Introduction

Cardiovascular disease (CVD), including ischemic heart disease and stroke, constitute the leading cause of premature death worldwide [1]. In 2017, CVD caused an estimated 17.8 million deaths and was responsible for 330 million years of life lost globally [1]. This highlights the importance of identifying risk factors that could predict the risk of CVD and thereby facilitate its prevention at an early stage.

Insulin resistance, a pathophysiological condition characterized by the decreased insulin sensitivity of peripheral tissues, plays a key role in the development of metabolic syndrome and atherosclerosis [2, 3]. The euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp is served as the gold standard to identify insulin resistance, but the technique is laborious, costly, and therefore impractical in the clinical setting [4]. The triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index and triglyceride to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (TG/HDL-C) ratio have been proposed as simple and credible surrogate indicators of insulin resistance because they show strong correlations with the euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp and they are suitable for clinical practice and large epidemiological studies [5, 6]. Several cross-sectional and retrospective studies have reported significant associations of the TyG index and TG/HDL-C ratio with incident CVD [14]. Furthermore, another 8-year prospective study of 796 participants showed that an elevated TG/HDL-C ratio predicted the incident risk of CVD events [21]. Consistent with prior studies, our study of a larger sample size confirmed that higher TyG index and TG/HDL-C ratio were significantly associated with increased risks of total CVD and CHD in the UK Biobank population. Neither the TyG index nor TG/HDL-C ratio was associated with stroke in our population after full covariate adjustment, in contrast with some earlier studies [39].

In conclusion, our analysis of data from the UK Biobank showed that elevated baseline TyG index and TG/HDL-C ratio, two surrogate markers of insulin resistance, were associated with a higher risk of CVD after adjustment for the well-established CVD risk factors. These associations were largely mediated by the greater prevalence of dyslipidemia, diabetes, and hypertension.