Abstract
Background
Retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) cell therapy is a promising way to treat many retinal diseases. However, obtaining transplantable RPE cells is time-consuming and less effective. This study aimed to develop novel strategies for generating engineered RPE patches with physiological characteristics.
Results
Our findings revealed that RPE cells derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) successfully self-assembled into spheroids. The RPE spheroids treated with Y27632 and Repsox had increased expression of epithelial markers and RPE-specific genes, along with improved cell viability and barrier function. Transcriptome analysis indicated enhanced cell adhesion and extracellular matrix (ECM) organization in RPE spheroids. These RPE spheroids could be seeded and bioprinted on collagen vitrigel (CV) membranes to construct engineered RPE sheets. Circular RPE patches, obtained by trephining a specific section of the RPE sheet, exhibited abundant microvilli and pigment particles, as well as reduced proliferative capacity and enhanced maturation.
Conclusions
Our study suggests that the supplementation of small molecules and 3D spheroid culture, as well as the bioprinting technique, can be effective methods to promote RPE cultivation and construct engineered RPE sheets, which may support future clinical RPE cell therapy and the development of RPE models for research applications.
Similar content being viewed by others
Background
The retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) is a highly specialized and polarized single-cell sheet located in the outer retina. RPE cells play a critical role in the visual cycle, light absorption, the photoreceptor outer segments (POS) absorption, formation of the blood-retinal barrier (BRB), and transportation of nutrients and ions [1]. Dysfunctions in the RPE which can lead to disruption of the BRB and photoreceptor cell death, are implicated in many blinding retinal diseases, such as age-related macular degeneration and retinitis pigmentosa [2,3,4]. Therefore, the therapies targeting RPE are of great importance. A few RPE cell therapies have been conducted utilizing human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) or human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) [5,6,7]. Compared to hESCs, hiPSCs offer the advantage of circumventing issues related to immune rejection, adverse effects associated with immunosuppressants and ethical concerns, making hiPSCs an abundant and accessible cell source for cell therapy [8]. Despite the remarkable progress, the development of clinically approved hiPSC-derived RPE for stem cell therapy remains an ongoing process. Clinical-grade and qualified hiPSC-RPE must exhibit a polarized and mature phenotype, possess a functional barrier and display low proliferative capacity to mitigate the risk of tumorigenicity [9, 10]. Besides, there is a need for improved production efficiency, as the current methods are often time-consuming [11].
Small molecules are known to manipulate cell fate, state, and function in vitro by targeting specific proteins [12]. By controlling duration time and concentration, the manipulation of small molecule compounds can be flexible and convenient. Among these small molecules, Y27632, classified as a rho-associated protein kinase(ROCK) inhibitor, has been reported to promote adhesion, extended passages, anti-apoptosis, pigmentation, and morphological characteristics of hiPSC-RPE [13, 14]. Repsox, also known as 616452, functions as an inhibitor of the transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) receptor and is widely used in iPSC reprogramming and lineage reprogramming due to its ability to replace Sox2 and c-Myc by inhibiting TGF-β signaling pathways [15, 16]. Both Y27632 and Repsox are integral components of small molecule cocktails utilized in the direct reprogramming of human astrocytes into early neuroectodermal cells [17]. However, the combined impact of Y27632 and Repsox on stem-cell derived RPE cells is explored little. These small molecules have been reported to intervene in epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in an EMT model derived from hESC-RPE [18]. Nevertheless, the effects of Y27632 and Repsox on hiPSC-RPE cells remain to be elucidated.
Three-dimensional (3D) spheroid cell culture is a popular method for tissue engineering [19]. Compared to conventional 2D cell culture which may induce genetic and epigenetic alterations, as well as characteristic changes in cells, 3D spheroid culture offers a more physiologically relevant environment for cell growth [20]. Spheroid culture facilitates robust cell-cell interactions and cell-extracellular matrix (ECM) interactions for the cultured cells [21]. Our previous research demonstrated enhanced stemness in spheroid culture for corneal stromal cells and corneal endothelial cells [22, 23]. In regards to research on hiPSC-RPE cells, our group also observed enhanced RPE characteristics resulting from spheroid culture [ The normal hiPSC cell line was cultured on Matrigel-coated plates(Corning, USA) using hiPSC medium (NuwacellTM hiPSC/hESC medium ncTarget; Nuwacell, Anhui, China). The hiPSCs were dissociated with 0.5 mM EDTA(Nuwacell) at 80% of confluence and passaged every 3–4 days. The culture medium was changed daily. The hiPSC-RPE cells were differentiated as previously reported [27]. Briefly, hiPSCs were cultured in a differentiation medium composed of Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM, high glucose, Gibco,Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), supplemented with 50 μM β-mercaptoethanol (Sigma-Aldrich Corp., St. Louis, MO, USA), 1 × minimum essential medium–nonessential amino acids (MEM NEAA; Gibco), 1% penicillin-streptomycin (Gibco), and 20% of knockout serum replacement (KSR; Gibco) from D0-D42. 10 mM Nicotinamide (Sigma) was added to the differentiation medium at D0-D7, and 100 ng/ml Activin A (Peprotech, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and 3 µM CHIR99021 (Med Chem Express, New Jersey, USA) were added at D7-D14, D14-D42 respectively. On day 42, the pigmented cells were dissociated by TrypLE Express Reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and enriched. Cells were then seeded on Matrigel-coated culture plates at a density of 3.5 × 104/cm2 in a maintained medium composed of high glucose DMEM, 4% KSR, 1 × MEM NEAA, 1% penicillin-streptomycin and 50 μM β-mercaptoethanol. The culture medium was changed every 2–3 days. RPE cells were dissociated as described above. The collected hiPSC-RPE cells were seeded onto specific agarose micromolds as described previously [23] and incubated for 48 h. During this time, the suspended cells formed into a spheroid-like aggregate. After incubation, the RPE spheroids were seeded or bioprinted for further use. A cell counting kit-8 (Bimake, Houston, USA) assay was performed to evaluate the viability of hiPSC-RPE cells. Briefly, RPE cells were seeded in a 96-well plate at a same density for 24 h. Then, Y27632 (10 μM) (Med Chem Express), Repsox (10 μM) (Med Chem Express) and a combination of Y27632 (10 μM) + Repsox (10 μM) were added into the culture medium, and the cells were further for additional 24 h. Then, 10 μL CCK-8 reagent was directly added into each well and the plate was incubated for 2 h until the color of medium turned orange. Subsequently, the absorbance value of the medium was read at 450 nm with a microplate reader. The viability of RPE spheroids was evaluated using a live/dead cell imaging kit (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific) following the manufacturer’s instructions. RPE spheroids were exposed to a 1 × Live/dead working solution for 25 min at 37℃ in the dark. RPE spheroids were imaged using a fluorescence microscope (Olympus, Japan). The percentage of live cells was acquired from three independent samples. To compare the expansion ability of RPE spheroids, the relative quantification process of the pigmented area was conducted with imageJ. The original color images of three groups were first combined into one image. Then, the combined images were converted to 8-bit grayscale images followed by the find edge process, threshold adjustment, target area setting, and the measurement of mean gray value (Fig. S6). For the cell apoptosis experiment, hiPSC-RPE cells were dissociated, and the RPE suspension was divided evenly and treated with Y27632 (10 μM), Repsox (10 μM) and Y27632 (10 μM) + Repsox (10 μM), respectively. The Annexin V-Alexa Fluor 488/PI Kit (4A biotech, Bei**g, China) was used. First, the cell suspension was centrifuged, washed with PBS, then centrifuged again. Second, the RPE cells were re-suspended in 1 × binding buffer and incubated with annexin V-Alexa Fluor 488 for 5 min. Third, propidium iodide solution was added to the cell samples, and the samples were detected immediately and analyzed using a flow cytometer (Novocyte). Cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min at room temperature and rinsed thrice with PBS. Following that, the cells were permeabilized in 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS for 10 min and blocked with 3% BSA in PBS for 1 h at room temperature. Next, the cells were incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4℃. After rinsing with PBS, the cells were stained with Alexa Fluor-conjugated secondary antibodies (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 1:1000) for 1 h at room temperature. Following PBS wash, the cells were stained with DAPI for 5 min and mounted with a mounting medium. Immunofluorescence was examined using a fluorescence microscope (Olympus, Japan). CoraLite594-Phalloidin (Proteintech, USA) conjugates were used to label filamentous actin (F-actin). The other antibodies used are listed in Table S1. Total RNA was extracted using the FastPure® Cell Total RNA Isolation Kit (Vazyme, Nan**g, China) and dissolved in RNase-free water. RNA samples were quantified by measuring the OD value at 260 nm, and the OD 260/280 ratios for all RNA samples fell within the range of 1.8 to 2.1. Reverse transcription was performed using the HiScript III RT SuperMix for qPCR (+gDNA wiper) kit (Vazyme), following the manufacturer’s instructions. RT-qPCR was conducted using the ChamQ Universal SYBR qPCR Master Mix kit (Vazyme), and the PCR mixture was run in the CFX96 Real-Time PCR system (Bio-Rad, USA). Three technical replicates were set and expression levels were normalized to the expression of GAPDH. Relative expression levels compared to the control group were determined by calculating the 2 - ΔΔCt. The cells were washed twice with PBS, then treated with RIPA buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 15 min. The supernatant was reserved. The protein concentration of the samples was determined using a BCA protein assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The protein samples were adjusted to a concentration of 2 μg/μl. Subsequently, 10 μl of the protein samples were loaded and separated by electrophoresis on a 10% SDS-PAGE gel (SDS-PAGE gel kit, Solarbio Life Sciences, Bei**g, China). Following protein separation, the proteins were transferred to PVDF membranes (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA), blocked with 5% BSA at room temperature for 1 h, and then incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4℃. The membrane was washed three times with TBST and subsequently incubated with HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies for 2 h at room temperature. After further washing with TBST, protein bands were visualized using an ECL kit (Millipore, USA) with a gel imager. The antibodies used are listed in Additional file 3, Table S1. The karyotype analysis were conducted using a standard G-band technique (350G–400G) and analyzed by Ikaros karyoty** system. 20 metaphases were examined. The number of chromosomes as well as the presence of structural chromosomal abnormalities was examined. TER assay was conducted using the EVOM2 voltohmmeter (World Precision Instruments, Sarasota, Florida, USA), following the manufacturer’s instructions. RPE cells and RPE spheroids were seeded onto PET Transwell membranes (3 μm pore size, Corning) coated with Matrigel at a same density and cultured for 2 weeks. TER values were measured from three replicates on day 14. Background resistance was determined from a blank culture insert. The TER value (Ωcm2) was calculated using the following formula. Rtotal represents the total resistance measured (Ω), Rinsert represents the resistance of the blank insert, and A represents the membrane area (cm2) of the insert. POS was obtained from fresh porcine eyes, isolated in sucrose gradient solution, and centrifugated at 106,000 × g for 50 min at 4 ℃, following established protocols [59, 60]. Then, POS was labeled with FITC isomer 1 (0.5 mg/ml) in DMEM for 1 h at room temperature in the dark. RPE cells were exposed to the labeled POS solution containing 10%FBS for 6 h at 37℃. After incubation, RPE cells were thoroughly washed with PBS, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100, and blocked with 3% BSA. Subsequently, the ZO-1 antibody was used for immunolabelling, and nuclei were stained with DAPI. Imaging was performed using a confocal microscope (Leica TCS SP8, Germany). Total RNA was isolated from hiPSC-RPE in 2D culture and spheroid culture way with Trizol total RNA reagent (Invitrogen). RNA sequencing was performed by the DNBSEQ platform (BGI Tech, Shenzhen,China). After the filtration of raw data, the clean reads were generated and aligned to the human genome assembly. After that, the qualified reads were standardized and quantified with transcripts per kilobase million(TPM) values. Differentially expressed genes(DEGs) were identified between the two groups. The significance of DEGs was defined by the combination of |log2FoldChange|≥ 1 and Q-value ≤ 0.05. Gene Ontology (GO) terms enrichment and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analysis were performed to further analyze data. The CV membrane was constructed as previously described [61]. Briefly, 5 mg/ml pre-cooling type I collagen solution (extracted from bovine tendon, Guangzhou Trauer Biotechnology, China) and 10 × DMEM (Hyclone, USA) were mixed in volume of 1:9. The mixed collagen hydrogel was centrifugated (2000 rpm, 3 min) and added into 6-well plates. The plates were then incubated at 37℃ to complete the gelation of the collagen for 30 min and dried in a clean air chamber at 10℃ and 40% humidity for 8 h to roughly remove the moisture of the gel. After that, the collagen gel was dried on a clean table and exposed to ultraviolet rays at room temperature for additional days to achieve vitrification. Then, the vitrified membrane was rehydrated with PBS. Using tweezers, the CV membrane was gently removed and placed into a ring-shaped polytetrafluoroethylene mold for the subsequent loading of RPE cells. SEM was used to examine the ultrastructural surface of the CV membrane and the RPE cells cultured on the CV membranes. RPE spheroids were initially seeded onto the CV membrane and cultured for 14 days. Subsequently, the cell sample and CV membrane were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde for 2 h, followed by three washes with a PBS solution. The cell samples were then dehydrated using a series of increasing ethanol concentrations in PBS (50%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, 100%, 100%). Afterward, the samples underwent critical point drying and gold metal coating, and were imaged using a scanning electron microscope (Zeiss, Ultra 55). The automatic spheroids bioprinting device was designed and assembled by our team. Its precision and accuracy were validated through calibration and testing conducted by a certified center (Ceprei, China; Certificate NO. 1GA18004742-0002). RPE spheroids from 96-well U-shaped plates were aspirated and accurately printed onto the surface of CV membranes automatically following a preset pattern (Movie S1). Subsequently, culture medium was gently added to the cell plates, and they were placed in an incubator at 37℃ with 5% CO2 for further cultivation. The data are presented as means ± standard deviation (SD) and derived from a minimum of three samples. GraphPad Prism 6.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) and ImageJ (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA) were employed for data analysis. The unpaired two-tailed t-test was applied for comparison between groups. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.Materials and methods
hiPSCs culture and RPE cell differentiation
Generation and seeding of RPE spheroids
Cell counting kit-8 assay (CCK-8)
Live/dead cell assay
Relative quantification of pigmented area
Flow cytometry
Immunocytochemistry
Reverse Transcription and Quantitative Real-time PCR (RT-qPCR)
Western blotting
Karyotype analysis
Transepithelial electrical resistance (TER) assay
Phagocytosis assay
RNA-sequencing analysis
Fabrication of collagen vitrigel (CV) membrane
Scanning electron microscope (SEM)
Automatic RPE spheroids bioprinting
Statistical analysis
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Abbreviations
- RPE:
-
Retinal pigment epithelium
- BRB:
-
Blood-retinal barrier
- hiPSC:
-
Human induced pluripotent stem cell
- ECM:
-
Extracellular matrix
- CV:
-
Collagen vitrigel
- POS:
-
Photoreceptor outer segments
- 3D:
-
Three dimensional
- hESCs:
-
Human embryonic stem cells
- TER:
-
Transepithelial electrical resistance
- ROCK:
-
Rho-associated protein kinase
- TGF-β:
-
Transforming growth factor-beta
- EMT:
-
Epithelial-mesenchymal transition
- TC:
-
Tissue culture
- SEM:
-
Scanning electron microscope
References
Zhou M, Geathers JS, Grillo SL, Weber SR, Wang W, Zhao Y, et al. Role of epithelial-mesenchymal transition in retinal pigment epithelium dysfunction. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020;8:501. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2020.00501.
Raimondi R, Zollet P, De Rosa FP, Tsoutsanis P, Stravalaci M, Paulis M, et al. Where are we with RPE replacement therapy? A translational review from the ophthalmologist perspective. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(2):682. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23020682.
Strauss O. The retinal pigment epithelium in visual function. Physiol Rev. 2005;85(3):845–81. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00021.2004.
Blenkinsop TA, Saini JS, Maminishkis A, Bharti K, Wan Q, Banzon T, et al. Human adult retinal pigment epithelial stem cell-derived RPE monolayers exhibit key physiological characteristics of native tissue. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56(12):7085–99. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.14-16246.
Mandai M, Watanabe A, Kurimoto Y, Hirami Y, Morinaga C, Daimon T, et al. Autologous induced stem-cell-derived retinal cells for macular degeneration. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(11):1038–46. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1608368.
Kashani AH, Lebkowski JS, Rahhal FM, Avery RL, Salehi-Had H, Dang W, et al. A bioengineered retinal pigment epithelial monolayer for advanced, dry age-related macular degeneration. Sci Transl Med. 2018;10(435):eaao4097. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aao4097.
Da CL, Fynes K, Georgiadis O, Kerby J, Luo YH, Ahmado A, et al. Phase 1 clinical study of an embryonic stem cell-derived retinal pigment epithelium patch in age-related macular degeneration. Nat Biotechnol. 2018;36(4):328–37. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4114.
Liu G, David BT, Trawczynski M, Fessler RG. Advances in pluripotent stem cells: history, mechanisms, technologies, and applications. Stem Cell Rev Rep. 2020;16(1):3–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12015-019-09935-x.
Sharma R, Khristov V, Rising A, Jha BS, Dejene R, Hotaling N, et al. Clinical-grade stem cell-derived retinal pigment epithelium patch rescues retinal degeneration in rodents and pigs. Sci Transl Med. 2019;11(475):eaat5580. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aat5580.
Zhang H, Su B, Jiao L, Xu ZH, Zhang CJ, Nie J, et al. Transplantation of GMP-grade human iPSC-derived retinal pigment epithelial cells in rodent model: the first pre-clinical study for safety and efficacy in China. Ann Transl Med. 2021;9(3):245. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-4707.
Akiba R, Takahashi M, Baba T, Mandai M. Progress of iPS cell-based transplantation therapy for retinal diseases. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2023;67(2):119–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-022-00974-5.
Li W, Li K, Wei W, Ding S. Chemical approaches to stem cell biology and therapeutics. Cell Stem Cell. 2013;13(3):270–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2013.08.002.
Ishida M, Sugita S, Makabe K, Fujii S, Futatsugi Y, Kamao H, et al. A ROCK inhibitor promotes graft survival during transplantation of iPS-cell-derived retinal cells. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(6):3237. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22063237.
Croze RH, Buchholz DE, Radeke MJ, Thi WJ, Hu Q, Coffey PJ, et al. ROCK inhibition extends passage of pluripotent stem cell-derived retinal pigmented epithelium. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2014;3(9):1066–78. https://doi.org/10.5966/sctm.2014-0079.
Wang J, Sun S, Deng H. Chemical reprogramming for cell fate manipulation: methods, applications, and perspectives. Cell Stem Cell. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2023.08.001.
Ichida JK, Blanchard J, Lam K, Son EY, Chung JE, Egli D, et al. A small-molecule inhibitor of tgf-Beta signaling replaces sox2 in reprogramming by inducing nanog. Cell Stem Cell. 2009;5(5):491–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2009.09.012.
Xu J, Fang S, Deng S, Li H, Lin X, Huang Y, et al. Generation of neural organoids for spinal-cord regeneration via the direct reprogramming of human astrocytes. Nat Biomed Eng. 2023;7(3):253–69. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-022-00963-6.
Chen Y, Wu B, He JF, Chen J, Kang ZW, Liu D, et al. Effectively intervening epithelial-mesenchymal transition of retinal pigment epithelial cells with a combination of ROCK and TGF-beta signaling inhibitors. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2021;62(4):21. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.62.4.21.
Caprio ND, Burdick JA. Engineered biomaterials to guide spheroid formation, function, and fabrication into 3D tissue constructs. Acta Biomater. 2023;165:4–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2022.09.052.
Yen BL, Hsieh CC, Hsu PJ, Chang CC, Wang LT, Yen ML. Three-dimensional spheroid culture of human mesenchymal stem cells: offering therapeutic advantages and in vitro glimpses of the in vivo state. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2023;12(5):235–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/stcltm/szad011.
Duval K, Grover H, Han LH, Mou Y, Pegoraro AF, Fredberg J, et al. Modeling physiological events in 2D vs. 3D cell culture. Physiology (Bethesda). 2017;32(4):266–77. https://doi.org/10.1152/physiol.00036.2016.
Li H, Dai Y, Shu J, Yu R, Guo Y, Chen J. Spheroid cultures promote the stemness of corneal stromal cells. Tissue Cell. 2015;47(1):39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tice.2014.10.008.
Guo Y, Liu Q, Yang Y, Guo X, Lian R, Li S, et al. The effects of ROCK inhibitor Y-27632 on injectable spheroids of bovine corneal endothelial cells. Cell Reprogram. 2015;17(1):77–87. https://doi.org/10.1089/cell.2014.0070.
Zhu D, **e M, Gademann F, Cao J, Wang P, Guo Y, et al. Protective effects of human iPS-derived retinal pigmented epithelial cells on retinal degenerative disease. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2020;11(1):98. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-020-01608-8.
Liu Y, Zhang Y, Mei T, Cao H, Hu Y, Jia W, et al. hESCs-derived early vascular cell spheroids for cardiac tissue vascular engineering and myocardial infarction treatment. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2022;9(9):e2104299. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202104299.
Ong CS, Fukunishi T, Nashed A, Blazeski A, Zhang H, Hardy S, et al. Creation of cardiac tissue exhibiting mechanical integration of spheroids using 3D bioprinting. J Vis Exp. 2017(125). https://doi.org/10.3791/55438.
Regent F, Morizur L, Lesueur L, Habeler W, Plancheron A, Ben MK, et al. Automation of human pluripotent stem cell differentiation toward retinal pigment epithelial cells for large-scale productions. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):10646. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47123-6.
Daly AC, Davidson MD, Burdick JA. 3D bioprinting of high cell-density heterogeneous tissue models through spheroid fusion within self-healing hydrogels. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):753. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21029-2.
Cui Z, Zeng Q, Liu S, Zhang Y, Zhu D, Guo Y, et al. Cell-laden and orthogonal-multilayer tissue-engineered corneal stroma induced by a mechanical collagen microenvironment and transplantation in a rabbit model. Acta Biomater. 2018;75:183–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2018.06.005.
Chae JJ, Ambrose WM, Espinoza FA, Mulreany DG, Ng S, Takezawa T, et al. Regeneration of corneal epithelium utilizing a collagen vitrigel membrane in rabbit models for corneal stromal wound and limbal stem cell deficiency. Acta Ophthalmol. 2015;93(1):e57-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.12503.
Mcintosh AW, Salahuddin A, So S, Ng S, Ponce MS, Takezawa T, et al. Collagen vitrigel membranes for the in vitro reconstruction of separate corneal epithelial, stromal, and endothelial cell layers. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2009;90(2):818–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.31351.
Limnios IJ, Chau YQ, Skabo SJ, Surrao DC, O’Neill HC. Efficient differentiation of human embryonic stem cells to retinal pigment epithelium under defined conditions. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2021;12(1):248. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-021-02316-7.
Foltz LP, Clegg DO. Rapid, directed differentiation of retinal pigment epithelial cells from human embryonic or induced pluripotent stem cells. J Vis Exp. 2017(128). https://doi.org/10.3791/56274.
Riento K, Ridley AJ. Rocks: multifunctional kinases in cell behaviour. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2003;4(6):446–56. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm1128.
Amano M, Nakayama M, Kaibuchi K. Rho-kinase/ROCK: a key regulator of the cytoskeleton and cell polarity. Cytoskeleton (Hoboken). 2010;67(9):545–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/cm.20472.
He D, Gao J, Zheng L, Liu S, Ye L, Lai H, et al. TGF-beta inhibitor RepSox suppresses osteosarcoma via the JNK/Smad3 signaling pathway. Int J Oncol. 2021;59(5):84. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2021.5264.
Wang X, Wu J, Wang W, Zhang Y, He D, **ao B, et al. Reprogramming of rat fibroblasts into induced neurons by small-molecule compounds in vitro and in vivo. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2022;13(14):2099–109. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.2c00078.
Shen J, He J, Wang F. Isolation and culture of primary mouse retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells with Rho-kinase and TGFbetaR-1/ALK5 inhibitor. Med Sci Monit. 2017;23:6132–6. https://doi.org/10.12659/msm.905569.
Saari JC, Nawrot M, Kennedy BN, Garwin GG, Hurley JB, Huang J, et al. Visual cycle impairment in cellular retinaldehyde binding protein (CRALBP) knockout mice results in delayed dark adaptation. Neuron. 2001;29(3):739–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00248-3.
Foty R. A simple hanging drop cell culture protocol for generation of 3D spheroids. J Vis Exp. 2011(51). https://doi.org/10.3791/2720.
Zhang L, Liang L, Su T, Guo Y, Yu Q, Zhu D, et al. Regulation of the keratocyte phenotype and cell behavior derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells by substrate stiffness. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2023;9(2):856–68. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c01003.
Burke JM. Epithelial phenotype and the RPE: is the answer blowing in the Wnt? Prog Retin Eye Res. 2008;27(6):579–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2008.08.002.
Wei J, Wu L, Yang S, Zhang C, Feng L, Wang M, et al. E-cadherin to N-cadherin switching in the TGF-beta1 mediated retinal pigment epithelial to mesenchymal transition. Exp Eye Res. 2022;220:109085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2022.109085.
Czajka CA, Mehesz AN, Trusk TC, Yost MJ, Drake CJ. Scaffold-free tissue engineering: organization of the tissue cytoskeleton and its effects on tissue shape. Ann Biomed Eng. 2014;42(5):1049–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-014-0986-8.
Katoh K, Kano Y, Amano M, Kaibuchi K, Fujiwara K. Stress fiber organization regulated by MLCK and Rho-kinase in cultured human fibroblasts. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2001;280(6):C1669–79. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.2001.280.6.C1669.
Lin S, Yang G, Jiang F, Zhou M, Yin S, Tang Y, et al. A magnesium-enriched 3D culture system that mimics the bone development microenvironment for vascularized bone regeneration. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2019;6(12):1900209. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201900209.
Jiang Y, Pjesivac-Grbovic J, Cantrell C, Freyer JP. A multiscale model for avascular tumor growth. Biophys J. 2005;89(6):3884–94. https://doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.105.060640.
Hidalgo SJL, Stephens P, Song B, Barrow D. Microfluidic encapsulation supports stem cell viability, proliferation, and neuronal differentiation. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2018;24(3):158–70. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEC.2017.0368.
Biju TS, Priya VV, Francis AP. Role of three-dimensional cell culture in therapeutics and diagnostics: an updated review. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2023;13(9):2239–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13346-023-01327-6.
Mookherjee S, Acharya M, Banerjee D, Bhattacharjee A, Ray K. Molecular basis for involvement of CYP1B1 in MYOC upregulation and its potential implication in glaucoma pathogenesis. PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e45077. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045077.
Falero-Perez J, Sorenson CM, Sheibani N. Retinal astrocytes transcriptome reveals Cyp1b1 regulates the expression of genes involved in cell adhesion and migration. PLoS One. 2020;15(4):e0231752. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231752.
Hao N, Lee KL, Furness SG, Bosdotter C, Poellinger L, Whitelaw ML. Xenobiotics and loss of cell adhesion drive distinct transcriptional outcomes by aryl hydrocarbon receptor signaling. Mol Pharmacol. 2012;82(6):1082–93. https://doi.org/10.1124/mol.112.078873.
Afshari FT, Fawcett JW. Improving RPE adhesion to Bruch’s membrane. Eye (Lond). 2009;23(10):1890–3. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2008.411.
Howard C, Garcia-Finana M, Yan Q, Hiscott P. Human retinal pigment epithelial SPARC expression and age: an immunohistochemical study. Histol Histopathol. 2010;25(9):1163–9. https://doi.org/10.14670/HH-25.1163.
Johnson AA, Guziewicz KE, Lee CJ, Kalathur RC, Pulido JS, Marmorstein LY, et al. Bestrophin 1 and retinal disease. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2017;58:45–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2017.01.006.
Rizzolo LJ, Peng S, Luo Y, **ao W. Integration of tight junctions and claudins with the barrier functions of the retinal pigment epithelium. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2011;30(5):296–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2011.06.002.
Wang X, Maruotti J, Majumdar S, Roman J, Mao HQ, Zack DJ, et al. Collagen vitrigels with low-fibril density enhance human embryonic stem cell-derived retinal pigment epithelial cell maturation. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2018;12(3):821–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/term.2598.
Bringmann A, Syrbe S, Gorner K, Kacza J, Francke M, Wiedemann P, et al. The primate fovea: structure, function and development. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2018;66:49–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2018.03.006.
Parinot C, Rieu Q, Chatagnon J, Finnemann SC, Nandrot EF. Large-scale purification of porcine or bovine photoreceptor outer segments for phagocytosis assays on retinal pigment epithelial cells. J Vis Exp. 2014(94). https://doi.org/10.3791/52100.
Mazzoni F, Mao Y, Finnemann SC. Advanced analysis of photoreceptor outer segment phagocytosis by RPE cells in culture. Methods Mol Biol. 2019;1834:95–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-8669-9_7.
Takezawa T, Ozaki K, Nitani A, Takabayashi C, Shimo-Oka T. Collagen vitrigel: a novel scaffold that can facilitate a three-dimensional culture for reconstructing organoids. Cell Transplant. 2004;13(4):463–73. https://doi.org/10.3727/000000004783983882.
Acknowledgements
We thank for Guangzhou Trauer Biotechnology for providing the bovine type I collagen. We also thank the Centric Laboratory of Medical College, **an University.
Funding
This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC-RGC, 32061160469, N_CUHK432/20).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
J.C. and W.W. contributed to the conception and design of the manuscript. W.W., T.Y., L.L., X.Y., S.C. and Y.G. contributed to the acquisition of data in this manuscript. W.W., T.Y., and S.C. contributed to the revision of the manuscript. T.Y., W.W, S.S., Y.D., Y.W., W.X. and H.C. contributed to the analysis of data. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Additional file 1: Figure S1.
Quantification of MITF positive cells. Figure S2. The results of karyotype analysis. Figure S3. Formation of RPE spheroids in agarose molds. (A) The photograph of agarose molds. (B, C) Bright-field images of the RPE spheroids formed in agarose molds. Scale bar 250μm. Scale bar 50μm. Figure S4. The process of RPE spheroids bioprinting. (A) The photographs of the CV membrane. (B) The preset print pattern of bioprinting. (C) The photograph of the bioprinter. Figure S5. The bioprinted RPE spheroids on CV membranes. (A) The photograph of RPE spheroids without bioprinting. (B) The bioprinted RPE spheroids. (C) The expansion of bioprinted RPE spheroids. Figure S6. Process for quantification of the pigmented area.
Additional file 2: Movie S1. Bioprinting RPE spheroids on CV scaffolds.
Additional file 3: Table S1.
List of primary antibodies. Table S2. The top 15 KEGG signaling pathways. Table S3. The top 15 GO biological process terms.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, W., Yang, T., Chen, S. et al. Tissue engineering RPE sheet derived from hiPSC-RPE cell spheroids supplemented with Y-27632 and RepSox. J Biol Eng 18, 7 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13036-024-00405-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13036-024-00405-8