of donor cells from the host or graft. Osseointegration, defined as the anchoring ability of the implant, involves bone tissue formation within the surrounding area of the implant at the bone-implant interface without obvious formation of fiber and other connective tissues [4, 5].

As a common synthetic bone repair material, hydrogels have been extensively utilized to construct bone repair material systems due to their ECM-like properties. In addition, polymer-based bone substitutes that possess suitable physicochemical and bioactive properties exhibit excellent application prospects in BTE. Among them, GelMA, a representative hydrogel formulation, has been extensively utilized in various biomedical fields [9, 10]. It is a dual-bond-modified gelatin that can be crosslinked and solidified into a gel by ultraviolet (UV) or visible light irradiation under the action of photoinitiators, and the scaffolds after gelation possess characteristics of both natural and synthetic biomaterials [10]. The initiation of chain-growth polymerization was triggered by generation of free radicals via homolytic cleavage, and such an unique photo polymerization offers a number of advantages including good injectability, rapid gelation, promoted mechanical properties and bioprinting suitability [9]. More importantly, GelMA hydrogels contain the common Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) moiety, a tripeptide that facilitates certain important cellular behaviors, including adherence, spreading and differentiation into numerous cell lineages. Moreover, they contain matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) sequences belonging to endopeptidases that facilitate enzymatic degradation, which plays a critical role in tissue rehabilitation and wound closure [11, 12]. In addition, GelMA itself can replace artificial basement membranes or other natural collagen hydrogels because its three-dimensional structure is suitable for cell growth and differentiation, as well as because of its excellent biocompatibility, low antigenicity and cellular response properties [11]. GelMA has also been introduced into bone repair material systems by many researchers because of its good temperature-sensitive gel properties, degradability, adjustable mechanical properties, and ability to promote bone differentiation and vascularization [11,

Fig. 3
figure 3

GelMA/β-TCP-based hydrogel scaffold decorated with personalized MXene (Ti3C2) with excellent photothermal antimicrobial and osteogenic capabilities for the therapy of infected bone defects. a Schematic illustration of the fabrication, in vitro biological effects and in vivo bone repair efficacy of the GelMA/β-TCP/Sr2+/MXene (GTAM) hydrogel scaffold. b Surface characterization of different 3D-printed hydrogel scaffolds. c Determination of the NIR-responsive photothermal properties of different 3D-printed scaffolds. d Representative images of S. aureus and E. coli clones cocultured with 3D-printed scaffolds with or without NIR irradiation for 24 h. e Determination of the in vivo photothermal effect and bone regenerative actions of the hydrogel scaffolds via radiographic and histological analysis. Images reproduced from [21], © 2022 The Royal Society of Chemistry

Bioactive glass-incorporated composite hydrogels

Bioglass (BG), a category of synthetic silicate-based ceramics, originally consisted of silicon dioxide (SiO2), sodium oxide (Na2O), calcium oxide (CaO), and phosphorus pentoxide (P2O5) when first developed in the 1970s. For better stability, these ceramics were restructured by the incorporation of potassium oxide (K2O), magnesium oxide (MgO), and boron oxide (B2O), and the key component, silicate, subsequently accounted for approximately 50% by weight. When exposed to biological fluids, ions including Si, Ca and P are rapidly released from BG and form a hydroxycarbonate apatite (HCA) surface layer. This thin HCA coating absorbs proteins and attracts bone progenitor cells. Furthermore, this bioapatite layer is partially replaced by bone tissues during long-term implantation through a creep replacement process [3]. To summarize, BG 45S5 (46.1 mol.% SiO2, 24.4 mol.% Na2O, 26.9 mol.% CaO and 2.6 mol.% P2O5, now sold by NovaBone Products LLC, US) and S53P4 (53.8 mol.% SiO2, 22.7 mol.% Na2O, 21.8 mol.% CaO and 1.7 mol.% P2O5, now sold by BonAlive Biomaterials, Finland) are two of the most widely recognized commercial BGs available on the market as bone graft substitutes [72].

BG-XLS/GelMA-DFO hydrogel

As one of commonly used bioglass, BG 45S5, has good bioactivity and osteoconductivity along with the ability to bind to living bone tissue. However, the application of BTE 3D BG scaffolds is usually restricted by their inherent brittleness, low fracture toughness and compressive deformation, as well as unsatisfactory osteoinductivity [73]. The mechanical properties of BG scaffolds can, however, be illustrated by do** other metal ions or polymers into silica-based networks. A previous study confirmed that 2D Sn (laponite, XLS), a magnesium silicate (Na+0.7[(Si8Mg5.5:Li0.3) O20(OH)4]0.7), served as a crosslinker of molecules and significantly improved the mechanical properties of polymer matrices. In addition, XLS was found to promote cell adhesion, proliferation and osteogenic differentiation [74]. Desferoxamine (DFO) is a hypoxia-mimetic agent that promotes bone regeneration by activating hypoxia-inhibitable factor-1α (HIF-1α)-mediated angiogenesis [75]. A novel BG-XLS/GelMA-DFO scaffold was developed in which XLS significantly enhanced the mechanical properties of the scaffold compared to those of a pure BG scaffold without affecting its mineralization and promoted the osteogenic differentiation of human adipose mesenchymal stem cells (ADSCs). The immobilization of DFO-loaded GelMA hydrogels onto XLS-functionalized BG scaffolds achieved sustained release and inhibited DFO degradation, and in vitro data showed increased expression of HIF-1α and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) by ADSCs. In vivo data showed that the BG-XLS/GelMA-DFO scaffold exhibited strong pro-bone healing ability in a rat cranial defect model 8 weeks after implantation [22]. BG has excellent osteoconductive properties but lacks angiogenic and osteoinductive activities, and it is a feasible strategy to compound other biomaterials with pro-angiogenic and osteoinductive abilities in BTE substitutes.

BG/GelMA hydrogel

In one study conducted by Zheng et al. photocrosslinkable bionic BG/GelMA composite hydrogels were prepared by sequential physical and chemical crosslinking (gel + UV) methods [23]. Briefly, different amounts of BG were dispersed into the GelMA solutions, followed by physical crosslinking. Immediately after incubation, "enhanced" composite hydrogels were obtained by photocrosslinking. The four sets of hydrogels had highly interconnected porous structures, with BG uniformly distributed in the composite hydrogel network. In addition, in terms of mechanical properties, the "enhanced" composite hydrogels had a higher compressive modulus than the "conventional" composite hydrogels. This study showed that the mechanical properties and cellular behaviors of the hydrogel scaffolds significantly improved after the addition of BG due to the reliable interactions between the GelMA polymers and BG powder. The “enhanced” composite hydrogels showed good mine good mineralization capacity, and the in vitro results showed that the BG/GelMA composite hydrogels facilitated cell attachment, proliferation and osteogenic differentiation, combined with the interesting crosslinking method for GelMA, signifying their promising application in the development of biomaterials for promoting bone regeneration.

Cell-loaded biomimetic composite hydrogel

BTE-associated biomaterials capable of mimicking the structural, mechanical and biological properties of natural bone, i.e., bionic scaffolds, are currently a popular research topic. Scaffolds and cells are the basic components of BTE, and correctly combining these two materials while satisfying the requirements of mechanical properties as well as biological activity is currently the most common BTE method. GelMA hydrogels, as a class of hydrophilic polymers with three-dimensional structures, good biocompatibility, biodegradability and weak immunogenicity, have been applied in various studies and exhibit advantageous abilities to promote cell adhesion and proliferation, making them a very good platform for cell loading [9, 10]. BMSCs are the most commonly used stem cells in cell therapy and tissue engineering due to their ability to mobilize and migrate from bone marrow to damaged tissues to repair bone and cartilage defects [76]. GelMA hydrogels lack the osteogenic induction capacity required for bone mineralization and are often used in various studies in combination with stem cells, such as BMSCs or osteoblasts, to prepare cell-loaded scaffolds to enhance the bioactivity and bone repair capacity of hydrogel materials [24, 25].

Li et al. fabricated an injectable GelMA hydrogel loaded with BMSCs [24]. In this study, BMSCs were mixed with GelMA solution to which a photoinitiator was added, followed by in situ injection at bone defect sites and then by crosslinking and molding under UV irradiation. The BMSC-loaded hydrogels prepared in the in vitro cellular experiments exhibited good cytocompatibility as well as proliferative properties; the BMSC group and the BMSC-loaded hydrogel group showed vigorous bone growth, new blood vessels and more newly formed bone tissues with mature tissue structure in the bone defect area. The free radical polymerization of GelMA hydrogels is usually initiated by exposure to UV light with the assistance of photoinitiators. Given the damaging effects of UV light on cells and tissues, Goto et al. used riboflavin (RF) as a photosensitizer for GelMA hydrogel polymerization under visible light, providing a safer and more effective environment for loaded cells [25]. The GelMA-Irgacure2959 (IR) hydrogel had a similar to that of the UV light-irradiated GelMA-Irgacure2959 (IR) hydrogel, except that the visible light-irradiated GelMA-RF hydrogel required a longer time to polymerize. In vitro experiments showed that KUSA-A1 cells encapsulated in GelMA hydrogels polymerized with visible light had significantly higher viability than those encapsulated in GelMA hydrogels. In terms of osteogenic activity, the late bone formation marker osteocalcin (OCN) was clearly expressed in the KUSA-A1 cells encapsulated in the GelMA-RF hydrogels, whereas the levels of the early markers RUNX2 and osterix (OSX) were downregulated. Additionally, KUSA-A1 cells aggregated and exhibited spherical structures when cultured in the GelMA-RF hydrogels, indicating that the cells cultured in the 3D environment were in a later stage of differentiation, and the 3D matrix structure of the GelMA-RF hydrogels led to high levels of osteoblast differentiation and maturation, indicating the suitability of GelMA-RF hydrogel cultures for osteoblast osteogenesis in vitro.

In addition to being loaded with BMSCs to enhance its osteogenic activity, GelMA can be loaded with other cell types, such as endothelial cells (ECs) to promote bone tissue angiogenesis and vascularization or bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMMs) to inhibit inflammatory responses and promote osteogenic repair to further promote bone defect repair. One study constructed in situ vascularized tissue-engineered bone using 3D-bioprinting technology [26] (Fig. 4a-c), with GelMA as the matrix bioink, uniformly inoculating ECs and BMSCs on the porous scaffold surface to form a scaffold with effective angiogenic and osteoinductive activity for bone defect restoration. As demonstrated in the in vitro results, a visible coupling effect between angiogenesis and osteogenesis was found in this in situ vascularized scaffold. In vivo investigation further confirmed that the scaffold promoted osteogenic repair. Importantly, amelioration of the inflammatory microenvironment is also a crucial aspect of effective bone repair. Considering the important role of the host immune response to implanted bioengineered bone substitutes, Yu et al. used 3D bioprinting technology to introduce BMMs into a scaffold integrated with GelMA and HAMA hydrogels as an encapsulation system [27] (Fig. 4d-f), with the introduction of BMSCs to further promote the osteogenic activity of the synthetic scaffold. The results showed that BMSCs could promote the polarization of BMMs to the M2 type, decrease the expression of proinflammatory genes and increase the expression of anti-inflammatory genes in the early stage, while BMMs could promote BMSC osteogenic differentiation and further promote osteogenic repair. This dual-channel system resulted in effective bone repair in a rat calvarial defect model by early immune regulation and late osteogenesis induction. This investigation reported the 3D multichannel bioprinting of immune cells and BMSCs for BTE biomaterials and provided thoughtful insights into the modulation of the inflammatory microenvironment during bone tissue healing, signifying the importance of osteoimmunology in the preparation of bone scaffolds.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Cell-laden 3D-bioprinted tissue engineered bone substitutes with excellent osteogenic potential for repairing bone defects. a In vitro osteogenic performances of GelMA hydrogel scaffold loaded with BMSCs and ECs prepared by 3D-bioprinting technology. b CLSM observation of the in situ 3D seeding of BMSCs and RAOECs. c In vivo bone repair effect of the cell-loaded GelMA hydrogel on a rat critical-sized calvarial defect model as confirmed by micro-CT evaluation. Images reproduced from [26], © 2022 Elsevier© 2022 American Chemical Society. d Graphic description of the 3D bioprinting, in vitro and in vivo experimental procedures used to test the hybrid hydrogel composed of GelMA/HAMA, alginate, GO, rBMMs, and rBMSCs. e Graphic illustration of the bioink composition in two channels. f Morphological characterization of different 3D bioprinted scaffolds. g In vivo bone regeneration of rat calvarial defects implanted with different hydrogel scaffolds. Images reproduced from [27], © 2022 American Chemical Society